How to Take into Account Uncertainty in Species Extinction Probabilities for Phylogenetic Conservation Prioritization
- 168 Downloads
In this article, we are concerned with the general problem of choosing from a set of taxa T a subset S to protect in order to try to contribute to halting biodiversity loss as efficiently as possible given limited resources. The protection of a taxon decreases its extinction probability, and the impact of protecting the taxa of S is measured by the resulting expected phylogenetic diversity (ePD) of the set T. The primary challenge posed by this approach lies in determining the extinction probability of a taxon (protected or unprotected). To deal with this difficulty, the uncertainty about the extinction probabilities can be described through a set of possible scenarios, each corresponding to different extinction probability values for each taxon. We show how to determine an “optimal robust set” of taxa to protect, defined as the set of taxa that minimizes the maximum “regret,” i.e., the maximum relative gap, over all the scenarios, between (1) the ePD of T obtained by protecting the taxa of this set and (2) the ePD of T which would be produced by protecting the subset of taxa optimal for the considered scenario. In our experimental conditions covering 100 cases, this gap is almost always less than 1%. Consequently, the ePD of T obtained by protecting the taxa of the optimal robust set is not far from the maximum ePD of T that could have been obtained if we had known the true scenario. In other words, a way of escaping (in large part, at least) from the uncertainty related to the extinction probabilities of the taxa consists of choosing to protect those belonging to the optimal robust set. We also compare the optimal robust set to other relevant subsets of T.
KeywordsBiodiversity conservation Phylogenetic diversity Protected taxa Extinction risk Robustness Optimization Integer programming Experiments
I thank Dan Faith for the useful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
- 6.Carvalho, S. B., Brito, J. C., Crespo, E. G., Watts, M. E., & Possingham, H. P. (2011). Conservation planning under climate change: toward accounting for uncertainty in predicted species distributions to increase confidence in conservation investments in space and time. Biological Conservation, 144, 2020–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.CPLEX 12.6, 2013. IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.6 reference manual.Google Scholar
- 15.Faith, D. P. (2015). Phylogenetic diversity, functional trait diversity and extinction: avoiding tipping points and worst-case losses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 370.Google Scholar
- 16.Faith , DP. 2016. The PD phylogenetic diversity framework: linking evolutionary history to feature diversity for biodiversity conservation. In: Pellens R., Grandcolas P. (eds), Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics, Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation 14, Springer.Google Scholar
- 19.Forest, F., Grenyer, R., Rouget, M., Davies, T. J., Cowling, R. M., Faith, D. P., Balmford, A., Manning, J. C., Procheş, Ş., van der Bank, M., Reeves, G., Hedderson, T. A. J., & Savolainen, V. (2007). Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 445, 757–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fourer, R., Gay, D. M., & Kernighan, B. W. (1993). AMPL, a modeling language for mathematical programming. Danvers (MA): Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- 27.Meynard, C. N., Devictor, V., Mouillot, D., Thuiller, W., Jiguet, F., & Mouquet, N. (2011). Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Nunes, L. A., Turvey, S. T., & Rosindell, J. (2015). The price of conserving avian phylogenetic diversity: a global prioritization approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370.Google Scholar
- 33.Pardi F. 2009. Algorithms on phylogenetic trees. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar