Probabilistic risk assessment of insecticide concentrations in agricultural surface waters: a critical appraisal
Due to the specific modes of action and application patterns of agricultural insecticides, the insecticide exposure of agricultural surface waters is characterized by infrequent and short-term insecticide concentration peaks of high ecotoxicological relevance with implications for both monitoring and risk assessment. Here, we apply several fixed-interval strategies and an event-based sampling strategy to two generalized and two realistic insecticide exposure patterns for typical agricultural streams derived from FOCUS exposure modeling using Monte Carlo simulations. Sampling based on regular intervals was found to be inadequate for the detection of transient insecticide concentrations, whereas event-triggered sampling successfully detected all exposure incidences at substantially lower analytical costs. Our study proves that probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) concepts in their present forms are not appropriate for a thorough evaluation of insecticide exposure. Despite claims that the PRA approach uses all available data to assess exposure and enhances risk assessment realism, we demonstrate that this concept is severely biased by the amount of insecticide concentrations below detection limits and therefore by the sampling designs. Moreover, actual insecticide exposure is of almost no relevance for PRA threshold level exceedance frequencies and consequential risk assessment outcomes. Therefore, we propose a concept that features a field-relevant ecological risk analysis of agricultural insecticide surface water exposure. Our study quantifies for the first time the environmental and economic consequences of inappropriate monitoring and risk assessment concepts used for the evaluation of short-term peak surface water pollutants such as insecticides.
KeywordsInsecticides Surface water exposure Monitoring Risk assessment
This study has been funded by the German Society for the Advancement of Sciences (DFG SCHU 2271/6-1). The authors thank Engelbert Niehaus and Ralf B. Schäfer for valuable comments on this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aguilar, C., Ferrer, I., Borrull, F., Marce, R. M., & Barcelo, D. (1999). Monitoring of pesticides in river water based on samples previously stored in polymeric cartridges followed by on-line solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography diode array detection and confirmation by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 386, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allan, J. D., & Castillo, M. M. (2007). Stream ecology—structure and functioning of running waters (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ashauer, R., & Brown, C. D. (2007). Comparison between FOCUS output for pesticide concentrations over time and field observations. University of York report for Defra project PS2231.Google Scholar
- Brock, T., Alix, A., Brown, C., Capri, E., Gottestbüren, B., Heimbach, F., et al. (2008). ELINK—linking aquatic exposure and effects in the registration procedure of plant protection products. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
- California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2006). Amendments to the water quality control plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River basins for the control of diazinon and chlorpyrifos runoff into the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. Appendix D—Cost calculations. Final Staff Report.Google Scholar
- DG SANCO. (2002). Guidance document on aquatic ecotoxicology—in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. Sanco/3268/2001 rev.4 (final), Working Document. European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General.Google Scholar
- DG SANCO. (2008). EU pesticide database. http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides/public/index.cfm2011. Accessed 27 May 2011.
- Commission, E. (2000). Plant protection in the EU—consumption of plant protection products in the European Union (Data 1992–1996). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency. (2007). Briefing small water bodies. Report prepared by European Topic Centre on water. (EEA/ADS/06/001—Water).Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2007). The use of plant protection products in the European Union—data 1992–2003. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.Google Scholar
- Finley, D. B., Scott, G. I., Daugomah, J. W., Layman, S. L., Reed, L., Sanders, M., et al. (1999). Case study: ecotoxicological assessment of urban and agricultural nonpoint source runoff effects on the Grass Shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. In M. A. Lewis, F. L. Mayer, R. L. Powell, M. K. Nelson, S. I. Klaine, & M. G. Henry (Eds.), Ecotoxicology and risk assessment for wetlands (pp. 243–273). Pensacola: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC).Google Scholar
- FOCUS (2001). FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios. EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2.Google Scholar
- Gianessi, L., & Reigner, N. (2006). Pesticide use in U.S. crop production: 2002—insecticides & other pesticides. Washington: CropLife Foundation.Google Scholar
- Gilliom, R. J., Barbash, J. E., Crawford, C. G., Hamilton, P. A., Martin, J. D., Nakagaki, N., et al. (2006). The quality of our nation’s waters—pesticides in the nation’s streams and ground water, 1992–2001. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1291. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- Harmel, R. D., King, K. W., & Slade, R. M. (2003). Automated storm water sampling on small watersheds. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 19, 667–674.Google Scholar
- Hart, A. (2001). Probabilistic risk assessment for pesticides in Europe: implementation & research needs. Sand Hutton: Central Science Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Kreuger, J. (1995). Monitoring of pesticides in subsurface and surface water within an agricultural catchment in southern Sweden. British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 62, Pesticide Movement to Water, 81–86.Google Scholar
- Kreuger, J. K., & Brink, N. (1988). Losses of pesticides from agriculture. In IEAE (Ed.), Pesticides: food and environmental implications (pp. 101–112). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
- Liess, M., & Schulz, R. (2000). Sampling methods in surface waters. In L. M. L. Nollet (Ed.), Handbook of water analysis (pp. 1–24). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
- PPDB (2011). The Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB) developed by the Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU), University of Hertfordshire, funded by UK National Sources and the EU-funded Footprint Project (FP6-SSP-022704). http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/footprint/index2.htm2011.
- R Development Core Team. (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.11.1. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 29 June 2011.
- Spurlock, F. (2002). Analysis of diazinon and chlorpyrifos surface water monitoring and acute toxicity bioassay data, 1991—2001. Sacramento: California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Environmental Hazards Assessment Program—Environmental Monitoring BranchGoogle Scholar
- Starner, K., Spurlock, F., Kelley, K., & Goh, K. S. (2011). Pesticides in surface water from agricultural regions of California 2006–2007. Report 238. Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Pesticide Regulation.Google Scholar
- Sturm, A., Wogram, J., Segner, H., & Liess, M. (2000). Different sensitivity to organophosphates of acetylcholinesterase from three-spined stickleback (Gaterosteus aculeatus). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 1607–1615.Google Scholar
- Süss, A., Bischoff, G., Mueller, A. C. W., & Buhr, L. (2006). Chemisch-biologisches Monitoring zu Pflanzenschutzmittelbelastungen und Lebensgemeinschaften in den Gräben des Alten Landes. Nachrichtenblatt Deutscher Pflanzenschutzdienst, 58, 28–42.Google Scholar
- Turnbull, A., Harrison, R., DiGuardo, A., Mackay, D., & Calamari, D. (1995). An assessment of the behavior of selected pesticides at ADAS Rosemaund. BCPC, 62, 87–92.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2011). Initiative to revise the ecological assessment process for pesticides—about ecological risk assessment. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk/. Accessed 5 Dec 2011.
- Wirtz, K., Bala, S., Amann, A., & Elbert, A. (2009). A promise extended—future role of pyrethroids in agriculture. Bayer CropScience Journal, 62, 145–158.Google Scholar
- Yu, S. J. (2008). The toxicology and biochemistry of insecticides. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar