Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 185, Issue 5, pp 3993–4003

Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method

Article

Abstract

Increasing evidences show that inhalation of indoor bioaerosols has caused numerous adverse health effects and diseases. However, the bioaerosol size distribution, composition, and concentration level, representing different inhalation risks, could vary with different living environments. The six-stage Andersen sampler is designed to simulate the sampling of different human lung regions. Here, the sampler was used in investigating the bioaerosol exposure in six different environments (student dorm, hospital, laboratory, hotel room, dining hall, and outdoor environment) in Beijing. During the sampling, the Andersen sampler was operated for 30 min for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed for each of the environments. The air samples collected onto each of the six stages of the sampler were incubated on agar plates directly at 26 °C, and the colony forming units (CFU) were manually counted and statistically corrected. In addition, the developed CFUs were washed off the agar plates and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for diversity analysis. Results revealed that for most environments investigated, the culturable bacterial aerosol concentrations were higher than those of culturable fungal aerosols. The culturable bacterial and fungal aerosol fractions, concentration, size distribution, and diversity were shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. PCR-DGGE analysis indicated that different environments had different culturable bacterial aerosol compositions as revealed by distinct gel band patterns. For most environments tested, larger (>3 μm) culturable bacterial aerosols with a skewed size distribution were shown to prevail, accounting for more than 60 %, while for culturable fungal aerosols with a normal size distribution, those 2.1–4.7 μm dominated, accounting for 20–40 %. Alternaria, Cladosporium, Chaetomium, and Aspergillus were found abundant in most environments studied here. Viable microbial load per unit of particulate matter was also shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. The results from this study suggested that different environments even with similar levels of total microbial cuturable aerosol concentrations could present different inhalation risks due to different bioaerosol particle size distribution and composition. This work fills literature gaps regarding bioaerosol size and composition-based exposure risks in different human dwellings in contrast to a vast body of total bioaerosol levels.

Keywords

Six-stage Andersen sampler Bacterial and fungal aerosols Diversity Inhalation risks 

Supplementary material

10661_2012_2844_MOESM1_ESM.doc (480 kb)
Fig. S1(DOC 479 kb)

References

  1. Andersen, A. A. (1958). New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne parcticles. Journal of Bacteriology, 76, 471–484.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, C. W., Chung, H., Huang, C. F., & Su, H. J. J. (2001). Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(1), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Douwes, J., Thorne, P., Pearce, N., & Heederik, D. (2003). Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 47(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang, Z. G., Ouyang, Z. Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, X. K. (2008). Concentration and size distribution of culturable airborne microorganisms in outdoor environments in Beijing, China. Aerosol Science and Technology, 42(5), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Gόrny, R. L., Dutkiewicz, J., & Krysinska-Traczyk, E. (1999). Size distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in indoor air. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 6(2), 105–113.Google Scholar
  7. Harold, C. B., Constantine, J. A., & Theodore, D. (1980). Morphology of plants and fungi. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Hyvarinen, A., Vahteristo, M., Meklin, T., Jantunen, M., Nevalainen, A., & Moschandreas, D. (2001). Temporal and spatial variation of fungal concentrations in indoor air. Aerosol Science and Technology, 35(2), 688–695.Google Scholar
  9. ICRP. (1994). Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 66. Tarrytown: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  10. Just, N., Kirychuk, S., Gilbert, Y., Léourneau, V., Veillette, M., Singh, B., et al. (2011). Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environmental Research, 111(4), 492–498. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, K. Y., & Kim, C. N. (2007). Airborne microbiological characteristics in public buildings of Korea. Building and Environment, 42(5), 2188–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klanova, K., & Hollerova, J. (2003). Hospital indoor environment: screening for micro-organisms and particulare matter. Indoor and Built Environment, 12(1–2), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, S., Choi, B., Yi, S. M., & Ko, G. (2009). Characterization of microbial community during Asian dust events in Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 407(20), 5308–5314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, C. S., & Hou, P. A. (2003). Bioaerosol characteristics in hospital clean rooms. Science of the Total Environment, 305(1–3), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, K. J., Dong, S. F., Wu, Y., & Yao, M. S. (2010). Comparison of the biological content of air samples collected at ground level and at higher elevation. Aerobiologia, 26(3), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maki, T., Susuki, S., Kobayashi, F., Kakikawa, M., Yamada, M., Higashi, T., et al. (2008). Phylogenetic diversity and vertical distribution of a halobacterial community in the atmosphere of an Asian dust (KOSA) source region, Dunhuang City. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 1(2), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meklin, T., Reponen, T., Toivola, M., Koponen, V., Husman, T., Hyvarinen, A., et al. (2002). Size distributions of airborne microbes in moisture-damaged and reference school buildings of two construction types. Atmospheric Environment, 36(39–40), 6031–6039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muyzer, G., Dewaal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993). Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(3), 695–700.Google Scholar
  19. Nasir, Z. A., & Colbeck, I. (2010). Assessment of bacterial and fungal aerosol in different residential settings. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 211(1–4), 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nehme, B., Letourneau, V., Forster, R. J., Veillette, M., & Duchaine, C. (2008). Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings, and assessment of the seasonal effect. Environmental Microbiology, 10(3), 665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otten, W., Gilligan, C. A., Watts, C. W., Dexter, A. R., & Hall, D. (1999). Continuity of air-filled pores and invasion thresholds for a soilborne fungal plant pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(13), 1803–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polymenakou, P. N., Mandalakis, M., Stephanou, E. G., & Tselepides, A. (2008). Particle size distribution of airborne microorganisms and pathogens during an intense African dust event in the eastern Mediterranean. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(3), 292–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Predicala, B. Z., Urban, J. E., Maghirang, R. G., Jerez, S. B., Goodband, R. D. (2002). Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction.Current Microbiology, 44(2), 136–140.Google Scholar
  24. Reponen, T., Hyvarinen, A., Ruuskanen, J., Raunemaa, T., & Nevalainen, A. (1994). Comparison of concentrations and size distributions of fungal spores in buildings with and without mould problems. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25(8), 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reponen, T., Willeke, K., Grinshpun, S., & Nevalainen, A. (2011). Biological particle sampling. In P. Kulkarni, P. Baron, & K. Willeke (Eds.), Aerosol measurement, principles, techniques, and applications (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson, L. D. (1997). Monitoring viable fungal and bacterial bioaerosol concentrations to identify acceptable levels for common indoor environments. Indoor and Built Environment, 6(5), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Stentiford, E. I., & Urpilainen, S. T. (2005). Bioaerosol generation at large-scale green waste composting plants. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 55(5), 612–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shelton, B. G., Kirkland, K. H., Flanders, W. D., & Morris, G. K. (2002). Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(4), 1743–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stewart, S. L., Grinshpun, S. A., Willeke, K., Terzieva, S., Ulevicius, V., & Donnelly, J. (1995). Effect of impact stress on microbial recovery on an agar surface. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61(4), 1232–1239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations