Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 186, Issue 2, pp 1253–1260 | Cite as

Antibiotic-resistant E. coli in surface water and groundwater in dairy operations in Northern California

  • Xunde Li
  • Naoko Watanabe
  • Chengling Xiao
  • Thomas Harter
  • Brenda McCowan
  • Yingjia Liu
  • Edward R. Atwill
Article

Abstract

Generic Escherichia coli was isolated from surface water and groundwater samples from two dairies in Northern California and tested for susceptibility to antibiotics. Surface samples were collected from flush water, lagoon water, and manure solids, and groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells. Although E. coli was ubiquitous in surface samples with concentrations ranging from several hundred thousand to over a million colony-forming units per 100 mL of surface water or per gram of surface solids, groundwater under the influence of these high surface microbial loadings had substantially fewer bacteria (3- to 7-log10 reduction). Among 80 isolates of E. coli tested, 34 (42.5 %) were resistant to one or more antibiotics and 22 (27.5 %) were multi-antibiotic resistant (resistant to ≥3 antibiotics), with resistance to tetracycline, cefoxitin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and ampicillin being the most common. E. coli isolates from the calf hutch area exhibited the highest levels of multi-antibiotic resistance, much higher than isolates in surface soil solids from heifer and cow pens, flush alleys, manure storage lagoons, and irrigated fields. Among E. coli isolates from four groundwater samples, only one sample exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline, indicating the potential of groundwater contamination with antibiotic-resistant bacteria from dairy operations.

Keywords

Dairy Water E. coli Antibiotic resistance 

References

  1. Anderson, M. E., & Sobsey, M. D. (2006). Detection and occurrence of antimicrobially resistant E. coli in groundwater on or near swine farms in eastern North Carolina. Water Science and Technology, 54(3), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslam, M., Greer, G. G., Nattress, F. M., Gill, C. O., & McMullen, L. M. (2004). Genetic diversity of Escherichia coli recovered from the oral cavity of beef cattle and their relatedness to faecal E. coli. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 39(6), 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berge, A. C. B., Atwill, E. R., & Sischo, W. M. (2005). Animal and farm influences on the dynamics of antibiotic resistance in faecal Escherichia coli in young dairy calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 69(1–2), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chee-Sanford, J. C., Aminov, R. I., Krapac, I. J., Garrigues-Jeanjean, N., & Mackie, R. I. (2001). Occurrence and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater underlying two swine production facilities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(4), 1494–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummings, K. J., Warnick, L. D., Elton, M., Gröhn, Y. T., McDonough, P. L., & Siler, J. D. (2010). The effect of clinical outbreaks of salmonellosis on the prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding among dairy cattle in New York. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 7(7), 815–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vliegher, S., Fox, L. K., Piepers, S., McDougall, S., & Barkema, H. W. (2012). Invited review: Mastitis in dairy heifers: Nature of the disease, potential impact, prevention, and control. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(3), 1025–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimri, G. P., Rudd, K. E., Morgan, M. K., Bayat, H., & Ames, G. F. (1992). Physical mapping of repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences in Escherichia coli and phylogenetic distribution among Escherichia coli strains and other enteric bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 174(14), 4583–4593.Google Scholar
  8. Dodson, K., & LeJeune, J. (2005). Escherichia coli O157:H7, Campylobacter jejuni, and Salmonella prevalence in cull dairy cows marketed in northeastern Ohio. Journal of Food Protection, 68(5), 927–931.Google Scholar
  9. Donaldson, S. C., Straley, B. A., Hegde, N. V., Sawant, A. A., DebRoy, C., & Jayarao, B. M. (2006). Molecular epidemiology of ceftiofur-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from dairy calves. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(6), 3940–3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donovan, D. C., Franklin, S. T., Chase, C. C., & Hippen, A. R. (2002). Growth and health of Holstein calves fed milk replacers supplemented with antibiotics or Enteroguard. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(4), 947–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy, G. (2003). Verocytoxigenic Escherichia coli in animal faeces, manures and slurries. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94(Suppl), 94S–103S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esiobu, N., Armenta, L., & Ike, J. (2002). Antibiotic resistance in soil and water environments. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 12(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harter, T., Davis, H., Mathews, M. C., & Meyer, R. D. (2002). Shallow groundwater quality on dairy farms with irrigated forage crops. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 55(3–4), 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoar, B. R., Atwill, E. R., Elmi, C., Utterbach, W. W., & Edmondson, A. (1999). Comparison of fecal samples collected per rectum and off the ground for estimation of environmental contamination attributable to beef cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 60(11), 1352–1356.Google Scholar
  15. Ibekwe, A. M., Murinda, S. E., & Graves, A. K. (2011). Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from human and animal sources uncovers multiple resistances from human sources. PLoS One, 6(6), e20819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kenny, J., Barber, N., Hutson, S., Linsey, K., Lovelace, J., & Maupin, M. (2009). Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344. 52 p.Google Scholar
  17. Koike, S., Krapac, I. G., Oliver, H. D., Yannarell, A. C., Chee-Sanford, J. C., Aminov, R. I., et al. (2007). Monitoring and source tracking of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater adjacent to swine production facilities over a 3-year period. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(15), 4813–4823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, D. J., Atwill, E. R., Lennox, M. S., Hou, L., Karle, B., & Tate, K. W. (2005). Linking on-farm dairy management practices to storm-flow fecal coliform loading for California coastal watersheds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107(1–3), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackie, R. I., Koike, S., Krapac, I., Chee-Sanford, J., Maxwell, S., & Aminov, R. I. (2006). Tetracycline residues and tetracycline resistance genes in groundwater impacted by swine production facilities. Animal Biotechnology, 17(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morris, B. L., Lawrence, A. R. L., Chilton, P. J. C., Adams, B., Calow, R. C., & Klinck, B. A. (2003). Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation: A global assessment of the problem and options for management (Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, RS. 03-3). Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  21. Pradhan, A. K., Van Kessel, J. S., Karns, J. S., Wolfgang, D. R., Hovingh, E., Nelen, K. A., et al. (2009). Dynamics of endemic infectious diseases of animal and human importance on three dairy herds in the northeastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(4), 1811–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Purdy, C. W., Straus, D. C., Parker, D. B., Williams, B. P., & Clark, R. N. (2001). Water quality in cattle feedyard playas in winter and summer. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 62(9), 1402–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rysz, M., & Alvarez, P. J. (2006). Transport of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance-carrying plasmids through porous media. Water Science and Technology, 54(11–12), 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sapkota, A. R., Curriero, F. C., Gibson, K. E., & Schwab, K. J. (2007). Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(7), 1040–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shere, J. A., Bartlett, K. J., & Kaspar, C. W. (1998). Longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 dissemination on four dairy farms in Wisconsin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(4), 1390–1399.Google Scholar
  26. Stanton, A. L., Kelton, D. F., Leblanc, S. J., Millman, S. T., Wormuth, J., Dingwell, R. T., & Leslie, K. E. (2010). The effect of treatment with long-acting antibiotic at postweaning movement on respiratory disease and on growth in commercial dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(2), 574–581.Google Scholar
  27. Stanton, A. L., Kelton, D. F., LeBlanc, S. J., Wormuth, J., & Leslie, K. E. (2012). The effect of respiratory disease and a preventative antibiotic treatment on growth, survival, age at first calving, and milk production of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(9), 4950–4960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. USDA APHIS Antibiotic Use on U.S. Dairy Operations, 2002 and 2007. Retrieved from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_is_AntibioticUse.pdf.
  29. Watanabe, N., Harter, T., & Bergamaschi, B. A. (2008). Environmental occurrence and shallow ground water detection of the antibiotic monensin from dairy farms. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37(5), S78–S85.Google Scholar
  30. Watanabe, N., Bergamaschi, B. A., Loftin, K. A., Meyer, M. T., & Harter, T. (2010). Use and environmental occurrence of antibiotics in freestall dairy farms with manure forage fields. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(17), 6591–6600. doi:10.1021/es100834s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xunde Li
    • 1
  • Naoko Watanabe
    • 2
  • Chengling Xiao
    • 1
  • Thomas Harter
    • 2
  • Brenda McCowan
    • 1
  • Yingjia Liu
    • 1
  • Edward R. Atwill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Land, Air, and Water ResourcesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations