Empirical Software Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 91–118 | Cite as

Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review

  • Darja Šmite
  • Claes Wohlin
  • Tony Gorschek
  • Robert Feldt
Article

Abstract

Recognized as one of the trends of the 21st century, globalization of the world economies brought significant changes to nearly all industries, and in particular it includes software development. Many companies started global software engineering (GSE) to benefit from cheaper, faster and better development of software systems, products and services. However, empirical studies indicate that achieving these benefits is not an easy task. Here, we report our findings from investigating empirical evidence in GSE-related research literature. By conducting a systematic review we observe that the GSE field is still immature. The amount of empirical studies is relatively small. The majority of the studies represent problem-oriented reports focusing on different aspects of GSE management rather than in-depth analysis of solutions for example in terms of useful practices or techniques. Companies are still driven by cost reduction strategies, and at the same time, the most frequently discussed recommendations indicate a necessity of investments in travelling and socialization. Thus, at the same time as development goes global there is an ambition to minimize geographical, temporal and cultural separation. These are normally integral parts of cross-border collaboration. In summary, the systematic review results in several descriptive classifications of the papers on empirical studies in GSE and also reports on some best practices identified from literature.

Keywords

Empirical evidence Empirical studies Systematic review Global software engineering Distributed software engineering 

References

  1. Abran A, Moore JW et al (2004) Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK®), IEEE Computer Society 2004 GuideGoogle Scholar
  2. Ågerfalk PJ, Fitzgerald B, Holmström H, Lings B, Lundell B, Conchúir EÓ (2005) A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Paris, 29, Austrian Computer Society, pp 47–61Google Scholar
  3. Battin RD, Crocker R, Kreidler J, Subramanian K (2001) Leveraging resources in global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boden A, Nett B, Wulf V (2007) Coordination practices in distributed software development of small enterprises. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Software Engineering ICGSE 2007, pp 235–246Google Scholar
  5. Carmel E (1999) Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmel E, Abbott P (2007) Why ‘Nearshore’ means that distance matters. Commun ACM 50(10):40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmel E, Agarwal R (2001) Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conchuir EO, Holmström H, Ågerfalk PJ, Fitzgerald B (2006) Exploring the assumed benefits of global software development. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp 159–168Google Scholar
  9. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Damian D, Moitra D (2006) Global software development: how far have we come? IEEE Softw 23(5):17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebert C, De Neve P (2001) Surviving global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebert C, Parro CH, Suttels R, Kolarczyk H (2001) Improving validation activities in a global software development. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE 2001, pp 545–554Google Scholar
  13. Friedman TL (2005) The world is flat: brief history of the 21st century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmström H, Fitzgerald B, Ågerfalk PJ, Conchúir EÓ (2006) Agile practices reduce distance in global software development. Inf Syst Manage 23(3):7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karolak DW (1998) Global software development: managing virtual teams and environments. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.Google Scholar
  16. Kitchenham B, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, version 2.3. EBSE Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee JN, Huynh MQ, Kwok CW, Pi SM (2000) The evolution of outsourcing research: what is the next issue? In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  18. Loh L, Venkatraman N (1995) An empirical study of information technology outsourcing: benefits, risks, and performance implications. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems, pp 277–288Google Scholar
  19. Petersen K, Feldt R, Mujtaba S, Mattsson M (2008) Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp 71–80Google Scholar
  20. Poikolainen T, Paananen J (2007) Performance criteria in inter-organizational global software development projects. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Global Software Engineering ICGSE, pp 60–70Google Scholar
  21. Ramesh B, Cao L, Mohan K, Xu P (2006) Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls? Can distributed software development be agile? Commun ACM 49(10):41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sahay S, Nicholson B, Krishna S (2003) Global IT outsourcing: software development across borders. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Smite D, Wohlin D, Feldt R, Gorschek T (2008) Reporting empirical research in global software engineering: a Classification Scheme. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Global Software Engineering ICG-SE 2008, pp 173–181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darja Šmite
    • 1
    • 2
  • Claes Wohlin
    • 1
  • Tony Gorschek
    • 1
  • Robert Feldt
    • 1
  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyRonnebySweden
  2. 2.University of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations