Validation of atmospheric aerosols parallel sampling in a multifold device
In this work, particulate matter was collected using an active sampling system consisting of a PM10 (<10 μm) inlet coupled to a multifold device containing six channels, connected to a vacuum pump. Each channel was equipped with a filter holder fitted with adequately chosen filters. The system was fixed on a metallic structure, which was placed on the roof of the laboratory building, at the Faculty of Sciences, in Lisbon. Sampling took place under flow-controlled conditions. Aerosols were extracted from the filters with water, in defined conditions, and the water-soluble fraction was quantified by ion chromatography (IC) for the determination of inorganic anions (Cl−, NO3− and SO42−). Equivalent sampling through the various channels was validated. Validation was based on the metrological compatibility of the content results for the various filters. Ion masses are metrologically equivalent when their absolute difference is smaller than the respective expanded uncertainty. When this condition is verified, the studied multifold device produces equivalent samples.
KeywordsEquivalent sampling Validation Atmospheric aerosols Ion chromatography Uncertainty
- Anthony, T.R., Sleeth, D.K., Volckens, J., (2014). Design, evaluation and validation of a next-generation inhalable aerosol sampler. R01OH 2012–2016 Project, National Institute of Health, U.S.A.Google Scholar
- Brockmann, J. E. (2001). Sampling and transport of aerosols. In P. Baron & K. Willeke (Eds.), Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques and applications (2nd ed., pp. 143–195). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- EC (2008). Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 of May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Official Journal of the European Union, 11/6/2008.Google Scholar
- EMEP (2001). Manual for sampling and chemical analysis, NILU. revision 2001.Google Scholar
- Eurachem CITAC (2012). Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd ed., Eurachem. (http://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam).
- JCGM (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). JCGM 100, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, BIPM (http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf).
- JCGM (2012). International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). JCGM 200, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, BIPM. (http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf).
- John, W. (2011). Size distribution characteristics of aerosols. In P. Kulkarni, P. A. Baron, & K. Willeke (Eds.), Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques and applications (3rd ed.). USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. C., & Miller, J. N. (2005). Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry (5th ed.). UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Nunes, M.J.M. (2002). Establishment of chemical properties of the aerosol in the north east Atlantic Ocean. PhD Thesis, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
- Raynor, P. C. (2011). Controlling nanoparticle exposures. In G. Ramachandran (Ed.), Assessing nanoparticle risks to human health. USA: William Andrew. Chap. 7.Google Scholar
- Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, N. S. (1998). Atmospheric chemistry and physics—from air pollution to climate change. USA: Wiley-Interscience Publication.Google Scholar
- Vincent, J. H. (2007). Aerosol sampling, science, standards, instrumentation and applications. USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- WMO/GAW (2003). Aerosol measurement procedures guidelines and recommendations, N° 153, World Meteorological Organisation Global Atmosphere Watch, September.Google Scholar