Evaluation of a field appropriate membrane filtration method for the detection of Vibrio cholerae for the measurement of biosand filter performance in the Artibonite Valley, Haiti

Article

Abstract

Biosand filters in the Artibonite Valley of Haiti, the epicenter of the cholera epidemic that began in October 2010, were tested for total coliform and Vibrio cholerae removal efficiencies. While coliform are often used as an indicator organism for pathogenic bacteria, a correlation has never been established linking the concentration of coliform and V. cholerae, the causative agent for cholera. Hence, a method for field enumeration of V. cholerae was developed and tested. To this end, a plate count test utilizing membrane filtration technique was developed to measure viable V. cholerae cell concentration in the field. Method accuracy was confirmed by comparing plate count concentrations to microscopic counts. Additionally, biosand filters were sampled and removal efficiencies of V. cholerae and coliform bacteria compared. The correlation between removal efficiency and time in operation, biofilm (“schmutzdecke”) composition, and idle time was also investigated. The plate count method for V. cholerae was found to accurately reflect microscope counts and was shown to be effective in the field. Overall, coliform concentration was not an appropriate indicator of V. cholerae concentration. In 90 % of the influent samples from the study, coliform underestimated V. cholerae concentration (n = 26). Furthermore, coliform removal efficiency was higher than for V. cholerae hence providing a conservative measurement. Finally, time in operation and idle time were found to be important parameters controlling performance. Overall, this method shows promise for field applications and should be expanded to additional studies to confirm its efficacy to test for V. cholerae in various source waters.

Keywords

Biosand filter Haiti Vibrio cholerae enumeration Indicator organism Cholera 

References

  1. Alito, C., & Gunsch, C. (2014). Assessing the effects of silver nanoparticles on biological nutrient removal in bench-scale activated sludge sequencing batch reactors. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2), 970–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badireddy, A., & Chellam, S. (2011). Bismuth dimercaptopropanol (BisBAL) inhibits formation of multispecies wastewater flocs. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 110(6), 1426–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campos, L. C., Su, M. F. J., Graham, N. J. D., & Smith, S. R. (2002). Biomass development in slow sand filters. Water Research, 36, 4543–4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin, C., Sorenson, J., Harris, J., Robins, W., Charles, R., Jean-Charles, R., Bullard, J., Webster, D., Kasarskis, A., Peluso, P., Paxinos, E., Yamaichi, Y., Calderwood, S., Mekalanos, J., Schadt, E., & Waldor, M. (2011). The origin of the Haitian cholera outbreak strain. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Culman, S. W., Bukowski, R., Gauch, H. G., Cadillo-Quiroz, H., & Buckley, D. H. (2009). T-REX: software for the processing and analysis of T-RFLP data. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edberg, S. C., Rice, E. W., Karlin, R. J., & Allen, M. J. (2000). Escherichia coli: the best biological drinking water indicator for public health protection. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 88, 106S–116S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, M., Stauber, C., Koksal, F., DiGiano, F., & Sobsey, M. (2008). Reductions of E-coli, echovirus type 12 and bacteriophages in an intermittently operated household-scale slow sand filter. Water Research, 42(10–11), 2662–2670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enserink, M. (2010). Infectious diseases: Haiti’s outbreak is latest in cholera’s new global assault. Science, 330(6005), 738–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser, B. (2010). Haiti still gripped by cholera as election looms. Lancet, 376(9755), 1813–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallardo-Moreno, A., Gonzalez-Martin, M., Bruque, J., Perez-Giraldo, C., Sanchez-Silos, R., & Gomez-Garcia, A. (2003). Influence of the growth medium, suspending liquid and measurement temperature on the physico-chemical surface properties of two enterococci strains. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 17(14), 1877–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunsch, C., Cheng, Q., Kinney, K., Szaniszlo, P., & Whitman, C. (2005). Identification of a homogentisate-1,2-dioxygenase gene in the fungus Exophiala lecanii-corni: analysis and implications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 68(3), 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunsch, C., Kinney, K., Szaniszlo, P., & Whitman, C. (2007). Relative gene expression quantification in a fungal gas‐phase biofilter. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 98(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammer, Ø., & Harper, D. A. T. (2006). Paleontological data analysis. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, S., Werner, E., Huang, B., Hamilton, M., & Stewart, P. (2004). Hypothesis for the role of nutrient starvation in biofilm detachment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(12), 7418–7425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikuma, K., & Gunsch, C. (2013). Successful genetic bioaugmentation with Pseudomonas putida for toluene degradation in soil columns: engineering in situ microbial adaptation: a case study for genetic bioaugmentation in soil columns. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 11(4), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy, T. J., Hernandez, E. A., Morse, A. N., & Anderson, T. A. (2012). Hydraulic loading rate effect on removal rates in a biosand filter: a pilot study of three conditions. Water Air Soil Pollution, 223, 4527–4537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawrence, J., Chenier, M., Roy, R., Beaumier, D., Fortin, N., Swerhone, G., Neu, T., & Greer, C. (2004). Microscale and molecular assessment of impacts of nickel, nutrients, and oxygen level on structure and function of river biofilm communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(7), 4326–4339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller, R., McDougald, D., Cusumano, D., Sodhi, N., Kjelleberg, S., Azam, F., & Bartlett, D. (2007). Vibrio cholerae strains possess multiple strategies for abiotic and biotic surface colonization. Journal of Bacteriology, 189(14), 5348–5360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, H. M., McBean, E. A., & Farahbakhsh, K. (2010). Nitrification, denitrification and ammonification in point-of-use biosand filters in rural Cambodia. Journal of Water and Health, 8(4), 803–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D., & Costerton, J. (2002). Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annual Review of Microbiology, 56, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van der Kooij, D., Vrouwenvelder, J., & Veenendaal, H. (2003). Elucidation and control of biofilm formation processes in water treatment and distribution using the unified biofilm approach. Water Science and Technology, 47(5), 83–90.Google Scholar
  22. Walton, D., & Ivers, L. (2011). Responding to cholera in post-earthquake Haiti. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(1), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations