A framework for adaptive monitoring of the cumulative effects of human footprint on biodiversity
- 1k Downloads
Effective ecological monitoring is imperative in a human-dominated world, as our ability to manage functioning ecosystems will depend on understanding biodiversity responses to anthropogenic impacts. Yet, most monitoring efforts have either been narrowly focused on particular sites, species and stressors — thus inadequately considering the cumulative effects of multiple, interacting impacts at scales of management relevance — or too unfocused to provide specific guidance. We propose a cumulative effects monitoring framework that integrates multi-scaled surveillance of trends in biodiversity and land cover with targeted evaluation of hypothesized drivers of change. The framework is grounded in a flexible conceptual model and uses monitoring to generate and test empirical models that relate the status of diverse taxonomic groups to the nature and extent of human “footprint” and other landscape attributes. An adaptive cycle of standardized sampling, model development, and model evaluation provides a means to learn about the system and guide management. Additional benefits of the framework include standardized data on status and trend for a wide variety of biodiversity elements, spatially explicit models for regional planning and scenario evaluation, and identification of knowledge gaps for complementary research. We describe efforts to implement the framework in Alberta, Canada, through the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, and identify key challenges to be addressed.
KeywordsCumulative effects Ecological monitoring Human footprint Biodiversity conservation Adaptive monitoring Impact assessment
- ABMI (Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute). (2012a). Manual for Reporting Human Footprint, version 2012–03–26. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Alberta, Canada. Available at www.abmi.ca/ (accessed March 2013).
- ABMI (Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute). (2012b). Terrestrial field data collection protocols (abridged version) 2012–06–27. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Alberta, Canada. Available at www.abmi.ca/ (accessed March 2013).
- ABMI (Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute). (2012c). The Status of Landbirds in Alberta’s Boreal Plains Ecozone: Preliminary Assessment. Version 2011–12. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Alberta, Canada. Available at www.abmi.ca/ (published September 2012).
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Environment Canada (2011). Integrated monitoring plan for the oil sands: terrestrial biodiversity component. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
- Franklin, J. (2009). Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gitzen, R. A., Millspaugh, J. J., Cooper, A. B., & Licht, D. S. (Eds.). (2012). Design and analysis of long-term ecological monitoring studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Government of Alberta. (2008). Land-use framework. Canada: Edmonton.Google Scholar
- Government of Alberta. (2012). About Alberta. http://alberta.ca/aboutalberta.cfm (accessed March 2012).
- Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J., Byrnes, J. E. K., Hungate, B. A., Matulich, K. L., et al. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 486, 105–108.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. H. (2012). Monitoring that matters. In R. A. Gitzen, J. J. Millspaugh, A. B. Cooper, & D. S. Licht (Eds.), Design and analysis of long-term ecological monitoring studies (pp. 55–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D., Lalonde, K., McEachern, M., Kenney, J., Mendoza, G., Buffin, A., & Rich, K. (2011). Improving cumulative effects assessment in Alberta: regional strategic assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev, 31, 481–483.Google Scholar
- Lindenmayer, D., & Likens, G. (2010). Effective ecological monitoring. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R. J., Montague-Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, A., Burgman, M., et al. (2008). A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett, 11, 78–91.Google Scholar
- Lookingbill, T. R., Schmit, J. P., & Carter, S. L. (2012). GRTS and graphs: monitoring natural resources in urban landscapes. In R. A. Gitzen, J. J. Millspaugh, A. B. Cooper, & D. S. Licht (Eds.), Design and analysis of long-term ecological monitoring studies (pp. 362–380). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Roloff, G., & Kernohan, B. (1999). Evaluating reliability of habitat suitability index models. Wildl Soc Bull, 27, 973–985.Google Scholar
- Schneider, R., & Dyer, S. (2006). Death by a thousand cuts: impacts of in situ oil sands development on Alberta’s boreal forest. Edmonton: Pembina Institute and Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.Google Scholar