Advertisement

Rapid in situ assessment for predicting soil quality using an algae-soaked disc seeding assay

  • Sun-Hwa Nam
  • Jongmin Moon
  • Shin Woong Kim
  • Hakyeong Kim
  • Seung-Woo Jeong
  • Youn-Joo AnEmail author
Article

Abstract

The soil quality of remediated land is altered and this land consequently exerts unexpected biological effects on terrestrial organisms. Therefore, field evaluation of such land should be conducted using biological indicators. Algae are a promising new biological indicator since they are a food source for organisms in higher soil trophic levels and easily sampled from the soil. Field evaluation of soil characteristics is preferred to be testing in laboratory conditions because many biological effects cannot be duplicated during laboratory evaluations. Herein, we describe a convenient and rapid algae-soaked disc seeding assay for assessing soil quality in the field based on soil algae. The collection of algae is easy and rapid and the method predicts the short-term quality of contaminated, remediated, and amended farm and paddy soils. The algae-soaked disc seeding assay is yet to be extensively evaluated, and the method cannot be applied to loamy sand soil in in situ evaluations. The algae-soaked disc seeding assay is recommended for prediction of soil quality in in situ evaluations because it reflects all variations in the environment. The algae-soaked disc seeding assay will help to develop management strategies for in situ evaluation.

Keywords

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Disc Field In situ Soil algae 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) through “The Chemical Accident Prevention Technology Development Project,” funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (No. 2016001970001). This research was also supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01059664).

References

  1. Ahmad, R., James, T. K., Rahman, A., & Holland, P. T. (2003). Dissipation of the herbicide clopyralid in an allophanic soil: laboratory and field studies. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, 38, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An, Y.-J., & Kampbell, D. H. (2003). Total, dissolved, and bioavailable metals at Lake Texoma marinas. Environmental Pollution, 122, 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. H. (2003). Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98(1-3), 285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00088-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antunes, S. C., Pereira, J. L., Cachada, A., Duarte, A. C., Gonçalves, F., Sousa, J. P., & Pereira, R. (2010). Structural effects of the bioavailable fraction of pesticides in soil suitability of elutriate testing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 184(1-3), 215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aruoja, V., Kurvet, I., Dubourguier, H. C., & Kahru, A. (2004). Toxicity testing of heavy-metal-polluted soils with algae Selenastrum a soil suspension assay. Environmental Toxicology, 19(4), 396–402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baun, A., Justesen, K. B., & Nyholm, N. (2002). Algal test with soil suspensions and elutriates: a comparative evaluation for PAH-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 46(2), 251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00097-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boshoff, M., Jordaens, K., Baguet, S., & Bervoets, L. (2015). Trace metal transfer in a soil–plant–snail microcosm field experiment and biomarker responses in snails. Ecological Indicators, 48, 636–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cang, L., Zhou, D.-M., Wang, Q.-Y., & Wu, D.-Y. (2009). Effects of electrokinetic treatment of a heavy metal contaminated soil on soil enzyme activities. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2-3), 1602–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, L. W., Meier, J. R., & Smith, M. K. (1997). Application of plant and earthworm bioassays to evaluate remediation of a lead-contaminated soil. Archives of Environmental Contamination Toxicology, 32, 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiochetta, C. G., Radetski, M. R., Corrêa, A. X., Tischer, V., Tiepo, E. N., & Radetski, C. M. (2013). Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(11), 7656–7665.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1269-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, S. V., Chu, A., & Goodman, R. H. (2002). Leachability and toxicity of hydrocarbons, metals and salt contamination from flare pit soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 133(1/4), 297–314.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012925812698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Schamphelaere, K. A. C., Vasconncelos, F. M., Heijerick, D. G., Tack, F. M. G., Delbeke, K., Allen, H. E., & Janssen, C. R. (2003). Development and field validation of a predictive copper toxicity model for the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 22, 2454–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dose, H. L., Fortuna, A. M., Cihacek, L. J., Norland, J., DeSutter, T. M., Clay, D. E., & Bell, J. (2015). Biological indicators provide short term soil health assessment during sodic soil reclamation. Ecological Indicators, 58, 244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fossi, M. C., Sanchez-Hernandez, J. C., Diaz-Diaz, R., Lari, L., Garcia-Hernandez, J. E., & Gaggi, C. (1995). The lizard Gallotia galloti as a bioindicator of organophosphorus contamination in the Canary Islands. Environmental Pollution, 87(3), 289–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)P4160-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frouz, J., Hrčková, K., Lána, J., Krištůfek, V., Mudrák, O., Lukešová, A., & Mihaljevič, M. (2011). Can laboratory toxicity tests explain the pattern of field communities of algae, plants, and invertebrates along a toxicity gradient of post-mining sites? Applied Soil Ecology, 51, 114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guéi, A. M., & Tondoh, J. E. (2012). Ecological preferences of earthworms for land-use types in semi-deciduous forest areas, Ivory Coast. Ecological Indicators, 18, 644–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammel, W., Steubing, L., & Debus, R. (1998). Assessment of the ecotoxic potential of soil contaminants by using a soil-algae test. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 40(1-2), 173–176.  https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1998.1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harding, D. E., & Ross, D. J. (1964). Some factors in low-temperature storage influencing the mineralisable nitrogen of soils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 15(12), 829–834.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740151203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartley, W., Uffindell, L., Plumb, A., Rawlinson, H. A., Putwain, P., & Dickinson, N. M. (2008). Assessing biological indicators for remediated anthropogenic urban soils. Science of the Total Environment, 405, 358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrero-Hernández, E., Marín-Benito, J. M., Andrades, M. S., Sánchez-Martín, M. J., & Rodríguez-Cruz, M. S. (2015). Field versus laboratory experiments to evaluate the fate of azoxystrobin in an amended vineyard soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 163, 78–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hosikian, A., Lim, S., Halim, R., & Danquah, M. K. (2010). Chlorophyll extraction from microalgae: a review on the process engineering aspects. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/391632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hund, K. (1997). Algal growth inhibition test-feasibility and limitations for soil assessment. Chemosphere, 35(5), 1069–1082.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00173-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalchuk, I., Kovalchuk, O., Arkhipov, A., & Hohn, B. (1998). Transgenic plants are sensitive bioindicators of nuclear pollution caused by the Chernobyl accident. Nature Biotechnology, 16(11), 1054–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1038/3505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, X.-Q., Ng, A., King, R., & Durnford, D. G. (2008). A rapid and simple bioassay method for herbicide detection. Biomarker Insights, 3, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lors, C., Ponge, J. F., Martínez Aldaya, M., & Damidot, D. (2011). Comparison of solid and liquid-phase bioassays using ecoscores to assess contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2974–2981.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magdaleno, A., Vėlez, C. G., Wenzel, M. T., & Tell, G. (2014). Effects of cadmium, copper and zinc on growth of four isolated algae from a highly polluted Argentina river. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 92(2), 202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-013-1171-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maisto, G., Manzo, S., De Nicola, F., Carotenuto, R., Rocco, A., & Alfani, A. (2011). Assessment of the effects of Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb soil contamination by ecotoxicological tests. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(11), 3049–3056.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10496a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mancinelli, R., Marinari, S., Di Felice, V., Savin, M. C., & Campiglia, E. (2016). Soil property, CO2 emission and aridity index as agroecological indicators to assess the mineralization of cover crop green manure in a Mediterranean environment. Ecological Indicators, 34, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marques, C. R., Pereira, R., & Gonçalves, F. (2011). Toxicity evaluation of natural samples from the vicinity of rice fields using two trophic levels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180(1-4), 521–536.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1803-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Rao, A. S. (1986a). Effect of monocrotophos and quinalphos on soil algae. Environmental Pollution, 40(2), 121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-1471(86)90079-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Rao, A. S. (1986b). The toxicity of phenolic compounds to soil algal population and to Chlorella vulgaris and Nostoc linckia. Plant and Soil, 96(2), 197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Rao, A. S. (1989). The use of unicellular soil green algae for insecticide bioassay. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 10(2), 119–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(89)90008-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Megharaj, M., Boul, H. L., & Thiele, J. H. (1999a). Effects of DDT and its metabolites on soil algae and enzymatic activity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 29(2), 130–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Megharaj, M., Singleton, I., Kookana, R., & Naidu, R. (1999b). Persistence and effects of fenamiphos on native algal populations and enzymatic activities in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(11), 1549–1553.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00078-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meier, J. R., Chang, L. W., Jacobs, S., Toresella, J., Meckes, M. C., & Smith, M. K. (1997). Use of plant and earthworm bioassays to evaluate remediation of soil from a site contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyl. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16(5), 928–938.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mendonca, E., & Picado, A. (2002). Ecotoxicological monitoring of remediation in a coke oven soil. Environmental Toxicology, 17(1), 74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.10034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Metting, B. (1981). The systematics and ecology of soil algae. Botanic Review, 47, 195–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ministry of Environment (ME). (2015). Official test methods of water quality. South Korea: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  39. Muralikrishna, P. V. G., & Venkateswarlu, K. (1984). Effect of insecticides on soil algal population. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 33(1), 241–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01625537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muscolo, A., Settineri, G., & Attinà, E. (2015). Early warning indicators of changes in soil ecosystem functioning. Ecological Indicators, 48, 542–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nam, S.-H., & An, Y.-J. (2015). An efficient and reproducible method for improving growth of a soil alga (Chlorococcum infusionum) for toxicity assays. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 119, 59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nam, S.-H., & An, Y.-J. (2016). Paper-disc method: an efficient assay for evaluating metal toxicity to soil algae. Environmental Pollution, 216, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National Academy of Agricultural Science (NAAS). (2010). Soil chemical analysis method, National Academy of Agricultural Science. South Korea: Suwon.Google Scholar
  44. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1984). Test no. 207: Earthworm, acute toxicity test, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Paz-Ferreiro, J., Trasar-Cepeda, C., del Carmen Leirós, M., Seoane, S., & Gil-Sotres, F. (2011). Intra-annual variation in biochemical properties and the biochemical equilibrium of different grassland soils under contrasting management and climate. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47, 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pen-Mouratov, S., Shukurov, N., & Steinberger, Y. (2010). Soil free-living nematodes as indicators of both industrial pollution and livestock activity in Central Asia. Ecological Indicators, 10(5), 955–967.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Planas, D., & Healey, F. P. (1978). Effects of arsenate on growth and phosphorus metabolism of phytoplankton. Journal of Phycology, 14(3), 337–341.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1978.tb00309.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rila, J.-P., & Eisentraeger, A. (2003). Application of bioassays for risk characterisation and remediation control of soils polluted with nitroaromatics and PAHs. Water AirSoil Pollution, 148, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rousseau, L., Fonte, S. J., Téllez, O., Van, d., Hoek, R., & Lavelle, P. (2013). Soil macrofauna as indicators of soil quality and land use impacts in smallholder agroecosystems of western Nicaragua. Ecological Indicators, 27, 71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shanab, S. M. M., & Shalaby, E. A. (2012). The first record of biological activities of the egyptian red algal species Compsopogon helwanii. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 2, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smolders, E., Mcgrath, S. P., Lombi, E., Karman, C. C., Bernhard, R., Cools, D., Van den Brande, K., Van Os, B., & Walrave, N. (2003). Comparison of toxicity of zinc for soil microbial processes between laboratory-contamined and polluted field soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22(11), 2592–2598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smolders, E., Buekers, J., Oliver, I., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2004). Soil properties affecting toxicity of zinc to soil microbial properties in laboratory-spiked and field-contaminated soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23, 2633–2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tan, K. H. (2005). Soil sampling, preparation, and analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wong, P. T. S., & Chau, Y. K. (1990). Zinc toxicity to freshwater algae. Environmental Toxicology, 5, 167–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health ScienceKonkuk UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Environmental EngineeringKunsan National UniversityKunsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations