Advertisement

Assessing the efficiency in assisted depuration of coffee processing wastewater from mixed wild microbial selected inoculum

  • Josiane Ferreira Pires
  • Rosane Freitas Schwan
  • Cristina Ferreira SilvaEmail author
Article

Abstract

This work evaluated the efficiency of bacterial bio-augmentation to the biological treatment of coffee processing wastewater (CPWW) in a pilot wastewater treatment plant (WTP). Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) values were the basis for the treatment efficiency. Serratia marcescens CCMA 1010 and CCMA 1013, Corynebacterium flavescens CCMA 1006 and Acetobacter indonesiensis CCMA 1002 were previously selected. The microbial cocktail was inoculated and persisted in CPWW during all treatments. The richness of wild species was a little altered over time and up to nine species were found in each sampled season. The microbiota composition presented variation of a total of 13 species, despite the inoculation of the microbial inoculum. The biodegradability index of effluent, close to 0.5, was favourable to biological treatment. The pollution parameters of CPWW were decreased in function of the variation of community composition and microbial activity. The greatest reduction of BOD (~ 33%) and COD (~ 25%) was observed between 72 h and 8 days of the biological treatment. The CPWW toxicity in Allium cepa seeds was lower by up to 60%, and the germination index (GI) exceeded 100% in the treated CPWW. The results of the CPWW biological treatment by bio-augmentation from native micro-organisms in the pilot-scale WTP indicated the greatest efficiency relating to the spontaneous biological treatment of CPWW. After this treatment, the discharge of effluent in the environment would not have toxic effects on the plants.

Keywords

Bio-augmentation Indigenous micro-organism Mixed cultures Biological treatment Biodegradability index Fitotoxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the CNPq, CAPES and FAPEMIG for their financial support and scholarship. They are also indebted to the Daterra farm, Patrocínio in the State of Minas Gerais, for the opportunity to build the WTP on a pilot scale and for the partial financial support.

