Differentiation of weathered chemically dispersed oil from weathered crude oil
- 42 Downloads
Oil fingerprinting is a crucial technology to trace the sources and behaviors of spilled oil. The use of dispersants enhances the stay of dispersed oil in a water column and changes the important properties of spilled oil. In case of fingerprinting of dispersed oil driven by dispersants, the fate and behaviors of biomarkers may be affected by the application of dispersants. Limited studies have investigated the statistical difference between fingerprinting of dispersed oil and non-dispersed oil using biomarkers, and the possible influence of the differences, if present. This study applied several principal component analyses (PCA) to differentiate weathered chemically dispersed oil from weathered crude (non-dispersed) oil using 103 diagnostic ratios of the same type of biomarkers and those of two types of biomarkers as input data. It showed that weathered chemically dispersed oil (CDO) can be differentiated from weathered crude oil (WCO) using specific diagnostic ratios that are affected by weathering. PCA analyses indicated the effects of the application of dispersants and weathering duration on weathering of biomarkers in CDO and WCO.
KeywordsOil fingerprinting Principal component analysis Weathering Chemically dispersed oil Biomarker
The authors acknowledge the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Canada Research Chairs (CRC) Program, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for their kind support.
- Alberto, W. D., del Pilar, D. A. M. A., Valeria, A. M. A., Fabiana, P. S., Cecilia, H. A., & de los Ángeles, B. M. A. (2001). Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquı́a River Basin (Córdoba–Argentina). Water Research, 35(12), 2881–2894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bao, M., Sun, P., Yang, X., Wang, X., Wang, L., Cao, L., & Li, F. (2014). Biodegradation of marine surface floating crude oil in a large-scale field simulated experiment. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 16(8), 1948–1956.Google Scholar
- Ismail, A., Toriman, M. E., Juahir, H., Kassim, A. M., Zain, S. M., Ahmad, W. K. W., Wong, K. F., Retnam, A., Zali, M. A., Mokhtar, M., & Yusri, M. A. (2016). Chemometric techniques in oil classification from oil spill fingerprinting. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 111(1–2), 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman, R., Dashti, H., Kabir, C., Pederson, J., Moon, M., Quttainah, R., & Al-Wael, H. (1997). Characterizing the greater Burgan Field: use of geochemistry and oil fingerprinting. In Middle East Oil Show and Conference, Bahrain: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 5, 385–394.Google Scholar
- Kendall, M. G. (1948). Rank correlation methods. Oxford, England: Griffin.Google Scholar
- Song, X., Zhang, B., Chen, B., Lye, L., & Li, X. (2018). Aliphatic and aromatic biomarkers for fingerprinting of weathered chemically dispersed oil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(16), 15702–15714.Google Scholar
- Sun, P., Bao, M., Li, F., Cao, L., Wang, X., Zhou, Q., Li, G., & Tang, H. (2015). Sensitivity and identification indexes for fuel oils and crude oils based on the hydrocarbon components and diagnostic ratios using principal component analysis (PCA) biplots. Energy & Fuels, 29(5), 3032–3040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Swannell, R. P., & Daniel, F. (1999). Effect of dispersants on oil biodegradation under simulated marine conditions. In International Oil Spill Conference, Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute,1999, 169-176.Google Scholar