Advertisement

Delineation of contaminated aquifers using integrated geophysical methods in Northeast Punjab, Pakistan

  • Muhammad HasanEmail author
  • Yanjun Shang
  • Gulraiz Akhter
  • Weijun Jin
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

A decline in surface water sources in Pakistan is continuously causing the over-extraction of groundwater resources which is in turn costing the saltwater intrusion in many areas of the country. The saltwater intrusion is a major problem in sustainable groundwater development. The application of electrical resistivity methods is one of the best known geophysical approaches in groundwater study. Considering the accuracy in extraction of freshwater resources, the use of resistivity methods is highly successful to delineate the fresh-saline aquifer boundary. An integrated geophysical study of VES and ERI methods was carried out through the analysis and interpretation of resistivity data using Schlumberger array. The main purpose of this investigation was to delineate the fresh/saline aquifer zones for exploitation and management of fresh water resources in the Upper Bari Doab, northeast Punjab, Pakistan. The results suggest that sudden drop in resistivity values caused by the solute salts indicates the saline aquifer, whereas high resistivity values above a specific range reveal the fresh water. However, the overlapping of fresh/saline aquifers caused by the formation resistivity was delineated through confident solutions of the D-Z parameters computed from the VES data. A four-layered unified model of the subsurface geologic formation was constrained by the calibration between formation resistivity and borehole lithologs. i.e., sand and gravel-sand containing fresh water, clay-sand with brackish water, and clay having saline water. The aquifer yield contained within the fresh/saline aquifers was measured by the hydraulic parameters. The fresh-saline interface demarcated by the resistivity methods was confirmed by the geochemical method and the local hydrogeological data. The proposed geophysical approach can delineate the fresh-saline boundary with 90% confidence in any homogeneous or heterogeneous aquifer system.

Keywords

Fresh water Saline water VES ERI Resistivity Upper Bari Doab 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge support received from Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing China, and Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR), Islamabad Pakistan, and Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), Pakistan.

Funding information

This research was sponsored by CAS-TWAS President’s Fellowship for International PhD Students and financially supported by the National Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation project (No. 2018FY10050003).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ABEM Instrument, AB. (2006). Terrameter SAS4000/SAS1000 LUND Imaging system, instruction manual.Google Scholar
  2. Adepelumi, A. A., Ako, B. D., Ajayi, T. R., Afolabi, O., & Omotoso, E. J. (2008). Delineation of saltwater intrusion into the freshwater aquifer of Lekki Peninsula, Lagos, Niger. Journal of Environmental Geology, 565, 927–933.Google Scholar
  3. Akhter, G., & Hasan, M. (2016). Determination of aquifer parameters using geoelectrical sounding and pumping test data in Khanewal District, Pakistan. Open Geosciences, 8, 630–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baharuddin, M. F. T., Talib, S., Hashim, R., Abidin, M. H. Z., & Ishak, M. F. (2011). Time-lapse resistivity investigation of salinity changes at an ex-promontory land: a case study of Carey Island, Selangor, Malaysia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180, 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhsh, A., & Awan, Q. A. (2002). Water issues in Pakistan and their remedies. In National Symposium on Drought and Water Resources in Pakistan 16 March (pp. 145–150). Lahore, Pakistan: CEWRE. University of Engineering and Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, P. M., & Reichard, E. G. (2010). Saltwater intrusion in coastal regions of North America. Hydrogeology Journal, 18, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer, P., Supper, R., Zimmermann, S., & Kinzelbach, W. (2006). Geoelectrical imaging of groundwater salinization in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 60, 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benabdelouahab, S., Salhi, A., Himi, M., Stitou el Messari, J. E., & Casas Ponsati, A. (2019). Geoelectrical investigations for aquifer characterization and geoenvironmental assessment in northern Morocco. Environment and Earth Science, 78, 209–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8221-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capaccionia, B., Diderob, M., Palettab, C., & Didero, L. (2005). Saline intrusion and re-freshening in a multilayer coastal aquifer in the Catania Plain (Sicily, Southern Italy): dynamics of degradation processes according to the hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 307, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardona, A., Carrillo-Rivera, J. J., Huizar, A., Ivarez, R., & Graniel-Castro, E. (2004). Salinization in coastal aquifers of arid zones: an example from Santo Domingo, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Environmental Geology, 45, 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao, Q., Shang, Y., Hasan, M., Jin, W., & Yang, P. (2018). Evaluation of a weathered rock aquifer using ERT method in South Guangdong, China. Water, 10, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haq, A. U. (2002). Drought Mitigation interventions by improved water management: a case study from Punjab-Pakistan. In In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, Montreal, Canada (pp. 21–28) July.Google Scholar
  13. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Jin, W., & Akhter, G. (2019a). Investigation of fractured rock aquifer in South China using electrical resistivity tomography and self-potential methods. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(4), 850–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., & Jin, W. (2018c). Delineation of weathered/fracture zones for aquifer potential using an integrated geophysical approach: a case study from South China. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 157, 47–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.06.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Akhter, G., & Jin, W. (2017a). Geophysical assessment of groundwater potential: a case study from MianChannu area, Pakistan. Groundwater, 56, 783–796.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Akhter, G., & Jin, W. (2018a). Delineation of saline-water intrusion using surface geoelectrical method in Jahanian area, Pakistan. Water, 10, 1548.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Akhter, G., & Jin, W. (2018b). Evaluation of groundwater potential in Kabirwala area, Pakistan: a case study by using geophysical, geochemical and pump data. Geophysical Prospecting, 66, 1737–1750.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Akhter, G., & Jin, W. (2019b). Application of VES and ERT for delineation of fresh-saline interface in alluvial aquifers of Lower Bari Doab. Pakistan. Journal of Applied Geophysics., 164, 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasan, M., Shang, Y., Akhter, G., & Khan, M. (2017b). Geophysical Investigation of fresh-saline water interface: a case study from South Punjab, Pakistan. Groundwater, 55, 841–856.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodlur, G. K., Dhakate, R., & Andrade, R. (2006). Correlation of vertical electrical sounding and borehole-log data for delineation of saltwater and freshwater aquifers. Geophysics, 7, G11–G20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Irrigation and Power Department (I&P). (2005). A report on groundwater monitoring network of the directorate of land reclamation, Punjab. Pakistan: Lahore.Google Scholar
  22. Khwaja, A. R., Singh, R., & Tandon, S. N. (2001). Monitoring of Ganga water and sediments vis-a-vis tannery pollution at Kanpur (India): a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 68(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kouzana, L., Benassi, R., Ben Mammou, A., & Felfoul, M. S. (2010). Geophysical and hydrochemical study of the seawater intrusion in Mediterranean semi arid zones. Case of the Korba coastal aquifer Cap-Bon, Tunisia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 582, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar, V. S., Dhakate, R., Amarender, B., & Sankaran, S. (2016). Application of ERT and GPR for demarcating the saline water intrusion in coastal aquifers of Southern India. Environment and Earth Science, 75, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kura, N. U., Ramli, M. F., Ibrahim, S., Sulaiman, W. N., & Aris, A. Z. (2014). An integrated assessment of seawater intrusion in a small tropical island using geophysical, geochemical, and geostatistical techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 7047–7064.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2598-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leghouchi, E., Laib, E., & Guerbet, M. (2009). Evaluation of chromium contamination in water, sediment and vegetation caused by the tannery of Jijel (Algeria): a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 153(1-4), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, P., Wu, J., & Qian, H. (2013). Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation purposes and identification of hydrogeochemical evolution mechanisms in Pengyang County. China Environ Earth Sci, 69, 2211–2225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2049-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loke, M. H., Acworth, I., & Dahlin, T. (2003). A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion method in 2D electrical tomography surveys. Exploration Geophysics, 34, 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mario, Z., Joan, B., Rogelio, L., & Xavier, M. P. (2011). Electrical methods (VES and ERT) for identifying, mapping and monitoring different salinedomains in a coastal plain region (Alt Emporda, Northern Spain). Journal of Hydrology, 409, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masoumi, M., Mahmudy Gharaie, M. H., & Ahmadzadeh, H. (2019). Assessment of groundwater quality for the irrigation of melon farms: a comparison between two arable plains in northeastern Iran. Environment and Earth Science, 78, 214–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8187-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock (MINFAL). (2008). Agricultural statistics of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Government of Pakistan (Economic Wing).Google Scholar
  33. Mondal, N. C., & Singh, V. P. (2012). Chloride migration in groundwater for a tannery belt in Southern India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(5), 2857–2879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mondal, N. C., Singh, V. P., Singh, S., & Singh, V. S. (2011). Hydrochemical characteristic of coastal aquifer from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175(1-4), 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2010-11. In Statistics Division Government of Pakistan. Islamabad: Statics House, 21-Mauve area, G-9/1.Google Scholar
  36. Post, V. E. A. (2005). Fresh and saline groundwater interaction in coastal aquifers: Is our technology ready for the problems ahead. Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qureshi, A. L., Lashari, B. K., Kori, S. M., & Lashari, G. A. (2011). Hydro-salinity behaviour of shallow groundwater. In Paper presented at the Fifteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC-15. Alexandria: Egypt.Google Scholar
  38. Rasool, A., Xiao, T., Baig, Z. T., Masood, S., Mostofa, K. M. G., & Iqbal, M. (2015). Co-occurrence of arsenic and fluoride in the groundwater of Punjab, Pakistan: source discrimination and health risk assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(13), 13578–13580.Google Scholar
  39. Saeed, M. M. (2008). Skimming Wells. Islamabad, Pakistan: Higher education commission.Google Scholar
  40. Simyrdanis, K., Papadopoulos, N., Soupios, P., Kirkou, S., & Tsourlos, P. (2018). Characterization and monitoring of subsurface contamination from Olive Oil Mills’ waste waters using electrical resistivity tomography. Science of the Total Environment, 637-638, 991–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh, U. K., Das, R. K., & Hodlur, G. K. (2004). Significance of Dar-Zarrouk parameters in the exploration of quality affected coastal aquifer systems. Environmental Geology, 455, 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Son, Y. (2011). Assessment of concentration in contaminated soil by potentially toxic elements using electrical properties. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soupios, P. M., Kouli, M., Vallianatos, F., Vafidis, A., & Stavroulakis, G. (2007). Estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters from surficial geophysical methods: a case study of Keritis Basin in Chania (Crete–Greece). Journal of Hydrology, 338, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (1980). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Water and Power Development Authority (Pakistan). (1978). Hydro geological data of Lower Bari Doab. V, 01.Google Scholar
  46. Water and Power Development Authority (Pakistan). (1980). Hydro geological data of Lower Bari Doab. V, 01, 1.Google Scholar
  47. Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA). (1989). Annual reports 1988-89. Lahore, 21–98.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson, S. R., Ingham, M., & Mcconchie, J. A. (2006). The ability of earth resistivity methods for saline interface definition. Journal of Hydrology, 316, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2011). Annual report 2011, year in review. In 1818 Washington DC (p. 20433). isbn:9780821388280.Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization (WHO). (2008). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. In Recommendations Incorporating1ST and 2nd Addenda (Vol. Volume 1, 3rd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institutions of Earth ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingP.R. China
  5. 5.Department of Earth SciencesQuaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations