Advertisement

Real-time water quality monitoring using Internet of Things in SCADA

  • K. Saravanan
  • E. Anusuya
  • Raghvendra Kumar
  • Le Hoang Son
Article
  • 236 Downloads

Abstract

Water pollution is the root cause for many diseases in the world. It is necessary to measure water quality using sensors for prevention of water pollution. However, the related works remain the problems of communication, mobility, scalability, and accuracy. In this paper, we propose a new Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system that integrates with the Internet of Things (IoT) technology for real-time water quality monitoring. It aims to determine the contamination of water, leakage in pipeline, and also automatic measure of parameters (such as temperature sensor, flow sensor, color sensor) in real time using Arduino Atmega 368 using Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) module. The system is applied in the Tirunelveli Corporation (Metro city of Tamilnadu state, India) for automatic capturing of sensor data (pressure, pH, level, and energy sensors). SCADA system is fine-tuned with additional sensors and reduced cost. The results show that the proposed system outperforms the existing ones and produces better results. SCADA captures the real-time accurate sensor values of flow, temperature, and color and turbidity through the GSM communication.

Keywords

Sensors Internet of Things SCADA Water quality monitoring Water distribution 

Notes

Funding information

This project work is supported by the consultancy project SCADA Roc.No.E1/9912/2007 dated 24.5.17 from Tirunelveli Corporation, Tamilnadu, India.

References

  1. Afifi, M., Abdelkader, M. F., & Ghoneim, A. (2018). An IoT system for continuous monitoring and burst detection in intermittent water distribution networks. In Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE), 2018 International Conference on (pp. 240-247).Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, A., Shukla, V., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., & Garg, V. (2018). Design and development of air and water pollution quality monitoring using IoT and quadcopter. In Intelligent Communication, Control and Devices (pp. 485–492). Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S., & Ismail, S. (2018). Water pollution and its sources, effects & management: a Case Study of Delhi. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 7(2L), 10436–10442.Google Scholar
  4. Ali, M., Son, L. H., Thanh, N. D., & Van Minh, N. (2017). A neutrosophic recommender system for medical diagnosis based on algebraic neutrosophic measures. Applied Soft Computing.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali, M., Dat, L. Q., Son, L. H., & Smarandache, F. (2018a). Interval complex neutrosophic set: formulation and applications in decision-making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(3), 986–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali, M., Son, L. H., Khan, M., & Tung, N. T. (2018b). Segmentation of dental X-ray images in medical imaging using neutrosophic orthogonal matrices. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anusuya, E., & Saravanan, K. (2017). Real time data handling in SCADA system using map reducing algorithm. International Conference on Discrete and Computational Mathematics.Google Scholar
  8. Asalmol, M., et al. (2017). Water management system for Smart City using IoT. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(11), 45–52.Google Scholar
  9. Azman, A. A., Rahiman, M. H. F., Taib, M. N., Sidek, N. H., Bakar, I. A. A., & Ali, M. F. (2016). A low cost nephelometric turbidity sensor for continual domestic water quality monitoring system. In Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems, I2CACIS, (pp. 202–207), IEEE.Google Scholar
  10. Barabde, M. & Danve, S., (2015a). Real time water quality monitoring system. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  11. Barabde, M.N. & Danve, S.R. (2015b). Design of a Water Environment Monitoring System Based on IOT using embedded Linux, international conference on Technologies for Sustainable Development ICTSD, (pp. 1475-1479).Google Scholar
  12. Chuan, P. M., Son, L. H., Ali, M., Khang, T. D., & Dey, N. (2018). Link prediction in co-authorship networks based on hybrid content similarity metric. Applied Intelligence, 48(8), 2470–2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creaco, E., & Pezzinga, G. (2015). Embedding linear programming in multi objective genetic algorithms for reducing the size of the search space with application to leakage minimization in water distribution networks. Environmental Modelling and Software, 69, 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, E. S., Alameddine, I., & El-Fadel, M. (2018). Monitoring water quality in a hypereutrophic reservoir using Landsat ETM+ and OLI sensors: how transferable are the water quality algorithms? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(3), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devi, B. M. & Abirami, N. A. (2014), Real time system for determination of drinking water quality. American Water Works Association Journal awwa, (pp. 20–26).Google Scholar
  16. Ebere, E. V., & Francisca, O. O. (2013). Microcontroller based automatic water level control system. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 1(6), 1390–1396.Google Scholar
  17. Giap, C. N., Son, L. H., & Chiclana, F. (2018). Dynamic structural neural network. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34(4), 2479–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemanth, D. J., Anitha, J., Popescu, D. E., & Son, L. H. (2018a). A modified genetic algorithm for performance improvement of transform based image steganography systems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(1), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemanth, D. J., Anitha, J., & Son, L. H. (2018b). Brain signal based human emotion analysis by circular back propagation and deep Kohonen neural networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 68, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang, P., Jin, Y., Hou, D., Yu, J., Tu, D., Cao, Y., & Zhang, G. (2017). Online classification of contaminants based on multi-classification support vector machine using conventional water quality sensors. Sensors, 17(3), 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jácome, G., Valarezo, C., & Yoo, C. (2018). Assessment of water quality monitoring for the optimal sensor placement in lake Yahuarcocha using pattern recognition techniques and geographical information systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(4), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jegadeesan, S., et.al. (2018). ECC based algorithms for secure water quality monitoring system using wireless sensor networks. Taga Journal, 14, 1347–1356.Google Scholar
  23. Jindal, H., Saxena, S., & Kasana, S. S. (2017a). Sewage water quality monitoring framework using multi-parametric sensors. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1), 881–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jindal, H., Saxena, S., & Kasana, S. S. (2017b). A sustainable multi-parametric sensors network topology for river water quality monitoring. Wireless Networks, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1532-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamaludin, Hafiz, K. & Ismail W. (2017). Water quality monitoring with internet of things (IoT). Systems, process and control (ICSPC), 2017 IEEE conference. (pp.12-17), IEEE.Google Scholar
  26. Kapoor, R., Gupta, R., Kumar, R., Son, L. H., & Jha, S. (2018a). New scheme for underwater acoustically wireless transmission using direct sequence code division multiple access in MIMO systems. Wireless Networks, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1750-z.
  27. Kapoor, R., Gupta, R., Son, L. H., Jha, S., & Kumar, R. (2018b). Boosting performance of power quality event identification with KL divergence measure and standard deviation. Measurement, 126, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kapoor, R., Gupta, R., Son, L. H., Jha, S., & Kumar, R. (2018c). Detection of power quality event using histogram of oriented gradients and support vector machine. Measurement, 120, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan, M, Son, LH, Ali, M, Chau, HTM, Na, NTN, Smarandache, F (2018). Systematic review of decision making algorithms in extended neutrosophic sets. Symmetry-Basel, 10, 314–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, L. H., D’Arcy, B. J., Ibanez, M., & Maniquiz-Redillas, M. (2017). Industrial estates as sources of water pollution. Wealth Creation without Pollution-Designing for Industry, Ecobusiness Parks and Industrial Estates, (pp. 37–51).Google Scholar
  31. Lambrou, T. P., Anastasiou, C. C., Panayiotou, C. G., & Polycarpou, M. M. (2014). A low-cost sensor network for real-time monitoring and contamination detection in drinking water distribution systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(8), 2765–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, W. C., Brondum, K., Monroe, C. W., & Burns, M. A. (2017). Multifunctional water sensors for pH, ORP, and conductivity using only micro fabricated platinum electrodes. Sensors, 17(7), 16–55.Google Scholar
  33. Louati, A., Son, L. H., & Chabchoub, H. (2018). Smart routing for municipal solid waste collection: a heuristic approach. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0778-3.
  34. Luo, X., & Yang, J. (2017). Water pollution detection based on hypothesis testing in sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, p. 8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3829894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mir & Mehwish. (2017). An IOT approach to monitor water quality using MQTT algorithm. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 3(3), 800–805.Google Scholar
  36. Ngan, R. T., Son, L. H., Cuong, B. C., & Ali, M. (2018a). H-max distance measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 69, 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ngan, R. T., Ali, M., & Son, L. H. (2018b). δ-equality of intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a new proximity measure and applications in medical diagnosis. Applied Intelligence, 48(2), 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nguyen, G. N., Son, L. H., Ashour, A. S., & Dey, N. (2017). A survey of the state-of-the-arts on neutrosophic sets in biomedical diagnoses. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0691-7.
  39. Panfili, I., Bartucca, M. L., Ballerini, E., & Del Buono, D. (2017). Combination of aquatic species and safeners improves the remediation of copper polluted water. Science of the Total Environment, 601, 1263–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parameswari, M., & Balasingh M. (2018a). Efficient analysis of water quality measurement reporting system using IOT based system in WSN. Cluster Computing, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1581-1.
  41. Parameswari, M., & Balasingh M. (2018b). Online measurement of water quality and reporting system using prominent rule controller based on aqua care-IOT. Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 22(1–2), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pham, B. T., Son, L. H., Hoang, T. A., Nguyen, D. M., & Bui, D. T. (2018). Prediction of shear strength of soft soil using machine learning methods. Catena, 166, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pranata, A. A., Lee, J. M., & Kim, D. S, (2017). Towards an IoT-based water quality monitoring system with brokerless pub/sub architecture. In local and metropolitan area networks, LANMAN, IEEE international symposium, (pp. 1-6), IEEE.Google Scholar
  44. PressReade (2018). Water: Freely we receive, freely we abuse. Available at: https://www.pressreader.com/sri-lanka/daily-mirror-sri-lanka/20160608/282432758422013
  45. Ramesh, Maneesha V., et al. (2017). Water quality monitoring and waste management using IoT. Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), (pp. 78–82),IEEE.Google Scholar
  46. Riis, T. S. (2016). Modelling water distribution systems-integration between SCADA systems and hydraulic network simulation models, Master’s thesis, NTNU, 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Saravanan, K. (2017). Cloud robotics: robot rides on the cloud – architecture, applications, and challenges. In R. Kumar, P. Pattnaik, & P. Pandey (Eds.), Detecting and mitigating robotic cyber security risks (pp. 261–274). Hershey: IGI Global.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2154-9.ch017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saravanan, K., & Saraniya, S. (2018). Cloud IOT based novel livestock monitoring and identification system using UID. Sensor Review, 38(1), 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1108/SR-08-2017-0152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saravanan, K., & Srinivasan, P. (2017). Examining IoT’s applications using cloud services. In P. Tomar & G. Kaur (Eds.), Examining cloud computing technologies through the Internet of Things (pp. 147–163). Hershey: IGI Global.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3445-7.ch008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Satish, T., & Amruta, K., (2013). Water quality monitoring system using ZigBee based wireless sensor network, IEEE conference on automation, computing, communication, control and compressed sensing, (pp. 281-285), IEEE.Google Scholar
  51. Silva, et al. (2011). Grid-based wide area water quality measurement system for surface water, IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, (pp.108–114), IEEE.Google Scholar
  52. Singh, K., Singh, K., Son, L. H., & Aziz, A. (2018). Congestion control in wireless sensor networks by hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm. Computer Networks, 138, 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, L., Inman, A., Lai, X., Zhang, H., Fanqiao, M., Jianbin, Z., et al. (2017). Mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in England and China, and the scope for policy transfer. Land Use Policy, 61, 208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Son, L. H., Fujita, H. (2018). Neural-fuzzy with representative sets for prediction of student performance. Applied Intelligence, in press.Google Scholar
  55. Son, L. H., Chiclana, F., Kumar, R., Mittal, M., Khari, M., Chatterjee, J. M., & Baik, S. W. (2018a). ARM–AMO: an efficient association rule mining algorithm based on animal migration optimization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 154, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Son, L. H., Jha, S., Kumar, R., Chatterjee, J. M., & Khari, M. (2018b). Collaborative handshaking approaches between internet of computing and internet of things towards a smart world: a review from 2009–2017. Telecommunication Systems, 1–18.Google Scholar
  57. Stoian, I., Capatina, D., Ghiran, O., Miclea, L. C., & Enyedi, S. (2016). SCADA plug-in modules and instruments for federative organisation: application on water management. In automation, quality and testing, robotics, AQTR, (pp.1-6), IEEE.Google Scholar
  58. Sun, H., Shi, B., Yang, F., & Wang, D. (2017). Effects of sulfate on heavy metal release from iron corrosion scales in drinking water distribution system. Water Research, 114, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tam, N. T., Hai, D. T., Son, L. H., & Vinh, L. T. (2018). Improving lifetime and network connections of 3D wireless sensor networks based on fuzzy clustering and particle swarm optimization. Wireless Networks, 24(5), 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tuan, T. M., Fujita, H., Dey, N., Ashour, A. S., Ngoc, V. T. N., & Chu, D. T. (2018). Dental diagnosis from X-ray images: an expert system based on fuzzy computing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 39, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuong, L., Son, L. H., Vo, M. T., Lee, M. Y., & Baik, S. W. (2018). Cluster-based boosting algorithm for bankruptcy prediction. Symmetry, 10, 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong, B. P., & Kerkez, B. (2016). Real-time environmental sensor data: an application to water quality using web services. Environmental Modelling & Software, 84, 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zakaria, Y., & Michael, K. (2017). An integrated cloud-based wireless sensor network for monitoring industrial wastewater discharged into water sources. Wireless Sensor Network, 9(8), 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhenan, L., Kai, W., & Bo, L. (2013). Design and development of automatic water flow. IEEE Journal of Sensors, 2(4), 78–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAnna University Regional CampusTirunelveliIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringLNCT CollegeJabalpurIndia
  3. 3.VNU Information Technology InstituteVietnam National UniversityHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations