Soil criteria to protect terrestrial wildlife and open-range livestock from metal toxicity at mining sites
Thousands of hard rock mines exist in the western USA and in other parts of the world as a result of historic and current gold, silver, lead, and mercury mining. Many of these sites in the USA are on public lands. Typical mine waste associated with these sites are tailings and waste rock dumps that may be used by wildlife and open-range livestock. This report provides wildlife screening criteria levels for metals in soil and mine waste to evaluate risk and to determine the need for site-specific risk assessment, remediation, or a change in management practices. The screening levels are calculated from toxicity reference values based on maximum tolerable levels of metals in feed, on soil and plant ingestion rates, and on soil to plant uptake factors for a variety of receptors. The metals chosen for this report are common toxic metals found at mining sites: arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc. The resulting soil screening values are well above those developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The difference in values was mainly a result of using toxicity reference values that were more specific to the receptors addressed rather than the most sensitive receptor.
KeywordsWildlife Metals Soil criteria Toxicity Mining
- Basta, N., Ryan, J., & Chaney, R. (2005). Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(1), 49–63.Google Scholar
- BLM (2013a). Wild horse and burro adoption and sales information. http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/wild_horse_and_burro/What_We_Do/sale_authority.html. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- BLM (2013b). Wild horse and burro. https://www.blm.gov/adoptahorse/herdareas.php?herd_areas_seq=23&herd_states_seq=1. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- Drexler, J., Fisher, N., Henningsen, G., Lanno, R., McGeer, J., Sappington, K., et al. (2003). Issue paper on the bioavailability and bioaccumulation of metals. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Efroymson, R., Will, M., & Suter II, G. (1997). Toxicological benchmarks for contaminants of potential concern for effects on soil and litter invertebrates and heterotrophic process: 1997 Revision. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Environment Agency (2007). UK soil and herbage pollutant survey. UKSHS report no. 1.Google Scholar
- Ford, K. (1996). Risk management criteria for BLM mining sites. Technical notes 390. Denver, CO: U.S. Bureau of Land Management National Operations Center.Google Scholar
- Ford, K. (2004). Risk Management criteria for metals at BLM mining sites. U.S Bureau of Land Management Papers, Paper 22. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub/22. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- Jensen, B. (2000). Estimating big game weights: a crash course for the curious. North Dakota Outdoors, 63(3), 26–27.Google Scholar
- Kabata-Pendias, A., & Pendias, H. (1992). Trace metals in soils and plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
- Kendall, R. J., & Scanlon, P. F. (1981). Effects of chronic lead ingestion on reproductive characteristics of ringed turtle doves (Streptopelia risoria) and on tissue lead concentrations of adults and their progeny. Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecology and Biology, 26(3), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krieger, R. I. (1990). Toxicity and bioavailability studies of lead and other elements in the lower Coeur d'Alene River. Prepared for the Coeur d’Alene District, Bureau of Land Management, Technical Bulletin, 90–3.Google Scholar
- Mirarchi, R. E. (1993). Growth, maturation and moult. In T. S. Baskett, M. W. Sayre, R. E. Tomlinson, & R. E. Mirarchi (Eds.), Ecology and management of the mourning dove (pp. 129–142). Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole.Google Scholar
- NOAA (2012). SQuiRTS, Screening Quick Reference Tables. http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/RI/suwailem/Standards/122_squirt_cards.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- NRC. (2005). Mineral tolerance of animals (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
- NRCS (2003). National range and pasture handbook. Temple, TX: U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1043065.pdf Accessed 20 September 2013.
- Rao, P., Jordan, S., & Bhatnagar, M. (1989). Ultrastructure of kidney of ducks exposed to methylmercury, lead and cadmium in combination. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology, and Oncology, 9(1), 19–44.Google Scholar
- Sample, B., Opresko, D., & Suter, G. (1996). Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1996 revision. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Shacklette, H., & Boerngen, J. (1984). Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1270.Google Scholar
- Sileo, L., Creekmore, L. H., Audet, D. J., Snyder, M. R., Meteyer, C. U., Franson, J. C., et al. (2001). Lead poisoning of waterfowl by contaminated sediment in the Coeur d'Alene River. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 41(3), 364–368.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. S., Ramsey, C. A., & Hageman, P. L. (2000). Sampling strategy for the rapid screening of mine-waste dumps on abandoned mine lands. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1043065.pdf Accessed 20 March 2013
- Sneva, F. A., Mayland, H., & Vavra, M. (1983). Soil ingestion by ungulates grazing a sagebrush-bunchgrass range in Eastern Oregon. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 628. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1993). Wildlife exposure factors handbook, volumes I and II. EPA/600/R-93/187 a and b. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2000). Abandoned mine site characterization and cleanup handbook. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/remedy/pdfs/amscch.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- USEPA (2002). National recommended water quality criteria: 2002. EPA 822-R-02-047. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/upload/2008_04_29_criteria_wqctable_nrwqc-2002.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2013.
- USEPA (2005a). Ecological soil screening levels for cadmium: interim final. OSWER Directive 9285.7-65. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2005b). Ecological soil screening levels for arsenic: interim final. OSWER Directive 9285-7-62. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2005c). Ecological soil screening levels for lead: interim final. OSWER Directive 9285.7-70. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2007a). Ecological soil screening levels for copper: interim final. OSWER Directive 9285.7-68. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2007b). Ecological soil screening levels for zinc: interim final. OSWER 9285.7-73. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2007c). Guidance for evaluating the oral bioavailability of metals in soils for use in human health risk assessment. OSWER 9285.7-80. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/bioavailability/bio_guidance.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2013.