Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 741–766 | Cite as

The impact of multilingualism on host language acquisition

  • Santiago Budría
  • Pablo SwedbergEmail author
Original Paper
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

The paper uses micro-data from the Spanish National Immigrant Survey to examine an uncharted question: are multilingual immigrants superior at learning the destination language? The article adopts an instrumental variable (IV) approach where the number of foreign languages known by the immigrant is instrumented using the following variables: (1) the number of nationalities of the immigrant’s father and (2) the number of foreign countries where the individual has settled prior to his arrival in Spain. Above all, these instruments pass well several validity tests. The IV estimates show that for every additional foreign language learned by the immigrant the probability of being proficient in the destination language—Spanish—increases by 10.7%. This effect is equivalent to multiple years of formal education, to living in Spain for more than 4 years, and as important as having a mother tongue linguistically close to Spanish. We find mild evidence that women reap larger benefits from multilingualism than men (13.0 against 10.0%).

Keywords

Immigration Language proficiency Destination language proficiency Instrumental variables 

JEL Classification

J15 J24 J61 

References

  1. Adsera A, Chiswick B (2007) Are there gender and country of origin differences in immigrant labor market outcomes across European destinations? J Popul Econ 20:495–526Google Scholar
  2. Adserà A, Pytliková M (2016) Language and migration. In: Ginsburgh V, Weber S (eds) The Palgrave handbook of economics and language, chap. 12. Palgrave, London, pp 342–372Google Scholar
  3. Angrist J, Pischke S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Antoniou M, Liang E, Ettlinger M, Wong P (2015) The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Biling: Lang Cognit 18:283–295Google Scholar
  5. Beenstock M, Chiswick BR, Paltiel A (2010) Testing the immigrant assimilation hypothesis with longitudinal data. Rev Econ Household 8:7–27Google Scholar
  6. Bialystock E (1988) Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Dev Psychol 24:560–567Google Scholar
  7. Bleakley H, Chin A (2010) Age at arrival, english proficiency, and social assimilation among US immigrants. Am Econ J: Appl Econ 2:165–192Google Scholar
  8. Bound J, Jaeger D, Baker R (1995) Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between instruments and the endogenous explanatory variables is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):443–450Google Scholar
  9. Budría S, Swedberg P (2015) The impact of language proficiency on immigrants’ earnings in Spain. Rev de Econ Aplicada 23(67):63–91Google Scholar
  10. Cameron C, Trivedi PK (2010) Microeconometrics using stata. Revised edition. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  11. Casale D, Posel D (2011) English language proficiency and earnings in a developing country: the case of South Africa. J Socio-Economics 40:385–393Google Scholar
  12. Cenoz J (2013) The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: focus on multilingualism. Lang Teach 46:71–86Google Scholar
  13. Charette M, Meng R (1994) Explaining language proficiency. Econ Lett 44(3):313–321Google Scholar
  14. Chiswick B, Miller P (2001) A model of destination-language acquisition: application to male immigrants in Canada. Demography 38:391–409Google Scholar
  15. Chiswick B, Miller P (2005) Linguistic distance: a quantitative measure of the distance between english and other languages. J Multiling Multicult Dev 26:1–11Google Scholar
  16. Chiswick B, Miller P (2008a) Modeling immigrants’ language skills. Res Labor Econ 27:75–128Google Scholar
  17. Chiswick B, Miller P (2010) Occupational language requirements and the value of English in the US labor market. J Popul Econ 23:353–372Google Scholar
  18. Chiswick B, Repetto G (2001) Immigrants adjustment in Israel: the determinants of literacy and fluency in hebrew and the effects on earnings. In: Djacic S (ed) International migration: trends, policy and economic impact. Routledge, London, pp 204–228Google Scholar
  19. Chiswick B, Beenstock M, Repetto G (2001) The effect of linguistic and country of origin on immigrant language skills: application to Israel. Int Migr 39:33–60Google Scholar
  20. Chiswick B, Lee YL, Miller P (2004) Immigrants’ language skills: the Australian experience in a longitudinal survey. Int Migrat Rev 38:611–654Google Scholar
  21. Chiswick B, Lee YL, Miller P (2005) Family matters: the role of the family in immigrants’ destination language acquisition. J Popul Econ 18:631–647Google Scholar
  22. Chiswick B, Miller P (2008b) A test for critical period hypothesis for language learning. J Multiling Multicult Dev 29:16–29Google Scholar
  23. De Palo D, Faini R, Venturini A (2007) The social assimilation of immigrants. The World Bank Social Protection DP 0701Google Scholar
  24. Dustmann C (1999) Temporary migration, human capital, and language fluency of migrants. Scand J Econ 101:297–314Google Scholar
