Impact of salinity on the grazing rate of a cladocera (Latonopsis australis) in a large tropical estuarine system

  • 62 Accesses


Cladocerans are ecologically important as active grazers at the secondary trophic level, and they are economically important in aquaculture as potential live feed for many commercially valuable fishes. This study deals with the effect of salinity on grazing of the rare cladocera Latonopsis australis. The experimental specimens were collected from the lower reaches of the Kochi backwaters, the largest estuarine system along the west coast of India, during the Pre-Southwest Monsoon (May 2015), and their cultures developed in the laboratory. Eight experimental salinity treatments (freshwater, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 salinity) with three life phases of the specimens (phase I: neonates with a developed digestive tract, phase II: adults carrying egg and phase III: adults carrying developing neonates) were carried out to measure their grazing rates. Two different approaches, namely individual-specific and biovolume-specific grazing measurements, were adopted in the study. The results showed a significant influence of salinity on the size and grazing rates of L. australis, irrespective of their life phases. Filtration and ingestion rates of the specimens also varied significantly between different life phases with the lowest rates in phase III. Irrespective of the life phases, grazing rates were the highest in freshwater conditions, which decreased to 25–84% in medium salinity (4–8) and 65–93% in high salinity (10–14). Further, the study demonstrated that size/biovolume/weight-based quantification of cladocera grazing provides a more precise method for the estimation of feeding rates compared to the individual-basic approach. This study emerges as the first attempt to quantify the grazing measurements of a cladocera from Indian waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7


  1. Achuthankutty, C. T., Shrivastava, Y., Mahambre, G. G., Goswami, S. C., & Madhupratap, M. (2000). Parthenogenetic reproduction of Diaphanosoma celebensis (Crustacea: Cladocera): Influence of salinity on feeding, survival, growth and neonate production. Marine Biology, 137, 19–22.

  2. Agasild, H., & Nuges, T. (2005). Cladoceran and rotifer grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in two shallow eutrophic lakes: In situ measurement with fluorescent microspheres. Journal of Plankton Research, 27, 1155–1174.

  3. Aka, M., Pagano, M., SaintJean, L., Arfi, R., Bouvy, M., Cecchi, P., Corbin, D., & Thomas, S. (2000). Zooplankton variability in 49 shallow tropical reservoirs of Ivory Coast (West Africa). International Review of Hydrobiology, 85, 491–504.

  4. Anjusha, A., Jyothibabu, R., Jagadeesan, L., Mohan, A. P., Sudheesh, K., Krishna, K., Ullas, N., & Deepak, M. P. (2013). Trophic efficiency of plankton food webs: Observations from the Gulf of Mannar and the Palk Bay, southeast coast of India. Journal of Marine Systems, 115, 40–61.

  5. Arunpandi, N., Jyothibabu, R., Jagadeesan, L., Gireeshkumar, T. R., Karnan, C., & Naqvi, S. A. (2017). Noctiluca and copepods grazing on the phytoplankton community in a nutrient-enriched coastal environment along the southwest coast of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 351.

  6. Bamstedt, U., Gifford, D. J., Irigoien, X., Atkinson, A., & Roman, M. (2000). Feeding. In R. P. Harris, P. H. Wiebe, J. Lenz, H. R. Skjoldal, & M. Huntley (Eds.), ICES zooplankton methodology manual. San Diego: Academic 684 pp.

  7. Bogdan, K. G., & Gilbert, J. J. (1987). Quantitative comparison of food niches in some freshwater zooplankton. Oecologia, 72, 331–340.

  8. Burns, C. W. (1968). The relationship between body size of filter feeding Cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnology and Oceanography, 13, 675–678.

  9. Egloff, D. A., Fofonoff, P. W., & Onbe, T. (1997). Reproductive biology of marine cladocerans. In Advances in marine biology (Vol. 31, pp. 79–167). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  10. Fernando, C. H. (2002). Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: Identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. In Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. Leiden: Backhuys.

  11. Frey, D. G. (1993). The penetration of cladocerans into saline waters. In Saline Lakes V (pp. 233–248). Berlin: Springer.

  12. Frost, B. W. (1972). Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnology and Oceanography, 17, 805–815.

  13. Halse, S. A., Shiel, R. J., & Williams, W. D. (1998). Aquatic invertebrates of Lake Gregory, northwestern Australia, in relation to salinity and ionic composition. Hydrobiologia, 381, 15–29.

  14. Haney, J. F. (1985). Regulation of cladoceran filtering rates in nature by body size, food concentration, and diel feeding patterns 1. Limnology and Oceanography, 30, 397–411.

  15. Haridas, P., Menon, P. G., & Madhupratap, M. (1980). Annual variations in zooplankton from a polluted coastal environment. Mahasagar, 13, 239–248.

  16. Haridevan, G., Jyothibabu, R., Arunpandi, N., Jagadeesan, L., & Biju, A. (2015). Influence of salinity on the life table demography of a rare Cladocera Latonopsis australis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 643.

  17. Hart, R. C., & Jarvis, A. C. (1993). In situ determinations of bacterial selectivity and filtration rates by five cladoceran zooplankters in a hypertrophic subtropical reservoir. Journal of Plankton Research, 15, 295–315.

  18. Jagadeesan, L., Jyothibabu, R., Arunpandi, N., & Parthasarathi, S. (2017). Copepod grazing and their impact on phytoplankton standing stock and production in a tropical coastal water during the different seasons. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 105.

  19. Jyothibabu, R., & Madhu, N. V. (2007). Zooplankton in the Mandovi and Zuari estuary. In S. R. Shyte, M. Dileepkumar, & D. Shankar (Eds.), Mandovi and Zuari estuaries (pp. 83–90).

  20. Kankaala, P. (1988). The relative importance of algae and bacteria as food for Daphnia longispina (Cladocera) in a polyhumic lake. Freshwater Biology, 19, 285–296.

  21. Lair, N. (1991). Grazing and assimilation rates of natural populations of planktonic cladocerans in a eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia, 215, 51–61.

  22. Lampert, W. (1987). Laboratory studies on zooplankton and cyanobacteria interactions. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 21, 483–490.

  23. Loureiro, C., Castro, B. B., Cuco, A. P., Pedrosa, M. A., & Gonsalves, F. (2013). Life-history responses of salinity-tolerant and salinity-sensitive lineages of a stenohaline cladoceran do not confirm clonal differentiation. Hydrobiologia, 702, 73–82.

  24. Madhupratap, M. (1981). Cladocera in the estuarine and coastal waters of south-west coast of India. Mahasagar, 14, 215–219.

  25. Madhupratap, M., & Haridas, P. (1975). Composition & Variations in the abundance of zooplankton of backwaters from Cochin to Alleppey. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 4, 77–85.

  26. Menon, N. R., Venugopal, P., & Goswami, S. C. (1971). Total biomass and faunistic composition of the zooplankton in the Cochin backwater. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 13, 220–225.

  27. Nandini, S., & Sarma, S. S. S. (2000). Life table demography of four cladoceran species in relation to algal food (Chlorella vulgaris) density. Hydrobiologia, 435, 117–126.

  28. Negrea, S. (1982). Revision des especes de Diaphanosoma (Cladocera, Sididae) de Roumanie et description de D. orghidani sp. n. Trav Mus hist nat Gr Antipa, 24, 29–43.

  29. Pagano, M. (2008). Feeding of tropical cladocerans (Moina micrura, Diaphanosoma excisum) and rotifer (Brachionus calyciflorus) on natural phytoplankton: Effect of phytoplankton size structure. Journal of Plankton Research, 30, 401–414.

  30. Pandian, T. J. (1994). In reproductive biology of invertebrates. Asexual propagation and reproductive strategies, 6, 40–166.

  31. Peters, R. H., & Downing, J. A. (1984). Empirical analysis of zooplankton filtering and feeding rates1. Limnology and Oceanography, 29, 763–784.

  32. Pollupuu M. (2010). Ecological relations of cladocerans in a brackish-water ecosystem. Dissertation.

  33. Raghunathan, M. B., & Suresh Kumar, R. (2002). Cladocera (Crustacea) of Tamil Nadu-checklist and bibliography. Zoos' Print Journal, 17, 959–961.

  34. Rivier, I. K. (1998). The predatory Cladocera (Onychopoda: Podonidae, Polyphemidae, Cercopagidae) and Leptodorida of the world. Guides to the identification of the micro-invertebrates of the continental waters of the world.

  35. Rothhaupt, K. (1990). Differences in particle size dependent feeding efficiencies of closely related rotifer species. Limnology and Oceanography, 35, 16–23.

  36. Sipuaba-Tavares, L. C. H., Truzzi, B. S., & Berchielli-Morais, F. V. d. A. (2014). Growth and development time of subtropical Cladocera Diaphanosoma birgei Korinek, 1981 fed with different microalgal diets. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74, 464–471.

  37. Sommer, U., Sommer, F., Santer, B., Jamieson, C., Boersma, M., Becker, C., & Hansen, T. (2001). Complementary impact of copepods and cladocerans on phytoplankton. Ecology Letters, 4, 545–550.

  38. UNESCO. (1994). Protocols for the joint Global Ocean flux study, manual and guides (Vol. 29, p. 170). Paris: UNESCO.

  39. Wallace, R. L., & Snell, T. W. (2001). Phylum Rotifera. In J. Thorpe & A. Covich (Eds.), Ecology and classification of north American freshwater invertebrates (2nd ed., pp. 195–254). San Diego: Academic.

Download references


The authors thank the Director, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (CSIR-NIO), India, for facilities and support. We thankfully acknowledge all of our colleges in National Institute of Oceanography, India, who helped in carrying out the field work. The first author acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST) for providing him DST-INSPIRE Fellowship (IF120804). This is NIO contribution 6487.

Author information

Correspondence to R. Jyothibabu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arunpandi, N., Jyothibabu, R., Jagadeesan, L. et al. Impact of salinity on the grazing rate of a cladocera (Latonopsis australis) in a large tropical estuarine system. Environ Monit Assess 192, 107 (2020) doi:10.1007/s10661-020-8068-x

Download citation


  • Cladocera
  • Latonopsis australis
  • Ingestion rate
  • Salinity
  • Kochi backwaters