Advertisement

A process-based insight to the recent disappearance of streams in the central part of Tarai region, Uttarakhand, India

  • Ashok Kumar
  • Shashank Shekhar
  • Aditya Sarkar
  • A. K. Sharma
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The integrated study of geomorphology and hydrogeology could be significant in predicting and assessing the groundwater environment of ecologically sensitive terrains such as the Tarai region in North India. In this article, we integrate topographic elevation, stream network, water level data, and input and output stresses acting on the aquifer to understand the hydrological processes and linkages between groundwater dynamics and geomorphic elements in Rudrapur sub-division of Udham Singh Nagar district, Uttarakhand in the central part of Tarai region. The study area was selected on account of the fact that the Rudrapur area of late has witnessed rapid agricultural growth, urbanization, and industrialization. It has been observed that primarily, water table elevations are controlled by the topography of the region. Further, the groundwater abstraction has increased with time; however, except in urbanized sectors, the water level does not show any significant decline. This has been attributed to increased recharge. Prima facie, it appears to be ecologically balanced. However, in a temporal framework, it was observed that over the years, a few streams have disappeared to compensate for enhanced groundwater abstraction. The article explains the underlying hydrological processes behind the disappearance of streams with help of schematic diagrams. It also put forward reasons for the persistence of shallow water level in parts of the study area. It suggests for preservation of the waterways of disappeared streams as possible sites for remedial measures like check dams etc. if required in future on account of over-exploitation of groundwater resources.

Keywords

Tarai Uttarakhand Groundwater dynamics Geomorphology Hydrogeology Stream-aquifer interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support to AK through UGC-SRF is duly acknowledged. The discussions and technical advice of Dr. V Jain, IIT Gandhinagar during revision of the manuscript are duly acknowledged.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. A., Chandrashekarappa, K. N., Raj, S. K., Nischitha, V., & Kavitha, G. (2010). Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—a study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38(2), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. G., & Kneale, P. E. (1982). The influence of low-angled topography on hillslope soil-water convergence and stream discharge. Journal of Hydrology, 57(1–2), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawa, N., Jain, V., Shekhar, S., Kumar, N., & Jyani, V. (2014). Controls on morphological variability and role of stream power distribution pattern, Yamuna River, western India. Geomorphology, 227, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlston, C. W. (1963). Drainage density and streamflow; physiographic and hydraulic studies of rivers, Geological Survey Professional Paper 422 – C. Washington: United Nations government printing office.Google Scholar
  5. CGWB. (2006). Dynamic groundwater resources of India (As on 31.3.2004). New Delhi: Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.Google Scholar
  6. CGWB. (2007). District brochure. New Delhi: Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.Google Scholar
  7. CGWB. (2009). District brochure. New Delhi: Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.Google Scholar
  8. CGWB. (2013). Groundwater scenario of Uttarakhand. Dehradun: Central Ground Water Board.Google Scholar
  9. CGWB. (2014). Dynamic groundwater resources of India (As on 31.3.2011). New Delhi: Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.Google Scholar
  10. Chatterjee, R., Gupta, B. K., Mohiddin, S. K., Singh, P. N., Shekhar, S., & Purohit, R. (2009). Dynamic groundwater resources of National Capital Territory, Delhi: assessment, development and management options. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59(3), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gleyzer, A., Denisyuk, M., Rimmor, A. & Salinger, Y. (2004). A fast recursive GIS algorithm for computing Strahler stream ordering in Braided and non braided network. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resource Association, 40(4), 937–946.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01057.x.
  12. Heine, R. A., Lant, C. L., & Sengupta, R. R. (2004). Development and comparison of approaches for automated mapping of stream channel networks. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hjerdt, K. N., McDonnell, J. J., Seibert, J., & Rodhe, A. (2004). A new topographic index to quantify downslope controls on local drainage. Water Resources Research, 40(5), 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Horton, R. E. (1936). Maximum ground-water levels. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 17(Pt.2), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jadhao, R. B. (2013). A new approach of groundwater resource development in indo Gangetic plain. International Journal of Science and Research, 2(3).Google Scholar
  17. Kodge, B. G., & Hiremath, P. S. (2011). Elevation contour analysis and water body extraction for finding water scarcity locations using DEM. World Journal of Science and Technology, 1(12), 29–34.Google Scholar
  18. Kumar, C. P. (1997). Estimation of natural groundwater recharge. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 3(1), 61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.1997.10514603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langbein, W. B. (1947). Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. U. S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, 968-C, 125–157.Google Scholar
  20. MacDonald, A. M., Bonsor, H. C., Ahmed, K. M., Burgess, W. G., Basharat, M., Calow, R. C., & Lark, R. M. (2016). Groundwater quality and depletion in the Indo-Gangetic Basin mapped from in situ observations. Nature Geoscience, 9(10), 762–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukherjee, A., Saha, D., Harvey, C. F., Taylor, R. G., Ahmed, K. M., & Bhanja, S. N. (2015). Groundwater systems of the IndianSub-continent. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 4, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandey, A. C., Singh, S. K., & Nathawat, M. S. (2010). Waterlogging and flood hazards vulnerability and risk assessment in Indo Gangetic plain. Natural Hazards, Springer, 55, 273–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9525-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pandey, A. C., Singh, S. K., Nathawat, M. S., & Saha, D. (2013). Assessment of surface and subsurface water logging, water level fluctuations, and lithological variations for evaluating groundwater resources in Ganga Plains. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6(3), 276–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajmohan, N., & Amarasinghe, U. A. (2016). Groundwater quality issues and management in Ramganga Sub-Basin. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(12), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rawat, A. S., & Sah, R. (2009). Traditional knowledge of water management in Kumaon Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8(2), 249–254.Google Scholar
  26. Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2009). Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature, 460(7258), 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saha, D., Shekhar, S., Ali, S., Vittala, S. S., & Raju, N. J. (2016). Recent hydrogeological research in India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 82(3), 787–803.Google Scholar
  28. Sarkar, A., & Shekhar, S. (2015). The controls on spatial and temporal variation of hydrochemical facies and major ion chemistry in groundwater of South West District, Delhi, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(12), 7783–7791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarkar, A., Ali, S., Kumar, S., Shekhar, S., & Rao, S. V. N. (2016). Groundwater environment in Delhi, India. In: S. Shrestha, V. P. Pandey, B. R. Shivakoti, & S. Thatikonda (Eds.), Groundwater Environment in Asian Cities, Butterworth-Heinemann, (pp. 77–108).  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803166-7.00005-2.
  30. Sarkar, A., Shekhar, S., & Rai, S. P. (2017). Assessment of the spatial and temporal hydrochemical facies variation in the flood plains of North-West Delhi using integrated approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(19), 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schumann, G., Matgen, P., Cutler, M. E. J., Black, A., Hoffmann, L., & Pfister, L. (2008). Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 63(3), 283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shekhar, S. (2006). An approximate projection of availability of the fresh groundwater resources in the South West district of NCT Delhi, India: a case study. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(7), 1330–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shekhar, S., Mao, R. S., & Imchen, E. B. (2015). Groundwater management options in North district of Delhi, India: a groundwater surplus region in over-exploited aquifers. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 4, 212–226.Google Scholar
  34. Shekhar, S., Kumar, S., Sinha, R., Gupta, S., Densmore, A., Rai, S. P., Kumar, M., Singh, A., Dijk, W., Joshi, S., Mason, P. & Kumar, D. (2018). Efficient conjunctive use of surface and groundwater can prevent seasonal death of non-glacial linked rivers in groundwater stressed areas. In: D. Saha, S. Marwaha, & A. Mukherjee (Eds.), Clean and Sustainable Groundwater in India (pp. 117–124). Springer Hydrogeology. Springer, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4552-3_9.
  35. Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 38, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarboton, D. G., Bras, R. L., & Iturbe, I. R. (1992). A physical basis for drainage density. Elsevier science publisher B.V., Geomorphology, 5, 59–76.Google Scholar
  37. Tiwari, V. M., Wahr, J., & Swenson, S. (2009). Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, l18401.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl039401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tiwari, S. K., Bartarya, S. K., Rai, S. K., Gupta, A. K., & Asthana, A. K. L. (2016). Isotopic and geochemical studies of groundwater from the Ramganga basin and the middle Ganga Plains: implication for pollution and metal contamination. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(16), 1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Web reference

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyKumaun UniversityNainitalIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of GeologyPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations