Advertisement

Empirical Software Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1861–1897 | Cite as

The kanban approach, between agility and leanness: a systematic review

  • Osama Al-Baik
  • James Miller
Article

Abstract

The interest in lean product development in general and the Kanban approach in particular has increased over the years. However, practitioners, in the software development field, have significant challenges in implementing the Kanban approach as it lacks a clear definition of its principles, practices, techniques and tools. This study aims to provide insight into the Kanban approach and its elements (concepts, principles, practices, techniques, and tools) that have been empirically reported by scholars and practitioners. This insight is produced by using the systematic review method to analyze the available literature. A total of 37 primary studies were selected from more than 3,000 unique studies. Our findings show that the primary studies have considered and reported 20 different elements as part of the Kanban approach based upon considerations of being an agile approach or a lean principle; these elements have realized great benefits and improvements to the software development teams. These benefits along with the challenges have been reported in this study. Due to the variety of organization types, contexts, and project sizes reported in the primary studies, it is expected that the results in this study would help in establishing knowledge on what are the different elements of the Kanban approach as well as offering a first step towards developing guidelines for practitioners to help in introducing the Kanban approach to software development organizations.

Keywords

Kanban Lean Agile Software development Software engineering Process improvement Systematic review 

References

  1. Al-Baik O, Miller J (2014) Waste identification and elimination in information technology organizations. Empir Softw Eng 19(6):2019-2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DJ (2003) Agile management for software engineering: applying the theory of constraints for business results. Prentice Hall Professional, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DJ (2010) Kanban: successful evolutionary change for your technology business. Blue Hole Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, Sinha D (1999) Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat 27(1):3–23zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biolchini J, Mian PG, Natali ACC, Travassos GH (2005) Systematic review in software engineering. Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, 679(05) Google Scholar
  6. Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80(4):571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronza G (2012) The Human Side of Kanban-How to helpYour Team Deliver. 3P Vantage MediaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 10(1):45–53BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Softw Technol 50(9–10):833–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hibbs C, Jewett S, Sullivan M (2009) The art of lean software development: a practical and incremental approach Google Scholar
  11. Ivarsson M, Gorschek T (2010) A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations. Empir Softw Eng 16(3):365–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen J, Rodgers R (2002) Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Adm Rev 61:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitchenham BA, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report (Vol. EBSE-2007-01)Google Scholar
  14. Ladas C (2008) Scrumban-essays on kanban systems for lean software development. Modus Cooperandi Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Liker J (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the World’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Liker JK, Hoseus M (2008) Toyota culture: the heart and sould of the Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Magee D (2008) How Toyota became #1. Penguin Group, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Oostvogels N (2012) Kanban for skeptics: clear answers to kanban in software development. Leanpub, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  20. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pink D (2009) The suprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead books, New YrokGoogle Scholar
  22. Poppendieck M, Poppendieck T (2003) Lean software development: an agile toolkit. Addison-Wesley Professional, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  23. Reinertsen DG (2009) The principles of product development flow: second generation lean product development. Celeritas Publishing, BuchananGoogle Scholar
  24. Ries E (2011) The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Random House Digital Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Shah R, Ward PT (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manag 25(4):785–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang X, Conboy K, Cawley O (2012) “Leagile” software development: an experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development. J Syst Softw 85(6):1287–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Part I: lean principles. In: Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, NY, pp 15–98Google Scholar
  28. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical & Computer EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations