Advertisement

Numerical simulation to assess potential groundwater recharge and net groundwater use in a semi-arid region

  • Ch. Jyotiprava Dash
  • A. Sarangi
  • D. K. Singh
  • P. P. AdhikaryEmail author
Article

Abstract

Accurate assessment of deep percolation (potential groundwater recharge) under different field crops is essential for sustainable management of scarce water resources and proper planning of crop rotation in irrigated, semi-arid regions of the world. The potential recharge from commonly grown field crops in semi-arid Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) of India was estimated using HYDRUS-1D model, where, irrigation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture dynamics were simulated. Simultaneously, net groundwater use by different cropping patterns was also calculated. Among the hydraulic parameters, n was found most sensitive for water percolation. During rainy season, 293.8 and 159.1 mm water was percolated below the root zone of cotton and soybean, respectively, which accounted for 39.4 and 32.9% of the water input. During winter season, 66.8 and 30.3 mm water was percolated below the root zone of winter maize and mustard, respectively, accounting for 20.5 and 10.6% of added water. It was observed that net groundwater use was positive for cotton, soybean, and summer maize with the values of 168.8, 159.1, and 18.0 mm year−1, respectively, and negative for rice, wheat, winter maize, and mustard. For the eight most important cropping patterns of semi-arid IGP, the net groundwater use was negative and varied between − 4.4 mm year−1 for cotton-maize and −423 mm year−1 for rice-wheat. With these cropping patterns, the overall rate of decline of groundwater was 231 mm year−1. It was found that maize-wheat and soybean-wheat cropping patterns consume much less water than rice-wheat cropping pattern and therefore are suitable to arrest the declining trend of groundwater in semi-arid IGP of India.

Keywords

HYDRUS-1D Irrigation Moisture dynamics Net groundwater use Potential recharge Root zone Water flux 

Notes

References

  1. Ahmed, M., Chakraborty, D., Aggarwal, P., Bhattacharyya, R., & Singh, R. (2018). Modeling soil water dynamics and crop water use in a soybean-wheat rotation under chisel tillage in a sandy clay loam soil. Geoderma, 327, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., & Raes, D. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  3. Beyene, A., Cornelis, W., Verhoest, N. E. C., Tilahun, S., Alamirew, T., Adgo, E., Pue, J. D., & Nyssen, J. (2018). Estimating the actual evapotranspiration and deep percolation in irrigated soils of a tropical floodplain, northwest Ethiopia. Agric Water Manag, 202, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I physical and mineralogical properties. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  5. CGWB. (2016). Aquifer mapping and groundwater management plan of NCT Delhi (p. 163). New Delhi: Central Ground Water Board, State Unit Office.Google Scholar
  6. Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., Singh, D. K., Singh, A. K., & Adhikary, P. P. (2015). Prediction of root zone water and nitrogen balance in an irrigated rice field using a simulation model. Paddy Water Environ, 13, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., Adhikary, P. P., & Singh, D. K. (2016a). Soil water budgeting approach to quantify potential groundwater recharge from croplands and groundwater use in a semi-arid region. Environ Earth Sci, 75(853).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5620-7.
  8. Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., Adhikary, P. P., & Singh, D. K. (2016b). Simulation of nitrate leaching under maize-wheat cropping system in a semiarid irrigated area of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, India. J Irrig Drain Eng (ASCE), 142(2), 04015053.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugas, W. A. (1989). Plant spacing effects on net irradiance extinction in cotton. Theor Appl Climatol, 40, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J., & Zaradny, H. (1978). Simulation of field water use and crop yield. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Flenet, F., Kiniry, J. R., Board, J. E., Westgate, M. E., & Reicosky, D. C. (1996). Row spacing effects on light extinction coefficients of corn, sorghum, soybean and sunflower. Agron J, 88, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013. World Food and Agriculture, 289.Google Scholar
  13. Forkutsa, I., Sommer, R., Shirokova, Y. I., Lamers, J. P. A., Kienzler, K., Tischbein, B., Martius, C., & Vlek, P. L. G. (2009). Modeling irrigated cotton with shallow groundwater in the Aral Sea basin of Uzbekistan: I. Water dynamics. Irrig Sci, 27(4), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, S. S. D., & Chilton, P. J. (2003). Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci, 358, 1957–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han, M., Zhao, C., Šimůnek, J., & Feng, G. (2015). Evaluating the impact of groundwater on cotton growth and root zone water balance using HYDRUS-1D coupled with a crop growth model. Agric Water Manag, 160, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, K., Li, B., Chen, D., Zhang, Y., & Edis, R. (2008). Simulation of nitrate leaching under irrigated maize on sandy soil in desert oasis in inner magnolia, China. Agri Water Manag, 95, 1180–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huo, S., Menggui, J., Liang, X., & Lin, D. (2014). Changes of vertical groundwater recharge with increase in thickness of vadose zone simulated by one-dimensional variably saturated flow model. J Earth Sci, 25(6), 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jalota, S. K., & Arora, V. K. (2002). Model-based assessment of water balance components under different cropping systems in north-west India. Agri Water Manag, 57(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jimenez-Martinez, J., van Genuchten, M. T., & Candela, L. (2009). A root zone modelling approach to estimating groundwater recharge from irrigated areas. J Hydrol, 367, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kar, G., Kumar, A., & Martha, M. (2007). Water use efficiency and crop coefficient of dry season oil seed. Agric Water Manag, 87, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kendy, E., Gérard-Marchant, P., Walter, M. T., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., & Steenhuis, T. S. (2003). A soil water-balance approach to quantify groundwater recharge from irrigated cropland in the North China Plain. Hydrol Proc, 17, 2011–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Coz, M., Favreau, G., & Ousmane, S. D. (2013). Modeling increased groundwater recharge due to change from rainfed to irrigated cropping in a semiarid region. Vadose Zone J, 12(2), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenka, S., Singh, A. K., & Lenka, N. K. (2009). Water and nitrogen interaction on soil profile water extraction and ET in maize-wheat cropping system. Agric Water Manag, 96(2), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leterme, B., Mallants, D., & Jacques, D. (2012). Sensitivity of groundwater recharges using climatic analogues and HYDRUS-1D. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 16, 2485–2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindquist, J. L., Arkebauer, T. J., Walters, D. T., Cassman, K. G., & Dobermann, A. (2005). Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agron J, 97, 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu, X., Jin, M., van Genuchten, M. T., & Wang, B. (2011). Ground water recharge at five representative sites in the Hebei Plain of China: case study. Ground Water, 49(2), 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marechal, J. C., Dewandel, B., Ahmed, S., Galeazzi, L., & Zaidi, F. K. (2006). Combined estimation of specific yield and natural recharge in a semi-arid groundwater basin with irrigated agriculture. J Hydrol, 329, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohan, S., Arumugam, N. (1994) Crop coefficients of major crops in South India. Agricultural Water Management 26(1–2):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol, 10(3), 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Connell, M. G., O’Leary, G. J., Whitfield, D. M., & Connor, D. J. (2004). Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Res, 85, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pachepsky, Y. A., Smettem, K. R. J., Vanderborght, J., Herbst, M., Vereecken, H., & Wosten, J. H. M. (2004). Reality and fiction of models and data in soil hydrology. In R. A. Feddes et al. (Eds.), Unsaturated zone modeling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Patel, N., & Rajput, T. B. S. (2008). Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agric Water Manag, 95, 1335–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patil, N. G., Tiwari, P., Bhattayachaarya, T., & Nair, K. M. (2014). Natural resources of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: a land use planning perspective. Curr Sci, 107, 1537–1549.Google Scholar
  34. Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2009). Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature, 460, 999–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.08238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rushton, K. R., Eilers, V. H. M., & Carter, R. C. (2006). Improved soil moisture balance methodology for recharge estimation. J Hydrol, 318, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saâdi, M., Zghibi, A., & Kanzari, S. (2018). Modeling interactions between saturated and un-saturated zones by Hydrus-1D in semi-arid regions (plain of Kairouan, Central Tunisia). Environ Monit Assess, 190(170).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6544-3.
  37. Safriel, U., & Adeel, Z. (2005). Dryland systems. In R. Hassan et al. (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being, current state and trends (Vol. 1, pp. 625–658). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  38. Scanlon, B. R., Healy, R. W., & Cook, P. G. (2002). Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J, 10, 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scanlon, B., Keese, K., Reedy, R. C., Simunek, J., & Andraski, B. J. (2003). Variations in flow and transport in thick desert vadose zones in response to paleoclimatic forcing (0–90 kyr): monitoring, modeling, and uncertainties. Water Resour Res, 39(7), 1179.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seiler, K. P., & Gat, J. (2007). Groundwater recharge from run-off, infiltration and percolation. Water Sci Technol Li (Vol. 55). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siebert, S., Henrich, V., Frenken, K., & Burke, J. (2013) Update of the digital global map of irrigation areas to version 5. Rheinische FriedrichWilhelms-Universitat, Bonn, Germany and FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 170.Google Scholar
  42. Šimunek, J. (2015). Estimating groundwater recharge using HYDRUS 1D. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Eng Geol Hydrogeol, 29, 25–36.Google Scholar
  43. Šimunek, J., van Genuchten, M. T., & Šejna, M. (2009). The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variability saturated media. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  44. Tafteh, A., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2012). Application of HYDRUS-1D model for simulating water and nitrate leaching from continuous and alternate furrow irrigated rapeseed and maize fields. Agric Water Manag, 113, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tyagi, N. K., Sharma, D. K., & Luthra, S. K. (2003). Determination of evapotranspiration for maize and berseem clover. Irrig Sci, 21, 173–181.Google Scholar
  46. Van Genuchten, M. T. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 44(5), 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang, X., Chen, Y., Pacenka, S., Gao, W., Zhang, M., Sui, P., & Steenhuis, T. S. (2015). Recharge and groundwater use in the north China plain for six irrigated crops for an eleven year period. PLOS ONE, 10(1), e0115269.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu, G. R., Zhuang, J., Nakayama, K., & Yan, J. (2007). Root water uptake and profile soil water as affected by vertical root distribution. Plant Ecol, 189, 15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9163-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeng, W. Z., Xu, C., Wu, J. W., & Huang, J. S. (2014). Soil salt leaching under different irrigation regimes: HYDRUS-1D modelling and analysis. J Arid Land, 6(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water ConservationKoraputIndia
  2. 2.Water Technology CentreICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, PUSANew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations