Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 23–49 | Cite as

Population, Land Use and Deforestation in the Pan Amazon Basin: a Comparison of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Venezuela

  • Stephen G. Perz
  • Carlos Aramburú
  • Jason Bremner
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the linkages between population change, land use, and deforestation in the Amazon regions of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, and Venezuela. We begin with a brief discussion of theories of population–environment linkages, and then focus on the case of deforestation in the PanAmazon. The core of the paper reviews available data on deforestation, population growth, migration and land use in order to see how well land cover change reflects demographic and agricultural change. The data indicate that population dynamics and net migration exhibit to deforestation in some states of the basin but not others. We then discuss other explanatory factors for deforestation, and find a close correspondence between land use and deforestation, which suggests that land use is loosely tied to demographic dynamics and mediates the influence of population on deforestation. We also consider national political economic contexts of Amazon change in the six countries, and find contrasting contexts, which also helps to explain the limited demographic-deforestation correspondence. The paper closes by noting general conclusions based on the data, topics in need of further research and recent policy proposals.

Keywords

Amazon deforestation land use migration population 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal A., Gibson C.C. ed. (1999). ‘Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation’. World Development 27(4)Google Scholar
  2. Alston, L.J., Libecap, G.D., Mueller, B. 1999Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon FrontierUniversity of Michigan PressAnn ArborGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves, D.S., Skole, D.L. 1996‘Characterizing land cover dynamics using multitemporal imagery’International Journal of Remote Sensing.17835839Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, A.B. eds. 1990Alternatives to DeforestationColumbia University PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Arizpe, L.Stone, M.P.Major, D.C. eds. 1994Population and Environment: Rethinking the DebateWestview PressBoulderGoogle Scholar
  6. Bannowsky, P. 2001‘In the grip of the anaconda: Plan Colombia, US drug war’s effects in Ecuador’NACLA Report on the Americas353840Google Scholar
  7. Bedoya Garland, E., Klein, L. 1996‘Forty years of political ecology in the Peruvian upper forest: The case of the upper Huallaga’Sponsel, L.E.Headland, T.N.Bailey, R.C. eds. Tropical Deforestation The Human Dimension.Columbia University PressNew York165186Google Scholar
  8. Bilsborrow, R.E. 1987‘Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: Aconceptual framework and recent evidence’World Development.15183203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilsborrow, R.E. 2002‘Migration, population change, and the rural environment’Environmental Change and Security Project Report86994Google Scholar
  10. Binswanger, H. 1991‘Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon’World Development19821829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browder, J.O. 1988Public policy and deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonRepetto, R.Gillis, M. eds. Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources.Cambridge University PressCambridge247297Google Scholar
  12. Browder, J.O., Pedlowski, M.A. 2000‘Agroforestry performance on small farms in Amazonia: Findings from the Rondonia agroforestry project’Agroforestry Systems496383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boserup, E. 1965The Conditions of Agricultural GrowthAllen and UnwinLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, K.Pearce, D. eds. 1994The Causes of Tropical DeforestationUniversity of British Columbia PressVancouverGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpio, J. 1988‘Settlement policies in the forest highlands of Peru’Oberai, A.S. eds. Land Settlement Policies and Population Redistribution in Developing Countries.PraegerNewYork355386Google Scholar
  16. Carrillo, A.Perera, M.A. eds. 1995Amazonas: Modernidad en TradiciónSADA/MARNRCaracasGoogle Scholar
  17. Carvalho, G.O. 1999‘Hydroelectric development and road paving in Brazil’s transamazon area’Journal of Environment and Development.8397406Google Scholar
  18. CEPAR (Centro de Estudios de Población e Paternidad Responsable): 1993, Perfil Socio-demográfico del Ecuador, Quito, CEPARGoogle Scholar
  19. CEGA (Centro de Estudos Ganaderos y AgrÍcolas). (1998, Del Proteccionismo a la Apertura: ?‘El Camino a la Modernización Agropecuária? Website available at http://www.dnp.gov.co/infosector, AprilGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, J. 1988Unseasonal Migrations: The Effects of Rural Labor ScarcityPrinceton University PressPeru, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., VanDen Belt, M. 1997‘The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital’Nature387253260Google Scholar
  22. Coomes, O.T., Grimard, F., Burt, G.J. 2000‘Tropical forests and shifting cultivation: Secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon’Ecological Economics32109124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. CCRP (Corporación Centro Regional de Población). (1993, Población, Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. Santafé de Bogotá, UNC/IDEA/FNUAP/CCRPGoogle Scholar
  24. Cubides F., DomÍnguez C. ed. (1999). Desplazados,Mmigraciones Internas y Restructuraciones Territoriales. DC, CES, Santafé de BogotáGoogle Scholar
  25. DANE (Departamento Admnistrativo Nacional de EstadÍstica). (1986). XV Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda, Santafé de Bogotá, DC, DANEGoogle Scholar
  26. DANE. (1997) Colombia EstadÍstica: 1993–1997, Santafé de Bogotá, DC, DANEGoogle Scholar
  27. DANE. (1999). Colombia: Proyecciones Municipales de Población por Area, 1995–2005, Santafé de Bogotá, DC, DANEGoogle Scholar
  28. DANE/DNP (Departamento Nacional de Planejamento). (2001a). Población Censada por Zona, Nacional y Departamental, 1951–1993, Website available at http://www.dnp.gov.co/sisd/sisdats/I040103.htm, AprilGoogle Scholar
  29. DANE/DNP. (2001b). Tasa Global de Fecundidad, Nacional e Departamental, 1985, 1993; Quinquenal 1995–2015, Website available at http://www.dnp.gov.co/sisd/sisdats/I030401.htm, AprilGoogle Scholar
  30. DANE/DNP. (2001c). Esperanza de Vida al Nacer por Sexo, Nacional e Departamental, 1995–2015, Website available at http://www.dnp.gov.co/sisd/sisdats/I020406.htm, AprilGoogle Scholar
  31. Davis, K.Bernstam, M.S. eds. 1991Resources, Environment and PopulationOxford University PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  32. DomÍnguez, C. 1999‘Petróleo y Reordenamiento Territorial en la Orinoquia y la Amazonia’Cubides, F.DomÍnguez, C. eds. Desplazados, Migraciones Internas y Restructuraciones Territoriales.DC, CESSantafé de Bogotá4156Google Scholar
  33. Dourojeanni, M. (1990). AmazonÍa: ?‘Que Hacer? Iquitos, CETAGoogle Scholar
  34. Drigo, R., Marcoux, A. (1999). Population Dynamics and Assessment of Land Use Changes and Deforestation, Part1, Available at http://www.fao.org/sd/wpdirect/wpan0030.htm, October2003Google Scholar
  35. Dugas, J.C. 2001‘Drugs, lies and audiotape: The samper crisis in Colombia’Latin American Research Review36157174Google Scholar
  36. Eberhart, N. (1998). Transformaciones Agrárias en el Frente de Colonización de la AmazonÍa Ecuatoriana, Quito, Ediciones Abya-yala EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit): 2000a, Country Profile: Ecuador: 1999–2000, London, EIUGoogle Scholar
  37. EIU.2000Country Profile: Peru: 1999–2000EIULondonGoogle Scholar
  38. EIU.2000Country Profile: Venezuela: 1999–2000EIULondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Fearnside, P.M. 1990‘Environmental destruction in the Brazilian Amazon’Goodman, D.Hall, A. eds. The Future of Amazonia.St.Martin’s PressLondon171220Google Scholar
  40. Fearnside, P.M. 2000‘Deforestation impacts, environmental services and the international community’Hall, A. eds. Amazonia at the Crossroads: The Challenge of Sustainable Development.Institute of Latin American StudiesLondon1124Google Scholar
  41. Flórez, C.E. 1999‘Migraciones en Torno al Petróleo en Casanare’Cubides, F.DomÍnguez, C. eds. Desplazados, Migraciones Internas y Restructuraciones Territoriales.DC, CESSantafé de Bogotá5788Google Scholar
  42. Fujisaka, S., White, D. 1998‘Pasture or permanent crops after slash-and-burn cultivation? Land-use choice in three Amazon colonies’Agroforestry Systems424559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. FKA (Fundación Konrad Adenauer). (1995). AmazonÍa Venezolana: Una Perspectiva Común para el Futuro. Caracas, FKAGoogle Scholar
  44. Gash, J.H.C., Nobre, C., Roberts, J.M., Victoria, R.L. 1996Amazonian Deforestation and Climate ChangeJohn Wiley and SonsChichesterGoogle Scholar
  45. Geist, H., Lambin, E. 2002‘Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation’BioScience52143150Google Scholar
  46. Gibson, C., Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.-K. 2000‘The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey’Ecological Economics32217239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goldammer, J.G. 1999‘Forests on fire’Science.2841782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. González Arias, J.J. 1998Amazonia Colombiana: Espacio y SociedadDC, CINEPSantafé de BogotáGoogle Scholar
  49. Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D. 1999The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and AssessmentRoyal Institute of International Affairs/EarthscanLondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Hageman, H. 1996Bancos, Incendiários, e Florestas TropicaisFASE/IBASE/ISARio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  51. Hall, A.L. 1992‘Putting people last: A sociological perspective on development policies for Brazilian Amazonia and thequestion of sustainability’Pansters, W. eds. Amazonia: Ecology and Sustainable Development.ISOR/University of UtrechtUtrecht110126Google Scholar
  52. Hall, A.L. eds. 1997Sustaining Amazonia: Grassroots Action for Productive ConservationManchester University PressManchesterGoogle Scholar
  53. Imbernon, J. 1999‘A comparison of the driving forces behind deforestation in the Peruvian and the Brazilian Amazon’Ambio.28509513Google Scholar
  54. IBGE (Instituto Nacional de Geografia e EstatÍstica): 1983, Censo Demográfico: 1980, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  55. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatÍstica). (1990). Censo Agropecuário: 1985, Rio de Janeiro,IBGEGoogle Scholar
  56. IBGE. (1991a). Sinopse Preliminar do Censo Demográfico: 1991, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  57. IBGE. (1991b). Censo Demográfico 1991: Dados Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  58. IBGE. (1993). Anuário EstatÍstico do Brasil: 1992, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  59. IBGE. (1996). Censo Demográfico 1991: Microdados da Amostra, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  60. IBGE (Instituto Nacional de Geografia e EstatÍstica). (1998). Censo Agropecuário: 1995/1996, Rio de Janeiro,IBGEGoogle Scholar
  61. IBGE. (2001). Censo Demográfico 2000: CaracterÍsticas da População e dos DomicÍlios, Rio de Janeiro, IBGEGoogle Scholar
  62. INE (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica). (1976). Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda de 1976, LaPaz,INEGoogle Scholar
  63. INE. (1990). Evolución de la Población Peruana en la Década del 80, Lima, INEGoogle Scholar
  64. INE (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica). (1995). Anuário EstadÍstico 1994, LaPaz, INEGoogle Scholar
  65. INE. (1997a). CaracterÍsticas Demográficas de la Población en Bolivia, La Paz, INE/UNFPA/CELADEGoogle Scholar
  66. INE. (1997b). Anuário EstadÍstico 1996, LaPaz, INEGoogle Scholar
  67. INE. (1999). Anuário EstadÍstico 1999, LaPaz, INEGoogle Scholar
  68. INEC (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica e Censos). (1992). V censo de Población y IV de Vivienda. (1990, Quito, INECGoogle Scholar
  69. INEC (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica y Censos). (1994). Compedio estadistico, 1991-1993, Quito, INECGoogle Scholar
  70. INEC. (1996). Encuesta Nacional de Superficie y Producción Agropecuário de 1995, Quito, INECGoogle Scholar
  71. INEC. (2001). Proyección de la Población Total por Años Calendario según Provincias, Website available at http://www.inec.gov.ec/censo/proyecc/proye01.htm, April INEI (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica y Informática): 1983, Censos Nacionales 1981 VIII de Población y III de Vivienda: Resultados Definitivos. Lima, INEIGoogle Scholar
  72. INEI (Instituto Nacional de EstadÍstica e Informática). (1994). Censos Nacionales 1993 IX de Población e IV de Vivienda: Resultados Definitivos. Lima, INEIGoogle Scholar
  73. INEI. (1996a). Compendios EstadÍsticos 1995–1996, Lima, INEIGoogle Scholar
  74. INEI. (1996b). Censo Nacional de Agropecuário: Resultados Definitivos, Lima, INEIGoogle Scholar
  75. INEI. (1997). Perú: EstadÍsticas del Medio Ambiente, Lima, INEIGoogle Scholar
  76. INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). (2001). Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica por Satélite, 1999–2000, Website available at http://www.inpe.br/Informacoes_Eventos/amazonia.htm, MayGoogle Scholar
  77. Jordan, C.F. 1986‘Local effects of tropical deforestation’Soulé, M. eds. Conservation Biology.Sinauer AssociatesSutherland410426Google Scholar
  78. Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A. 1998Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A ReviewCIFORJakartaGoogle Scholar
  79. Kaimowitz, D., Vallejos, C., Pacheco, P., Lopez, R. 1998‘Municipal governments and forest management in lowland Bolivia’Journal of Environment and Development.74559Google Scholar
  80. Kaimowitz, D., Thiele, G., Pacheco, P. 1999‘The effects of structural adjustment on deforestation and forest degradation in lowland Bolivia’World Development.27505520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kaimowitz, D., Mendez, P., Puntodewo, A., Vanclay., J. (1999b). Spatial regression analysis of deforestation in SantaCruz, Bolivia, Paper presented at the 48thAnnual Conference of the Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, March23–26Google Scholar
  82. Kimerling, J. 2000‘Oil development in Ecuador and Peru: Law, politics and the environment’Hall, A. eds. Amazonia at the Crossroads: The Challenge of Sustainable Development.Institute for Latin American StudiesLondon7396Google Scholar
  83. Kosinski, L. 1992Ecological Disorder in Amazonia: Social AspectsISSCRiodeJaneiroGoogle Scholar
  84. Laurance, W.F., Cochrane, M.A., Bergen, S., Fearnside, P.M., Delamônica, P., Barber, C., D’Angelo, S., Fernandes, T. 2001‘The future of the Brazilian Amazon’Science291438439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Loker, W. 1993‘The human ecology of cattle raising in the Peruvian Amazon: The view from the farm’Human Organization.521424Google Scholar
  86. MacKellar, F.L., Lutz, W., McMichael, A.J., Suhrke, A., Mishra, V., O’Neill, B., Prakeesh, S., Wexler, L. 1998‘Population and climate change’Rayner, S.Malone, E.L. eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, vol.1.The Societal Framework. Battelle PressColumbus89193Google Scholar
  87. Mahar, D.J. 2000‘Agro-ecological zoning in Rondônia, Brazil: What are the lessons?’Hall, A. eds. Amazonia at the Crossroads: The Challenge of Sustainable Development.Institute for Latin American StudiesLondon115128Google Scholar
  88. Malthus, T.R. 1989An Essay on the Principle of PopulationCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Marquette, C.M. 1998‘Land use patterns among small farmer settlers in the northeastern Ecuadorian Amazon’Human Ecology.26573593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Martine, G. 1993População, Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento: Verdades e ContradiçõesEditora da UNICAMPCampinasGoogle Scholar
  91. Mazur, L.A. 1994Beyond the NumbersIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  92. MINAG (Ministerio de Agricultura). (1986). Estado de la Superficie Cosechada e de la Producción AgrÍcola del Ecuador, Quito, MINAGGoogle Scholar
  93. MARNR (Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables). (1997). Balance Ambiental de Venezuela: Apéndice 1996, Caracas, MARNRGoogle Scholar
  94. Mora, C. 1991‘Expansión de la Frontera AgrÍcola en la AmazonÍa Peruana’Munévar, L. eds. Colonización del Bosque Húmedo Tropical.DC, FPC/COASantafé de Bogotá125146Google Scholar
  95. Moran, E.F. 1993‘Deforestation and land use in the Brazilian Amazon’Human Ecology21121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Moran, E.F., Brondizio, E., Mausel, P., Wu, Y. 1994‘Integrating Amazonian vegetation, land-use, and satellite data’BioScience.44329338Google Scholar
  97. Munévar, L. eds. 1991Colonización del Bosque Húmedo TropicalDC, FPC/COASantafé de BogotáGoogle Scholar
  98. Nepstad, D., VerÍssimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C., Lima, E., Lefebvre, P., Schlesinger, P., Potter, C., Moutinho, P., Mendoza, E., Cochrane, M., Brooks, V. 1999‘Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire’Nature398505508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ness, G.D.Drake, W.D.Brechin, S.R. eds. 1993Population–Environment DynamicsUniversity of MichiganAnnArborGoogle Scholar
  100. OCEI (Oficina Central de EstadÍstica e Informática). (1983). XI Censo General de Población y Vivienda, Caracas, OCEIGoogle Scholar
  101. OCEI. (1988). V Censo AgrÍcola, Caracas, OCEI OCEI: 1994, Venezuela: Situación Demográfica e Socioecnómica, Caracas, OCEIGoogle Scholar
  102. OCEI. (1998). Anuário EstadÍstico de Venezuela 1998, Caracas, OCEIGoogle Scholar
  103. OCEI. (2002). Proyecciones de Población: Naciona y Estatal, website available at http://www.ocei.gov.ve/scripts/proyecciones/proyecciones.htm, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  104. OCEI/Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo/Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas. (1996). Índice e Entorno del Desarrollo Humano en Venezuela 1996, Caracas, OCEI/PNUD/FNUAPGoogle Scholar
