Advertisement

Replacing rubber plantations by rain forest in Southwest China—who would gain and how much?

  • Michael Ahlheim
  • Tobias BörgerEmail author
  • Oliver Frör
Article

Abstract

The cultivation of rubber trees in Xishuangbanna Prefecture in China’s Yunnan Province has triggered an unprecedented economic development but it is also associated with severe environmental problems. Rubber plantations are encroaching the indigenous rain forests at a large scale and a high speed in Xishuangbanna. Many rare plant and animal species are endangered by this development, the natural water management is disturbed, and even the microclimate in this region has changed over the past years. The present study aims at an assessment of the environmental benefits accruing from a reforestation project partly reversing the deforestation that has taken place over the past years. To this end, a Contingent Valuation survey has been conducted in Xishuangbanna to elicit local residents’ willingness to pay for this reforestation program that converts existing rubber plantations back into forest. It is shown that local people’s awareness of the environmental problems caused by increasing rubber plantation is quite high and that in spite of the economic advantages of rubber plantation there is a positive willingness among the local population to contribute financially to a reduction of existing rubber plantations for the sake of a partial restoration of the local rain forest. These results could be used for the practical implementation of a Payments for Eco-System Services system for reforestation in Xishuangbanna.

Keywords

Contingent valuation Rubber plantation Reforestation Environmental valuation Ecosystem services Southwest China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This survey study was conducted within the framework of the Sino-German Research Cooperation “Living Landscapes—China” funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education. The authors want to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments which have helped to improve earlier versions of this paper.

References

  1. Ahlheim, M., Ekasingh, B., Frör, O., Kitchaicharoen, J., Neef, A., Sangkapitux, C., & Sinphurmsukskul, N. (2010). Better than their reputation: enhancing the validity of contingent valuation mail survey results through citizen expert groups. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlheim, M., Börger, T., & Frör, O. (2013). The effects of extrinsic incentives on respondent behaviour in contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, G., Grimsrud, K., Thacher, J., & Kotchen, M. (2007). Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity? Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 757–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bärnighausen, T., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Sauerborn, R. (2007). Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, M.T. (2008). China’s sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 699–711.Google Scholar
  6. Börger, T. (2012). Social desirability and environmental valuation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Börger, T. (2013). Keeping up appearances: motivations for socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews. Ecological Economics, 87, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, T. A., & Huppert, D. D. (1989). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson, R.T. and Hanemann, M.W. (2005). Contingent valuation. In Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. R. (Eds.) Handbook of environmental economics (pp. 821–936). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, W. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2010). Resident motivations and willingness-to-pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China). Environmental Management, 45, 1052–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, W. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2011). Resident valuation and expectation of the urban greening project in Zhuhai, China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 851–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi, A. S. (2013). Nonmarket values of major resources in the Korean DMZ areas: a test of distance decay. Ecological Economics, 88, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Suttonkk, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crooker, J. R., & Herriges, J. A. (2004). Parametric and semi-nonparametric estimation of willingness-to-pay in the dichotomous choice contingent valuation framework. Environmental and Resource Economics, 27, 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, B. and Mourato, S. (2002). Valuing river quality in China. In: Pearce, C. and Palmer, C. (Eds.) Valuing the environment in developing countries (pp. 25–66). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Du, Y. (1998). The value of improved water quality for recreation in East Lake, Wuhan, China: an application of contingent valuation and travel cost methods. Institute of Economics at the Hubei Academy of Social Sciences, Hubei.Google Scholar
  17. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fu, Y., Guo, H., Chen, A., Cui, J. (2004). Rubber development by smallholder farmers in Xishuangbanna, Yunna, China, a case study from Daka and Baka. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  19. Gao, T., Shen, L., Liu, L., & Xue, J. (2012). The impacts of rubber plantation on society, economy and eco-environmental in Jinghong City (in Chinese). Ziyuan Kexue (Resource Science), 34(7), 1200–1206.Google Scholar
  20. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis, 5th edition. Prentice, Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  21. Halstead, J. M., Luloff, A. E., & Stevens, T. H. (1992). Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21, 160–169.Google Scholar
  22. Hammitt, J. K., & Zhou, Y. (2006). The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han, F., Yang, Z., Wang, H., & Xu, X. (2011). Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: a contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180, 451–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanley, N., & Barbier, E. B. (2009). Pricing nature—cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinke, A. (2013). The role of incentives in contingent valuation surveys. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  27. Hu, H., Liu, W., & Cao, M. (2008). Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 146, 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiang, Y., Liu, J., Cui, Q., An, X., & Wu, C. (2011). Land use/land cover change and driving force analysis in Xishuangbanna Region in 1986–2008. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5, 288–93.Google Scholar
  29. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2009). Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities, 26, 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jin, J., Jiang, C., & Li, L. (2013). The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: a contingent valuation study in Wenling City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jinghong, (2008). Statistical Yearbook of Jinghong Municipality 2007. Jinghong.Google Scholar
  33. Jinghong (2011). Report of major figures of the sixth national census of Jinghong Municipality, http://xxgk.yn.gov.cn/canton_model12/newsview.aspx?id=1359465, accessed March 28, 2012.
  34. Jorgensen, B. S., & Syme, G. J. (2000). Protest response and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological Economics, 33, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental attitudes motivations and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics, 32, 93–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leng, Z., & Lei, Y. (2011). Estimate the forest recreational values of Zhangjiajie in China using a contingent valuation method. Low Carbon Economy, 2, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, Y., Wu, Z., Li, L., & Xu, Y. (2006). A preliminary study on species diversity usage and ecological impact of alien plants in Xishuangbanna (in Chinese). Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 15, 68–72.Google Scholar
  38. Li, H., Mitchell Aide, T., Youxin, M., Wenjun, L., & Min, C. (2007). Demand for rubber is causing the loss of high diversity rain forest in SW China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 1731–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LILAC (2006). Conservation of cultural landscapes through diversification of resource-use strategies and technologies for agro-ecosystems in mountainous Southwest China, Project Proposal, Hohenheim.Google Scholar
  40. Lin, Z., Lib, F., Huang, H., Dilly, O., Liu, J., Wei, Y., Yang, L., & Cao, X. (2011). Households’ willingness to reduce pollution threats in the Poyang Lake region, Southern China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 110, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindhjem, H., & Navrud, S. (2011). Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? Ecological Economics, 70, 1628–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu, X. and Lin, S. (2010) Rubber expansion in Xishuangbanna. In: Expansion of Rubber in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia: what are the prospects for small holders? Chiang Mai, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  43. Mann, C. C. (2010). Addicted to rubber. Science, 325, 564–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyerhoff, J., & Liebe, U. (2006). Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics, 57, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Myres, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Qiu, J. (2009). Where the rubber meets the garden. Nature, 457, 246–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stone, R. (2009). Nursing China’s ailing forests back to health. Science, 325, 556–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sturgeon, J. C. (2010). Governing minorities and development in Xishuangbanna, China: Akha and Dai rubber farmers as entrepreneurs. Geoforum, 41, 318–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sturgeon, J. C., & Menzies, N. (2006). Ideological landscapes: rubber in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 1950 to 2007. Asian Geographer, 25, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tan, Z.-H., Zhang, Y.-P., Song, Q.-H., Liu, W.-J., Deng, X.-B., Tang, J.-W., Deng, Y., Zhou, W.-J., Yang, L.-Y., Yu, G.-R., Sun, X.-M., & Liang, N.-S. (2011). Rubber plantations act as water pumps in tropical China, Geophysical Research Letters, 38.Google Scholar
  52. Tao, Z., Yan, H., & Zhan, J. (2012). Economic valuation of forest ecosystem services in Heshui Watershed using contingent valuation method. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 2445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, H., & Mullahy, J. (2006). Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China. Science of the Total Environment, 367, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y.-S. (2009). Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji’nan, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1022–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang, X. J., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Yang, K. Z., & Bai, M. (2006). Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method, a case study in Beijing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 120, 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, W. (2007). Residents’ willingness to pay for improving air quality in Jinan, China. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 5, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang, H., Shi, Y., Kim, Y. and Kamata, T. (2011). Valuing water quality improvement in China: a case study of Lake Puzhehei in Yunnan Province. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5766, Washington.Google Scholar
  58. Wei, Y., Davidson, B., Chen, D., White, R., Li, B. and Zhang, J. (2007). Can contingent valuation be used to measure the in situ value of groundwater on the North China Plain?. Water Resource Management, 21 Google Scholar
  59. Xu, Z., Cheng, G., Zhang, Z., Su, Z., & Loomis, J. (2003). Applying contingent valuation in China to measure the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Ejina region. Ecological Economics, 44, 345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu, Z., Loomis, J., Zhiqiang, Z., & Hamamura, K. (2006). Evaluating the performance of different willingness to pay question formats for valuing environmental restoration in rural China. Environment and Development Economics, 11, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu, L., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., & Xiao, L. (2009). Can PC format CV reveal the true value of environmental resources in developing countries? A laboratory experiment in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54, 4679–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu, C., Li, Q., & Wang, W. (2014a). Contingent valuation method assessment of the ecological benefits of Populus euphratica forest based on consumer perspective—taking the typical area in Tarim River Basin as example. Advanced Materials Research, 962–965, 703–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu, J., Grumbine, R. E., & Beckschäfer, P. (2014b). Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region. Ecological Indicators, 36, 749–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yi, Z.-F., Cannon, C. H., Chen, J., Ye, C.-X., & Swetnam, R. D. (2014). Developing indicators of economic value and biodiversity loss for rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna, southwest China: a case study from Menglun township. Ecological Indicators, 36, 788–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang, W.-W. (2011). Measuring the value of water quality improvements in Lake Tai, China. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 12, 710–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao, Y., & Wu, S. (2011). Willingness to pay: animal welfare and related influencing factors in China. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14, 150–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., & Xu, J. (2009). The rubber juggernaut. Science, 324, 1024–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economics (520 F)University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect PlacePlymouthUK
  3. 3.Environmental Economics, Institute of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Koblenz-LandauLandauGermany

Personalised recommendations