Advertisement

Pollution by oestrogenic endocrine disruptors and β-sitosterol in a south-western European river (Mira, Portugal)

  • Maria João Rocha
  • Catarina Cruzeiro
  • Mário Reis
  • Miguel Ângelo Pardal
  • Eduardo Rocha
Article

Abstract

The Mira River is a Portuguese water body widely known for its wilderness and is advertised as one of the less polluted European rivers. On this presumption, the levels of endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) in Mira waters were never measured. However, because environmentalists have claimed that the Mira could be moderately polluted, a range of 17 EDCs were measured not only at the estuary but also along the river. The targeted EDCs included natural and pharmaceutical oestrogens (17β-oestradiol, oestrone and 17α-ethynylestradiol), industrial/household pollutants (octylphenols, nonylphenols and their monoethoxylates and diethoxylates and bisphenol A), phytoestrogens (formononetin, biochanin A, daidzein, genistein) and the phytosterol sitosterol (SITO). For this propose, waters from six sampling sites were taken every 2 months, over a 1-year period (2011), and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Unexpectedly high levels of oestrogens and of industrial/household pollutants were measured at all sampling sites, including those located inside natural protected areas. Indeed, the annual average sum of EDCs was ≈57 ng/L for oestrogens and ≈1.3 μg/L for industrial/household chemicals. In contrast, the global average levels of phytoestrogens (≈140 ng/L) and of SITO (≈295 ng/L) were lower than those reported worldwide. The EDC concentrations were normalised for ethynylestradiol equivalents (EE2eq). In view of these, the oestrogenic load of the Mira River attained ≈47 ng/L EE2eq. In addition, phosphates were above legal limits at both spring and summer (>1 mg/L). Overall, data show EDCs at toxicant relevant levels in the Mira and stress the need to monitor rivers that are allegedly less polluted.

Keywords

Oestrogens Alkylphenols Alkylphenol ethoxylates Phytoestrogens Sitosterol 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the Operational Competitiveness Program (COMPETE), and by Portuguese funds, through the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), via projects PTDC/MAR/70436/2006 and PEst-C/MAR/LA0015/2013.

Supplementary material

10661_2016_5236_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Table A Figures referring to intra and inter-day precision, accuracy and recovery data for all EDCs spiked at three different levels of concentration (low, medium and high) in artificial coastal water (Rocha et al. 2013c). (DOCX 23 kb)
10661_2016_5236_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Table B Analytical characteristics of the optimized GC-MS method (Rocha et al. 2013c): calibration equations, coefficients of determination (r2), method detection limit (MDL), time of retention (tR), and quantification / diagnostic ions used in GC-MS analysis. Inside brackets is referred to the relative abundance of ions (m/z) for each target EDC. (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Agapito, D., Mendes, J., & do Valle, P. O. (2012). The rural village as an open door to nature-based tourism in Portugal: the Aldeia da Pedralva case. Tourism, 60(3), 325–338.Google Scholar
  2. Benassayag, C., Perrot-Applanat, M., & Ferre, F. (2002). Phytoestrogens as modulators of steroid action in target cells. Journal of Chromatography B, 777(1–2), 233–248. doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00340-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettencourt, A.M., Bricker, S.B., Ferreira, J.G., Franco, A., Marques, J.C., Melo, J.J., et al. (2003). Typology and reference conditions for Portuguese transitional and coastal waters. Development of guidelines for the application of the European Union Water Framework Directive. INAG – Instituto da Água, 1–119.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, D. J., Mastrocco, F., Anderson, P. D., Lange, R., & Sumpter, J. P. (2012). Predicted-no-effect concentrations for the steroid estrogens estrone, 17beta-estradiol, estriol, and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31(6), 1396–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chainho, P., Chaves, M. L., Costa, J. L., Costa, M. J., & Dauer, D. M. (2008). Use of multimetric indices to classify estuaries with different hydromorphological characteristics and different levels of human pressure. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(6), 1128–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clotfelter, E. D., & Rodriguez, A. C. (2006). Behavioral changes in fish exposed to phytoestrogens. Environmental Pollution, 144(3), 833–839. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coldham, N. G., Dave, M., Sivapathasundaram, S., McDonnell, D. P., Connor, C., & Sauer, M. J. (1997). Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105, 734–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Directive. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council. Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  9. Directive. (2003). Directive 2003/53/EC. Book of the amending for the 26th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement) L178/24-L178/27: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Ferreira, J.G., Simas, T., Nobre, A., Silva, M.C., Shifferegger, K., & Lencart-Silva, J. (2003). Identification of sensitive areas and vulnerable zones in transitional and coastal Portuguese systems. Application of the United States National estuarine eutrophication assessment to the Minho, Lima, Douro, Ria de Aveiro, Mondego, Tagus, Sado, Mira, Ria Formosa and Guadiana systems. In I. a. IMAR (Ed.).Google Scholar
  11. FSA. (2003). Food Standards Agency, working group on phytoestrogens and health of the committee of toxicology of chemicals in food, consumer products and the environment: phytoestrogens and health. In C. Copyright (Ed.), COT Report.Google Scholar
  12. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. Hoerger, C. C., Wettstein, F. E., Hungerbuehler, K., & Bucheli, T. D. (2009). Occurrence and origin of estrogenic isoflavones in Swiss river waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(16), 6151–6157. doi: 10.1021/es901034u.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly, M. M., & Arnold, W. A. (2012). Direct and indirect photolysis of the phytoestrogens genistein and daidzein. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(10), 5396–5403. doi: 10.1021/es300041f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kostich, M., Flick, R., & Martinson, J. (2013). Comparing predicted estrogen concentrations with measurements in US waters. Environmental Pollution, 178(0), 271–277. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leusch, F. D. L., & MacLatchy, D. L. (2003). In vivo implants of β-sitosterol cause reductions of reactive cholesterol pools in mitochondria isolated from gonads of male goldfish (Carassius auratus). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 134(3), 255–263. doi: 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00265-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Micić, V., & Hofmann, T. (2009). Occurrence and behaviour of selected hydrophobic alkylphenolic compounds in the Danube River. Environmental Pollution, 157(10), 2759–2768. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mills, L. J., & Chichester, C. (2005). Review of evidence: are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations? Science of The Total Environment, 343(1–3), 1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pojana, G., Gomiero, A., Jonkers, N., & Marcomini, A. (2007). Natural and synthetic endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in water, sediment and biota of a coastal lagoon. Environment International, 33(7), 929–936. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Público. (2011). Nova estação para tratar esgotos em Milfontes. In: http://www.publico.pt/j374643.Google Scholar
  21. Rocha, M. J., Cruzeiro, C., Reis, M., Rocha, E., & Pardal, M. (2013a). Determination of seventeen endocrine disruptor compounds and their spatial and seasonal distribution in Ria Formosa Lagoon (Portugal). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(10), 8215–8226. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3168-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rocha, M. J., Cruzeiro, C., Reis, M., Rocha, E., & Pardal, M. A. (2013b). Determination of 17 endocrine disruptor compounds and their spatial and seasonal distribution in the Sado River Estuary (Portugal). Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 95(2), 237–253. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2012.758730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rocha, M. J., Cruzeiro, C., & Rocha, E. (2013c). Development and validation of a GC-MS method for the evaluation of 17 endocrine disruptor compounds, including phytoestrogens and sitosterol, in coastal waters—their spatial and seasonal levels in Porto costal region (Portugal). [Article]. Journal of Water and Health, 11(2), 281–296. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rocha, M., Cruzeiro, C., Peixoto, C., & Rocha, E. (2014a). Annual fluctuations of endocrine-disrupting compounds at the lower end of the Lima River, Portugal, and in adjacent coastal waters. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 67(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1007/s00244-014-0063-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rocha, M. J., Cruzeiro, C., Peixoto, C., & Rocha, E. (2014b). Annual fluctuations of endocrine-disrupting compounds at the lower end of the Lima River, Portugal, and in adjacent coastal waters. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 67(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1007/s00244-014-0063-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rocha, M. J., Cruzeiro, C., Reis, M., Pardal, M. A., & Rocha, E. (2014c). Spatial and seasonal distribution of 17 endocrine disruptor compounds in an urban estuary (Mondego River, Portugal): evaluation of the estrogenic load of the area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(6), 3337–3350. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3621-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodriguez-Mozaz, S., López de Alda, M. J., & Barceló, D. (2004). Monitoring of estrogens, pesticides and bisphenol A in natural waters and drinking water treatment plants by solid-phase extraction–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1045(1–2), 85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.06.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Safe, S. H. (2000). Endocrine disruptors and human health—is there a problem? An update. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(6), 487–493.Google Scholar
  29. Sharma, V. K., Anquandah, G. A. K., Yngard, R. A., Kim, H., Fekete, J., Bouzek, K., et al. (2009). Nonylphenol, octylphenol, and bisphenol-A in the aquatic environment: a review on occurrence, fate, and treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 44(5), 423–442. doi: 10.1080/10934520902719704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharpe, R. L., Woodhouse, A., Moon, T. W., Trudeau, V. L., & MacLatchy, D. L. (2007). β-Sitosterol and 17β-estradiol alter gonadal steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression in goldfish, Carassius auratus. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 151(1), 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2006.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sodré, F. F., Pescara, I. C., Montagner, C. C., & Jardim, W. F. (2010). Assessing selected estrogens and xenoestrogens in Brazilian surface waters by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal, 96(1), 92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2010.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Urbatzka, R., Rocha, E., Reis, B., Cruzeiro, C., Monteiro, R. A. F., & Rocha, M. J. (2012). Effects of ethinylestradiol and of an environmentally relevant mixture of xenoestrogens on steroidogenic gene expression and specific transcription factors in zebrafish. Environmental Pollution, 164, 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. USEPA. (1996). Environmental indicators of water quality in the United States (US EPA 841-R-96-02). In O. o. w. (4503F) (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  34. WFD. (2013). Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  35. WHO (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality - Nitrate and nitrite in drinking-water. In B. d. f. development (Ed.): W. H. Organization.Google Scholar
  36. Ying, G.-G., Kookana, R. S., & Ru, Y.-J. (2002a). Occurrence and fate of hormone steroids in the environment. Environment International, 28(6), 545–551. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00075-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ying, G.-G., Williams, B., & Kookana, R. (2002b). Environmental fate of alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates—a review. Environment International, 28(3), 215–226. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00017-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu, Y., Huang, Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, K., Tang, C., Cui, J., et al. (2011). Occurrence and behavior of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, and endocrine-disrupting personal care products in wastewater and the recipient river water of the Pearl River Delta, South China. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(4), 871–878. doi: 10.1039/c0em00602e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao, J. L., Ying, G. G., Chen, F., Liu, Y. S., Wang, L., Yang, B., et al. (2011). Estrogenic activity profiles and risks in surface waters and sediments of the Pearl River system in South China assessed by chemical analysis and in vitro bioassay. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(4), 813–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zoller, U. (2006). Estuarine and coastal zone marine pollution by the nonionic alkylphenol ethoxylates endocrine disrupters: is there a potential ecotoxicological problem? Environment International, 32(2), 269–272. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.08.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zoller, U., Plaut, I., & Hushan, M. (2004). The case of the nonionic alkylphenol ethoxylates in the Mediterranean Sea region: is there a problem? Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 50(5), 79–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria João Rocha
    • 1
    • 2
  • Catarina Cruzeiro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mário Reis
    • 3
  • Miguel Ângelo Pardal
    • 3
  • Eduardo Rocha
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Department of MicroscopyInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS)UPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Histomorphology, Physiopathology and Applied Toxicology Group, Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), CIMAR Associate Laboratory (CIMAR LA)University of Porto (UPorto)UPortoPortugal
  3. 3.CFE—Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations