Advertisement

Assessment of public perception and environmental compliance at a pulp and paper facility: a Canadian case study

  • Emma Hoffman
  • Meagan Bernier
  • Brenden Blotnicky
  • Peter G. Golden
  • Jeffrey Janes
  • Allison Kader
  • Rachel Kovacs-Da Costa
  • Shauna Pettipas
  • Sarah Vermeulen
  • Tony R. Walker
Article

Abstract

Communities across Canada rely heavily on natural resources for their livelihoods. One such community in Pictou County, Nova Scotia, has both benefited and suffered, because of its proximity to a pulp and paper mill (currently owned by Northern Pulp). Since production began in 1967, there have been increasing impacts to the local environment and human health. Environmental reports funded by the mill were reviewed and compared against provincial and federal regulatory compliance standards. Reports contrasted starkly to societal perceptions of local impacts and independent studies. Most environmental monitoring reports funded by the mill indicate some levels of compliance in atmospheric and effluent emissions, but when compliance targets were not met, there was a lack of regulatory enforcement. After decades of local pollution impacts and lack of environmental compliance, corporate social responsibility initiatives need implementing for the mill to maintain its social licence to operate.

Keywords

Atmospheric emissions Community concerns Effluents Pulp and paper Regulatory compliance 

References

  1. Alberta Environment. (2008). Technical and regulatory review and benchmarking of air emissions from Alberta’s Kraft Pulp Mills. Retrieved 2015-03-30 from http://environment.gov.ab.ca/.
  2. Ali, M., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2001). Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill effluents: a review. Advances in Environmental Research, 5, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreatta, D. (2013). In Nova Scotia town, residents fight local mills pollution. The globe and mail. Retrieved 2015-03-20 from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/.
  4. BC MOE. 2011. Permit 3095—Howe Sound Pulp and Paper Corporation. Retrieved 2015-03-30 from http://www.hspp.ca/.
  5. BC MOE (BC Ministry of Environment). (2007). Permit PA-01902: Catalyst Paper Corporation and Catalyst Pulp Operations Limited. Retrieved 2015-03-30 from http://www.catalystpaper.com/.
  6. Bennett, E. 2013. “We had something good and sacred here”: restorting A’se’k with Pictou landing first nation. (Master’s thesis). Dalhousie University, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Bice, S. (2014). What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. Resources, 3, 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brannen, J. (2014). Pictou Landing, Nova Scotia government reach agreement on Boat Harbour. NovaNewsNow.com. Retrieved 2015-03-16 from http://www.novanewsnow.com/.
  9. Campbell, D. (2013). Chronic illness high near pulp mill. Retrieved 2015-03-20 from http://www.ngnews.ca/.
  10. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), and Authority to enter into an agreement. (1999). Government of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved 2015-03-20 from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/O-2.4/page-1.html
  11. Cantox. (1997). Human health risk assessment of Pictou Landing Community Exposures Associated with Boat Harbour. Report Prepared for Joint Environmental and Health Monitoring Committee. Halifax.Google Scholar
  12. CBC News. (2014). Erin Brockovich on Pictou mill: “It’s really not OK to wait until 2015.” Retrieved 2015-03-04 from http://www.cbc.ca/.
  13. CCME. (2011). Ambient air monitoring protocol for PM 2.5 and ozone: Canada-Wide Standards for Particulate Matter and Ozone. Retrieved 2015-04-03 from http://www.ccme.ca/.
  14. CCME. (2014). Air Quality Management System (AQMS). Retrieved 2015-03-16 from http://www.ccme.ca.
  15. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). (2000). Canada-wide standards for particulate matter (PM) and ozone. Retrieved 2015-03-16 from http://www.ccme.ca/.
  16. Clean The Mill. (2015). Monitoring and enforcement. Retrieved 2015-03-04 from http://cleanthemill.com/clean.
  17. CRA (Conestoga-Rovers & Associates). 2014. Public consultation program: industrial approval renewal for bleached kraft mill and effluent treatment system. Report submitted to NP. Dartmouth, 73p.Google Scholar
  18. Crawford, E., and Williams, T. (2006). Smog and population health. The parliamentary information and research service of the Library of Parliament (PRB 05-101E). Retrieved on 2015-02-15 from http://www.parl.gc.ca.
  19. Dalziel, J.A., P.A. Yeats, & D.H. Loring. (1993). Water chemistry and sediment core data from Pictou Harbour and the East River Estuary. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 1917.Google Scholar
  20. DCL (Dillon Consulting Limited). (2012). Boat Harbour Treatment Facility Monitoring Review: Analysis and Future Monitoring Recommendations. Final Report submitted to Joint Environmental and Health Monitoring Committee (JEHMC). Halifax, 412p.Google Scholar
  21. EC. (2003). National assessment of pulp and paper environmental effects monitoring data: a report synopsis. Burlington: National Water Research Institute. NWRI Scientific Assessment Report Series No. 2. 28p.Google Scholar
  22. EC. (2013a). Pulp and Paper. Retrieved 2015-01-18 from http://ec.gc.ca/.
  23. EC. (2013b). Science solutions for improved pulp and paper mill effluents. Retrieved 2015-03-23 from http://www.ec.gc.ca/.
  24. EC. (2014a). Pulp and paper mill effluent chlorinated dioxins and furans regulations. Retrieved 2015-03-23 from http://www.ec.gc.ca/.
  25. EC. (2014b). National pollutant release inventory. Retrieved 2015-02-22 from http://www.ec.gc.ca/.
  26. EC. (2015). NAPS (National Air Pollution Survey). Retrieved 2015-03-29 from http://maps-cartes.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/.
  27. EC (Environment Canada). (1994). Reference method for source testing. Measurement of releases of particulate from stationary sources (EPS 1/RM/8). Retrieved 2015-03-30 from http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/.
  28. EcoMatrix. (2007). EEM cycle 4 interpretive report for the Neenah Paper (Pictou Mill) Facility. Halifax.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, M. D., Kundu, S., & Satish, M. (2013). Dispersion model evaluation of PM2.5, NOX and SO2 from point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD gaussian plume air dispersion model. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henderson, J. (2014). Pictou County residents split on NP mill. Retrieved 2015-03-20 from http://www.cbc.ca/.
  31. Hewitt, M. L., Parrott, J. L., & McMaster, M. E. (2006). A decade of research on the environmental impacts of pulp and paper mill effluents in Canada: sources and characteristics of bioactive substances. Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews, 9, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holmberg, R. (1988). Local residents voice concerns about pulp mill. Athabasca Advocate, 6, 1.Google Scholar
  33. Howe, M. (2014). The strange case of Pictou County, Nova Scotia—a community supported by Toxic Mills. Retrieved 2015-01-18 from http://www.vice.com/.
  34. JWEL. 2001. 2000 Sediment sampling BHTF stabilization lagoon. Report to Nova Scotia Transportation and Public Works (NSTPW). Halifax. Project No. NSD 15200.Google Scholar
  35. JWEL. (2004). Risk analysis for decommissioning boat harbour stabilization lagoon to tidal flushing. Halifax: Report to NSTPW.Google Scholar
  36. JWEL. 2005. 2003/2004 sediment sampling BHTF stabilization lagoon. Report to NSTPW. Project No. NSD 17324–7.Google Scholar
  37. JWEL (Jacques Whitford Environment Limited). (1996). First cycle aquatic environmental effects monitoring program boat harbour wastewater treatment facility. Dartmouth: Report to Environment Canada.Google Scholar
  38. JWEL and Beak Consultants. (1992). An investigation of sediment characteristics at BHTF. Report to Nova Scotia Department of Supply and Services (NSDSS). Project No. 8109.Google Scholar
  39. JWEL and Beak Consultants. (1993). BHTF remediation alternatives—phase II. Report to NSDSS. Project No. 8660.Google Scholar
  40. Lindholm-Lehto, P. C., Knuutinen, J. S., Ahkola, H. S., & Herve, S. H. (2015). Refractory organic pollutants and toxicity in pulp and paper mill wastewaters. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 22, 6473–6499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luthe, C. E., Fleming, B. I., Berry, R. M., Allen, L. H., & Voss, R. H. (1988). Some new insights into the origins of dioxins formed during chemical pulp bleaching. Pulp & Paper Canada, 89, 151–167.Google Scholar
  42. MacDonald, M. (2015). New pollution limits set for Nova Scotia pulp mill, but it will challenge rules. The Canadian Press. Retrieved 2015-02-12 from http://www.canadianbusiness.com.
  43. Mayrand, E., St-Jean, S. D., & Courtenay, S. C. (2005). Haemocyte responses of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) transferred from a contaminated site to a reference site: can the immune system recuperate? Aquaculture Research, 36, 962–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mirabelli, M. C., & Wing, S. (2006). Proximity to pulp and paper mills and wheezing symptoms among adolescents in North Carolina. Environmental Research, 102, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Munkittrick, K. R., McMaster, M. E., & Servos, M. R. (2013). Detection of reproductive impacts of effluents from pulp and paper mills: shifts in issues and potential causes. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 32, 729–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newcombe, C. P., & MacDonald, D. D. (2011). Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 11, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. NP. (2014b). Northern pulp october 2014 emission tests show improvement, still more work ahead. Retrieved 2015-03-28 from http://northernpulp.ca/.
  48. NP. (2015). Manufacturing. Retrieved 2015-01-15 from http://www.northernpulp.ca/.
  49. NP (Northern Pulp Nova Scotia Corporation). (2014a). About air emissions. Retrieved 2015-03-29 from http://www.northernpulp.ca/.
  50. NRC (Natural Resources Canada). (2012). Pulp and paper green transformation program: report and results. Ottawa: Canadian Forest Service, Headquarters. 11p.Google Scholar
  51. NSE. 2015. 2015 industrial approval for NP Nova Scotia. Province of Nova Scotia Environment Act, S.N.S. 1994–95, c.1.Google Scholar
  52. NSE (Nova Scotia Environment). (2013). Answers to questions regarding Northern Pulp that were submitted during August 27, 2013 meeting. Retrieved 2015-01-30 from http://www.cbc.ca/.
  53. OEE (Office of Environmental Enforcement). (2015). Air emissions monitoring guidance note #2 (AG2), Irish Environment Protection Agency Office of OEE, Retrieved 2015-03-30 from www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/air/emissions/.
  54. Ogden, J. G., III. (1972). Oxygen demand of effluent from a bleached kraft pulp mill. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Owens, J. W. (1991). The hazard assessment of pulp and paper effluents in the aquatic environment: a review. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 10, 1511–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Painter, H.G., & P.L. Stewart. (1992). An assessment of the environmental quality of Pictou Harbour and surrounding watershed. Report to Advisory Committee and Technical Committee of the Pictou Harbour Environmental Action Plan. Environment Canada, Atlantic Region. Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  57. Peer, D. L. (1972). Effects of kraft mill effluent on a marine benthic community. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pokhrel, D., & Viraraghavan, T. (2004). Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater—a review. The Science of the Total Environment, 333, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. PPER. (1992). Pulp and paper effluent regulations. Fisheries Act SQR/92–69. P.C. 1992–961.Google Scholar
  60. Rajotte, A. (2003). Paper production technology and environmental performance in Sweden and Finland: policy, science, and market share. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reid, D. S. (1989). Pictonians, pulp mill and pulmonary diseases. Nova Scotia Medical Journal, 68, 146–148.Google Scholar
  62. Scarratt, D. J. (1968). Distribution of lobster larvae (Homarus americanus) off Pictou, Nova Scotia. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada, 25, 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schiffman, S. S., & Williams, C. M. (2005). Science of odors as a potential health issue. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 129–138.Google Scholar
  64. Soskolne, C. L., & Sieswerda, L. E. (2010). Cancer risk associated with pulp and paper mills: a review of occupational and community epidemiology. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 29, 86.Google Scholar
  65. Stantec. (2004). Cycle 3 environmental effects monitoring interpretive report for the Kimberly-Clark Nova Scotia Mill at New Glasgow, Nova Scotia. Report to Kimberley Clark, New Glasgow.Google Scholar
  66. Statistics Canada. (2013). Health profile 2013. Retrieved 2014-11-12 from www.12.statcan.gc.ca/.
  67. St-Jean, S. D., Courtenay, S. C., & Parker, R. W. (2003). Immunomodulation in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) exposed to a pulp and paper mill effluent in eastern Canada. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 38, 647–666.Google Scholar
  68. Szabó, L., Soria, A., Forsström, J., Keränen, J. T., & Hytönen, E. (2009). A world model of the pulp and paper industry: demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taber, J. (2014). Locals fume over Pictou, Nova Scotia pulp mill emissions. Retrieved 2015-03-20 from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/.
  70. Taylor, B. R., & Dykstra, A. N. (2005). Effects of hot ground water on a small swamp-stream in Nova Scotia, Canada. Hydrobiologia, 545, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. The Advocate. (2014). Ministers to meet the clean pictou air group of business. Retrieved 2015-03-04 from http://www.pictouadvocate.com/.
  72. The News. (2015). Contractor pulls out of Northern Pulp precipitator construction. Retrieved 2015-04-07 from http://www.ngnews.ca/.
  73. Toren, K., Persson, B., & Wingren, G. (1996). Health effects of working in pulp and paper mills: malignant diseases. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walker, T. R. (2014). Environmental effects monitoring in Sydney Harbor during remediation of one of Canada’s most polluted sites: a review and lessons learned. Remediation Journal, 24, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walker, T. R., Crittenden, P. D., & Young, S. D. (2003). Regional variation in the chemical composition of winter snow pack and terricolous lichens in relation to sources of acid emissions in the USA river basin, northeast European Russia. Environmental Pollution, 125, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker, T. R., Habeck, J. O., Karjalainen, T. P., Virtanen, T., Solovieva, N., Jones, V., & Ingold, T. (2006). Perceived and measured levels of environmental pollution: interdisciplinary research in the subarctic lowlands of northeast European Russia. Ambio, 35, 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Walker, T. R., MacLean, B., Appleton, R., McMillan, S., & Miles, M. (2013). Cost‐effective sediment dredge disposal options for small craft harbors in Canada. Remediation Journal, 23, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wood, J. (2012). Canadian environmental indicators: air quality. Fraser Institute. Retrieved 2015-02-16 from http://www.fraserinstitute.org.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma Hoffman
    • 1
  • Meagan Bernier
    • 1
  • Brenden Blotnicky
    • 1
  • Peter G. Golden
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Janes
    • 1
  • Allison Kader
    • 1
  • Rachel Kovacs-Da Costa
    • 3
  • Shauna Pettipas
    • 1
  • Sarah Vermeulen
    • 1
  • Tony R. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.School for Resource and Environmental StudiesDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.Department of International Development StudiesDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations