Advertisement

Total mercury status in an urban water body, Mithi River, Mumbai and analysis of the relation between total mercury and other pollution parameters

  • Prashant Bhave
  • Rajita Shrestha
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Mercury is a heavy metal which has garnered attention recently in India. Minamata Convention on mercury was established on October 2013 and was joined by India on September 30, 2014. India is seen as a major mercury pollution source after China according to many studies in the past. Various mercury pollution sites that are currently recognized in India are Kodai Lake, Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu, and Thane Creek, Mumbai. Since 1992, chlor-alkali plants have been regulated to eliminate mercury cell process of manufacturing. Also, medical and health care facilities are discarding mercury-containing equipment and processes. Various anthropogenic sources of mercury to the atmosphere include combustion of fossil fuels, processing and mining of primary metal ores, cement manufacturing units, chlor-alkali plants, and use of mercury in various products like paints, electric switches, and relays. The hazard associated with mercury pollution becomes extremely serious when we consider its ability to be transported over long-range distances. Various atmospheric transport models suggest India and other Asian countries to be a major source of long-range transport of mercury to North America. Considering the hazards of mercury and its widespread presence in our life, a study on mercury pollution in an urban water body is conducted. This study deals with Mithi River located in Mumbai Metropolitan Region (19.0760° N, 72.8777° E) to study the total mercury in water and derive its relationship with other pollution parameters.

Keywords

Total mercury Urban water body India Mumbai 

Notes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Ali, J., Kazi, T., Tuzen, M., & Ullah, N. (2017). Evaluation of mercury and physicochemical parameters in different depths of aquifer water of Thar coalfield, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 100–110.Google Scholar
  2. Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) (2007). Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry.pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald, W., & Watras, C. (1989). Mercury in surficial waters of rural Wisconsin lakes. Science of the total Environment, 87-88, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gleason, J. D., Blum, J. D., Moore, T.C., Polyak, L., Jakobsson, M., Meyers, P. A., Biswas, A. (2017). Sources and cycling of mercury in the paleo Arctic Ocean from Hg stable isotope variations in Eocene and Quaternary sediments. GeochimicaetCosmochimicaActa, 16.Google Scholar
  5. Jiang, S., Liu, X., & Chen, Q. (2011). Distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in lake sediments in Arctic Ny-Alesund. Chemosphere, 83, 1108–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karunasagar, D., Balarama Krishna, M. V., Anjaneyulu, Y., & Arunachalam, J. (2006). Studies of mercury pollution in a lake due to a thermometer factory situated in a tourist resort: Kodaikkanal, India. Environmental Pollution., 143, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu, Y., Chai, X., Hao, Y., Gao, X., Lu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Cai, M. (2015). Total mercury and methylmercury distributions in surface sediments from Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic. Environmental Science Pollution Research.Google Scholar
  8. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) (2004). Report on Mithi River Water Pollution and Reccommendations for its Control.Google Scholar
  9. Mukherjee, A., Bhattacharya, P., Sarkar, A., & Zevenhoven, R. (2009). Mercury emissions from industrial sources in India and its effects. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S., Steenhuisen, F., & Maxson, P. (2010). Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmospheric Environment., 44, 2487–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ram, A., Rokade, M. A., Zingde, M. D., & Borole, D. V. (2009). Post-depositional memory record of mercury in sediment near the effluent disposal site of a chlor-alkali plant in Thane Creek- Mumbai Harbour, India. Environmental Technology., 30(8), 765–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramasamy, A. V., Jayasooryan, K. K., ShyleshChandran, M. M., Mohan, M. (2017). Total and methyl mercury in the water, sediment, and fishes of Vembanad, a tropical backwater system in India. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Streets, D. G., Hao, J., Wu, Y., Jiang, J., Chan, M., Tian, H., & Feng, X. (2005). Anthropogenic mercury emissions in China. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 7789–7806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. United Nations Environment Programme 2017. Toolkit for Identification and Quantification of Mercury Releases Version 1.4.Google Scholar
  15. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010). Summary of toxicological evaluations. In Summary report of the seventy-second meeting of JECFA.Google Scholar
  16. Zhang, L., & Wong, M. H. (2006). Environmental mercury contamination in China: sources and impacts. Environment International, 33, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil and Environmental Engineering DepartmentVJTIMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Civil and Engineering DepartmentVJTIMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations