Numerical simulation to assess potential groundwater recharge and net groundwater use in a semi-arid region
Accurate assessment of deep percolation (potential groundwater recharge) under different field crops is essential for sustainable management of scarce water resources and proper planning of crop rotation in irrigated, semi-arid regions of the world. The potential recharge from commonly grown field crops in semi-arid Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) of India was estimated using HYDRUS-1D model, where, irrigation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture dynamics were simulated. Simultaneously, net groundwater use by different cropping patterns was also calculated. Among the hydraulic parameters, n was found most sensitive for water percolation. During rainy season, 293.8 and 159.1 mm water was percolated below the root zone of cotton and soybean, respectively, which accounted for 39.4 and 32.9% of the water input. During winter season, 66.8 and 30.3 mm water was percolated below the root zone of winter maize and mustard, respectively, accounting for 20.5 and 10.6% of added water. It was observed that net groundwater use was positive for cotton, soybean, and summer maize with the values of 168.8, 159.1, and 18.0 mm year−1, respectively, and negative for rice, wheat, winter maize, and mustard. For the eight most important cropping patterns of semi-arid IGP, the net groundwater use was negative and varied between − 4.4 mm year−1 for cotton-maize and −423 mm year−1 for rice-wheat. With these cropping patterns, the overall rate of decline of groundwater was 231 mm year−1. It was found that maize-wheat and soybean-wheat cropping patterns consume much less water than rice-wheat cropping pattern and therefore are suitable to arrest the declining trend of groundwater in semi-arid IGP of India.
KeywordsHYDRUS-1D Irrigation Moisture dynamics Net groundwater use Potential recharge Root zone Water flux
- Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., & Raes, D. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I physical and mineralogical properties. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
- CGWB. (2016). Aquifer mapping and groundwater management plan of NCT Delhi (p. 163). New Delhi: Central Ground Water Board, State Unit Office.Google Scholar
- Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., Adhikary, P. P., & Singh, D. K. (2016a). Soil water budgeting approach to quantify potential groundwater recharge from croplands and groundwater use in a semi-arid region. Environ Earth Sci, 75(853). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5620-7.
- Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., Adhikary, P. P., & Singh, D. K. (2016b). Simulation of nitrate leaching under maize-wheat cropping system in a semiarid irrigated area of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, India. J Irrig Drain Eng (ASCE), 142(2), 04015053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J., & Zaradny, H. (1978). Simulation of field water use and crop yield. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013. World Food and Agriculture, 289.Google Scholar
- Pachepsky, Y. A., Smettem, K. R. J., Vanderborght, J., Herbst, M., Vereecken, H., & Wosten, J. H. M. (2004). Reality and fiction of models and data in soil hydrology. In R. A. Feddes et al. (Eds.), Unsaturated zone modeling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Patil, N. G., Tiwari, P., Bhattayachaarya, T., & Nair, K. M. (2014). Natural resources of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: a land use planning perspective. Curr Sci, 107, 1537–1549.Google Scholar
- Saâdi, M., Zghibi, A., & Kanzari, S. (2018). Modeling interactions between saturated and un-saturated zones by Hydrus-1D in semi-arid regions (plain of Kairouan, Central Tunisia). Environ Monit Assess, 190(170). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6544-3.
- Safriel, U., & Adeel, Z. (2005). Dryland systems. In R. Hassan et al. (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being, current state and trends (Vol. 1, pp. 625–658). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, B., Keese, K., Reedy, R. C., Simunek, J., & Andraski, B. J. (2003). Variations in flow and transport in thick desert vadose zones in response to paleoclimatic forcing (0–90 kyr): monitoring, modeling, and uncertainties. Water Resour Res, 39(7), 1179. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siebert, S., Henrich, V., Frenken, K., & Burke, J. (2013) Update of the digital global map of irrigation areas to version 5. Rheinische FriedrichWilhelms-Universitat, Bonn, Germany and FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 170.Google Scholar
- Šimunek, J. (2015). Estimating groundwater recharge using HYDRUS 1D. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Eng Geol Hydrogeol, 29, 25–36.Google Scholar
- Šimunek, J., van Genuchten, M. T., & Šejna, M. (2009). The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variability saturated media. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
- Tyagi, N. K., Sharma, D. K., & Luthra, S. K. (2003). Determination of evapotranspiration for maize and berseem clover. Irrig Sci, 21, 173–181.Google Scholar