Advertisement

From lake to estuary, the tale of two waters: a study of aquatic continuum biogeochemistry

  • Paul JulianIIEmail author
  • Todd Z. Osborne
Article

Abstract

The balance of fresh and saline water is essential to estuarine ecosystem function. Along the fresh-brackish-saline water gradient within the C-43 canal/Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE), the quantity, timing and distribution of water, and associated water quality significantly influence ecosystem function. Long-term trends of water quality and quantity were assessed from Lake Okeechobee to the CRE between May 1978 and April 2016. Significant changes to monthly flow volumes were detected between the lake and the estuary which correspond to changes in upstream management. and climatic events. Across the 37-year period, total phosphorus (TP) flow-weighted mean (FWM) concentration significantly increased at the lake; meanwhile, total nitrogen (TN) FMW concentrations significantly declined at both the lake and estuary headwaters. Between May 1999 and April 2016, TN, TP, and total organic carbon (TOC), ortho-P, and ammonium conditions were assessed within the estuary at several monitoring locations. Generally, nutrient concentrations decreased from upstream to downstream with shifts in TN/TP from values > 20 in the freshwater portion, ~ 20 in the estuarine portion, and < 20 in the marine portion indicating a spatial shift in nutrient limitations along the continuum. Aquatic productivity analysis suggests that the estuary is net heterotrophic with productivity being negatively influenced by TP, TN, and TOC likely due to a combination of effects including shading by high color dissolved organic matter. We conclude that rainfall patterns, land use, and the resulting discharges of runoff drive the ecology of the C-43/CRE aquatic continuum and associated biogeochemistry rather than water management associated with Lake Okeechobee.

Keywords

Water management Aquatic productivity Aquatic continuum Water quality Climate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Eric Millbrandt, South Florida Water Management District and the Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation staff for field and analytical support. The authors would like to thank Peter Doering, John Kominoski, the anonymous reviewers, and editor(s) for their efforts and constructive review of this manuscript.

Funding information

The River, Estuary, and Coastal Observing Network is partially supported by NOAA award to E.C.M. and B. Kirkpatrick for the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) (#NA16NOS0120018) and the LAT Foundation.

Supplementary material

10661_2017_6455_MOESM1_ESM.docx (442 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 441 kb)

References

  1. Abrantes, K. G., & Sheaves, M. (2010). Importance of freshwater flow in terrestrial–aquatic energetic connectivity in intermittently connected estuaries of tropical Australia. Marine Biology, 157(9), 2071–2086.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-010-1475-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abtew, W., & Ciuca, V. (2017). Hydrology of the South Florida environment. In South Florida environmental report. West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  3. Abtew, W., Pathak, C., Huebner, R. S., & Ciuca, V. (2009). Hydrology of the South Florida environment. In South Florida environmental report. West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  4. Alber, M. (2002). A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries, 25(6), 1246–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. L., & Flaig, E. G. (1995). Agricultural best management practices and surface water improvement and management. Water Science and Technology, 31(8), 109–121.Google Scholar
  6. Avila, L. A. (2007). Tropcial cyclone report: Tropical Storm Barry (AL022007) (p. 12). Miami: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL022007_Barry.pdf
  7. Barnes, T. (2005). Caloosahatchee estuary conceptual ecological model. Wetlands, 25(4), 884–897.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes, T. K., Volety, A. K., Chartier, K., Mazzotti, F. J., & Pearlstine, L. (2007). A habitat suitability index model for the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), a tool for restoration of the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida. Journal of Shellfish Research, 26(4), 949–959.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, M. W. (2016). SWMPr: Retrieving, organizing, and analyzing estuary monitoring data. CRAN R-Project. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SWMPr
  10. Bianchi, T. S. (2013). Estuarine chemistry. In J. W. Day, B. C. Crump, W. M. Kemp, & A. Yanez-Aranciba (Eds.), Estuarine ecology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Billen, G. (1993). The Phison River system: a conceptual model of C, N and P transformations in the aquatic continuum from land to sea. In R. Wollast, F. T. Mackenzie, & L. Chou (Eds.), Interactions of C, N, P and S biogeochemical cycles and global change (pp. 141–161). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouwman, A. F., Bierkens, M. F. P., Griffioen, J., Hefting, M. M., Middelburg, J. J., Middelkoop, H., & Slomp, C. P. (2013). Nutrient dynamics, transfer and retention along the aquatic continuum from land to ocean: towards integration of ecological and biogeochemical models. Biogeosciences, 10(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1-2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronaugh, D. B., & Werner, A. (2013). Zhang + Yue-Pilon trends package. CRAN R-Project. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=zyp
  14. Buzzelli, C., Gorman, P., Doering, P., Chen, Z., & Wan, Y. (2015). The application of oyster and seagrass models to evaluate alternative inflow scenarios related to Everglades restoration. Ecological Modelling, 297, 154–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buzzelli, C., Doering, P., Wan, Y., Coley, T., Sun, D., Chen, Z., et al. (2016). DRAFT: assessment of the responses of the Caloosahatchee River Estuary to low freshwater inflow in the dry season (p. 200). West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  16. Caffrey, J. M. (2004). Factors controlling net ecosystem metabolism in U.S. estuaries. Estuaries, 27(1), 90–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caffrey, J. M., Murrell, M. C., Amacker, K. S., Harper, J. W., Phipps, S., & Woodrey, M. S. (2013). Seasonal and inter-annual patterns in primary production, respiration, and net ecosystem metabolism in three estuaries in the Northeast Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts, 37(1), 222–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9701-5.Google Scholar
  18. Childers, D. L., Boyer, J. N., Davis, S. E., Madden, C. J., Rudnick, D. T., & Sklar, F. H. (2006). Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentrations in the oligotrophic “upside-down” estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(1part2), 602–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (2000). Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations. Limnology and Oceanography, 45(8), 1718–1730.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.8.1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conley, D. J., Paerl, H. W., Howarth, R. W., Boesch, D. F., Seitzinger, S. P., Karl, E., et al. (2009). Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science, 123, 1014–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cook, J. (2014). Influence of freshwater inflow on the abundance and distribution of decapod zooplankton in the Caloosahatchee River, Florida (Master of Science). Fort Myers: Florida Gulf Coast University.Google Scholar
  22. del Giorgio, P. A., & Peters, R. H. (1994). Patterns in planktonic P: R ratios in lakes: influence of lake trophy and dissolved organic carbon. Limnology and Oceanography, 39(4), 772–787.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.4.0772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dinno, A. (2015). Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. CRAN R-Project. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test
  24. Dodds, W. K. (2003). Misuse of inorganic N and soluble reactive P concentrations to indicate nutrient status of surface waters. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 22(2), 171–181.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1467990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dodds, W. K. (2006). Nutrients and the “dead zone”: the link between nutrient ratios and dissolved oxygen in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(4), 211–217.Google Scholar
  26. Doering, P. H., & Chamberlain, R. H. (1999). Water quality and source of freshwater discharge to the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(4), 793–806.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doering, P. H., Oviatt, C. A., Nowicki, B. L., Klos, E. G., & Reed, L. W. (1995). Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of primary production in a simulated estuarine gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 124, 271–287.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps124271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doering, P. H., Chamberlain, R. H., & Haunert, D. E. (2002). Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida. Estuaries, 25(6), 1343–1354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doering, P. H., Chamberlain, R. H., & Haunert, K. M. (2006). Chlorophyll a and its use as an indicator of eutrophication in the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida. Florida Scientist, 69, 51.Google Scholar
  30. England, L. E., & Rosemond, A. D. (2004). Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkages in headwater streams. Freshwater Biology, 49(6), 721–734.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01219.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ensign, S. H., & Doyle, M. W. (2006). Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 111(G4), G04009.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eyre, B. (1998). Transport, retention and transformation of material in Australian estuaries. Estuaries, 21(4), 540–551.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1353293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Florida Administrative Code. (2008) Chapter 62–160 Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  34. Gallardo, B., Español, C., & Comin, F. A. (2012). Aquatic metabolism short-term response to the flood pulse in a Mediterranean floodplain. Hydrobiologia, 693(1), 251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1126-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geider, R., & La Roche, J. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. European Journal of Phycology, 37(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967026201003456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenawalt-Boswell, J. M., Hale, J. A., Fuhr, K. S., & Ott, J. A. (2006). Seagrass species composition and distribution trends in relation to salinity fluctuations in Charlotte Harbor, Florida. Florida Scientist, 69, 24.Google Scholar
  37. Grimm, N. B., Gergel, S. E., McDowell, W. H., Boyer, E. W., Dent, C. L., Groffman, P., Hart, S. C., Harvey, J., Johnston, C., Mayorga, E., McClain, M. E., & Pinay, G. (2003). Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. Oecologia, 137(4), 485–501.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guildford, S. J., & Hecky, R. E. (2000). Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: Is there a common relationship? Limnology and Oceanography, 45(6), 1213–1223.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.6.1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hagerthey, S. E., Cole, J. J., & Kilbane, D. (2010). Aquatic metabolism in the Everglades: Dominance of water column heterotrophy. Limnology and Oceanography, 55(2), 653–666.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.55.2.0653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hagy, J. D., Boynton, W. R., Keefe, C. W., & Wood, K. V. (2004). Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries, 27(4), 634–658.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanson, P. C., Bade, D. L., Carpenter, S. R., & Kratz, T. K. (2003). Lake metabolism: relationships with dissolved organic carbon and phosphorus. Limnology and Oceanography, 48(3), 1112–1119.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.3.1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris, G. P. (2001). Biogeochemistry of nitrogen and phosphorus in Australian catchments, rivers and estuaries: effects of land use and flow regulation and comparisons with global patterns. Marine and Freshwater Research, 52(1), 139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF00031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heil, C. A., Revilla, M., Glibert, P. M., & Murasko, S. (2007). Nutrient quality drives differential phytoplankton community composition on the southwest Florida shelf. Limnology and Oceanography, 52(3), 1067–1078.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoellein, T. J., Bruesewitz, D. A., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). Revisiting Odum (1956): a synthesis of aquatic ecosystem metabolism. Limnology and Oceanography, 58(6), 2089–2100.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howarth, R. W., & Marino, R. (2006). Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(1part2), 364–376.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Howarth, R., & Paerl, H. W. (2008). Coastal marine eutrophication: control of both nitrogen and phosphorus is necessary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pnas–0807266106.Google Scholar
  47. Howarth, R., Chan, F., Conley, D. J., Garnier, J., Doney, S. C., Marino, R., & Billen, G. (2011). Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(1), 18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1890/100008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jenerette, G. D., & Lal, R. (2005). Hydrologic sources of carbon cycling uncertainty throughout the terrestrial–aquatic continuum. Global Change Biology, 11(11), 1873–1882.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01021.x.Google Scholar
  49. Jickells, T. D. (1998). Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone. Science, 281(5374), 217–222.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Karlsson, J., Byström, P., Ask, J., Ask, P., Persson, L., & Jansson, M. (2009). Light limitation of nutrient-poor lake ecosystems. Nature, 460(7254), 506–509.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kimmerer, W. J. (2002). Effects of freshwater flow on abundance of estuarine organisms: physical effects or trophic linkages? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 243, 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps243039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewis, W. M., Wurtsbaugh, W. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2011). Rationale for control of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus to reduce eutrophication of inland waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(24), 10300–10305.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es202401p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Livingston, R. J., McGlynn, S. E., & Niu, X. (1998). Factors controlling seagrass growth in a gulf coastal system: Water and sediment quality and light. Aquatic Botany, 60(2), 135–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00079-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Macauley, J. M., Summers, J. K., Engle, V. D., & Harwell, L. C. (2002). The ecological condition of south Florida estuaries. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 75(3), 253–269.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014800217354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mannino, A., & Montagna, P. A. (1997). Small-scale spatial variation of macrobenthic community structure. Estuaries, 20(1), 159–173.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1352729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maranger, R. J., Pace, M. L., del Giorgio, P. A., Caraco, N. F., & Cole, J. J. (2005). Longitudinal spatial patterns of bacterial production and respiration in a large river–estuary: implications for ecosystem carbon consumption. Ecosystems, 8(3), 318–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0071-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Maynard, J. J., Dahlgren, R. A., & O’Geen, A. T. (2012). Quantifying spatial variability and biogeochemical controls of ecosystem metabolism in a eutrophic flow-through wetland. Ecological Engineering, 47, 221–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McPherson, B. F., & Miller, R. L. (1990). Nutrient distribution and variability in the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 26(1), 67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1990.tb01352.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mendoza-Lera, C., Larrañaga, A., Pérez, J., Descals, E., Martínez, A., Moya, O., et al. (2012). Headwater reservoirs weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkage by slowing leaf-litter processing in downstream regulated reaches. River Research and Applications, 28(1), 13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Milbrandt, E. C., Bartleson, R. D., Martignette, A. J., Siwicke, J., & Thompson, M. (2016). Evaluating light attenuation and low salinity in the lower Caloosahatchee Estuary with the River, Estuary, and Coastal Observing Network (RECON). Florida Scientist, 79(2).Google Scholar
  61. National Research Council. (2010). Progress toward restoring the Everglades: the 3rd Biennial review (p. 312). Washington DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  62. Odum, H. T. (1956). Primary production in flowing waters. Limnology and Oceanography, 1(2), 102–117.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1956.1.2.0102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Paerl, H. W. (2009). Controlling eutrophication along the freshwater–marine continuum: dual nutrient (N and P) reductions are essential. Estuaries and Coasts, 32(4), 593–601.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-009-9158-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paerl, H. W., Pinckney, J. L., Fear, J. M., & Peierls, B. L. (1998). Ecosystem responses to internal and watershed organic matter loading: consequences for hypoxia in the eutrophying Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 166, 17–25.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps166017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Perez Jr., B. C., J., W. D., Justic, D., Lane, R. R., & Twilley, R. R. (2010). Nutrient stoichiometry, freshwater residence time, and nutrient retention in a river-dominated estuary in the Mississippi Delta. Hydrobiologia, 658(1), 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0472-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Perona, E., Bonilla, I., & Mateo, P. (1999). Spatial and temporal changes in water quality in a Spanish river. Science of the Total Environment, 241(1–3), 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00334-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Petersen, J. E., Chen, C.-C., & Kemp, W. M. (1997). Scaling aquatic primary productivity: experiments under nutrient- and light-limited conditions. Ecology, 78(8), 2326–2338.Google Scholar
  68. Pholert, T. (2016). Non-parametric trend tests and change-point detection. CRAN R-Project. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend
  69. Prairie, Y. T., Bird, D. F., & Cole, J. J. (2002). The summer metabolic balance in the epilimnion of southeastern Quebec lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 47(1), 316–321.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Qiu, C., & Wan, Y. (2013). Time series modeling and prediction of salinity in the Caloosahatchee River Estuary. Water Resources Research, 49(9), 5804–5816.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reddy, K. R., Kadlec, R. H., Flaig, E., & Gale, P. M. (1999). Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 29(1), 83–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389991259182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Redfield, A. C. (1958). The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. American Scientist, 46(3), 230A–2221.Google Scholar
  73. Schindler, D. W., Hecky, R. E., Findlay, D. L., Stainton, M. P., Parker, B. R., Paterson, M. J., Beaty, K. G., Lyng, M., & Kasian, S. E. M. (2008). Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11254–11258.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805108105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. SFWMD. (2005). Documentation of the South Florida water management model version 5.5. West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  75. SFWMD, & USACE. (1999). Implementation strategies towards the most efficient water Management: the Lake Okeechobee WSE operation guideline (final). Jacksonville: The Operational Planning Core Team.Google Scholar
  76. Shen, X., Sun, T., Tang, S., & Yang, W. (2015). Short-term response of aquatic metabolism to hydrologic pulsing in the coastal wetlands of Yellow River Delta. Wetlands, 36(1), 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0710-y.Google Scholar
  77. Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(4), 464–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sklar, F. H., & Browder, J. A. (1998). Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Management, 22(4), 547–562.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sonderegger, D. (2012). SiZer: significant zero crossings. CRAN R-Project. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SiZer
  80. Soniat, T. M., Conzelmann, C. P., Byrd, J. D., Roszell, D. P., Bridevaux, J. L., Suir, K. J., & Colley, S. B. (2013). Predicting the effects of proposed Mississippi River diversions on oyster habitat quality; application of an oyster habitat suitability index model. Journal of Shellfish Research, 32(3), 629–638.  https://doi.org/10.2983/035.032.0302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. South Florida Water Management District, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, & Florida Department of Agriculture and conserver Services. (2009). Caloosahatchee River watershed protection plan. West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District http://www.sfwmd.gov/northerneverglades.Google Scholar
  82. Staehr, P. A., Bade, D., Van de Bogert, M. C., Koch, G. R., Williamson, C., Hanson, P., Cole, J. J., & Kratz, T. (2010). Lake metabolism and the diel oxygen technique: state of the science. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 8(11), 628–644.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.0628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Steinman, A. D., Havens, K. E., Rodusky, A. J., Sharfstein, B., James, R. T., & Harwell, M. C. (2002). The influence of environmental variables and a managed water recession on the growth of charophytes in a large, subtropical lake. Aquatic Botany, 72(3–4), 297–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00207-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sun, D., Wan, Y., & Qiu, C. (2016). Three dimensional model evaluation of physical alterations of the Caloosahatchee river and estuary: impact on salt transport. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 173, 16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2003). Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(25), 14949–14954.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2434847100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thébault, J., Schraga, T. S., Cloern, J. E., & Dunlavey, E. G. (2008). Primary production and carrying capacity of former salt ponds after reconnection to San Francisco Bay. Wetlands, 28(3), 841–851.  https://doi.org/10.1672/07-190.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner, R. E., & Rabalais, N. N. (2003). Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River basin for 200 years. Bioscience, 53(6), 563–572.Google Scholar
  88. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, & South Florida Water Management District. (2010). Central and southern Florida project Caloosahatchee River (C-43) west basin storage reservoir integrated project implementation report and environmental impact statement. Jacksonville: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
  89. Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(1), 130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vearil, J. (2008). History of Lake Okeechobee Operating Criteria. Presented at the Greater Everglades ecosystem restoration, Naples. https://conference.ifas.ufl.edu/GEER2008/Presentation_PDFs/Thursday/Royal%20Palm%20VIII/1140%20J%20Vearil.pdf
  91. Vito, M., & Muggeo, R. (2003). Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3055–3071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walters, R. A., Josberger, E. G., & Driedger, C. L. (1988). Columbia Bay, Alaska: an ‘upside down’ estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 26(6), 607–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(88)90037-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wan, Y., Qian, Y., Migliaccio, K. W., Li, Y., & Conrad, C. (2014). Linking spatial variations in water quality with water and land management using multivariate techniques. Journal of Environmental Quality, 43(2), 599–610.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.09.0355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Water SciencesUniversity of FloridaFt. PierceUSA
  2. 2.Soil and Water SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Whitney Laboratory for Marine BioscienceUniversity of FloridaSt. AugustineUSA

Personalised recommendations