Green supplier evaluation with SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors
- 63 Downloads
One of the most important agendas of the world is the topic of global warming. In order to protect the ecological balance, all organizations turning towards using natural resources more effectively and not harming the environment. Increasing social expectation, legal regulations, and diminishing natural resources necessitate the dissemination of these orientations in all areas. Enterprises’ supply chain management applications are also affected by this situation, and the concept of green supply chain management which reflects the environmentalist perspective has emerged. One of the most important stages of this chain is to find suppliers who care about the environment. Choosing a green supplier is of great importance for both the business and the environment. In this study, 11 environmental criteria were defined for green supplier evaluation and SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method was used to determine the most suitable supplier. Furthermore, a case study for an international yachting company operating in Turkey was also presented in this study. Based on the results of the study, it was seen that supplier 2 was the most suitable among five prominent alternative suppliers, and “environmental management system”, “senior management’s support and commitment”, and “green image” criteria were ranked as the top three criteria among the 11 determined criteria.
KeywordsEcological risk Green supplier MCDM SWARA TOPSIS
- Büyüközkan, G., & Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). Yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi. Lojistik Dergisi, 8, 66–73.Google Scholar
- Chiou, C. Y., Hsu, C. W., & Hwang, W. Y. (2008). Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1909–1914). New Jersey: IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- COMEAP. (2010). The mortality effects of long-term exposure to particulate air pollution in the United Kingdom, a report by the committee on the medical effects of air pollutants.Google Scholar
- Deshmukh, S., & Sunnapwar, V. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for green supplier selection in Indian industries. In In Proceedings of the international conference on Advanced Engineering Optimization through Intelligent Techniques. Surat: SVNIT.Google Scholar
- Hsu, C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2007). Application of analytic network process on supplier selection to hazardous substance management in green supply chain management. In In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1362–1368). New Jersey: IEEE.Google Scholar
- IMEAK DenizTicareti, (2017). Rakamlarla denizcilik sektörü ve istatistikler. İstanbul: IMEAK.Google Scholar
- İBB Gemi ve Yat İhracatçıları Birliği (2018). Gemi ve Yat İhracat Değerlendirmesi. http://www.iib.org.tr/files/downloads/raporlar/2018/ocak/gemi_ocak2018.pdf. .
- Kumar, A., & Jain, V. (2010). Supplier selection: a green approach with carbon footprint monitoring. In In 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information (pp. 1–8). New Jersey: IEEE.Google Scholar
- Lamprecht, J. L. (1997). ISO 14001: Issues and Implementation Guidelines for Responsible Management. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
- Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Aryee, M., et al. (2012). A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 216–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mavi, R. K., Kazemi, S., Najafabadi, A. F., & Mousaabadi, H. B. (2013). Identification and assessment of logistical factors to evaluate a green supplier using the fuzzy logic DEMATEL method. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(2), 445–455.Google Scholar
- P&G. (2018). Environmental sustainability. https://www.pg.com/citizenship2018/static/PDF/pg_citizenship_report_2018_environmental_sustainability.pdf. .
- Pang, Q., Yang, T., Li, M., & Shen, Y. (2017). A fuzzy-grey multicriteria decision making approach for green supplier selection in low-carbon supply chain. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017.Google Scholar
- REC Türkiye. (2011). Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi. Yeşil alım! Yeşil satın alım el kitabı. https://rec.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ysa_elkitabi_low.pdf. .
- Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(2), 181–187.Google Scholar
- The Royal Society. (2017). Climate updates - report references document. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/Publications/2017/27-11-2017-Climate-change-updates-report-references-document.pdf. .
- Um, W. S. (2016). Supplier evaluation and selection using AHP method and uncertainty theory. In In Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering (pp. 22–23).Google Scholar
- Vishnu, V. A., Babu, J., & George, B. (2018). Green supplier selection using hybrid grey relational analysis with fuzzy logic method. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 396, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing Bristol, United Kingdom.Google Scholar