Authors’ contributions

JFP carried out this study as a part of his PhD thesis, conducted the experiments, collected and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. CFS and RFS supervised the study at all stages and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexander, M. (1999). Biodegradation and bioremediation, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, p. 453.Google Scholar
  2. Bacilio-Jim, M., Aguilar-Flores, S., Ventura-Zapata, E., Eduardo, P., Perez-Capos, E., & Zenteno, E. (2003). Chemical characterization of root exudates from rice (Oryza sativa) and their effects on the chematactic response of endophytic bacteria. Plant and Soil, 249(5), 271–277.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022888900465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyene, A., Kassahun, Y., Addis, T., Assefa, F., Amsalu, A., Legesse, W., Kloos, H., & Triest, L. (2012). The impact of traditional coffee processing on river water quality in Ethiopia and the urgency of adopting sound environmental practices. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(11), 7053–7063.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2479-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonilla-Hermosa, V. A., Duarte, W. F., & Schwan, R. F. (2014). Utilization of coffee by-products obtained from semi-washed process for production of value-added compounds. Bioresource Technology, 166, 142–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, N. M., Ward, A. C., Beresford, T. P., Fox, P. F., Goodfellow, M., & Cogan, T. M. (2002). Biodiversity of the bacterial flora on the surface of a smear cheese. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(2), 820–830.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.2.820-830.2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campos, C. M. M., Prado, M. A. C., & Pereira, E. L. (2010). Physical-chemical, biochemical and energetic characterization of wastewater originated from wet coffee processing. Bioscience Journal, 26, 514–524.Google Scholar
  7. Cerqueira, V. S., Hollenbach, E. B., Maboni, F., Camargo, F. A. O., Peralba, M. d. C. R., & Bento, F. M. (2012). Bioprospection and selection of bacteria isolated from environments contaminated with petrochemical residues for application in bioremediation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28(3), 1203–1222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0923-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CONAB, C. N. d. A. (2019). Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos. Monitoramento agricola- Safra 2018/2019, 3(9), 1–174.Google Scholar
  9. Cruz-Salomón, A., Ríos-Valdovinos, E., Pola-Albores, F., Lagunas-Rivera, S., Meza-Gordillo, R., & Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V. M. (2018). Evaluation of hydraulic retention time on treatment of coffee processing wastewater (CPWW) in EGSB bioreactor. Sustainability, 10, 83.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dias, D. R., Valencia, N. R., Franco, D. A. Z., & Lopéz-Núñes, J. (2014). Manegement and utilization of wastes from coffee processing. In R. F. Schwan & G. H. Fleet (Eds.), Cocoa and coffee fermentations (pp. 545–575). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dijkstra, P., Thomas, S. C., Heinrich, P. L., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., & Hungate, B. A. (2011). Effect of temperature on metabolic activity of intact microbial communities: evidence for altered metabolic pathway activity but not for increased maintenance respiration and reduced carbon use efficiency. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(10), 2023–2031.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duarte, W. F., Amorim, J. C., & Schwan, R. F. (2013). The effects of co-culturing non-Saccharomyces yeasts with S. cerevisiae on the sugar cane spirit (cachaça) fermentation process. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 103(1), 175–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-012-9798-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO. (2000). Fertilizers and their use. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations (4th ed.). Paris: FAO and IFA.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)00047-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frigo, K. D. d. A., Feiden, A., Sampaio, S. C., Alberton, G. C., Schneider, L. T., Bonassa, G., et al. (2017). Treatments and utilization of swine waste in Brazil. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12, 542–549.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg, A. E., Clesceri, L. S., Eaton, A. D. (eds). (1992). Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA methods 4500-P., 18th ed. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/002/apha.method.4500-p.1992.pdf.
  16. Gtari, M., Ghodhbane-Gtari, F., Nouioui, I., Beauchemin, N., & Tisa, L. S. (2012). Phylogenetic perspectives of nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria. Archives of Microbiology, 194(1), 3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0733-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddis, A., & Devi, R. (2008). Effect of effluent generated from coffee processing plant on the water bodies and human health in its vicinity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(January), 259–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashimoto, K., Matsuda, M., Inoue, D., & Ike, M. (2014). Bacterial community dynamics in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant employing conventional activated sludge process. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 118(1), 64–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrero, M., & Stuckey, D. C. (2015). Bioaugmentation and its application in wastewater treatment: a review. Chemosphere, 140, 119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howard, I., Espigares, E., Lardelli, P., Martín, J. L., & Espigares, M. (2004). Evaluation of microbiological and physicochemical indicators for wastewater treatment. Environmental Toxicology, 19(3), 241–249.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang, C. H., Chang, M. T., Huang, L., & Chu, W. S. (2014). Utilization of elongation factor Tu gene (tuf) sequencing and species-specific PCR (SS-PCR) for the molecular identification of Acetobacter species complex. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 28(1), 31–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2013.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang, J., Xiao, L., & Xi, C. (2015). Performance and microbial community analysis of a pilot-scale UASB for corn-ethanol wastewater treatment. Biotechnology Letters, 37(4), 815–823.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1748-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iasur-Kruh, L., Hadar, Y., & Minz, D. (2011). Isolation and bioaugmentation of an estradiol-degrading bacterium and its integration into a mature biofilm. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(11), 3734–3740.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00691-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ICO - International Coffee Organization. (2018). Coffee market report—December 2018. IOC http://www.ico.org/documents/cy2015-16/cmr-0916-p.pdf.
  25. Kurade, M. B., Waghmode, T. R., Kagalkar, A. N., & Govindwar, S. P. (2012). Decolorization of textile industry effluent containing disperse dye Scarlet RR by a newly developed bacterial-yeast consortium BL-GG. Chemical Engineering Journal, 184, 33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, S. H., Kang, H. J., & Park, H. D. (2015). Influence of influent wastewater communities on temporal variation of activated sludge communities. Water Research, 73, 132–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2004). The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7(7), 601–613.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lou, J. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2008). Assessing the feasibility of wastewater recycling and treatment efficiency of wastewater treatment units. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 137(1–3), 471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9782-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma, F., Guo, J. b., Zhao, L. j., Chang, C. c., & Cui, D. (2009). Application of bioaugmentation to improve the activated sludge system into the contact oxidation system treating petrochemical wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 100(2), 597–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matos, A. T., & Lo Monaco, P. A. V. (2003). Tratamento e aproveitamento agrícola de resíduos sólidos e líquidos da lavagem e despolpa de frutos do cafeeiro. Viçosa: UFV/DEA.Google Scholar
  31. Matos, A. T., De Lo Monaco, P. A., & Silva, J. d. S. e. (2001). Tratamento de águas residuárias. In J. d. S. e. Silva (Ed.), Secagem e Armazenagem de Café - Tecnologias e custos (p. 162). Viçosa: Jard Editora LTDA.Google Scholar
  32. Militon, C., Hamdi, O., Michotey, V., Fardeau, M. L., Ollivier, B., Bouallagui, H., Hamdi, M., & Bonin, P. (2015). Ecological significance of Synergistetes in the biological treatment of tuna cooking wastewater by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(22), 18230–18238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4973-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montero-Rodríguez, D., Andrade, R. F. S., Lima, R. A., Silva, G. K. B., Rubio-ribeaux, D., Silva, T. A., & Hélvia, W. C. (2016). Conversion of agro-industrial wastes by Serratia marcescens UCP / WFCC 1549 into lipids suitable for biodiesel production. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 49, 307–312.  https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1649052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morikawa, M. (2006). Beneficial biofilm formation by industrial bacteria Bacillus subtilis and related species. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 101(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Okoh, A. I., & Trejo-Hernandez, M. R. (2006). Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon polluted systems: exploiting the bioremediation strategies. Journal of Biotechnology, 5(25), 2520–2525 http://ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/viewFile/56067/44523.Google Scholar
  36. Oller, I., Malato, S., & Sánchez-Pérez, J. A. (2011). Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—a review. Science of the Total Environment, 409(20), 4141–4166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pathiratne, A., Hemachandra, C. K., & De Silva, N. (2015). Efficacy of Allium cepa test system for screening cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of industrial effluents originated from different industrial activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4954-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pei, H., Shao, Y., Chanway, C. P., Hu, W., Meng, P., Li, Z., Chen, Y., & Ma, G. (2016). Bioaugmentation in a pilot-scale constructed wetland to treat domestic wastewater in summer and autumn. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(8), 7776–7785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5834-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pires, J. F., Ferreira, G. M. R., Reis, K. C., Schwan, R. F., & Silva, C. F. (2016). Mixed yeasts inocula for simultaneous production of SCP and treatment of vinasse to reduce soil and fresh water pollution. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 455–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pires, J. F., Cardoso, L. d. S., Schwan, R. F., & Silva, C. F. (2017). Diversity of microbiota found in coffee processing wastewater treatment plant. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33(0), 211–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2372-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qiu, S., McComb, A. J., Bell, R. W., & Davis, J. A. (2005). Response of soil microbial activity to temperature, moisture, and litter leaching on a wetland transect during seasonal refilling. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 13(1), 43–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-003-3054-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qiu, Q., Wang, Y., & Qiu, L. (2018). Discussion on evaluation and improvement technology of sewage biodegradability. E3S Web of Conferences, 53, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rattan, S., Parande, A. K., Nagaraju, V. D., & Ghiwari, G. K. (2015). A comprehensive review on utilization of wastewater from coffee processing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(9), 6461–6472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4079-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sabra, W., Dietz, D., Tjahjasari, D., & Zeng, A. P. (2010). Biosystems analysis and engineering of microbial consortia for industrial biotechnology. Engineering in Life Sciences, 10(5), 407–421.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201000111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sant’anna, G. L. J. (2013). Tratamento biológico de efluentes: fundamentos e aplicações. (Second.). Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.Google Scholar
  46. Sobrero, M., Ronco, A., & Castillo, G. (2004). Ensayo de toxicidad aguda con semillas de lechuga (Lactuca sativa L.). In G. C. Morales (Ed.), Ensayos Toxicologicos y Métodos de Evaluacion de calidad de Aguas: Estandarización, intercalibración, resultados y aplicaciones (1st ed., pp. 55–68). México: IMTA http://www.ine.gob.mx/ueajei/publicaciones/libros/573/cap4.pdf.Google Scholar
  47. Souza, T. P., Marques, S. C., da Silveira e Santos, D. M., & Dias, E. S. (2014). Analysis of thermophilic fungal populations during phase II of composting for the cultivation of Agaricus subrufescens. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(9), 2419–2425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1667-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sriwiriyarat, T., Ungkurarate, W., Fongsatitkul, P., & Chinwetkitvanich, S. (2008). Effects of dissolved oxygen on biological nitrogen removal in integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) wastewater treatment process. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 43(5), 518–527.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520701796481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tribedi, P., & Sil, A. K. (2013). Bioaugmentation of polyethylene succinate-contaminated soil with Pseudomonas sp. AKS2 results in increased microbial activity and better polymer degradation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(3), 1318–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1080-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vijayalakshmidevi, S. R., & Muthukumar, K. (2015). Improved biodegradation of textile dye effluent by coculture. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 114, 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.09.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Villanueva-Rodríguez, M., Bello-Mendoza, R., Wareham, D. G., Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J., & Maya-Treviño, M. L. (2014). Discoloration and organic matter removal from coffee wastewater by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 225(12), 2–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, J., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, G. (2016). Cold-adapted bacteria for bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 91(8), 2286–2297.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weathers, T. S., Harding-Marjanovic, K., Higgins, C. P., Alvarez-Cohen, L., & Sharp, J. O. (2016). Perfluoroalkyl acids inhibit reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene by repressing Dehalococcoides. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(1), 240–248.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wells, G. F., Park, H. D., Eggleston, B., Francis, C. A., & Criddle, C. S. (2011). Fine-scale bacterial community dynamics and the taxa-time relationship within a full-scale activated sludge bioreactor. Water Research, 45(17), 5476–5488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yetiman, A. E., & Kesmen, Z. (2015). Identification of acetic acid bacteria in traditionally produced vinegar and mother of vinegar by using different molecular techniques. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 204, 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaveri, P., Munshi, N., Vaidya, A., Jha, S., & Kumar, G. (2015). Functional microbial diversity dynamics in common effluent treatment plants of South Gujarat and hydrocarbon degradation. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 61, 389–395.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm2014-0700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao, X., Yang, J., Bai, S., Ma, F., & Wang, L. (2016). Microbial population dynamics in response to bioaugmentation in a constructed wetland system under 10°C. Bioresource Technology, 205, 166–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou, N. A., & Gough, H. L. (2016). Enhanced biological trace organic contaminant removal: a lab-scale demonstration with bisphenol A-degrading bacteria Sphingobium sp. BiD32. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(15), 8057–8066.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu, R., Yang, C., Zhou, M., & Wang, J. (2015). Industrial park wastewater deeply treated and reused by a novel electrochemical oxidation reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 260, 427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu, S., Huang, X., Ho, S.-H., Wang, L., & Yang, J. (2017). Effect of plant species compositions on performance of lab-scale constructed wetland through investigating photosynthesis and microbial communities. Bioresource Technology, 229, 196–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josiane Ferreira Pires
    • 1
  • Rosane Freitas Schwan
    • 1
  • Cristina Ferreira Silva
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversidade Federal de Lavras. Campus UniversitárioLavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations