Geographical mapping and modelling of noise pollution from industrial motors: a case study of the Mbalmayo Thermal Power Plant in Cameroon

  • J. C. SeutcheEmail author
  • J. L. NsouandéléEmail author
  • Njingti-NforEmail author
  • J. G. Tamba
  • B. Bonoma


To be able to geographically map, model and evaluate noisy sound emissions from industrial motors, emphases have been laid on various phenomena linked to the propagation of sound waves and their effects on the environment. The failure to respect factory-servicing norms coupled with the depreciation of parts of an industrial motor lead to additional sound production, which due to an accumulation in acoustic power and pressure levels contributes to environmental noise pollution. In this work, a study has been carried out on environmental noise pollution from a thermal power plant in Cameroon, using empirical, diagrammatic, analytical and noise map elaboration methods, with the aim of proposing an optimal protection of the surroundings of the thermal plant from the noise pollution. The results obtained show a similarity in propagation of acoustic pressure and power levels for the different types of frequencies considered. Besides these, the study has revealed that the inhabitants are exposed to sound levels higher than the upper limit of 50 dB and above the alert threshold level of 80 dB. At the geo-localized motors of the plant, the primary sources of acoustic power levels were found to fall within the range from 60 to 98 dB, which is very close to the acoustic pressure levels of between 60 and 95 dB. Due to dispersion of sound, the acoustic power levels are also felt at different points around the plant, considered here as secondary sources. From a general point of view, the observed distribution of the iso-sound contours from the collected data and their general NE-SW orientations show the development of new sources due to cumulative effects and superposition of sound waves at regular intervals. At the same time, the acoustic power and pressure levels have been found to be higher than 80 dB, which is the threshold value for human hearing. This therefore is considered detrimental to human health and wellbeing, provoking the need for a more profound investigation on the existing correlation between levels of sound due to stationary sources and frequency in a high sound medium and elaborating a strategic noise map for the town of Mbalmayo and its environs.


Frequency Mapping Noise pollution Power Pressure Sound 



The authors wish to express their gratitude to ENEO who permit them to take a collect data within the Mbalmayo Thermal Power Plant.


  1. Andéol, G., et al. (2010). Localisation sonore et capacité d'analyse spectrale de l'auditeur. In Lyon: CEDEX F-13402 (p. 65).Google Scholar
  2. Canetto, P., & Geneviève, J. (2007). Technique de réduction du bruit en entreprise. Montpellier: INRS.Google Scholar
  3. Cetin, M. A. (2015a). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 10.
  4. Cetin M. b. (2015b). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 5, 420 – 424.
  5. Cetin, M. a. (2016a). Sustainability of urban coastal area management: a case study on Cide. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(7), 527–541. Scholar
  6. Cetin, M., et al. (2018). A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190(3):167
  7. Costa, S. B., & Lourenço, R. W. (2011). Geoprocessing applied to the assessment of environmental noise: a case study in the city of Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 172, 329–337. Scholar
  8. CSTC. (2001). Acoustique Environnementale Chap02: Mesurage du bruit de l’environnement (p. 53). C.S construction.Google Scholar
  9. CSTC. (2004). Acoustique environnementale. Chapitre 02.1: Mesurage du bruit de l’environnement (p53). BRUXELLES: GEMBLOUX.Google Scholar
  10. CSTC. (2006). Acoustique environnementale, Chap7 : Bruit des installations techniques (p. 111). Bruxelles: GEMBLOUX. Université de Liège,: C.S. construction.Google Scholar
  11. Dauchez, N., & Al. (2010). Optimisation Acoustique de paroi par Algorithme génétique et influence de l'habillage par une couche poreuse. Congrès Francais D'acoustique, vol, 12-16, 5.Google Scholar
  12. Delprat, N., et al. (1992). Asymptotic wave let and gabor analysis: extract of instantaneous frequency. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 32(2), 644–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis A. Bohn (1988). Environmental effects on the speed of sound. Rane Corporation, Mukilteo, WA 98275 USA. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 36, No. 4.Google Scholar
  14. Directive, E. N. (2002). Directive 2002/49/EC of the European parliament and of the Cuncil of 25june 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Paris: Ministere de l'environnement.Google Scholar
  15. Golden Software. (2015). Surface Mapping System Version. London: Brevet n° Version 13.0.383 GoldenGoogle Scholar
  16. Grigolato, S. (2018). Assessment of noise level and noise propagation generated by light-lift helicopters in mountain natural environments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.,15.
  17. IEC1260. (1995). Electroacoustics- octave band and fractional-octave-band filters. LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. IS0 3744. (1994). Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure Engineering method in an essentially free field over a reflecting plane. BRUXELLES: GEMBLOUX.Google Scholar
  19. Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ISO/DIS. 9613-2.2. (1994). Acoustics-attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, part 2: general method of calculationGoogle Scholar
  21. ISO8297. (1994). Acoustics: détermination of sound power levels of multisource industrial plants for the evaluation of sound-pressure levels in the environment- Engineering methodGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaya, E., et al. (2018). Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: An International Journal, 11. Scholar
  23. Khanindra, P. A. T. H. A. K. (1996). These, modelling and prediction of environmental noise levels near mechanised surface mines and quarries. London: Imperial university of London college of science Technology and medicine, Department of earth resources engineering.Google Scholar
  24. Khuraibet, A. M., & Al-Attar, F. (2000). Preliminary assessment of indoor industrial noise pollution in Kuwait. The Environmentalist, 20(319), 320–334. Scholar
  25. Lamancusa, J. S. (2009). Outdoor sound propagation Inside (p. 19). Penn State: Wiley Interscience,NOISE CONTROL.Google Scholar
  26. Nikola Lilic and et al. (2018). Dust and noise environmental impact assessment and control in Serbian mining practice. Minerals doi:10.3390/min8020034, vol 8, pages 34.Google Scholar
  27. Owens C. (2004). Noise control Dising Guide. U.S.A. TOLEDO: OHIO PARKWAY 1-800-GET-PINKGoogle Scholar
  28. PATHAK, K., et al. (1999). Activity accounting technique for environmental noise assessment in mechanized surface mining. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 56, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R.O.F.E (2011). World Health Organization, Burden of disease from environmental noise,World Health Organization, Bonn, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. S.F.A. (2010). Méthode acoustique et caractérisation expérimentale des champs sonores Traitement du signal en acoustique. France: SFA (Societe Francaise de l'Acoustique) Le livre blanc de l’acoustique.Google Scholar
  31. Tao, Z., & al. (2019). Assessment of ventilation noise impact from metro depot with over-track platform structure on workers and nearby inhabitants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(9), 9203–9218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tonin, R. (1993). Computer methods and software for simulating environmental pollution and its averse effects. In P. Zannetti (Ed.), Elsvier Applied Science Environmental Noise Modelling (Vol. 1).Google Scholar
  33. Trikootam, C. S., & Hornikx, M. (2019). The wind effect on sound propagation over urban areas: Experimental approach with an uncontrolled sound source. Building and Environment 149:561-570Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2004). Description of model formulation. NC, USA : U.S. Environmental, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division: Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  35. Vignes, P. (2016). Directive Eropéenne n°2002/49/CE. Plan de prevention du bruit dans l'environoment. Versaille: Bureau de l'Amenagement du territoire.Google Scholar
  36. Wenmaekers, R. H. C. (2014). The effective air absorption coefficient for predicting reverberation time in full octave bands. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 136(N°6), 3063–3071. Scholar
  37. Wenmaekers, R. H. C., & al. (2008). Air absorption error in room acoustical modeling. Eindhoven University of Technolog (p. 11). Paris: Euronoise. France.Google Scholar
  38. William, J., & al. (2013). Perception of soundscapes: aAn interdisciplinary approach. Applied Acoustics, 224–231(74), 8 pages.Google Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (WHO). (1999). Guidelines for comunity noise. In Edited by Birgitta Berghund. Thomas Lindvall: Dietrich H. Schela Scholar
  40. Yucedag, C., & al. (2018). Identifying and assessing environmental awareness of hotel and restaurant employees' attitudes in the Amasra District of Bartin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 8.Google Scholar
  41. Zare Sakhvidi, F., et al. (2018). Environmental noise exposure and neurodevelopmental and mental health problems in children: a systematic review. Journal of Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 365–380. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy, Electrical and Electronic System Laboratory, Research and Training Unit of PhysicsUniversity of Yaoundé I- CameroonYaoundéCameroon
  2. 2.Laboratory of Applied Physics, Department of Physics, Higher Teacher Training College YaoundeUniversity of Yaounde I - CameroonYaoundéCameroon
  3. 3.National Advanced School of Engineering MarouaUniversity of Maroua – CameroonMarouaCameroon
  4. 4.Department of Thermal Engineering and Energy, Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Douala - CameroonDoualaCameroon

Personalised recommendations