  105. Pacheco Balanza, P. (1998). Estilos de Desarrollo, Deforestación de los Bosques en las Tierras Bajas de Bolivia, LaPaz, CIFOR/CEDLA/TIERRAGoogle Scholar
  106. Panayotou, T. 1996‘An inquiry into population, resources, and environment’Ahlburg, D.A.Kelley, A.C.Oppenheim, K.Mason.,  eds. The Impact of Population Growth on Well-being in Developing Countries.Springer-VerlagNewYork259298Google Scholar
  107. Pebley, A.R. 1998‘Demography and the environment’Demography35377389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Perz, S.G. 2001‘Household demographic factors as lifecycle determinants of land use in the Amazon’Population Research and Policy Review.20159186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Perz, S.G. 2002‘Population growth and net migration in the Brazilian Legal Amazon, 1970–1996’Wood, C.H.Porro, R eds. Deforestation and Land Use in the AmazonUniversity of Florida PressGainesville107129Google Scholar
  110. Perz, S.G. 2003‘The changing social contexts of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon’Social Science Quarterly.833552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Petras, J. 2001‘The geopolitics of PlanColombia’Monthly Review533048Google Scholar
  112. Pfaff, A.S.P. 1999‘What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management372643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pichón, F.J. 1996‘The forest conversion process: A discussion of the sustainability of predominant land uses associated with frontier expansion in the Amazon’Agriculture and Human Values133252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Pichón, F.J. 1997‘Settler households and land-use strategies in the Amazon Frontier: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador’World Development.256791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Preston, S.H. 1996‘The effects of population growth on environmental quality’Population Research and Policy Reviews1595108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Reis, E., Guzmán, S. 1991‘Options for slowing Amazon jungle clearing’Dornbusch, R.Poterba, J. eds. Global Warming. (Economic and Policy Responses.MIT PressCambridge325375Google Scholar
  117. Rodriguez F. (2001). Amazonia: Una Herencia al Futuro, Paper presented at the international seminar entitled ‘Cambios Demográficos, Económicos y Sociales y su Impacto Ambiental en la AmazonÍa Andina,’ Iquitos, Perú, June11–13, 2001Google Scholar
  118. Rudel, T.K., Horowitz, B. 1993Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian AmazonColumbia University PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  119. Salgado Ruiz, H. 1995‘La Coca y su Impacto Socioeconómico y PolÍtico en el Campesinado del Putumayo Colombiano’Herrera, D eds. La Cuenca Amazónica de Cara al Nuevo SigloFLACSOQuito157189Google Scholar
  120. Santana Nazoa, A. 1991La Cuestión CientÍfica y Tecnológica en el Amazonas Venezolano Evaluación y PerspectivasCENDESCaracasGoogle Scholar
  121. Santos-Granero, F., Barclay, F. 1998Selva Central: History, Economy, and Land Use in Peruvian Amazonia E.King (transl.)Smithsonian Institution PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  122. Scatena, F.N., Walker, R.T., Homma, A.K.O., deConto, A.J., Ferreira, C.A.P., deAmorimCarvalho, R., NevesdaRocha, A.C.P., ItaguaraMoreiradosSantos, A., MourãodeOliveira, P. 1996‘Cropping and fallowing sequences of small farms in the ‘Terra Firme’ landscape of the Brazilian AmazonA case study from Santarém, Pará’. Ecological Economics.182940Google Scholar
  123. Schmink, M., Wood, C.H. 1992Contested Frontiers in AmazoniaColumbia University PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  124. Schneider, R.R. 1995Government and the Economy on the Amazon FrontierWorld BankWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  125. Schelhas, J.Greenberg, R. eds. 1996Forest Patches in Tropical LandscapesIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  126. Schjellerup, I. 2000‘LaMorada: A case study on the impact of human pressures on the environment in the CejadeSelva, northeastern PeruAmbio.29451454Google Scholar
  127. Schneider, R.R., Arima, E., VerÍssimo, A., Barreto, P., Souza, C. (2000, Amazonia Sustentavel: Limitantes e Oportunidades para o Desenvolvimento Rural. Available at http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/External/lac/lac.nsf/4c794feb793085a5852567d6006ad764/717ddc00c6b572678525690a0069c287/$FILE/ATTONE 11/Amazon.pdf, April2001Google Scholar
  128. Schwartzman, S., Araújo, A.V., Pankararú, P. 1996‘The legal battle over indigenous land rights’NACLA Report on the Americas.293643Google Scholar
  129. Segura Canizales, F., GarcÍa Tello, J.L. (1994). ‘Impacto de la GanaderÍa Bovina en la Amazonia Colombiana’, in Memorias del Seminario de Perspectivas del Desarrollo Amazónico, Caquetá: Universidad de la Amazonia/OEA-PROMESUP/UNAMAZ, pp. 125–132Google Scholar
  130. Serrão, E.A.S., Homma, A.K.O. 1993‘Brazil’NAS.,  eds. Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics.National Academy PressWashington, DC265351Google Scholar
  131. Shryock, H., Siegel, J. 1976The Methods and Materials of DemographyUS Government Publications OfficeWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  132. Skole, D.L., Tucker, C.J. 1993‘Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988’Science.26019051910Google Scholar
  133. Sponsel, L.E., Headland, T.N., Bailey, R.C. 1996Tropical Deforestation: The Human DimensionColumbia University PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  134. Thiele, G. 1993‘The dynamics of farm development in the Amazon: The Barbecho crisis model’Agricultural Systems.42179197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Torres H., Costa H. (2000). População e Meio Ambiente: Debates e Desafios, SãoPaulo, Editora SENACGoogle Scholar
  136. Turner B.L., II.Clark, W.C.Kates, R.W.Richards, J.F.Mathews, J.T.Meyer, W.B. eds. 1990The Earth as Transformed by Human ActionCambridge and Clark UniversitiesCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  137. Turner B.L., II., Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L., Leemans, R. 1995Land-use and Land-cover Change Science/Research PlanIGBP/HDPStockholm and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  138. Uhl, C., Nepstad, D. 2000‘Amazonia at the millennium’Interciencia.25159164Google Scholar
  139. UN (United, Nations). 1983ManualX: Indirect Estimation of Demographic MeasuresUNNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  140. N. (1994). Population, Environment and Development. Proceedings of the UN Working Expert Group Meetings on Population, Environment and Development, UN Headquarters, 20–24January 1992, NewYork,UNGoogle Scholar
  141. Uquillas, J. 1989‘Social impacts of modernization and public policy, and prospects for indigenous development in Ecuador’s Amazonia’Schumann, D.A.Partridge, W.L. eds. The Human Ecology of Tropical Land Settlement in Latin America.Westview PressBoulder407431Google Scholar
  142. Van Cott, D.L. 1994Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin AmericaSt.Martin’s PressNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  143. Varese M. (1999). Drivers of Investment in Cattle among Landholders in the Southern Peruvian Amazon, Master’s thesis, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  144. Vargas Meza, R. 1998‘The FARC, the war, and the crisis of the state’NACLA Report on the Americas.312227Google Scholar
  145. Vosti, S.A., Witcover, J., Oliveira, S., Faminow, M. 1998‘Policy issues in agroforestry: Technology adoption and regional integration in the western Brazilian Amazon’Agroforestry Systems38195222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Walker, R.T. 1999‘The structure of uncultivated wilderness: Land use beyond the extensive margin’Journal of Regional Science.39387410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Walker, R.T., Homma, A.K.O. 1996‘Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: An overview’Ecological Economics186780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Walker, R.T., Perz, S.G., Caldas, M., TeixeiradaSilva, L.G. 2002‘Land use and land cover change in forest frontiers: The role of household life cycles’International Regional Science Review.25169199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Webb, R., Baca, G.F. 1999Anuário EstadÍstico: Perú en Números 1999Cuanto SALimaGoogle Scholar
  150. Wood, C.H. 1992‘Demographic perspectives on ecological disorder in Brazilian Amazonia’Kosinski, L. eds. Ecological Disorder in Amazonia: Social Aspects.ISSCRiodeJaneiro129148Google Scholar
  151. Wood, C.H. 2002‘Land use and deforestation: Introduction’Wood, C.H.Porro, R. eds. Deforestation and Land Use in the Amazon.University of Florida PressGainesville138Google Scholar
  152. Wood, C.H., Skole, D.L. 1998‘Linking satellite, census and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon’Liverman, D.Moran, E.F.Rindfuss, R.R.Stern, P.C. eds. People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science.National Academy PressWashington, DC7093Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen G. Perz
    • 1
  • Carlos Aramburú
    • 2
  • Jason Bremner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Consorcio de Investigación Económica y SocialPerú
  3. 3.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations