Pre-mining trace element and radiation exposure to biota from a breccia pipe uranium mine in the Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA) watershed

  • Jo Ellen Hinck
  • Danielle Cleveland
  • William G. Brumbaugh
  • Greg Linder
  • Julia Lankton
Article

Abstract

The risks to wildlife and humans from uranium (U) mining in the Grand Canyon watershed are largely unknown. In addition to U, other co-occurring ore constituents contribute to risks to biological receptors depending on their toxicological profiles. This study characterizes the pre-mining concentrations of total arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), selenium (Se), thallium (Tl), U, and zinc (Zn); radiation levels; and histopathology in biota (vegetation, invertebrates, amphibians, birds, and mammals) at the Canyon Mine. Gross alpha levels were below the reporting limit (4 pCi/g) in all samples, and gross beta levels were indicative of background in vegetation (<10–17 pCi/g) and rodents (<10–43.5 pCi/g). Concentrations of U, Tl, Pb, Ni, Cu, and As in vegetation downwind from the mine were likely the result of aeolian transport. Chemical concentrations in rodents and terrestrial invertebrates indicate that surface disturbance during mine construction has not resulted in statistically significant spatial differences in fauna concentrations adjacent to the mine. Chemical concentrations in egg contents and nestlings of non-aquatic birds were less than method quantification limits or did not exceed toxicity thresholds. Bioaccumulation of As, Pb, Se, Tl, and U was evident in Western spadefoot (Spea multiplicata) tadpoles from the mine containment pond; concentrations of As (28.9–31.4 μg/g) and Se (5.81–7.20 μg/g) exceeded toxicity values and were significantly greater than in tadpoles from a nearby water source. Continued evaluation of As and Se in biota inhabiting and forging in the mine containment pond is warranted as mining progresses.

Keywords

Uranium mining Colorado plateau Contaminants Radiation Risk Baseline assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank staff from USGS (Jesse Arms, Scott Clingan, Cody Flagg, Keith Grabner, Matt Levitt, Vanessa Melton Emily Palmquist, Fred Tillman, Brad Van Gosen, Michael Walther, and Katie Walton-Day), U.S. Forest Service (Kit MacDonald, Liz Schuppert), Bethel College (Wes Goodrich, Jerry Harclerode, Francisca Mendez-Harclerode, Emily Simpson), Northern Arizona University (Dwight Clark, Nick Gengler, Jan. Ingram, Ian MacDonald, Catherine Propper, Tanya Sutton, Hannah Wilson), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Moira McKernan, Brenda Smith, Brian Wooldridge), National Park Service (Jan Busco, Lori Makarick, Cory Mosby), Arizona Game and Fish Department (Susi MacVean, Andi Rogers), and Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. (Danny Flannery) for contributing to the study design, field surveys and collections, or analytical measurements. Matt Struckoff created the map, and Punam Thakur (Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center) and Wendy Kuhne (Savannah River National Laboratory) provided helpful discussions on radiochemistry. Chris Schmitt, Jessica Leet, and anonymous reviewers improved the quality of earlier drafts of the manuscript. Collection of animals was performed under Arizona Game and Fish Department scientific collection license #SP616013 and Migratory Bird permit #MB32581B-0. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Supplementary material

10661_2017_5765_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 16 kb)

References

  1. Arnold, W. (1988). Arsenic. In H. G. Seiler & H. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook on toxicity of inorganic compounds. Inc. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  2. AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. (2013). AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Leary, S. and Members of the Panel on Euthanasia. 102 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, W. N., Pattee, O. H., Sileo, L., Hoffman, D. J., & Mulhern, B. M. (1985). Metal contamination in wildlife living near two zinc smelters. Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, 38(1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brumbaugh, W. G., & Walther, M. J. (1989). Determination of arsenic and selenium in whole fish by continuous-flow hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 72(3), 484–486.Google Scholar
  5. Brumbaugh, W. G., & Walther, M. J. (1991). Improved selenium recovery from tissue with modified sample decomposition. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 74(3), 570–571.Google Scholar
  6. Buschmann, J., Kappeler, A., Lindauer, U., Kistler, D., Berg, M., & Sigg, L. (2006). Arsenite and arsenate binding to dissolved humic acids: influence of pH, type of humic acid, and aluminum. Environmental Science and Tehcnology, 40(19), 6015–6020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark Jr., D. R., Cantu, R., Cowman, D. F., & Maxson, D. J. (1998). Uptake of arsenic and metals by tadpoles at an historically contaminated Texas site. Ecotoxicology, 7(2), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Csavina, J., Field, J., Taylor, M. P., Gao, S., Landázuri, A., Betterton, E. A., & Sáez, A. E. (2012). A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations. Science of the Total Environment, 433, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Densmore, C. L., & Green, D. E. (2007). Diseases of amphibians. ILAR Journal, 48(3), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driver, C. J. (1994). Ecotoxicity literature review of selected Hanford site contaminants (No. PNL--9394). Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States).Google Scholar
  11. Eisler, R. (1988). Arsenic hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A synoptic review. US FWS Contaminant Hazard Review 1–35. Biological Report 85(1.12). Laurel, Maryland. 65 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Eisler, R. (1994). Radiation hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review (No. 29). US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.Google Scholar
  13. Ellison, L.E., Valdez, E.W., Cryan, P.M., O’Shea, T.J., & Bogan, M.A. (2013). Standard operating procedure for the study of bats in the field. FORT IACUC SOP#: 2013–01 (Revision 2). Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey-Fort Collins Science CenterGoogle Scholar
  14. Fair, J., E. Paul, & Jones, J. (Eds). (2010). Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research. Washington, D.C.: Ornithological Council. Available online at http://www.nmnh.si.edu/BIRDNET/guide/
  15. Goyer, R. A. (1988). Lead. In H. G. Seiler & H. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook on toxicity of inorganic compounds (pp. 359–382). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc..Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, S. J. (2004). Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Science of the Total Environment, 326(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  17. Haschek, W. M., Rousseaux, C. G., & Wallig, M. A. (Eds.). (2013). Haschek and Rousseaux’s handbook of toxicologic pathology. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, S. M., Webb, S. M., Bargar, J. R., O’Day, P. A., Maier, R. M., & Chorover, J. (2012). Geochemical weathering increases lead bioaccessibility in semi-arid mine tailings. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11), 5834–5841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higham, A. M., & Tomkins, R. P. T. (1993). Determination of trace quantities of selenium and arsenic in canned tuna fish by using electroanalytical techniques. Food Chemistry, 48(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinck, J. E., Linder, G., Darrah, A. J., Drost, C. A., Duniway, M. C., Johnson, M. J., Mendez-Harclerode, F. M., Nowak, E. M., Valdez, E. W., van Riper, I. I. I.,. C., & Wolff, S. (2014). Exposure pathways and biological receptors: baseline data for the canyon uranium mine, Coconino County, Arizona. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 5(2), 422–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinck, J. E., Linder, G., Finger, S., Little, E., Tillitt, D., & Kuhne, W. (2010). Biological pathways of exposure and ecotoxicity values for uranium and associated radionuclides. Hydrological, geological, and biological sites characterization of breccia pipe uranium deposits in Northern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey. Scientific Investigations Report, 5025, 283–353.Google Scholar
  22. Hinck, J. E., Linder, G., Otton, J. K., Finger, S. E., Little, E., & Tillitt, D. E. (2013). Derivation of soil-screening thresholds to protect the chisel-toothed kangaroo rat from uranium mine waste in Northern Arizona. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 65(2), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinck, J. E., Schmitt, C. J., Ellersieck, M. R., & Tillitt, D. E. (2008). Relations between and among contaminant concentrations and biomarkers in black bass (Micropterus spp.) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) from large US rivers, 1995–2004. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10(12), 1499–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, M. S., Roberts, R. D., Hutton, M., & Inskip, M. J. (1978). Distribution of lead, zinc and cadmium in small mammals from polluted environments. Oikos, 30, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kathren, R. L. (1984). Radioactivity in the environment: sources, distribution and surveillance. New York, NY: Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. King, K.A., Velasco, A.L., Marr, C.L.H., & Kearns, R.L. (2003). Trace elements in bats roosting in mines at Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona, 2001–2002. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Phoenix, Arizona. Project Report, Project 22410–1261-2 N41. 28 pp. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/trace-elements-in-bats-roosting-in-mines-at-kofa-national-wildlife-refuge-arizona-2001-200
  27. King, K.A., Velasco, A.L., Record, J.A., & Kearns, R.L. (2001). Contaminants in bats roosting in mines at Imperial National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona, 1998–1999. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Phoenix, Arizona. Project Report, Project 22410–113-2 N30. 35 pp. https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/Documents/ECReports/BATS_Imperial_NWR_%20EC_REPORT%201.pdf
  28. Luna, L. G. (1968). Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Marques, S. M., Gonçalves, F., & Pereira, R. (2008). Effects of a uranium mine effluent in the early-life stages of Rana perezi Seoane. Science of the Total Environment, 402(1), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meza-Figueroa, D., Maier, R. M., de la O-Villanueva, M., Gómez-Alvarez, A., Moreno-Zazueta, A., Rivera, J., & Palafox-Reyes, J. (2009). The impact of unconfined mine tailings in residential areas from a mining town in a semi-arid environment: Nacozari, Sonora, Mexico. Chemosphere, 77(1), 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohammed, A., May, T., Echols, K., Walther, M., Manoo, A., Maraj, D., Agard, J., & Orazio, C. (2012). Metals in sediments and fish from Sea Lots and Point Lisas Harbors, Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64, 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naftz, D., & Walton-Day, K. (2016). Establishing a pre-mining geochemical baseline at a uranium mine near Grand Canyon National Park, USA. Geoderma Regional, 7(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niethammer, K. R., Atkinson, R. D., Baskett, T. S., & Samson, F. B. (1985). Metals in riparian wildlife of the lead mining district of southeastern Missouri. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 14(2), 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nriagu, J.O. (Ed.). (1998). Thallium in the Environment. Advances in Environmental Science and Technology, Wiley and Sons, NY, Vol. 29, 284p.Google Scholar
  35. Ohlendorf, H. M. (2003). Ecotoxicology of selenium. In D. J. Hoffman, B. A. Rattner, G. A. Burton Jr., & J. C. Cairns Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of ecotoxicology (Second ed., pp. 465–500). Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Otton, J. K., & Van Gosen, B. S. (2010). Uranium resource availability in breccia pipes in northern Arizona. Hydrological, geological, and biological sites characterization of breccia pipe uranium deposits in Northern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey. Scientific Investigations Report, 5025, 19–42.Google Scholar
  37. Otton, J. K., Gallegos, T. J., Van Gosen, B. S., Johnson, R. H., Zielinski, R. A., Hall, S. M., Arnolad, L. R., & Yager, D. B. (2010). Effects of 1980s uranium mining in the Kanab Creek area of northern Arizona. Hydrological, geological, and biological sites characterization of breccia pipe uranium deposits in Northern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report, 5025, 43–134.Google Scholar
  38. Peter, A. J., & Viraraghavan, T. (2005). Thallium: a review of public health and environmental concerns. EnvironmentInternational, 31(4), 493–501.Google Scholar
  39. Peterson, J. A., & Nebeker, A. V. (1992). Estimation of waterborne selenium concentrations that are toxicity thresholds for wildlife. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 23(2), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reynolds, K. D., Schwarz, M. S., McFarland, C. A., McBride, T., Adair, B., Strauss, R. E., Cobb, G. P., Hooper, M. J., & McMurry, S. T. (2006). Northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) as biomonitors of environmental metal contamination. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25(2), 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts, R. D., Johnson, M. S., & Hutton, M. (1978). Lead contamination of small mammals from abandoned metalliferous mines. Environmental Pollution (1970), 15(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roe, J. H., Hopkins, W. A., & Jackson, B. P. (2005). Species-and stage-specific differences in trace element tissue concentrations in amphibians: implications for the disposal of coal-combustion wastes. Environmental Pollution, 136(2), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saiki, M. K., Martin, B. A., & May, T. W. (2012). Selenium in aquatic biota inhabiting agricultural drains in the Salton Sea Basin, California. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(9), 5623–5640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saville, D. J. (1990). Multiple comparison procedures: the practical solution. The American Statistician, 44(2), 174–180.Google Scholar
  45. Scheuhammer, A.M., Beyer, W.N., & Schmitt, C.J., (2008). Lead. pp. 2133–2139 in Joregensen, S.E., and B.D. Faith (Eds). The Encyclopedia of Ecology, Vol. 3, Ecotoxicology, Elsevier, N.Y.Google Scholar
  46. Seiler, R.L., Skorupa, J.P., & Peltz, L.A. (1999). Areas susceptible to irrigation-induced selenium contamination of water and biota in the western United States: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1180, 36 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Sims, D. B., Hooda, P. S., & Gillmore, G. K. (2013). Mining activities and associated environmental impacts in arid climates: a literature review. Environment and Pollution, 2(4), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, G. J., & Rongstad, O. J. (1982). Small mammal heavy metal concentrations from mined and control sites. Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, 28(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snodgrass, J. W., Hopkins, W. A., Boughton, J., Gwinn, D., Baionno, J. A., & Burger, J. (2004). Species-specific responses of developing anurans to coal combustion wastes. Aquatic Toxicology, 66, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sparling, D. W., & Lowe, T. P. (1996). Metal concentrations of tadpoles in experimental ponds. Environmental Pollution, 91(2), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trail, P. W. (2006). Avian mortality at oil pits in the United States: a review of the problem and efforts for its solution. Environmental Management, 38(4), 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Bureau of Land Management. (2011). Northern Arizona proposed withdrawal final environmental impact statement. BLM/AZ/PL-11/002. Volumes I and II. Available: http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/info/nepa/ environmental_library/eis/naz-withdraw.html (May 2014).
  53. U.S. Department of Energy. (1997). HASL-300 Method Ga-01-R: Gamma Radioassay, EML Procedures Manual, HASL-300, 28th Edition.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. Department of the Interior. (1998). Guidelines for the interpretation of biological effects of selected constituents in biota, water, and sediment: Selenium. National Irrigation Water Quality Program, Department of the Interior, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. U.S. Department of the Interior. (2012). Record of decision: northern Arizona withdrawal; Mohave and Coconino counties, Arizona (see Supplemental Material, doi: 10.3996/052014-JFWM-039.
  56. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986). Method 9310: Gross alpha and gross beta, part of test methods for evaluating solid waste, Physical/chemical methods.Google Scholar
  57. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1994). Method 7742: Selenium (Atomic absorption, borohydride reduction).Google Scholar
  58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). Method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils.Google Scholar
  59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). Method 7473: Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry.Google Scholar
  60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Ecological soil screening levels for arsenic. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC, 128 p.Google Scholar
  61. Unrine, J. M., Hopkins, W. A., Romanek, C. S., & Jackson, B. P. (2007). Bioaccumulation of trace elements in omnivorous amphibian larvae: implications for amphibian health and contaminant transport. Environmental Pollution, 149, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Ecological soil screening levels for copper. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC, 313 p.Google Scholar
  63. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Method 6020B: Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.Google Scholar
  64. Valdez, E. (2015). Habitat use by bats at and near uranium mines within the Grand Canyon National Park region. 13th Biennial Conference of Science and Management on the Colorado Plateau. Flagstaff, Arizona. https://nau.edu/uploadedFiles/Centers-Institutes/Merriam-Powell/Biennial_Conference/_Forms/13%20Biennial%20Oral%20and%20Poster%20Abstracts.pdf#page=84
  65. Venne, L. S., Cobb, G. P., Coimbatore, G., Smith, L. M., & McMurry, S. T. (2006). Influence of land use on metal concentrations in playa sediments and amphibians in the Southern High Plains. Environmental Pollution, 144(1), 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walters, D. M., Rosi-Marshall, E., Kennedy, T. A., Cross, W. F., & Baxter, C. V. (2015). Mercury and selenium accumulation in the Colorado River food web, Grand Canyon, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 34(10), 2385–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wenrich, K. J. (1985). Mineralization of breccia pipes in northern Arizona. Economic Geology, 80(6), 1722–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Winsor, T. F., & Whicker, W. F. (1980). Pocket gophers and redistribution of plutonium in soil. Health Physics, 39(2), 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolfe, M. F., Schwarzbach, S., & Sulaiman, R. A. (1998). Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 17(2), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zitko, V., Carson, W. V., & Carson, W. G. (1975). Thallium—occurrence in the environment and toxicity to fish. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 13(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Ellen Hinck
    • 1
  • Danielle Cleveland
    • 1
  • William G. Brumbaugh
    • 1
  • Greg Linder
    • 2
  • Julia Lankton
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyColumbia Environmental Research CenterColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyColumbia Environmental Research CenterBrooksUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wildlife Health CenterMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations