A 3D numerical model for computing non-breaking wave forces on slender piles
- 298 Downloads
In this paper a numerical model for water-wave-body interaction is validated by comparing the numerical results with laboratory data. The numerical model is based on Euler’s equation without considering the effects of energy dissipation. The Euler equations are solved by a two-step projection finite-volume scheme and the free-surface displacements are tracked by the volume-of-fluid method. The numerical model is used to simulate solitary waves as well as periodic waves and their interaction with a vertical slender pile. A very good agreement between the experimental data and numerical results is observed for the time history of free-surface displacement, fluid-particle velocity, and dynamic pressure on the pile.
KeywordsCircular cylinder Experimental data Numerical modeling Wave forces
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Morison JR, O’Brien MP, Johson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The forces exerted by surface waves on piles. J Petroleum Technol, Petroleum Trans AIME 189:149–154Google Scholar
- 2.Sapkaya T, Issacson St MQ (1981) Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures. Van Nostrand Reinold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Guyenne P, Grilli ST (2006) Numerical study of three-dimensional overturning waves in shallow water. J Fluid Mech (to appear)Google Scholar
- 7.Pope SB (2001) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- 11.Watanabe Y, Saeki H (1999) Three-dimensional large eddy simulation of breaking waves. Coastal Engng 41(3/4):281–301Google Scholar
- 16.Wu T-R (2004) A numerical study of three-dimensional breaking waves and turbulence effects. PhD dissertation, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 19.Irschik K, Sparboom U, Oumeraci H (2003) Breaking wave characteristics for the loading of a slender pile. Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ICCE 2002, pp 1341–1352Google Scholar
- 20.Goring DJ, Raichlen F (1980) The generation of long waves in the laboratory. Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng ASCE, New York, pp 763–783Google Scholar