Advertisement

Evaluation of drainage problems in Antalya Konyaalti parks in the context of landscape engineering

  • Orhun SoydanEmail author
  • Ahmet Benliay
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, factors that cause drainage problems in 23 Nisan Park and Mevlana Park have been investigated in the scope of landscape design and landscape engineering. To propose regulations to protect the natural topography and natural drainage lines, evaluations and observations were conducted, and these data were digitized. Water accumulation analyses were performed using field observations, which were used to create a water accumulation analysis map that was compared with water collection area maps created using Arc Hydro extension in ArcGIS. The results show that surface waters accumulate in areas such as pedestrian ways and playgrounds due to deficiencies in landscape design. Surface water quantities were calculated using the rational method. To prevent structural damage and excessive water entry, deep drainage and concrete or grass-covered parabolic surface drainage systems are recommended. Additional suggestions are provided for other studies to be conducted in this regard.

Keywords

Drainage Surface runoff Landscape engineering Methods of drainage 

Notes

Funding information

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Unit of Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey (Project Code 2013.02.0121.005).

References

  1. Achleinter, S. (2007). An open source approach for simulation of integrated urban drainage systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1184–1195, Austria.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alley, W., Reilly, T., & Franke. (1999). Sustainability of ground–water resources. Denver: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.  https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altunkasa, M. F. (2002). Landscape engineering. Çukuroba University, Agriculture, General Publication, (123).Google Scholar
  4. Dobbins, D. V. (1960). Surface water drainage. Notre Dame Law, 36, 518. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol36/iss4/5. Accessed 06 June 2018.Google Scholar
  5. Dunnett, N., & Hitchmough, J. (2007). The dynamic landscape: design, ecology and management of naturalistic urban planting. Taylor & Francis, ISBN: 978–0415438100, Spon Press Publishing, (49).Google Scholar
  6. French, R. J., & Schultz, J. E. (1984). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(6), 743–764.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9840743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. General Directorate of Meteorology (2014). Chart of Antalya City rainfall intensity over time. Ankara: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Meteorology.Google Scholar
  8. Güngör, S., & Polat, A. T. (2017). The evaluation of the urban parks in Konya province in terms of quality, sufficiency, maintenance, and growth rate. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(4), 172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5875-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ismail, B. A. (2010). Hydrological Procedure No: 5. Rational Method of Flood Estimation for Rural Catchments in Peninsular Malaysıa. Division Of Water Resources Management And Hydrology Department Of Irrigation And Drainage Ministry Of Natural Resources And Environment, pp. 19.Google Scholar
  10. Loucks, D. P., & Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. Cambridge University Press (138).Google Scholar
  11. Mays, L. (2006). Water resources sustainability. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional ISBN: 978–0071462303, (140).Google Scholar
  12. Oğuz, D. (1998). A research on the usage of Ankara urban parks as a concept of urban park, PhD thesis Ankara University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00130-4 (220).
  13. Ostermann, F. O. (2010). Digital representation of park use and visual analysis of visitor activities. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6), 452–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Page, S., Nielsen, K., & Goodenough, R. (1994). Managing urban parks: user perspectives and local leisure needs in the 1990s. Service Industries Journal, 14(2), 216–237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069400000024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Russo, T., Alfredo, K., & Fisher, J. (2014). Sustainable water management in urban, agricultural, and natural systems. Water, 6(12), 3934–3956.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w6123934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmitt, T. G., Thomas, M., & Ettrich, N. (2004). Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. Journal of Hydrology, 299(3–4), 300–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson, D. (2006). The rational method. David B. Thompson Civil Engineering Department Texas Tech University, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21. In Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janero, Brazil.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UN WCED). (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; Document A/42/427. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  20. Uzun, S. (2005). User satisfaction in rural recreation areas: the example of Bolu Gölcük Forest-recreation area. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University, Master Thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.Google Scholar
  21. Walker, C. (2004). The public value of urban parks, Urban Institute, (20).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture, Landscape Architecture DepartmentAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations