Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 669–690 | Cite as

English skills, labour market status and earnings of Turkish women

  • Antonio Di PaoloEmail author
  • Aysit Tansel
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effect of the level of English skills on the labour market outcomes of Turkish women, using data from the Adult Education Survey of 2007. By adopting a bivariate equation framework, we jointly model the effect of English skills on labour market status and, conditional on being a wage earner, on monthly earnings and occupational status. The multinomial equation that explains labour market status allows for a different effect of language knowledge on the probability of being employed, unemployed but actively looking for a job, an unpaid family worker or involved in household tasks. The results indicate that being proficient in English is conditionally associated with a higher probability of being employed as a wage earner and, to a lesser extent, unemployed but looking for a job, whereas it decreases the likelihood of being involved in household tasks. Moreover, there is a significant conditional correlation between having a high level of skills in English and earnings, which is only modestly reduced when job-related variables and (especially) occupation dummies are included as additional controls. Indeed, being proficient in English barely affects occupational status when selection into employment status is controlled for. Therefore, the knowledge of foreign languages (in this case English) seems to stimulate labour market participation and earnings capacity, but does not substantially affect the occupational position of women in the Turkish labour market.

Keywords

English skills Females Labour market status Earnings Occupation 

JEL Classification

J16 J24 J31 O15 Z13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous referees of this journal for their insightful comments, which helped to improve the paper. Di Paolo gratefully acknowledges funding from the MEC Grant No. ECO2016-75805-R and the RecerCaixa Grant 2016ACUP00020.

References

  1. Adesope OO, Lavin T, Thompson T, Ungerleider C (2010) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Rev Educ Res 80(2):207–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldashev A, Gernandt J, Thomsen SL (2009) Language usage, participation, employment and earnings: evidence for foreigners in West Germany with multiple sources of selection. Labour Econ 16(3):330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azam M, Chin A, Prakash N (2013) The returns to English-language skills in India. Econ Dev Cult Change 61(2):335–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialystok E, Craik FI, Green DW, Gollan TH (2009) Bilingual minds. Psychol Sci Public Interest 10(3):89–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleakley H, Chin A (2004) Language skills and earnings: evidence from childhood immigrants. Rev Econ Stat 86(2):481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleakley H, Chin A (2010) Age at arrival, English proficiency, and social assimilation among US immigrants. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(1):165–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casale D, Posel D (2011) English language proficiency and earnings in a developing country: the case of South Africa. J Socio Econ 40(4):385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang SK (2011) Simulation estimation of two-tiered dynamic panel Tobit models with an application to the labor supply of married women. J Appl Econ 26(5):854–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2007) The economics of language: International analyses, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2014) International migration and the economics of language. Handb Econ Immigr 1:211–269Google Scholar
  12. Costa A, Sebastián-Gallés N (2014) How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain? Nat Rev Neurosci 15(5):336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Paolo A, Raymond JL (2012) Language knowledge and earnings in Catalonia. J Appl Econ 15(1):89–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Paolo A, Tansel A (2015) Returns to foreign language skills in a developing country: the Case of Turkey. J Dev Stud 51(4):407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donado A (2017) Foreign languages and their impact on unemployment. Labour 31(3):265–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dustmann C, Van Soest A (2004) An analysis of speaking fluency of immigrants using ordered response models with classification errors. J Bus Econ Stat 22(3):312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egger PH, Lassmann A (2012) The language effect in international trade: a meta-analysis. Econ Lett 116(2):221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Union (2012) Europeans and their languages, Special Euro-Barometer 243/Wave 64.3 (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf)
  19. Fabo B, Beblavý M, Lenaerts K (2017) The importance of foreign language skills in the labour markets of Central and Eastern Europe: assessment based on data from online job portals. Empirica 44(3):487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fidrmuc J (2011) The economics of multilingualism in the EU. In: Eger T, Schäfer H-B (eds) Research handbook on the economics of European Union Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 331–352Google Scholar
  21. Frankel J, Rose A (2002) An estimate of the effect of currencies on trade and income. Q J Econ 117:437–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ganzeboom HB, De Graaf PM, Treiman DJ (1992) A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Soc Sci Res 21(1):1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ginsburgh VA, Prieto-Rodriguez J (2011) Returns to foreign languages of native workers in the EU. Ind Labor Relat Rev 64(3):599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginsburgh V, Prieto-Rodriguez J (2013) Is there a gender bias in the use of foreign languages in Europe? Kyklos 66(4):552–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber M, Mellace G (2014) Testing exclusion restrictions and additive separability in sample selection models. Empir Econ 47(1):75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Isphording I (2015) Language and labor market success. International Encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edn., p 260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martins MFO (2001) Parametric and semiparametric estimation of sample selection models: an empirical application to the female labour force in Portugal. J Appl Econ 16(1):23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melitz J (2008) Language and foreign trade. Eur Econ Rev 52(4):667–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (2018) OECD Labour Force Statistics 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/oecd_lfs-2017-en http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STLABOUR#
  30. Rendon S (2007) The Catalan premium: language and employment in Catalonia. J Popul Econ 20(3):669–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roodman D (2018) CMP: Stata module to implement conditional (recursive) mixed process estimator. https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s456882.htm
  32. Saiz A, Zoido E (2005) Listening to what the world says: bilingualism and earnings in the United States. Rev Econ Stat 87(3):523–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seargeant P, Erling E (2011) The discourse of English as a language for International development: policy assumptions and practical challenge. In: Coleman H (ed) Dreams and realities: developing countries and the English language. British Council, London, pp 255–274Google Scholar
  34. Stöhr T (2015) The returns to occupational foreign language use: evidence from Germany. Labour Econ 32:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tansel A (1994) Wage employment, earnings and returns to schooling for men and women in Turkey. Econ Educ Rev 13(4):305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tansel A (2001) Self-employment, wage-employment, and returns to schooling by gender in Turkey. In: Salehi-Isfahani D (ed) labor and human capital in the Middle East: studies of markets and household behavior. Ithaca Press, Reading, pp 637–667Google Scholar
  37. Tansel A (2010) Changing returns to education for men and women in a developing country: Turkey, 1994 and 2005. Paper presented at the ESPE conference, 18–21 June 2008, in London, ECOMOD conference, 2–4 July 2008 in Berlin, MEEA conference, 20–23 Mar 2009 in Nice, France and ICE-TEA conference, 1–3 Sept 2010 in Girne, Republic of Northern CyprusGoogle Scholar
  38. Toomet O (2011) Learn English, Not the local language! Ethnic Russians in the Baltic States. American economic review: papers and proceedings 101(3):526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. TURKSTAT (2018) Turkish labor force statistics, www.tuik.gov.tr
  40. UNDP (United Nations Development Program) (2016) Human Development ReportGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Smyth R, Cheng Z (2017) The economic returns to proficiency in English in China. China Econ Rev 43:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams D (2011) The economic returns to multiple language usage in Western Europe. Int J Manpow 32(4):372–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yao Y, van Ours JC (2018) Daily dialect-speaking and wages among native Dutch speakers. Empirica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9420-z (on-line first) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AQR-IREA, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Middle East Technical University, ERF and IZAAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations