Abstract
One of the often cited benefits of citizen science is better connecting citizens and their science to adaptive management outcomes. However, there is no consensus as to whether this is a reasonable expectation, and if so, how best to approach creating a successful link to management. This review finds cases where the citizen science–management link is explicitly discussed and places each case into a meta-analysis framework that will help define some general successful approaches to forming such a link. We categorize the types of linkages between citizen science and management along two main axes: cooperative to adversarial and deliberate to serendipitous. Cooperative and deliberate types of linkages are the most common, likely due to a mix of causes: that such links are the most commonly written about in the scientific literature, because such links tend to exist for longer amounts of time, and because other types of links tend to drift toward the cooperative/deliberate approach over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvanitidis, C., Faulwetter, S., Chatzigeorgiou, G., Penev, L., Bánki, O., Dailianis, T., et al. (2011). Engaging the broader community in biodiversity research: the concept of the COMBER pilot project for divers in ViBRANT. ZooKeys, 150(0). doi:10.3897/zookeys.150.2149.
Baker, G. J., Parr, J., & Sewell, J. (2012). Citizen science : engaging with change in the marine environment. Plymouth, UK.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(October), 1251–1262.
Biber, E. (2013). The challenge of collecting and using environmental monitoring data. Ecology and Society, 18(4).
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience, 59(11), 977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change : the impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121. doi:10.1080/09500690500069483.
Brown, P., Brody, J. G., Morello-frosch, R., Tovar, J., Zota, A. R., & Rudel, R. A. (2012). Commentary Measuring the success of community science: the Northern California Household Exposure Study, 3, 326–331.
Burgman, M., Carr, A., Godden, L., Gregory, R., McBride, M., Flander, L., & Maguire, L. (2011). Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conservation Letters, 4(2), 81–87. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00165.x.
Carr, A. J. L. (2004). Policy reviews and essays: why do we all need community science? Society & Natural Resources, 17(9), 841–849. doi:10.1080/08941920490493846.
Cash, D. W., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., et al. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8086–8091.
Clark, W., & Holliday, L. (2006). Linking knowledge with action for sustainable development: the role of program management—summary of a workshop. Roundtable on Science and Technology for Sustainability. National Research Council.
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4), 273–291. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5.
Cooper, C. B. (2012). Links and distinctions among citizenship, science, and citizen science. A reponse to “The future of citizen science,” 1–4.
Cornwell, M. L., & Campbell, L. M. (2012). Co-producing conservation and knowledge: citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 101–120. doi:10.1177/0306312711430440.
Cullen-Unsworth, L. C., Hill, R., Butler, J. R. a., & Wallace, M. (2012). A research process for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge in cultural landscapes: principles and determinants of success in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia. The Geographical Journal, 178(4), 351–365. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00451.x.
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., Donald, P. F., Funder, M., Jones, J. P. G., et al. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 23(1), 31–42. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x.
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., & Pirhofer-Walzl, K. (2010). Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(6), 1166–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01874.x.
Danielsen, F., Pirhofer-Walzl, K., Adrian, T. P., Kapijimpanga, D. R., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., et al. (2013). Linking public participation in scientific research to the indicators and needs of international environmental agreements. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12024.
Delaney, D. G., Sperling, C. D., Adams, C. S., & Leung, B. (2008). Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10(1), 117–128. doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0.
Dietz, T., & Stern, P. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6OS69ZzNGL8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Public+Participation+in+Environmental+Assessment+and+Decision+Making&ots=a78cS5iVTL&sig=l40RZHUQKQ44_eITGlOc368oGIM. Accessed 12 August 2013
Erickson, L. B., Petrick, I., & Trauth, E. M. (2012). Hanging with the right crowd : matching crowdsourcing need to crowd characteristics. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–9).
Fan, F. (2012). “Collective monitoring, collective defense”: science, earthquakes, and politics in communist China. Science in Context, 25(01), 127–154. doi:10.1017/S0269889711000329.
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ballard, H. L., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2008). Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring : a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 4.
Firehock, K., & West, J. (1995). A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 14(1), 197–202.
Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321–340. doi:10.1108/00220410310472518.
Fraser, D. A., Gaydos, J. K., Karlsen, E., & Rylko, M. S. (2006). Collaborative science, policy development and program implementation in the transboundary Georgia Basin/Puget sound ecosystem. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 113(1–3), 49–69. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9096-2.
Freitag, A., Meyer, R., & Whiteman, L. (2016). Strategies employed by citizen science programs to increase the credibility of their data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. doi:10.5334/cstp.6.
Freitag, A., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2013). Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science “success”. PloS One, 8(5), e64079. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064079.
Gillett, D. J., Pondella, D. J., Freiwald, J., Schiff, K. C., Caselle, J. E., Shuman, C., & Weisberg, S. B. (2012). Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(5), 3239–3257. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2185-5.
Gouveia, C., Fonseca, A., Câmara, A., & Ferreira, F. (2004). Promoting the use of environmental data collected by concerned citizens through information and communication technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 71(2), 135–154. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.01.009.
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-2439(200123)26:4<399:BOIEPA>2.0.CO;2-D
Kates, R. W. (2010). Readings in Sustainability Science and Technology (No. 213). Science And Technology.
Kay, M. C., Lenihan, H. S., Guenther, C. M., Wilson, J. R., Miller, C. J., & Shrout, S. W. (2012). Collaborative assessment of California spiny lobster population and fishery responses to a marine reserve network. Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 22(1), 322–335. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2247109310661_5513.docx
Lawrence, A., & Turnhout, E. (2010). Personal meaning in the public sphere: the standardisation and rationalisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 353–360. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.02.001.
Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., & Ramprasad, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change, 2(11), 789–794. doi:10.1038/nclimate1614.
Matso, K. (2012). Challenge of integrating natural and social sciences to better inform decisions: a novel proposal review process. In H. A. Karl, L. Scarlett, J. C. Vargas-Moreno, & M. Flaxman (Eds.), Restoring lands-coordinating science, politics and action: complexities of climate and governance (pp. 129–161). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2549-2.
McNie, E. C. (2007). Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(1), 17. http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/science/article/B6VP6-4MFTVYG-1/2/2f5651dbaa9c27de1d6c7ef296640010
Measham, T. G. (2007). Building capacity for environmental management: local knowledge and rehabilitation on the Gippsland Red Gum Plains. Australian Geographer, 38(2), 145–159. doi:10.1080/00049180701392758.
Meyer, R. M. (2011). Public values failures of climate science in the US. Minerva, 49, 47–70. doi:10.1007/s11024-011-9164-4.
Mulrennan, M. E., Mark, R., & Scott, C. H. (2012). Revamping community-based conservation through participatory research. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 56(2), 243–259. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00415.x.
Nerbonne, J. F., & Nelson, K. C. (2008). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environmental Management, 42(3), 470–479. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9103-9.
NRC. (1996). Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. (C. on B. and S. S. and E. Committee on Risk Characterization, Ed.). Washington DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5138&page=R1
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton Univ Pr.
Ottinger, G. (2010). Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(2), 244–270. doi:10.1177/0162243909337121.
Parker, J. N., & Crona, B. I. (2012). On being all things to all people: boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 262–289.
Pattengill-Semmens, C., & Semmens, B. (2003). Conservation and management applications of the REEF volunteer fish monitoring program. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 81, 43–50.
Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton Univ Pr.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Robbins, P. (2000). The practical politics of knowing: state environmental knowledge and local political economy*. Economic Geography, 76(2), 126–144.
Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., et al. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work—CSCW ‘12, 217. doi: 10.1145/2145204.2145238.
Roy, H. E., Pocock, M. J. O., Preston, C. D., Roy, D. B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J. C., & Robinson, L. D. (2012). Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Wallingford, Oxfordshire.
Sarewitz, D., & Pielke Jr., R. A. (2007). The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(1), 5. http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/science/article/B6VP6-4MC0TRT-1/2/1680344e874d6ecc8c7f5cb1a35bc4d1
Schwartz, M. D., Betancourt, J. L., & Weltzin, J. F. (2012). From Caprio’s lilacs to the USA National Phenology Network. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 324–327. doi:10.1890/110281.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Univ Pr.
Sharpe, A., & Conrad, C. (2006). Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 113(1–3), 395–409. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9091-7.
Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., et al. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 1–20. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
Smith, C., Felderhof, L., & Bosch, O. J. H. (2007). Adaptive management : making it happen through participatory systems analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 587, 567–587. doi:10.1002/sres.
Sullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., et al. (2014). The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169, 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003.
Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., Simpson, R., Smith, A., & Packer, C. (2015). Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Scientific Data, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.26
Taylor, B., & de Loë, R. C. (2012). Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance. Geoforum, 43(6), 1207–1217. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.007.
Tulloch, A. I. T., Possingham, H. P., Joseph, L. N., Szabo, J., & Martin, T. G. (2013). Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 165, 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025.
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems : a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Ecology and Society, 6(1), 14.
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. a. (2009). Coalitions, science, and belief change: comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 195–212. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00310.x.
Wiederhold, B. K. (2011). Citizen scientists generate benefits for researchers, educators, society, and themselves. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(12), 703–704. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.1534.
Wilderman, C. C. (2007). Models of community science: design lessons from the field. Citizen Science Toolkit Conference, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 20–23 June, 2007.
Acknowledgments
A.F. developed this review to help the California Citizen Science Initiative (CCSI) which investigated how citizen science can contribute to marine protected area management. “We” in this paper refers to the whole CCSI team and their hard work is much appreciated: R. Meyer, H. Ballard, F. Shilling, O. Boyle, M. Hall-Arber, J. Freiwald, and L. Fortmann. The CCSI was supported by the Packard Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freitag, A. A typology for strategies to connect citizen science and management. Environ Monit Assess 188, 519 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5513-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5513-y