Empirica

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 247–271 | Cite as

Technical change in a bubble economy: Japanese manufacturing firms in the 1990s

  • Takanobu Nakajima
  • Alice Nakamura
  • Emi Nakamura
  • Masao Nakamura
Original Paper

Abstract

An important economic policy issue is to ascertain when and if technical change (TC) is driving measured growth in productivity. Was this the case for Japan during the late 1980s when a massive financial bubble was being formed? This paper addresses this question, after first further developing methods needed for this purpose. The movement of firms’ TC is of particular policy interest to Japan whose economy has been suffering from a prolonged recession for more than a decade since the burst of the bubble in 1990. In the period of time immediately prior to the burst of the bubble, our estimation results show a significant drop in technical progress. What we believe these results reflect is that Japanese manufacturing firms made excessive investments in production inputs in the years when the bubble was being formed. This excessive investment in inputs did not contribute positively to TC and hence the measured productivity and economic growth of the bubble period in the late 1980s was unsustainable.

Keywords

Technical change Total factor productivity Economies of scale Japan Index number method 

JEL classification

O3 O47 O53 O49 

References

  1. Balk BM (1993) Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes: comment. Econ J 103(418):680–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balk BM (1998) Industrial price, quantity, and productivity indices: the micro-economic theory and an application. Kluwer Acad emic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Balk BM (2001) Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change. J Prod Anal 15:159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW, Maindiratta A (1988) A comparison of DEA and translog estimates of production frontiers using simulated observations from a known technology. In: Dogramaci A, Färe R(eds) Applications of modern production theory: efficiency and productivity. Kluwer, New York, pp 33–55Google Scholar
  5. Burgess DF (1974) A cost minimization approach to import demand equations. Rev Econ Stat 56(2):224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caves R, Barton D (1990) Efficiency in U.S. manufacturing industries. MIT Press, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Caves DW, Christensen L, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan NWL, Mountain DC (1983) Economies of Scale and the Törnqvist Discrete Measure of Productivity Growth. Rev Econ Stat 70:663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic production function. Econometrica 39:255–256Google Scholar
  10. Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1973) Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev Econ Stat 60:28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diewert WE (1974) Applications of duality theory. In: Intrilligator MD, Kendrick DA (eds) Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, vol II. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp 106–171Google Scholar
  12. Diewert WE (1976) Exact and superlative index numbers. J Econometrics 4(2):115–146, and reprinted as Chapter 8 in Diewert and Nakamura (1993), 223–252Google Scholar
  13. Diewert WE, Fox KJ (2004) On the estimation of returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups. Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Discussion Paper, pp 04–09Google Scholar
  14. Diewert WE, Fox KJ (2005) Malmquist and Törnqvist productivity indexes: returns to scale and technical progress with imperfect competition. Center for Applied Economic Research Working Paper 2005/03, University of New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  15. Diewert WE, Lawrence D (2005) Australia’s productivity growth and the role of information and communications technology: 1960–2004. Report prepared by Meyrick and Associates for the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. Diewert WE, Nakajima T, Nakamura A, Nakamura E, Nakamura M (2007) also referred to as DN4, The Definition and estimation of returns to scale with an application to Japanese industries. In: Diewert WE, Balk BM, Fixler D, Fox KJ, Nakamura AO (eds) Price and productivity measurement, Trafford PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Diewert WE, Nakamura AO (1993) Essays in index number theory, vol I. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Diewert WE, Nakamura AO (2007) The measurement of productivity for nations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer EE (eds) Handbook of Econometrics, vol 6. Elsevier Science (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  19. Diewert WE (1999) Axiomatic and economic approaches to international comparisons. In: Heston A, Lipsey RE (eds) International and interarea comparisons of income, output and prices. Studies in Income and Wealth. vol 61. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 13–87Google Scholar
  20. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83Google Scholar
  21. Fisher I (1922) The making of index numbers. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Godfrey LG (1988) Misspecification tests in econometrics: the lagrange multiplier principle and other approaches. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.KGoogle Scholar
  23. Grosskopf S (2003) Some remarks on productivity and its decompositions. J Prod Anal 20:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall RE (1990) Invariance properties of Solow’s productivity residual. In: Diamond P (ed) Growth/Productivity/Employment. MIT Press, pp. 71–112Google Scholar
  25. Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. DecemberGoogle Scholar
  26. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jorgenson DW, Nishimizu M (1978) U.S. and Japanese economic growth, 1952–1974: an international comparison. Econ J 88: 707–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim JI, Lau LJ (1995) The sources of economic growth of the east Asian newly industrialized countries. J Jpn Int Econ 8:235–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuroda M, Kawai H, Shimpo K, Nomura K, Hikita K (2003) Structural change and productivity growth in Japan: 1960–2000. Paper presented at the Rieti-Keio conference on the Japanese economy, Tokyo, MayGoogle Scholar
  30. Lau L (2003) The impact of economic development of east Asia, including China, on Japan. Paper presented at the Rieti-Keio conference on the Japanese Economy, Tokyo, MayGoogle Scholar
  31. Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica 4:209–242Google Scholar
  32. Milana C (2005) The theory of exact and superlative index numbers revisited. EU KLEMS working paper number 3Google Scholar
  33. Morck R, Nakamura M (1999) Banks and corporate control in Japan. J Fin 54:319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morck R, Nakamura M, Shivsasani A (2000) Banks, ownership structure, and firm value in Japan. J Bus 73:539–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakajima T, Nakamura M, Yoshioka K (1998) An index number method for estimating scale economies and technical change using time-series of cross-section data: sources of total factor productivity growth for Japanese manufacturing, 1964–1988. Jpn Econ Rev 49:310–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakajima T, Nakamura M, Yoshioka K (2001) Economic growth: past and present. In: Nakamura M (ed) The Japanese business and economic system: history and prospects for the 21st century. Palgrave/MacMillan/St.Martin’s Press, New York, pp 13–40Google Scholar
  37. Nakamura A, Nakamura M (1981) On the relationships among several specification error tests presented by Durbin, Wu and Hausman. Econometrica 49:1583–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Park S-R, Kwon JK (1995) Rapid economic growth with increasing returns to scale and little or no productivity growth. Rev Econ Stat 77:332–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2001) Measuring productivity: measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Theil H (1965) The information approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 33:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Törnqvist L (1936) The bank of Finland’s consumption price index. Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin 10:23–55Google Scholar
  43. Tsurumi H, Wago H, Ilmakunnas P (1986) Gradual switching multivariate regression models with stochastic cross-equational constraints and an appllication to the KLEM translog production model. J Econ 31:235–253Google Scholar
  44. Yoshioka K, Nakajima T, Nakamura M (1994) Sources of total factor productivity, Keio Economic Observatory. Keio University, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takanobu Nakajima
    • 1
  • Alice Nakamura
    • 2
  • Emi Nakamura
    • 3
  • Masao Nakamura
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and CommerceKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Columbia Business School and Department of EconomicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Sauder School of BusinessUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Institute of Asian ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations