Advertisement

Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 143–163 | Cite as

Macroscopic models for a mushy region in concrete corrosion

  • Christos V. Nikolopoulos
Article

Abstract

Macroscopic models for the corrosion of concrete due to sulphation, describing the formation of a mushy region, are derived and studied by further expanding previous related studies. These models are derived from averaging using the multiple-scales method applied on microscopic Stefan-type problems to capture the effects of the microscopic transformation of calcite into gypsum. The resulting macroscopic model for the diffusion and production of the sulphate inside the concrete is coupled with a time-dependent Eikonal equation describing the evolution of the reaction at each point of the concrete wall. In certain cases and for specific geometries of the microstructure, the Eikonal equation admits analytical solutions, and the model takes the form of a macroscopic non-local problem. The models derived are solved numerically with the use of a finite-element method, and the results for various microstructure geometries on the microscale are presented.

Keywords

Concrete corrosion Eikonal equation Moving-boundary problems Perturbation methods  Sulphide corrosion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wants to thank Professor A. A. Lacey for having a very useful discussion regarding this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Böhm M, Devinny J, Jahani F, Rosen G (1998) On a moving-boundary system modelling corrosion in sewer pipes. Appl Math Comput 92:247–269CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fasano A, Natalini R (2006) Lost beauties of the Acropolis: what mathematics can say, SIAM News, 39, July/August 2006Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohm M, Devinny JS, Jahani F, Mansfeld FB, Rosen IG, Wang C (1999) A moving boundary diffusion model for the corrosion of concrete wastewater systems: simulation and experimental validation. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, San Diego, California, June 1999, pp 1739–1743Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhm M, Rosen IG (1997) Global weak solutions and uniqueness for a moving boundary problem for a coupled system of quasilinear diffusion-reaction equations arising as a model of chemical corrosion of concrete surfaces. Institut fur Mathematik Humboldt-Universitat, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fatima T, Arab N, Zemskov EP, Muntean A (2011) Homogenization of a reaction–diffusion system modeling sulfate corrosion of concrete in locally periodic perforated domains. J Eng Math 39(2–3):261–276CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fatima T, Muntean A (2014) Sulfate attack in sewer pipes: derivation of a concrete corrosion model via two-scale convergence. Nonlinear Anal 15(1):326–344Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fatima T, Muntean A, Aiki T (2012) Distributed space scales in a semilinear reaction–diffusion system including a parabolic variational inequality: a well-posedness study. Adv Math Sci Appl 22(1):295–318zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fatima T, Muntean A, Ptashnyk M (2012) Unfolding-based corrector estimates for a reaction–diffusion system predicting concrete corrosion. Appl Anal 91(6):1129–1154CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nikolopoulos CV (2010) A mushy region in concrete corrosion. Appl Math Model 34:4012–4030CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lacey AA, Herraiz LA (2002) Macroscopic models for melting derived from averaging microscopic Stefan problems I: simple geometries with kinetic undercooling or surface tension. Eur J Appl Math 11:153–169CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaklic A, Leonardis A, Solina F (2000) Segmentation and recovery of superquadrics, Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 20. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lacey AA, Herraiz LA (2002) Macroscopic models for melting derived from averaging microscopic Stefan problems II: effect of varying geometry and composition. Eur J Appl Math 13:261–282CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hinch EJ (1991) Perturbation methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ockendon J, Howison S, Lacey A, Movchan A (2003) Applied partial differential equations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moskalensky ED (2009) Finding exact solutions to the two-dimensional Eikonal equation. Numer Anal Appl 2:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leveque RJ (2002) Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiaia B, van Mier JGM, Vervuurt A (1998) On the fractal dimension of fracture surfaces of concrete elements. Cem Concr Res 28(1):103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Idorn GM (2005) Innovation in concrete research review and perspective. Cem Concr Res 35:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of the AegeanSamosGreece

Personalised recommendations