Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 185, Issue 7, pp 5585–5593 | Cite as

Receptor model-based source apportionment of particulate pollution in Hyderabad, India

  • Sarath K. Guttikunda
  • Ramani V. Kopakka
  • Prasad Dasari
  • Alan W. Gertler
Article

Abstract

Air quality in Hyderabad, India, often exceeds the national ambient air quality standards, especially for particulate matter (PM), which, in 2010, averaged 82.2 ± 24.6, 96.2 ± 12.1, and 64.3 ± 21.2 μg/m3 of PM10, at commercial, industrial, and residential monitoring stations, respectively, exceeding the national ambient standard of 60 μg/m3. In 2005, following an ordinance passed by the Supreme Court of India, a source apportionment study was conducted to quantify source contributions to PM pollution in Hyderabad, using the chemical mass balance (version 8.2) receptor model for 180 ambient samples collected at three stations for PM10 and PM2.5 size fractions for three seasons. The receptor modeling results indicated that the PM10 pollution is dominated by the direct vehicular exhaust and road dust (more than 60 %). PM2.5 with higher propensity to enter the human respiratory tracks, has mixed sources of vehicle exhaust, industrial coal combustion, garbage burning, and secondary PM. In order to improve the air quality in the city, these findings demonstrate the need to control emissions from all known sources and particularly focus on the low-hanging fruits like road dust and waste burning, while the technological and institutional advancements in the transport and industrial sectors are bound to enhance efficiencies. Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board utilized these results to prepare an air pollution control action plan for the city.

Keywords

Hyderabad India Particulate pollution Source apportionment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of USEPA’s Integrated Environmental Strategies program (IES, Washington DC, USA) and supported by the World Bank (Washington DC, USA). This paper is subjected to internal peer and policy review by the funding agencies and, therefore, does not necessarily reflect the views of the agencies. No official endorsement should be inferred.

References

  1. APPCB. (2006). Analysis of air pollution and health impacts in Hyderabad. APPCB report submitted to Burelal Committee. Hyderabad: Govt. of India, Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, L. W. A., Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., DuBois, D. W., & Herschberger, L. (2010). Chemical mass balance source apportionment for combined PM2 (5) measurements from U S non-urban and urban long-term networks. Atmospheric Environment, 44, 4908–4918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chowdhury, Z., Zheng, M., Schauer, J. J., Sheesley, R. J., Salmon, L. G., Cass, G. R., & Russell, A. G. (2007). Speciation of ambient fine organic carbon particles and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Indian cities. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D15303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coulter, C. T. (2004). Chemical mass balance receptor model version 8: User's manual. Research Triangle Park: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  5. CPCB. (2010). Air quality monitoring, emission inventory and source apportionment study for Indian cities. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.Google Scholar
  6. Gummeneni, S., Yusup, Y. B., Chavali, M., & Samadi, S. Z. (2011). Source apportionment of particulate matter in the ambient air of Hyderabad city, India. Atmospheric Research, 101(3), 752–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guttikunda, S. K., & Jawahar, P. (2012). Application of SIM-air modeling tools to assess air quality in Indian cities. Atmospheric Environment, 62, 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HEI. (2010). Outdoor air pollution and health in the developing countries of Asia: A comprehensive review. Special Report 18. Boston: Health Effects Institute.Google Scholar
  9. IES. (2004). Emission inventory and co-benefits analysis for Hyderabad, India. Integrated Environmental Strategies India Program. Washington DC: USEPA.Google Scholar
  10. IES. (2008). Co-benefits of air pollution and GHG emission reductions in Hyderabad, India. Integrated Environmental Strategies India Program. Washington DC: USEPA.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, T. M., Guttikunda, S. K., Wells, G., Bond, T., Russell, A., West, J., & Watson, J. (2011). Tools for improving air quality management. A review of top-down source apportionment techniques and their application in developing countries. ESMAP Publication Series. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Schwela, D., Haq, G., Huizenga, C., Han, W., Fabian, H., & Ajero, M. (2006). Urban air pollution in Asian cities—status, challenges and management. London: Earthscan Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Shah, J., Nagpal, T., Johnson, T., Amann, M., Carmichael, G., Foell, W., Green, C., Hettelingh, L. P., Hordijk, L., Li, J., Peng, C., Pu, Y. F., Ramankutty, R., & Streets, D. (2000). Integrated analysis for acid rain in Asia: policy implications and results of RAINS-ASIA model. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watson, J. G., Cooper, J. A., & Huntzicker, J. J. (1984). The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmospheric Environment, 18, 1347–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watson, J. G., Chen, L. W. A., Chow, J. C., Doraiswamy, P., & Lowenthal, D. H. (2008). Source apportionment: findings from the US supersites program. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 58, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarath K. Guttikunda
    • 1
  • Ramani V. Kopakka
    • 2
  • Prasad Dasari
    • 2
  • Alan W. Gertler
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Atmospheric SciencesDesert Research InstituteRenoUSA
  2. 2.Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control BoardHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations