Effects of Topographic Heterogeneity on Coarse Resolution Grid-Based Runoff Simulation—Assessment for Three River Basins in Peninsular Malaysia
- 158 Downloads
This paper investigates the effects of topographic heterogeneity on the runoff response simulated by a 0.05 degree (approximately 5.5 km) spatial resolution distributed hydrological model for the Pahang, Kelantan, and Muda river basins (25,600, 11,900, and 4010 km2, respectively) in Peninsular Malaysia. Daily simulations were carried out and assessed against observed streamflow for the period 1999–2004. Topographic structure was characterized by means of subgrid terrain slope to guide the decomposition of hydrological parameters over the model grid. The results show improved simulation skill for all three basins compared to a traditional runoff production parameterization scheme that does not take into account the subgrid topographic variability. However, other factors related to morphological heterogeneity and variability in physical terrain conditions should be considered in future work in order to characterize the hydrological heterogeneity. The present methodology may be of potential for further development of large-scale, coarse resolution grid-based hydrological models without adding structural model complexity and without affecting parameter parsimony.
KeywordsTopographic structure Distributed hydrological modeling Runoff production Streamflow routing Large-scale hydrology
The authors thank the Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia (DID) for providing the discharge station data. SRTM data are distributed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through ftp://e0srp01u.ecs.nasa.gov/srtm/. HydroSHEDS data are distributed by the Conservation Science Program of World Wildlife Fund (WWF), in partnership with the US Geological Survey (USGS) through http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov/.
- 13.Kauffeldt, A., Wetterhall, F., Pappenberger, F., Salamon, P., & Thielen, J. (2016). Technical review of large-scale hydrological models for implementation in operational flood forecasting schemes on continental level. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Jones, R. G., Moore, R. J., & Reynard, N. S. (2009). Use of soil data in a grid-based hydrological model to estimate spatial variation in changing flood risk across the UK. Journal of Hydrology, 377(3–4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.JICA. (1995). Comprehensive management plan of Muda River basin - final report. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
- 24.DID. (2009). DID manual. Volume 4 - hydrology and water resources. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia.Google Scholar
- 27.Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P. J., & Wilson, M. F. (1993). Biosphere atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR community climate model (Vol. TN-387+STR, NCAR Tech. Note): National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
- 28.Brutsaert, W. (2005). Hydrology. An Introduction: Cambridge Univerity Press.Google Scholar
- 30.Wong, C. L., Yusop, Z., Ismail, T., & Venneker, R. (submitted). Application of a hydrological land surface model to water resources management in Peninsular Malaysia. Paper presented at the The Seventh International Conference on Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment, GEOMATE 2017, Tsu City, Mie, Japan.Google Scholar
- 31.Jenson, S. K., & Domingue, J. O. (1988). Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1593–1600.Google Scholar
- 34.Lehner, B., Verdin, K., & Jarvis, A. (2008). HydroSHEDS technical documentation Washington. DC: World Wildlife Fund US.Google Scholar
- 35.Leopold, L. B., & Maddock, J. T. (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. United States Geological Survey Professional, Paper 252.Google Scholar
- 36.Hazalizah, B. H. (2010). The hydraulic geometry in relation to hydrological characteristics of major river basins in Peninsular Malaysia. Unpublished MSc, UNESCO-IHE, Delft.Google Scholar
- 37.Leopold, L. B. (1994). A view of the river. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 45.Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., & Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 46.Leopold, L. B., Wolman, G. M., & Miller, J. P. (1964). Fluvial processes in geomorphology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- 49.Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical Recipies in C. The Art of Scientific Computing (Second Edition ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 51.Wong, C. L., Venneker, R., Jamil, A. B. M., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2010). Development of a gridded daily hydrometeorological data set for peninsular Malaysia. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7654.
- 52.DID. (2003). National Register of river basins: Final report on updating of condition of flooding in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Malaysia.Google Scholar
- 53.Julien, P. Y., Ghani, A. A., Zakaria, N. A., Abdulla, R., & Chang, C. K. (2010). Case study: Flood mitigation of the Muda river, Malaysia. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar