Advertisement

The effect of land use in the catchment and meteorological conditions on the riverine transport of dissolved organic carbon into the Puck Lagoon (southern Baltic)

  • Dominika Saniewska
  • Karolina Gębka
  • Katarzyna Łukawska-Matuszewska
  • Magdalena Bełdowska
  • Agnieszka Wochna
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration and fluxes from four rivers draining the catchment of the Puck Lagoon in southern Baltic are presented. Water samples from rivers and coastal zone close to the rivers’ mouth were collected from April 2015 to March 2017. DOC was measured using high temperature catalytic oxidation with an NDIR detection. DOC concentration in rivers as well as area specific load discharged to the lagoon reflected variations of land use along their course. Area specific load of DOC discharged by rivers with high proportion of forests, meadows, and pastures in the catchment was significantly higher as compared to rivers with catchment dominated by arable land. However, the main controlling factor of the total discharged loads of DOC was the water flow. The highest loads were observed during the downpour. That was due to the larger volumes of water transported with rivers and the higher concentration of DOC resulting from increased leaching from the catchment area. The obtained results are especially important in the light of climate change in the southern Baltic region. According to the forecasts, we can expect increased precipitation and flooding and consequently increased leaching from the catchment and transport of DOC to the sea via rivers.

Keywords

DOC Freshwater discharge Watershed Precipitation Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Centre (grant number 2014/13/B/ST10/02807) and University of Gdansk (grant number 538-G235-B207-16).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andrulewicz, E. & Janta, A. (1997). Puck Lagoon. In A. Janta (Ed.), Seaside landscape park (pp. 123–137). Władysławowo: Coastal Landscape Park Publisher (in Polish).Google Scholar
  2. Asmala, E., Stedmon, C. A., & Thomas, D. N. (2012). Linking CDOM spectral absorption to dissolved organic carbon concentrations and loadings in boreal estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 111, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asmala, E., Autio, R., Kaartokallio, H., Pitkänen, L., Stedmon, C. A., & Thomas, D. N. (2013). Bioavailability of riverine dissolved organic matter in three Baltic Sea estuaries and the effect of catchment land-use. Biogeosciences, 10, 6969–6986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bełdowska, M., Jędruch, A., Słupkowska, J., Saniewska, D., & Saniewski, M. (2015). Macrophyta as a vector of contemporary and historical mercury from the marine environment to the trophic web. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(7), 5228–5240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benner, R. (2002). Chemical composition and reactivity. In A.D. Hansell & C.A. Carlson (Eds.), Biogeochemistry of marine dissolved organic matter (pp. 59–90). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi, T., Garcia-Tigreros, S.F., Yvon-Lewis, S.A., Shields, M., Mills, H.J., Butman, D., et al. (2013). Enhanced transfer of terrestrially derived carbon to the atmosphere in a flooding event. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conmy, R. N., Coble, P. G., Cannizzaro, J. P., & Heil, C. A. (2009). Influence of extreme storm events on West Florida shelf CDOM distributions. Journal Geophysical Research, 114, G00F04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai, M., Yin, Z., Meng, F., Liu, Q., & Cai, W.-J. (2012). Spatial distribution of riverine DOC inputs to the ocean: an updated global synthesis. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das, D., & Veziroǧlu, T. N. (2001). Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 26, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Degens, E. T., Kempe, S., & Richey, J. E. (1991). Summary: biogeochemistry of major world rivers. In E. T. Degens, S. Kempe, & J. E. Richey (Eds.), Biogeochemisty of major world rivers (pp. 323–347). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Del Vecchio, R., & Blough, N. V. (2004). On the origin of the optical properties of humic substances. Environmental Science Technology, 38, 3885–3891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elifantz, H., Dittel, A. I., Cottrell, M. T., & Kirchman, D. L. (2007). Dissolved organic matter assimilation by heterotrophic bacterial groups in the western Arctic Ocean. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 50, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner, H., Edmonds-Brown, V., & Green, A. (2000). Problems of quality designed in diffusely polluted urban streamsthe case of Pymme’s Brook, North London. Environmental Pollution, 109, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambrell, R.P. & Patrick, W.H. (1978). Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. In D.D. Hook, R.M.M. Crawford (Eds.). Plant life in anaerobic environments (pp. 375–423). MI, USA: Ann Arbor Science.Google Scholar
  15. Gogou, A., & Repeta, D. J. (2010). Particulate-dissolved transformations as a sink for semi-labile dissolved organic matter: chemical characterization of high molecular weight dissolved and surface active organic matter in seawater and in diatom cultures. Marine Chemistry, 121, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosnell, K., Balcom, P., Tobias, C., Gilhooly, W., & Mason, R. (2017). Spatial and temporal trophic transfer dynamics of mercury and methylmercury into zooplankton and phytoplankton of Long Island Sound. Limnology and Oceanography, 62, 1122–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graeber, D., Gelbrecht, J., Pusch, M. T., Anlanger, C., & von Schiller, D. (2012). Agriculture has changed the amount and composition of dissolved organic matter in Central European headwater streams. Science of the Total Environment, 438, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grigal, D. F. (2002). Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. Environmental Reviews, 10, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansell, D. A. (2013). Recalcitrant dissolved organic carbon fractions. Annual Review of Marine Science, 5, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HELCOM (2010). Hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea—an integrated thematic assessment of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 120B.Google Scholar
  21. HELCOM (2013). Climate change in the Baltic Sea area: HELCOM thematic assessment in 2013. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 137.Google Scholar
  22. Hoikkala, L., Kortelainen, P., Soinne, H., & Kuosa, H. (2015). Dissolved organic matter in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Marine System., 142, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IMGW (2017). Bulletin of the National Hydrological and Meteorological Service, Year 2016. Warszawa: IMGW-PIB (in Polish).Google Scholar
  24. Jędruch, A., Bełdowski, J., & Bełdowska, M. (2015). Long-term changes and distribution of mercury concentrations in surface sediments of the Gdansk Basin (Southern Baltic Sea). Journal of Soils Sediments, 15, 2487–2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jędruch, A., Kwasigroch, U., Bełdowska, M., & Kuliński, K. (2017). Mercury in suspended matter of the Gulf of Gdańsk: Origin, distribution and transport at the land–sea interface. Marine Pollution Bulletin., 118(1–2), 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonas, R. B. (1997). Bacteria, dissolved organics and oxygen consumption in salinity stratified Chesapeake Bay. An anoxia paradigm. American Zoologist, 37, 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korzeniewski, K. (1993). Puck Bay (532p). Gdańsk: FRUG (in Polish).Google Scholar
  28. Krajewska, Z. & Bogdanowicz, R. (2009). Differentiation of the export amount of biogenic substances in the catchment area of the Puck Bay. In A.T. Jankowski, D. Absalon, D. Machowski, M. Ruman. (Eds.). Transformation of water relations in a changing environment (pp. 177–187). Sosnowiec: University of Silesia, the Polish Geographical Society (in Polish).Google Scholar
  29. Kruk-Dowgiałło, L., & Szaniawska, A. (2008). Puck Bay. In U. Schiewer (Ed.), Ecology of Baltic coastal waters (pp. 154–162). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Kuliński, K. & Pempkowiak, J. (2012). Carbon cycling in the Baltic Sea (143 pp.). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Matczak, P. (2012). Climate change regional review: Poland. WIREs Climate Change, 3, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamborg, C., Fitzgerald, W., Skoog, A., & Visscher, P. (2004). The abundance and source of mercury-binding organic ligands in Long Island Sound. Marine Chemistry, 90, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ludwig, W., Probst, J.-L., & Kempe, S. (1996). Predicting the oceanic input of organic carbon by continental erosion. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lukawska-Matuszewska, K. (2016). Contribution of non-carbonate inorganic and organic alkalinity to total measured alkalinity in pore waters in marine sediments (Gulf of Gdansk, S-E Baltic Sea). Marine Chemistry, 186, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macioszczyk A. & Dobrzyński D. (2002). Hydrogeochemistry (448 p.). Warszawa: PWN (In Polish).Google Scholar
  36. Miller, W. L., & Moran, M. A. (1997). Interaction of photochemical and microbial processes in the degradation of dissolved organic matter from coastal marine environments. Limnology and Oceanography, 42, 1317–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Niemirycz, E. (2011). Riverine inflow of chemical substances. In Sz. Uścinowicz (Ed.) Geochemistry of the Baltic sea surface sediments (pp. 93–113). Warszawa: PIG-PIB.Google Scholar
  38. Pastuszak, M., & Igras J. (2012). Temporal and spatial differences in mission of nitrogen and phosphorus from polish territory to the Baltic Sea (448 p.). Gdynia–Puławy: National Marine Fisheries Research Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Rassmann, J., Lansard, B., Pozzato, L., & Rabouille, C. (2016). Carbonate chemistry in sediment pore waters of the Rhône River delta driven by early diagenesis (NW Mediterranean). Biogeosciences, 13, 5379–5394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravichandran, M. (2004). Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter—a review. Chemosphere, 55, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rolff, C., & Elmgren, R. (2000). Use of riverine organic matter in plankton food webs of the Baltic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 197, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., Bełdowski, J., Jędruch, A., Saniewski, M., & Falkowska, L. (2014a). Mercury loads into the sea associated with extreme flood. Environmental Pollution, 191, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., Bełdowski, J., Saniewski, M., Szubska, M., Romanowski, A., et al. (2014b). The impact of land use and season on the riverine transport of mercury into the marine coastal zone. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(11), 7593–7604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saniewska, D., Bełdowska, M., Bełdowski, J., Saniewski, M., Gębka, K., Szubska, M., & Wochna, A. (2018). Impact of intense rains and flooding on mercury riverine input to the coastal zone. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 127, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schnell, R. W., Vietor, D. M., Munster, C. L., White, R. H., & Provin, T. L. (2010). Effect of turfgrass establishment practices and composted biosolids on water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sholkovitz, E. R., Boyle, E. A., & Price, N. B. (1978). The removal of dissolved humic acids and iron during estuarine mixing. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 40(1), 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szymczycha, B., Maciejewska, A., Winogradow, A., & Pempkowiak, J. (2014). Could submarine groundwater discharge be a significant carbon source to the southern Baltic Sea? Oceanologia, 56, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Institute of OceanographyUniversity of GdanskGdyniaPoland
  2. 2.GIS CentreUniversity of GdanskGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations