Advertisement

Stripping traditionally productive Calcisols for tandir oven manufacturing in Diyarbakır, a semi-arid region in SE Turkey

  • Yakup Kenan KocaEmail author
Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

There is a close connection between human history and different purposes for which land is used, and various purposes can lead to the loss of productive agricultural lands. The increasing population in recent decades has particularly increased the pressure on agricultural lands. Despite the large number of land/soil misuse studies conducted during this period, land/soil loss is a continuing process. We thus seek to highlight the land/soil loss caused by the use of soil materials for the construction of tandır ovens in Diyarbakır region. The use of traditional tandır ovens is particularly widespread in eastern and northeastern rural Anatolia of Turkey, for baking bread. Because the soil material used in the production of this oven does not have any production standards, tandır oven producers extract their material from the nearest available lands that are mostly productive. Consequently, this study was conducted by collecting samples from soil materials used in the production of tandır ovens to determine their agricultural productivity. Satellite imagery from different dates was also used to detect the effects of inappropriate soil extraction. A number of interviews were conducted to obtain information on the type of soils extracted for production. Laboratory analyses of samples collected from the extracted areas revealed that soils’ utilized for oven production physical and chemical properties, as well as their land characteristics (flatness, depth, and stoniness), were appropriate for crop production. Consequently, these results point to accelerated future soil degradation which will threat regions food production.

Keywords

Misuse of soil Soil losses Tandır oven Degradation Diyarbakır 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Most of the producers engaged in tandır oven are Kurdish women who do not speak Turkish; thus, in this respect, I would like to thank Deniz Azra Tamer, one of the students of the Faculty of Agriculture, Dicle University, for interpreting for the tandır oven producers.

References

  1. Acartürk, B. (2012). Thousand years of clay. Journal of Acta Turcica, IV, 1.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, L. E. (1965). Organic carbon in methods of soil analysis. In: Black CA (ed) American Soc. Agron. Mon., 9, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (2018). MTA official website; http://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/bilgi-merkezi/tugla-kiremit. Accessed 6 Jan 2019.
  4. Bouyoucus, G. J. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agricultural Journal, 43, 434–438.Google Scholar
  5. Cilek, A. (2016). Soil organic carbon losses by water erosion in a Mediterranean watershed. Soil Research, 55(4), 363-375Google Scholar
  6. FAO. (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106, FAO, Rome. 203 p.Google Scholar
  7. Güzel, N., & Gülüt, K. Y. (2010). The nature and properties of soils. Published by University of Cukurova, General Public No: 289, Adana.Google Scholar
  8. Kapur, S., Akça, E., & Günal, H. (2018) The soils of Turkey. World Soils Book Series. ISBN 978-3-319-64390-8, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham.Google Scholar
  9. Lindsay, W. L., & Norwell, W. A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe, Mn and Cd. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 42, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maesen, L. J. G. (1984). Taxonomy, distribution and evolution of the chickpea and its wild relatives. In J. R. Witcombe & W. Erskine (Eds.), Genetic resources and their exploitation-chickpeas, faba beans and lentils. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.Google Scholar
  11. Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanable, F. S., & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Agric. Cir. 939.Google Scholar
  12. Pratt, P. F. (1965). Methods of soil analysis. In: Black CA (ed). Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, Series No: 9. Madison: Amer. Soc. Agr. Inc. Pub. Agron.Google Scholar
  13. Sarıbıyık, M. (2018). University of Sakarya, Department of Construction Engineering, Unpublished lecturer notes.Google Scholar
  14. Schlichting, E., & Blume, E. (1966). Bodenkundliches Praktikum. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin. Kartoniert: Preis.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. In L. A. Richards (Ed.), USDA agriculture handbook. No: 60. Washington, D.C.: US. Government Print Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science and Plant NutritionDicle UniversityDiyarbakırTurkey

Personalised recommendations