Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 539–553 | Cite as

The (in)stability of money demand in the euro area: lessons from a cross-country analysis

  • Dieter NautzEmail author
  • Ulrike Rondorf
Original Paper

Abstract

The instability of standard money demand functions has undermined the role of monetary aggregates for monetary policy analysis in the euro area. This paper uses country-specific monetary aggregates to shed more light on the economics behind the instability of euro area money demand. Our results obtained from panel estimation indicate that the observed instability of standard money demand functions could be explained by omitted variables like e.g. technological progress that are important for money demand but constant across member countries.

Keywords

Money demand Cross-country analysis Panel error correction model Euro area 

JEL Classification

E41 E51 E52 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jörg Breitung, Christian Offermanns and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the CRC 649 “Economic Risk”.

References

  1. Arnold I (1994) The myth of a stable European money demand. Open Econ Rev 5:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyer A (2009) A stable model for euro area money demand revisiting the role of wealth. ECB Working Paper No. 1111Google Scholar
  3. Beyer A, Doornik J, Hendry D (2001) Constructing historical euro-zone data. Econ J 3:102–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaes B (2009) Money and monetary policy transmission in the euro area: evidence from FAVAR- and VAR approaches. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, Series 1: Economic Studies (18)Google Scholar
  5. Boone L, van den Noord P (2008) Wealth effects on money demand in the euro area. Empir Econ 34:525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brand C, Cassola N (2004) A money demand system for euro area M3. Appl Econ 36(8):817–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cappiello L, Kadareja A, Sorensen C, Protopapa M (2010) Do bank loans and credit standards have an effect on output? a panel approach for the euro area. ECB Working Paper No. 1150Google Scholar
  8. Carstensen K (2006) Stock market downswing and the stability of European Monetary Union money demand. J Bus Econ Stat 24(4):395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coenen G, Vega J-L (2001) The demand for M3 in the euro area. J Appl Econom 16:727–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Bondt G (2009) Euro area money demand—empirical evidence on the role of equity and labour markets. ECB Working Paper No. 1086Google Scholar
  11. Dreger C, Wolters J (2009) Money velocity and asset prices in the euro area. Empirica 36(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreger C, Wolters J (2010) Investigating M3 money demand in the euro area. J Int Money Finance 29(1):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driscoll J (2004) Does bank lending affect output? Evidence from the U.S. states. J Monet Econ 51:451–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ECB (2003) The outcome of the ECB’s evaluation of its monetary policy strategy. Monthly Bulletin, 79–92Google Scholar
  15. ECB (2008) Financial integration in Europe, chapter 1Google Scholar
  16. Funke M (2001) Money demand in Euroland. J Int Money Finance 20:701–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerlach S, Svensson L (2003) Money and inflation in the euro area: A case for monetary indicators? J Monet Econ 50(8):1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greiber C, Lemke W (2005) Money demand and macroeconomic uncertainty. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 26(5)Google Scholar
  19. Hayo B (1999) Estimating a European demand for money. Scott J Polit Econ 46(3):221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lütkepohl H, Teräsvirta T, Wolters J (1998) Modeling the demand for M3 in the unified Germany. Rev Econ Stat 80(3):399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mankiw G (1992) Comment on: Mulligan CB and Sala-i-Martin X (1992) U.S. money demand: surprising cross-sectional estimates. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2:285–327Google Scholar
  22. Mulligan C, Sala-i Martin X (1992) U.S. money demand: surprising cross-sectional estimates. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2:285–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pesaran M (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-sectional dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pesaran M, Shin Y (1999) An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom S (eds) Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogenous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rondorf U (2010) Are bank loans important for output growth: a panel analysis of the euro area. Working paper, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Setzer R, Wolff G (2009) Money demand in the euro area: new insights from disaggregated data. EU Commission, Economic Papers (373)Google Scholar
  28. Westerlund J (2005) New simple test for panel cointegration. Econom Rev 24(3):297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsFree University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations