Acoustic scattering by a circular semi-transparent conical surface
- 60 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
The scattering of a plane acoustic wave by a circular semi-transparent conical surface with impedance-type boundary conditions is studied. The analytic solution is constructed on the basis of the incomplete separation of variables and the reduction of the problem to a functional difference equation of the second order. Although the latter is equivalent to a Carleman boundary-value problem for analytic vectors, the solution is studied by means of the direct reduction method, that is, converting the functional difference equations to a Fredholm-type integral equation. Its unique solvability is then studied and the expression for the scattering amplitude of the spherical wave from the vertex is discussed. Some numerical results for axial incidence are also presented.
Keywords
Carleman problems Fredholm integral equation Functional difference equation Scattering amplitude Wiener–HopfPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Felsen LB (1957). Plane wave scattering by small-angle cones. IRE Trans Antennas Propagation 5: 121–129 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 2.Borovikov VA (1966). Diffraction by polygons and polyhedrons. Nauka, Moscow Google Scholar
- 3.Cheeger J, Taylor ME (1982) Diffraction of waves by conical singularities. Commun Pure Appl Math 35(3,4): 275–331, 487–529Google Scholar
- 4.Smyshlyaev VP (1990). Diffraction by conical surfaces at high frequencies. Wave Motion 12(4): 329–339 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Jones DS (1997). Scattering by a cone. Quart J Mech Appl Math 50: 499–523 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.Babich VM, Dement’ev DB, Samokish BA and Smyshlyaev VP (2000). On evaluation of the diffraction coefficients for arbitrary ‘non-singular’ directions of a smooth convex cone. SIAM Appl Math 66(2): 536–573 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bernard J-ML (1997) Méthode analytique et transformées fonctionnelles pour la diffraction d’ondes par une singularité conique: équation intégrale de noyau non oscillant pour le cas d’impédance constante. rapport CEA-R-5764, Editions Dist-SaclayGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bernard J-ML, Lyalinov MA (2001) Diffraction of acoustic waves by an impedance cone of an arbitrary cross-section. Wave Motion 33:155–181 (erratum: p 177 replace \(O(1/\cos(\pi(\nu-b)))\) by \(O(\nu^d\sin(\pi\nu)/\cos(\pi(\nu-b)))\))Google Scholar
- 9.Antipov YA (2002). Diffraction of a plane wave by a circular cone with an impedance boundary condition. SIAM J Appl Math 62(4): 1122–1152 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lyalinov MA (2003) Diffraction of a plane wave by an impedance cone. Zap Nauch Sem Peterburg Otd Matem Inst Steklova) 297 Matem vopr teorii rasprostr voln 32:191–215 [English transl in: J Math Sci 2005, 127(6):2446–2460]Google Scholar
- 11.Bernard J-ML and Lyalinov MA (2004). Electromagnetic scattering by a smooth convex impedance cone. IMA J Appl Math 69: 285–333 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 12.Daniele VG (2003). Winer–Hopf technique for impenetrable wedges having arbitrary aperture angle. SIAM J Appl Math 63(4): 1442–1460 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 13.Abrahams ID and Lawrie JB (1995). On the factorization of a class of Winer–Hopf kernels. IMA J Appl Math 55(1): 35–47 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Antipov YA and Silvestrov VV (2004). Second-order functional-difference equations I: method of the Riemann–Hilbert problem on Riemann surfaces. Quart J Mech Appl Math 57(2): 245–265 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lyalinov MA and Zhu NY (2003). A solution procedure for second-order difference equations and its application to electromagnetic-wave diffraction in a wedge-shaped region. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 459: 3159–3180 MATHADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lyalinov MA and Zhu NY (2006). Diffraction of a skew incident plane electromagnetic wave by an impedance wedge. Wave Motion 44: 21–43 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Buslaev VS and Fedotov AA (2001). On the difference equations with periodic coefficients. Adv Theor Math Phys 5: 1105–1168 MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 18.Senior TBA and Volakis JL (1995). Approximate boundary conditions in electromagnetics. Inst of Electr Eng, London MATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Buldyrev VS and Lyalinov MA (2001). Mathematical methods in modern electromagnetic diffraction theory, vol 1. Intern monographs on advanced electromagnetics Science House, Tokyo Google Scholar
- 20.Abramowitz M, Stegun I (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- 21.Gradshteyn IS and Ryzhik IM (1980). Table of integrals, series and products, 4th edn. Academic Press, Orlando Google Scholar
- 22.Jones DS (1964). The theory of electromagnetism. Pergamon Press, London MATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tuzhilin AA (1973). The theory of Maliuzhinets’ inhomogeneous functional equations. Different Uravn 9(10): 1875–1888 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jones DS (1980). The Kontorovich–Lebedev transform. J Inst Math Appl 26: 133–141 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 25.Titchmarsh EC (1937) Introduction to the theory of Fourier integrals. Oxford PressGoogle Scholar
- 26.Babich VM (2002). To the problem on the asymptotics with respect to indices of the associated Legendre functions. Russian J Math Phys 9(1): 6–13, (in English)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 27.Vekua NP (1970). Systems of singular integral equations. Nauka, Moscow, (1st edn. 1967 Noordhoff Groningen)Google Scholar