The first-order approximation to the solution of the Boltzmann–Curtiss transport equation is derived. The resulting distribution function treats the rotation or gyration of spherical particles as an independent classical variable, deviating from the quantum mechanical treatment of molecular rotation found in the Wang Chang–Uhlenbeck equation. The Boltzmann–Curtiss equation, therefore, does not treat different rotational motions as separate molecular species. The first-order distribution function yields momentum equations for the translational velocity and gyration, which match the form of the governing equations of morphing continuum theory (MCT), a theory derived from the approach of rational continuum thermomechanics. The contributions of the local rotation to the Cauchy stress and the viscous diffusion are found to be proportional to an identical expression based on the relaxation time, number density, and equilibrium temperature of the fluid. When gyration is equated to the macroscopic angular velocity, the kinetic description reduces to the first-order approximation for a classical monatomic gas, and the governing equations match the form of the Navier–Stokes equations. The relaxation time used for this approximation is shown to be more complex due to the additional variable of local rotation. The approach of De Groot and Mazur is invoked to give an initial approximation for the relaxation of the gyration. The incorporation of this relaxation time, and other physical parameters, into the coefficients of the governing equations provides a more in-depth physical treatment of the new terms in the MCT equations, allowing for experimenters to test these expressions and get a better understanding of new coefficients in MCT.
BGK formulation Kinetic theory Turbulence
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This material is based upon work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Award Number FA9550-17-1-0154. LBW would like to thank his coworkers Mohamad Ibrahim Cheikh and Mohamed Mohsen for their assistance with this work.
Stokes VK (2012) Theories of fluids with microstructure: an introduction. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Meng J, Zhang Y, Hadjiconstantinou NG, Radtke GA, Shan X (2013) Lattice ellipsoidal statistical BGK model for thermal non-equilibrium flows. J Fluid Mech 718:347MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Munafo A, Panesi M, Magin TE (2014) Boltzmann rovibrational collisional coarse-grained model for internal energy excitation and dissociation in hypersonic flows. Phys Rev E 89:023001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arima T, Ruggeri T, Sugiyama M (2017) Rational extended thermodynamics of a rarefied polyatomic gas with molecular relaxation processes. Phys Rev E 96:042143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnevale EH, Carey C, Larson G (1967) Ultrasonic determination of rotational collision numbers and vibrational relaxation times of polyatomic gases at high temperatures. J Chem Phys 47:2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monchick L, Pereira ANG, Mason EA (1965) Heat conductivity of polyatomic and polar gases and gas mixtures. J Chem Phys 42:3241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini P, Zhang C, Schwartzentruber TE (2012) Molecular dynamics simulation of rotational relaxation in nitrogen: implications for rotational collision number models. Phys Fluids 24:106101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen J (2017) Morphing continuum theory for turbulence: theory, computation, and visualization. Phys Rev E 96:043108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen J, Lee JD, Liang C (2011) Constitutive equations of micropolar electromagnetic fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 166:867CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Peddieson J (1972) An application of the micropolar fluid model to the calculation of a turbulent shear flow. Int J Eng Sci 10:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian R, Atefi G (2008) A cosserat continuum mechanical approach to turbulent channel pressure driven flow of isotropic fluid. J Dispers Sci Technol 29(7):1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alizadeh M, Silber G, Nejad AG (2011) A continuum mechanical gradient theory with an application to fully developed turbulent flows. J Dispers Sci Technol 32(2):185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonnell LB, Chen J (2017) Morphing continuum theory: incorporating the physics of microstructures to capture the transition to turbulence within a boundary layer. J Fluid Eng 139:011205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonnell LB, Cheikh MI, Chen J (2018) Morphing continuum simulation of transonic flow over Axisymmetric Hill. AIAA J 56:4321–4330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheikh MI, Wonnell LB, Chen J (2018) Morphing continuum analysis of energy transfer in compressible turbulence. Phys Rev Fluids 3(2):024604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber G, Janoske U, Alizadeh M, Benderoth G (2006) An application of a gradient theory with dissipative boundary conditions to fully developed turbulent flows. J Fluid Eng 129:643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed MM, Chen J (2018) An advanced kinetic description for shock structure under hypersonic conditions. In: 71st Annual meeting of the APS division of fluid dynamics, 2018, vol 63. Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Cheikh MI, Chen J (2017) A morphing continuum approach to supersonic flow over a compression ramp. In: 47th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, pp AIAA 2017–3460Google Scholar
Cheikh MI, Wonnell LB, Chen J (2017) Energy cascade analysis: from subscale eddies to mean flow. In: 70th Annual meeting of the APS division of fluid dynamics, 2017, vol. 62. Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyGoogle Scholar