  25. Dustmann C, van Soest A (2001) Language fluency and earnings: estimation with misclassified language indicators. Rev Econ Stat 83(4):663–674Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2009) Study on the contribution of multilingualism to creativity: final report. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  27. Eurostat (2016) Migrant integration statistics-employment. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Migrant_integration_statistics_-_employment. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
  28. Goza F, Kayamura S (2013) English acquisition and Japanese language maintenance among Japanese-American youth. Int Migr 51:149–171Google Scholar
  29. Hirosh Z, Degani T (2018) Direct and indirect effects of multilingualism on novel language learning: an integrative review. Psychon Bull Rev 25(3):892–916Google Scholar
  30. Isphording IE, Otten S (2013) The cost of babylon-linguistic distance in applied economics. Rev Int Econ 21:354–369Google Scholar
  31. Jimenez-Catalan RM (2003) Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. Int J Appl Linguist 13:54–77Google Scholar
  32. Kalashnikova M, Mattock K, Monaghan P (2014) The effects of linguistic experience on the flexible use of mutual exclusivity in word learning. Biling: Lang Cognit 18:626–638Google Scholar
  33. Kasinitz P, Mollenkopf J, Waters M, Holdaway J (2008) Inheriting the City: the children of immigrants come of age. Russell Sage and Harvard University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaushanskaya M, Marian V (2009a) The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychon Bull Rev 16:705–710Google Scholar
  35. Kaushanskaya M, Marian V (2009b) Bilingualism reduces native- language interference during novel-word learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 35:829–835Google Scholar
  36. Krizman J, Marian V, Shook A, Skoe E, Kraus N (2012) Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(20):7877–7881Google Scholar
  37. Kulkarni VS, Hu X (2014) English language proficiency among the foreign born in the United States, 1980–2007: duration, age and cohort effect. Int Migrat Rev 48:762–800Google Scholar
  38. Lewis MP, Simons G, Fennig C (2015) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 18th edn. SIL International, DallasGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma S (2008) Paternal race/ethnicity and birth outcomes. Am J Public Health 98(12):2285–2292Google Scholar
  40. Manning A, Roy S (2010) Culture clash or culture club? National Identity in Britain. Econ J R Econ Soc 120(542):F72–F100Google Scholar
  41. Marian V, Shook A (2012) The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Cerebrum 12Google Scholar
  42. Medvedeva M (2012) Negotiating languages in immigrant families. Int Migrat Rev 46:517–545Google Scholar
  43. Nakao K, Takaishi J, Tatsuta K, Katayama H, Iwase M, Yorifuji K, Takeda M (2000) The influences of family environment on personality traits. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 54(1):91–95Google Scholar
  44. Nottmeyer O (2015) Intermarriage and the economic success of immigrants. IZA World Labor 2015:160.  https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD (2012) International migration outlook 2012. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2012-en. Accessed 26 Nov 2013
  46. OECD (2014) International migration outlook 2014, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2013-en. Accessed 26 Nov 2014
  47. Powell JC, Batters JD (1985) Pupils perception of foreign language learning at 12 + : some gender differences. Educ Stud 11:12–23Google Scholar
  48. Pritchard R (1987) Boys and girls attitudes towards French and German. Educ Res 29:12–23Google Scholar
  49. Quinteros Baumgart C, Billick SB (2018) Positive cognitive effects of bilingualism and multilingualism on cerebral function: a review. Pschiatry Q 89:273–283Google Scholar
  50. Raijman R (2013) Linguistic assimilation of first-generation Jewish South-African immigrants in Israel. J Int Migr Integr 14:615–636Google Scholar
  51. Sanz C (2007) Predicting enhanced L3 learning in bilingual contexts: The role of biliteracy. In: Pérez-Vidal C, Juan-Garau M, Bel A (eds) A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain. Multilingual Matters, Buffalo, pp 220–240Google Scholar
  52. Springer S, Deutsch G (1989) Left brain, right brain. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Stock JH, Wright J, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat 20(4):518–529Google Scholar
  54. Thomas K (2010) Household context, generational status and English proficiency among the children of African immigrants in the U.S. Int Migrat Rev 44:142–172Google Scholar
  55. Wang T, Saffran JR (2014) Statistical learning of a tonal language: the influence of bilingualism and previous linguistic experience. Front Psychol 5:953Google Scholar
  56. Waters MC, Tran Van C, Kasinitz P, Mollenkopf JH (2010) Segmented assimilation revisited: types of acculturation and socioeconomic mobility in young adulthood. Ethnic Racial Stud 33(7):1168–1193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de NebrijaMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business and EconomicsSaint Louis UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations