Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 186, Issue 9, pp 5337–5351 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal variation of surface ozone, NO and NO2 at urban, suburban, rural and industrial sites in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula

  • D. Domínguez-López
  • J. A. Adame
  • M. A. Hernández-Ceballos
  • F. Vaca
  • B. A. De la Morena
  • J. P. Bolívar
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Surface ozone is one of the most important photochemical pollutants in the low atmosphere, causing damage to human health, vegetation, materials and climate. The weather (high temperatures and high solar radiation), orography (presence of the Guadalquivir valley) and anthropogenic (the cities of Cádiz, Córdoba, Huelva and Seville and two important industrial complexes) characteristics of the southwestern Iberian Peninsula make this region ideal for the formation and accumulation of ozone. To increase the knowledge of ozone behaviour in this area, the monthly, daily and weekly variations of ozone and its precursors, nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2), were analysed over a 4-year period (2003 to 2006). Using the k-means cluster technique, 12 representative stations of five different areas with different ozone behaviour were selected from a total of 29 monitoring sites. This is the first time that the analysis of these atmospheric pollutants has been carried out for the whole area, allowing therefore a complete understanding of the dynamics and the relationships of these compounds in this region. The results showed an opposite behaviour among ozone and NO and NO2 concentrations in urban and suburban zones, marked by maximums of ozone (minimums NOx) in spring and summer and minimums (maximums) in autumn and winter. A seasonal behaviour, with lower amplitude, was also observed in rural and industrial areas for ozone concentrations, with the NO and NO2 concentrations remaining at low and similar values during the year in rural zones due to the absence of emission sources in their surroundings. The daily cycles of ozone in urban, suburban and industrial sites registered a maximum value in the early afternoon (14:00–17:00 UTC) while for NOx two peaks were observed, at 7:00–10:00 UTC and 20:00–22:00. In the case of rural stations, no hourly peak of ozone or NOx was registered. The weekend effect was studied by using a statistical contrast tests (Student’s t). The results indicated that only areas influenced by important traffic emissions presented a weekend effect for NO and NO2, whereas an ozone weekend effect was not detected in any case.

Keywords

Ozone Nitrogen oxides Temporal and spatial variation Cluster analysis Weekend/weekday differences Iberian Peninsula 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Environmental Department of Andalusia Government for the database provided.

References

  1. Adame, J. A., Lozano, A., Bolívar, J. P., De la Morena, B. A., Contreras, J., & Godoy, F. (2008). Behaviour, distribution, variability of surface ozone at an arid region in the south of the Iberian Peninsula (Seville, Spain). Chemosphere, 70, 841–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adame, J. A., Bolívar, J. P., & De la Morena, B. A. (2010). Surface ozone measurements in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Huelva, Spain). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 17, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adame, J. A., Notario, A., Villanueva, F., & Algadalejo, J. (2012). Application of cluster analysis to surface ozone, NO2 and SO2 daily patterns in an industrial area in Central-Southern Spain measured with a DOAS system. Science of the Total Environment, 429, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, C. L., & Fairley, D. (2001). Spatial mapping of VOC and NOx-limitation of ozone formation in central California. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 3861–3873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calesso, E., Ramos de Santana, E., Wiegand, F., & Jandyra, F. (2009). Measurement of surface ozone and its precursors in an urban area in South Brazil. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 2213–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. California Air Resource Board. (2003). The ozone weekend effect in California. Staff Report.Google Scholar
  8. CMAJA (2008). Inventario de Emisiones a la Atmósfera en Andalucía. Andalusian Government.Google Scholar
  9. Coyle, M., Smith, R. I., Stedman, J. R., Weston, K. J., & Fowler, D. (2002). Quantifying the spatial distribution of surface ozone concentration in the UK. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1013–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, J. M., Eder, B. K., Nychka, D., & Yang, Q. (1998). Modelling the effects of meteorology on ozone in Houston using cluster analysis and generalized additive models. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 2505–2520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Domínguez-López, D. (2009). Caracterización y comportamiento del ozono y los óxidos de nitrógeno en Andalucía occidental. Ph.D. thesis, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain, 284 pp., ISBN: 978-34-92944-59-0.Google Scholar
  12. EU, Directive 2008/50/CE. (2008). Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  13. Everitt, B. S. (1980). Cluster analysis. London: Halstead.Google Scholar
  14. Fernández-Fernández, M. I., Gallego, M. C., García, J. A., & Acero, F. J. (2011). A study of surface ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula during the last fifty years. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 1946–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fishman, J., & Crutzen, P. J. (1978). The origin of ozone in the troposphere. Nature, 274, 855–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García, M. A., Sánchez, M. L., Pérez, I. A., & Torre, B. (2005). Ground level O3 mixing ratio at a rural location in northern Spain. Science of the Total Environment, 348, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heuss, J. M., Kahlbaum, D., & Wolf, G. T. (2003). Weekday/weekend ozone differences: what can we learn from them? Journal of Air Waste Management, 53, 772–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hernández-Ceballos, M.A. (2012) Caracterización meteorológica y modelización de Andalucía occidental. Ph.D. thesis, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain, 284 pp., ISBN: 978-84-15147-73-2.Google Scholar
  19. Hernández-Ceballos, M. A., Adame, J. A., Bolívar, J. P., & De la Morena, B. A. (2013). A mesoscale simulation of coastal circulation in the Guadalquivir valley (southwestern Iberian Peninsula) using the WRF-ARW model. Atmospheric Research, 124, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Im, U., Tayanc, M., & Yenigun, O. (2006). Analysis of major photochemical pollutants with meteorological factors for high ozone days in Istanbul, Turkey. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 175, 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Im, U., Incecik, S., Guler, M., Tek, A., Topcu, S., Unal, Y. S., et al. (2013). Analysis of surface ozone and nitrogen oxides at urban, semi-rural and rural sites in Istanbul, Turkey. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 920–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. INM. (2001). Guía del clima en España 1971–2000. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, España.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkin, M. E., & Clemitshaw, K. C. (2000). Ozone and other secondary photochemical pollutants: chemical processes governing their formation in the planetary boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 2499–2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalabokas, P. D., Viras, L. G., Bartzis, J. G., & Repapis, C. C. (2000). Mediterranean rural ozone characteristics around the urban area of Athens. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 5199–5208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kassomenos, P.A., Dimitriou, K., & Paschalidou, A.K. (2013). Human health damage caused by particulate matter PM10 and ozone in urban environments: the case of Athens, Greece. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1–10. Article in press.Google Scholar
  26. Khoder, M. I. (2009). Diurnal, seasonal and weekdays–weekends variations of ground level ozone concentrations in an urban area in greater Cairo. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 149, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klumpp, A., Ansel, W. A., Klumpp, G., Catalayud, V., Garrec, J. P., He, S., et al. (2006). Ozone pollution and ozone biomonitoring in European cities. Part I: ozone concentrations and cumulative exposure indices at urban and suburban sites. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 7963–7974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Logan, J. A. (1994). Trends in the vertical distribution of ozone: an analysis of ozone data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(25), 2553–2555.Google Scholar
  29. Lozano, A., Usero, J., Vanderlinde, E., Raez, J., Contreras, J., & Navarrete, B. (2009). Air quality monitoring network design to control nitrogen dioxide and ozone, applied in Malaga, Spain. Microchemical Journal, 93, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monteiro, A., Carvalho, A., Ribeiro, I., Scotto, M., Barbosa, S., Alonso, A., et al. (2012). Trends in ozone concentrations in the Iberian Peninsula by quantile regression and clustering. Atmospheric Environment, 56, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Notario, A., Bravo, I., Adame, J. A., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., Aranda, A., Rodríguez, A., et al. (2012). Analysis of NO, NO2, NOx, O3 and oxidant (OX = O3 + NO2) levels measured in a metropolitan area in the southwest of Iberian Peninsula. Atmospheric Research, 104–105, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paoletti, E. (2006). Impact of ozone on Mediterranean forests: a review. Environmental Pollution, 144, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pellegrini, E., Lorenzini, G., & Nali, C. (2007). The 2003 European heat wave: which role for ozone? Some data from Tuscany, Central Italy. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 181, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pereira, S., & Leslie, G. (2009). Hypothesis testing. Australian Critical Care, 22, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qin, Y., Tonnesen, G. S., & Wang, Z. (2004). Weekend/weekday differences of ozone, NOx, CO, VOCs, PM10 and the light scatter during ozone season in southern California. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3069–3087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rice, J. A. (1994). Mathematical statistics and data analysis (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schipa, I., Tanzarella, A., & Mangia, C. (2009). Differences between weekend and weekday ozone levels over rural and urban sites in Southern Italy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 156, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sillman, S., Logan, J. A., & Wofry, S. C. (1990). A regional-scale model for ozone in the United States with a subgrid representation of urban and power plant plumes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 1837–1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sikder, H. A., Nasiruddin, M., Suthawaree, J., Kato, S., & Kajii, Y. (2013). Long term observation of surface O3 and its precursors in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Atmospheric Research, 122, 378–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stohl, A. (1998). Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories: a review and bibliography. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 947–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tarasova, O. A., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Jöckel, P., Zvyagintsev, A. M., & Kuznetsov, G. I. (2007). A climatology of surface ozone in the extra tropics: cluster analysis of observations and models results. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 6099–6117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trainer, M., Parrish, D., Goldan, P., Roberts, J., & Fehsenfeld, F. (2000). Review of observation-based analysis of the regional factors influencing ozone concentrations. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 2045–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varotsos, C., Kondratyev, K. Y., & Efstathiou, M. (2001). On the seasonal variation of the surface ozone in Athens, Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, R., Lei, W., Tie, X., & Hess, P. (2004). Industrial emissions cause extreme urban ozone diurnal variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 6346–6350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Domínguez-López
    • 1
  • J. A. Adame
    • 2
  • M. A. Hernández-Ceballos
    • 1
    • 3
  • F. Vaca
    • 1
  • B. A. De la Morena
    • 2
  • J. P. Bolívar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysicsUniversity of HuelvaHuelvaSpain
  2. 2.Atmospheric Sounding Station “El Arenosillo”, National Institute for Aerospace TechnologyHuelvaSpain
  3. 3.Joint Research CentreInstitute for Transuranium Elements, Nuclear Security UnitIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations