Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 11, pp 7079–7079

Erratum to: Benefits of Bt cotton counterbalanced by secondary pests? Perceptions of ecological change in China

Erratum

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2699-5

Cite this article as:
Zhao, J.H., Ho, P. & Azadi, H. Environ Monit Assess (2012) 184: 7079. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2699-5

Erratum to: Environ Monit Assess, (2011) 173, pp. 985–994,

DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1439-y

In Table 4 on p. 991 the labels for conventional cotton and Bt cotton have unfortunately been reversed. The corrected Table 4 is given below:
Table 4

Average sprayings for Bt cotton and conventional cotton per region/province

Cotton type

Yellow River region

Yangzi River region

Northwest

Hebei

Shandong

Jiangsu

Anhui

Xinjiang

Conventional cotton

23

22

17

16

Bt cotton

17

13

12

11

Average difference in sprays

6

9

5

5

Source: Authors’ survey

Figures for Xinjiang could not be obtained due to logistical problems during the survey

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agro-biotechnologyChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Leiden Institute for Area Studies (LIAS), Faculty of HumanitiesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations