Advertisement

Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses

  • Mohammad Reza Asgharipour
  • Hasan Shahgholi
  • Daniel E. Campbell
  • Issa Khamari
  • Adel Ghadiri
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

To address increasing demand, bean producers have intensified agricultural activities by increasing application of industrial inputs. Such intensification can impose environmental risks to vulnerable ecosystems. Emergy and economic analyses were utilized in this study to investigate and compare the environmental performance of five management patterns specified by differing degrees of intensification, i.e., ecologic, integrated, low-, medium-, and high-input production systems at Bean Research Station in Khorram Dasht, Iran. The total emergy supporting these systems was estimated to be 6.52E + 15, 1.22E + 16, 6.62E + 15, 1.10E + 16, and 1.54E + 16 sej ha−1 for the ecologic, integrated, low-, medium-, and high-input systems, respectively. The purchased emergy inputs accounted for the largest portion of the total emergy inputs to these systems and ranged between 60.84 and 75.80%. The renewable fractions, transformities, emergy yield ratios, environmental loading ratios, emergy sustainability indices, and the economic output to input ratios demonstrate that the ecologic and low-input systems performed well compared to the three more industrial systems when considering their environmental sustainability. However, the more industrial systems had comparatively higher economic output. Generally, the results illustrate that sustainable bean production will depend on the transition from fossil fuel-intensive systems to more natural resource-intensive ones. To achieve more sustainable systems, applying conservation tillage and replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer are advocated for use in bean production systems. Joint use of emergy and economic evaluation provided different but complementary standpoints for comparison of the five bean production systems examined, and can assist in solving the problems that may occur in decision-making.

Keywords

Cropping systems Pulse crops Emergy synthesis Environmental loading ratio Economic output-input ratio 

Notes

References

  1. Akibode, S., & Maredia, M. K. (2012). Global and regional trends in production, trade and consumption of food legume crops. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  2. Asgharipour, M. R., Mondani, F., & Riahinia, S. (2012). Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: a case study in Khorasan Razavi province. Energy, 44, 1078–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastianoni, S., Marchettini, N., Panzieri, M., & Tiezzi, E. (2001). Sustainability assessment of a farm in the chianti area (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastianoni, S., Campbell, D. E., Ridolfi, R., & Pulselli, F. M. (2009). The solar transformity of petroleum fuels. Ecological Modelling, 220, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt-Williams, S. L. (2002). Handbook of emergy evaluation. Folio #4. Emergy of Florida Agriculture. Gainesville: Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida 40 p.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, M. T., & Ulgiati, S. (1998). Emergy evaluation of the environment: quantitative perspectives on ecological footprints. In S. Ulgiati, M. T. Brown, M. Giampietro, R. A. Herendeen, & K. Mayumi (Eds.), Advances in energy studies (pp. 223–240). Roma: Energy Flows in Ecology and Economy. MUSIS.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, M. T., & Ulgiati, S. (2004). Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. FV’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecological Modelling, 178, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, M. T., Brandt-Williams, S., Tilley, D., & Ulgiati, S. (2000). Emergy synthesis: an introduction. In M. T. Brown (Ed.), Emergy synthesis: theory and applications of the emergy methodology, Proceedings from the First Biennial Emergy Analysis Research Conference (pp. 1–14). Gainesville: Centre for Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, M. T., Campbell, D. E., De Vilbiss, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). The geobiosphere emergy baseline: a synthesis. Ecological Modelling, 339, 92–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. E., & Erban, L. E. (2017). A reexamination of the emergy input to a system from the wind. In M. T. Brown, S. Sweeney, D. E. Campbell, S. Huang, T. Rydberg, & S. Ulgiati (Eds.), Emergy synthesis 9: THEORY and applications of the emergy methodology (Proceedings of the 9th biennial Emergy conference) (pp. 13–20). Gainesville: Center for environmental policy, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, D. E., & Garmestani, A. S. (2012). An energy systems view of sustainability: emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado. Journal of Environmental Management, 95, 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, C., & Laherrere, J. (1998). The end of cheap oil. Scientific American, 278(3), 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, D. E., Brandt-Williams, S. L., & Meisch, M. E. A. (2005). Environmental accounting using emergy: evaluation of the state of West Virginia. EPA/600/R-02/011. USEPA (p. 116). Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D. E., Lu, H. F., Knox, G. A., & Odum, H. T. (2009). Maximizing empower on a human-dominated planet: the role of exotic Spartina. Ecological Engineering, 35, 463–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavalett, O., Queiroz, J. F., & Ortega, E. (2006). Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Ecological Modelling, 193, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, F. (2011). Agricultural ecology (second ed.). Beijing: China Agricultural University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, G. Q., & Chen, B. (2009). Extended-exergy analysis of the Chinese society. Energy, 34, 1127–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, H., Chen, C., Wu, S., Mirza, Z. A., & Liu, Z. (2017). Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of three gorges reservoir of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, M. J., Brown, M. T., & Shepherd, K. D. (2006). Estimating the environmental costs of soil erosion at multiple scales in Kenya using emergy synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114(2–4), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cuadra, M., & Rydberg, T. (2006). Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua. Ecological Modelling, 196, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Barros, J. M., Blazy, G. S., Rodrigues, R., & Tournebize, J. P. (2009). Emergy evaluation and economic performance of banana cropping systems in Guadeloupe (French West Indies). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 129, 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., & Balzer, C. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Food and Agriculture Organization (2017) FAOSTAT 2016: FAO Statistical Databases [CD ROM]. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  24. Giannetti, B. F., Ogura, Y., Bonilla, S. H., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2011). Emergy assessment of a coffee farm in Brazilian Cerrado considering in a broad form the environmental services, negative externalities and fair price. Agricultural Systems, 104, 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillocks, R. J., Madata, C. S., Chirwa, R., Minja, E. M., & Msolla, S. (2006). Phaseolus bean improvement in Tanzania, 1959–2005. Euphytica, 150(1-2), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hole, D. G., Perkins, A. J., Wilson, J. D., Alexander, I. H., Grice, P. V., & Evans, A. D. (2005). Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 122, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, S., Mo, X. G., Lin, Z. G., & Qiu, J. X. (2010). Emergy assessment of a wheat-maize rotation system with different water assignments in the North China plain. Environmental Management, 46, 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ipsos, R. (2010). Factors influencing pulse consumption in Canada. Summary Report. Calgary: Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Government of Alberta.Google Scholar
  29. Iran Statistical Yearbook 1394 (Iranian Year) [2015-2016]. (2017). Publisher: Statistical Centre of Iran.Google Scholar
  30. ISO 1928 (1995). Solid mineral fuels. Determination of gross calorific value by the bomb calorimetric method, and calculation of net calorific value. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  31. Jafari, M., Asgharipour, M. R., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., & Hadarbadi, G. (2018). Sustainability assessment of date and pistachio agricultural systems using energy, emergy and economic approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 642–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, A. L. (1999). Phaseolus bean: Post-harvest operations. Post-harvest compendium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  33. Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Yousefi, M., & Movahedi, M. (2013). Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks. Energy, 52, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kohkan, S. A., Ghanbari, A., Asgharipour, M. R., & Fakheri, B. (2017). Emergy evaluation of Yaghuti grape of Sistan. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal, 7, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Rosa, A. D., Siracusa, G., & Cavallaro, R. (2008). Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1907–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lan, S. F., Qin, P., & Lu, H. F. (2002). Emergy assessment of ecological systems (Vol. 75 and 76, pp. 406–412). Beijing: Chemical industry press.Google Scholar
  37. Li, L., Lu, H., Ren, H., Kang, W., & Chen, F. (2011). Emergy evaluations of three aquaculture systems on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River estuary, China. Ecological Indicators, 11, 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu, H. F., & Campbell, D. E. (2009). Ecological and economic dynamics of the Shunde agricultural system under China’s small city development strategy. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2589–2600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lu, H. F., Kang, W. L., Campbell, D. E., Rena, H., Tand, Y. W., Fengd, R. X., Luod, J. T., & Chenb, F. P. (2009). Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River estuary, China. Ecological Engineering, 35, 1743–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lu, H. F., Bai, Y., Ren, H., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: implications for agricultural policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 2727–2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu, H. F., Yuan, Y., Campbell, D. E., Qin, P., & Cui, L. (2014). Integrated water quality, emergy and economic evaluation of three bioremediation treatment systems for eutrophic water. Ecological Engineering, 69, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu, H. F., Tan, Y. W., Zhang, W. S., Qiao, Y. C., Campbell, D. E., Zhou, L., & Ren, H. (2017). Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of lotus-root production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River estuary, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lu, H. F., Cai, C. J., Zeng, X. S., Campbell, D. E., Fan, S. H., & Liu, G. L. (2018). Bamboo vs. crops: an integrated emergy and economic evaluation of using bamboo to replace crops in South Sichuan Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin, J. F., Diemont, S. A. W., Powell, E., Stanton, M., & Levy-Tacher, S. (2006). Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115, 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milà i Canals, L., Burnip, G. M., & Cowell, S. J. (2006). Evaluation of the environmental impacts of apple production using life cycle assessment (LCA): case study in New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murphy, J. D., & Power, N. M. (2008). How can we improve the energy balance of ethanol production from wheat? Fuel, 87, 1799–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nemecek, T., von Richthofen, J. S., Dubois, G., Casta, P., Charles, R., & Pahl, H. (2008). Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 380–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Odum, H. T. (1986). Emergy in ecosystems. In N. Polunin (Ed.), Ecosystem theory and application (pp. 142–194). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Odum, H. T. (1994). Ecological and general systems, an introduction to systems ecology. Niwot: University of Colorado Press 644 p. revised edition of systems ecology, An introduction. 1983. Wiley, New York, 644 p.Google Scholar
  50. Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Odum, H. T. (2000). Handbook of emergy evaluation. A compendium of data for emergy computation. Folio #2 Emergy global processes. Gainesville: Center of Environmental Policy, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  52. Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., & Brand-Williams, S. L. (2000). Handbook of emergy evaluation: folio #1: introduction and global budget. Gainesville: Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  53. Ortega, E., Anami, M., & Diniz, G. (2002). Certification of food products using emergy analysis. In: Proceedings of III International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies. pp. 227–237.Google Scholar
  54. Panzieri, M., Marchettini, N., & Hallam, T. G. (2000). Importance of the Bradhyrizobium japonicum symbiosis for the sustainability of a soybean cultivation. Ecological Modelling, 135, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prager, K. & Posthumus, H. (2010). Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil conservation practices in Europe. In T. L. Napier (Ed.), Human Dimensions of Soil and Water Conservation (p. 2014). Napier: TL Nova Science Publishers. Last Accessed 9.Google Scholar
  56. Rótolo, G. C., Francis, C., Craviotto, R. M., & Ulgiati, S. (2015). Environmental assessment of maize production alternatives: traditional, intensive and GMO-based cropping patterns. Ecological Indicators, 57, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rydberg, T., & Haden, A. C. (2006). Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 117, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shahgholi H (2017) Evaluating and monitoring the sustainability of bean production systems using of emergy, energy and agronomic analysis. University of Zabol. Department of Agronomy. PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  59. Singh, U., & Singh, B. (1992). Tropical grain legumes as important human food. Economic Botany, 46, 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh, R. J., Ghosh, B. N., Sharma, N. K., Patra, S., Dadhwal, K. S., & Mishra, P. K. (2016). Energy budgeting and emergy synthesis of rainfed maize–wheat rotation system with different soil amendment applications. Ecological Indicators, 61, 753–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sun, W., & Huang, Y. (2012). Synthetic fertilizer management for China’s cereal crops has reduced N2O emissions since the early 2000s. Environmental Pollution, 160, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ting, Y. I., & Ping-an, X. I. A. N. G. (2016). Emergy analysis of paddy farming in Hunan Province, China: a new perspective on sustainable development of agriculture. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10, 2426–2436.Google Scholar
  63. Ulgiati, S., & Brown, M. T. (1998). Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 108, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ulgiati, S., Odum, H., & Bastianoni, S. (1994). Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability an emergy analysis of Italy. Ecological Modelling, 73, 215–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vassallo, P., Bastianoni, S., Beiso, I., Ridolfi, R., & Fabiano, M. (2007). Emergy analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system. Ecological Indicators, 7, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Wu, X., & Xiong, J. (2014a). Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Zhang, J., & Wu, X. (2014b). Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China plain based on LCA. Agricultural Systems, 128, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, X., Wu, X., Yan, P., Gao, W., Chen, Y., & Sui, P. (2016). Integrated analysis on economic and environmental consequences of livestock husbandry on different scale in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang, L., Li, L., Cheng, K., Ji, C., Yue, Q., Bian, R., & Pan, G. (2018). An assessment of emergy, energy, and cost-benefits of grain production over 6 years following a biochar amendment in a rice paddy from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 9683–9696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wei, X. M., Chen, B., Qu, Y. H., Lin, C., & Chen, G. Q. (2009). Emergy analysis for ‘four in one’ peach production system in Beijing. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14, 946–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu, X. H., Wu, F. Q., Tong, X. G., & Jiang, B. (2013). Emergy-based sustainability assessment of an integrated production system of cattle, biogas, and greenhouse vegetables: insight into the comprehensive utilization of wastes on a large-scale farm in Northwest China. Ecological Engineering, 61, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yang, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China—a case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County. Applied Energy, 118, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang, L. X., Yang, Z. F., & Chen, G. Q. (2007). Emergy analysis of cropping–grazing system in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Energ Policy, 35, 3843–3855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang, L. X., Hu, Q. H., & Wang, C. B. (2013a). Emergy evaluation of environmental sustainability of poultry farming that produces products with organic claims on the outskirts of mega-cities in China. Ecological Engineering, 54, 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang, L. X., Wu, L., Zhang, R., Deng, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Li, Y., Lin, L., Li, L., Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2013b). Evaluating the relation-ships among economic growth, energy consumption, air emissions and air environmental protection investment in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Reza Asgharipour
    • 1
  • Hasan Shahgholi
    • 1
  • Daniel E. Campbell
    • 2
  • Issa Khamari
    • 3
  • Adel Ghadiri
    • 4
  1. 1.Unit of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of ZabolZabolIran
  2. 2.US EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology DivisionNarragansettUSA
  3. 3.Unit of Agronomy, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of ZabolZabolIran
  4. 4.National Bean Research Station of KhomeynKhomeynIran

Personalised recommendations