Empirica

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 171–188 | Cite as

How do middle-aged children allocate time and money transfers to their older parents in Europe?

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper analyses the determinants of financial and time transfers from adult children to their older parents using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). It is the first survey containing rich comparable interdisciplinary information about individuals aged 50+ from ten European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). The first part of the paper highlights the differences in the provision of upward private intergenerational transfers (in terms of both time and money) across the ten European countries. The second part describes the different determinants in the decision to provide time or money transfers to parents and evaluates whether these two types of assistance are substitutes or complements. Results highlight the existence of a substitution between time and money in relation to geographical distance and the existence of a weak substitution regarding the employment status of the middle-aged children.

Keywords

Informal care Private intergenerational transfers 

JEL Classification

J22 

References

  1. Arrondel L, Masson A (2001) Family transfers involving three generations. Scand J Econ 103(3):415–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assous L, Ralle P (2000) La prise en charge de la dépendance des personnes âgées: une comparaison internationale. Etudes et Résultats 74Google Scholar
  3. Carmichael F, Charles S (1998) The labour market costs of community care. J Health Econ 17:747–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox D (1987) Motives for private income transfers. J Polit Econ 95:508–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ettner S (1996) The opportunity costs of elder care. J Hum Resour 31(1):189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ioannides Y, Kan K (1999) The nature of two-directional intergenerational transfers of money and time: an empirical analysis. Tufts University Discussion Paper 99–17Google Scholar
  7. Jacobzone S (1999) Ageing and care for frail elderly persons: an overview of international perspectives. Series OECD Labour Market and Social Policy – Occasional Papers, No. 38. Paris, OECDGoogle Scholar
  8. McGarry K (1999) Inter vivos transfers and intended bequests. J Public Econ 73:321–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McGarry K, Schoeni RF (1995) Transfer behavior in the health and retirement study: measurement and the distribution of resources within the family. J Hum Resour 30:S184-S226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McGarry K (2006) Does caregiving affect work? Evidence based on prior labour force experience. In: Wise DA (ed) Health care issues in the United States and Japan. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Norton CN, Van Houtven CH (2006) Inter-vivos transfers and exchange. South Econ J 73(1):157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD (2005) The OECD health project: long-term care for older peopleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sloan FA, Zhang HH, Wang J (2002) Upstream intergenerational transfers. South Econ J 69(2):363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stern S (1995) Estimating family long-term care decisions in the presence of endogenous child characteristics. J Hum Resour 30(3):551–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wolf D, Soldo B (1994) Married women’s allocation of time to employment and parental care. J Hum Resour 29(4):1259–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zissimopoulos J (2001) Resource transfers to the elderly: do adult children substitute financial transfers for time transfers? RAND Working Paper 01–05Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREPP-Université de LiègeLiegeBelgium

Personalised recommendations