Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 8, pp 5121–5138 | Cite as

Integrated approach for demarcating subsurface pollution and saline water intrusion zones in SIPCOT area: a case study from Cuddalore in Southern India

  • S. Sankaran
  • S. Sonkamble
  • K. Krishnakumar
  • N. C. Mondal
Article

Abstract

This paper deals with a systematic hydrogeological, geophysical, and hydrochemical investigations carried out in SIPCOT area in Southern India to demarcate groundwater pollution and saline intrusion through Uppanar River, which flows parallel to sea coast with high salinity (average TDS 28, 870 mg/l) due to back waters as well as discharge of industrial and domestic effluents. Hydrogeological and geophysical investigations comprising topographic survey, self-potential, multi-electrode resistivity imaging, and water quality monitoring were found the extent of saline water intrusion in the south and pockets of subsurface pollution in the north of the study area. Since the area is beset with highly permeable unconfined quaternary alluvium forming potential aquifer at shallow depth, long-term excessive pumping and influence of the River have led to lowering of the water table and degradation of water quality through increased salinity there by generating reversal of hydraulic gradient in the south. The improper management of industrial wastes and left over chemicals by closed industries has led surface and subsurface pollution in the north of the study area.

Keywords

Coastal aquifers Subsurface pollution Saline water intrusion Geophysical investigations Cuddalore South India 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The SIPCOT authority, Cuddalore cooperated during the field work. Director, NGRI, Hyderabad had given support and permission to publish this paper. The associate editor, Professor Yu-Pin Lin and three anonymous reviewers had suggested their constructive comments to improve the paper. The authors are thankful to them.

References

  1. Abdollahi-Nasab, A., Boufadel, M. C., Li, H. L., & Weaver, J. W. (2010). Saltwater flushing by freshwater in a laboratory beach. Journal of Hydrology, 386(1–4), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpar, B. (2009). Vulnerability of Turkish coasts to accelerated sea-level rise. Geomorphology, 107(1–2), 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association (APHA). (1985). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste (16th ed., p. 100). Washington: Am Public Health Assoc.Google Scholar
  4. Appelo, C. A. J., & Postma, D. (2005). Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Balkema.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubert, M., & Atangana, Q. Y. (1996). Self-potential method in hydrogeological exploration of volcanic areas. Ground Water, 34, 1010–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balaram, V., & Rao, T. G. (2004). Rapid determination of REEs and other trace elements in geological samples by microwave acid digestion and ICP-MS. Atomic Spectroscopy, 24(6), 206–212.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, E., Skougstad, M. W., & Fishmen, M. J. (1983). Method for collection and analyzing of water samples for dissolved minerals and gases (p. 75). Washington: U.S. Govt. Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. CAMP (2000). Integrated aquifer management plan: Final Report. Gaza coastal aquifer management program. Metcalf and Eddy Inc. in cooperation with the Palestinian Water Authority (PWA). United States Agency for International Development, USAID Contract No. 294-C-00-99-00038-00.Google Scholar
  9. Chapellier, D., Fitterman, D., Parasnis, D., & Valla, P. (1991). Application of geophysics to water prospecting in arid and semi-arid areas. Geoexploration, 27(1–2), R7–R7.Google Scholar
  10. Chidambaram, S., Kumar, G. S., Prasanna, M. V., Peter, A. J., Ramanthan, A. L., & Srinivasamoorthy. (2008). A study on the hydrogeology and hydrogeochemistry of groundwater from different depths in a coastal aquifer: Annamalai Nagar, Tamilnadu, India. Environmental Geology, 57(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choudhury, K., & Saha, D. K. (2004). Integrated geophysical and chemical study of saline water intrusion. Groundwater, 42(5), 671–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choudhury, K., Saha, D. K., & Chakraborty, P. (2001). Geophysical study for saline water intrusion in a coastal alluvial terrain. Journal of Geophysics, 46, 189–200.Google Scholar
  13. Custodio, E. (2010). Coastal aquifers of Europe: An overview. Hydrogeology Journal, 18(1), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Lima, O. A. L., Sato, H. K., & Porsani, M. J. (1995). Imaging industrial contaminant plumes with resistivity techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 34(2), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dey, A., & Morrison, H. F. (1979). Resistivity modelling for arbitrary shaped two-dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting, 27, 106–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Domenico, P. A., & Schwartz, F. W. (1990). Physical and chemical hydrogeology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Doussan, C., Jouniaux, L., & Thony, J. L. (2002). Temporal variations of SP and unsaturated water flow in loam and clay soils: a seasonal field study. Journal of Hydrology, 267, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falgas, E., Ledo, J., Marcuello, A., & Queralt, P. (2009). Monitoring freshwater–seawater interface dynamics with audiomagnetotelluric data. Near Surface Geophysics, 7(5–6), 391–399.Google Scholar
  19. Frohlich, R. K., Urish, D. W., Fuller, J., & Reilly, M. O. (1994). Use of geoelectrical method in groundwater pollution surveys in a coastal environment. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 32, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frohlich, R. K., Barosh, P. J., & Boving, T. (2008). Investigating changes of electrical characteristics of the saturated zone affected by hazardous organic waste. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 64(1–2), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gimenez, E., & Morell, I. (1997). Hydrogeochemical analysis of salinization processes in the coastal aquifer of Oropesa (Castellon, Spain). Environmental Geology, 29, 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giordana, G., & Montginoul, M. (2006). Policy instruments to fight against seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers: An overview. Vie Et Milieu Life and Environment, 56(4), 287–294.Google Scholar
  23. Hem, J. D. (1989). Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. U.S.G.S. Water-Supply Paper, vol. 2254. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Hidalgo, M. C., & Cruz-Sanjulian, J. (2001). Groundwater composition, hydrochemical evolution and mass transfer in a regional detrital aquifer (Baza basin, southern Spain). Applied Geochemistry, 16(7–8), 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hounslow, A. W. (1995). Water quality data analysis and interpretation. Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
  26. Ibrahim, D. E., & Hussein, M. T. (1998). Integrated hydrogeophysical methods for detecting and mapping the fresh–saline interface in Wadi Fatimah, Saudi Arabia. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 23(2A), 129–146.Google Scholar
  27. Jayaprakash, M., Giridharan, L., Venugopal, T., Krishna Kumar, S. P., & Periakali, P. (2008). Characterization and evaluation of the factors affecting the geochemistry of groundwater in Neyveli, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Geology, 54, 855–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonathan, M. P., Srinivasalu, S., Thangadurai, N., Ayyamperumal, T., Armstrong-Altrin, J. S., & Ram-Mohan, V. (2008). Contamination of Uppanar River and coastal waters off Cuddalore, southeast coast of India. Environmental Geology, 53(7), 1391–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jouniaux, L., Maineult, A., Naudet, V., Pessel, M., & Sailhac, P. (2009). Review of self-potential methods in hydrogeophysics. Comptes Rendus Geosciences, 341, 928–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilty, K. T. (1984). On the origin and interpretation of self-potential anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting, 32, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambrakis, N. (2006). Multicomponent heterovalent chromatography in aquifers. Modelling salinization and freshening phenomena in field conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 323(1–4), 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, S. H., Kim, K. W., Ko, I. W., Lee, S. G., & Hwang, H. S. (2002). Geochemical and geophysical monitoring of saline water intrusion in Korean paddy fields. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 24(4), 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maineult, A., Strobach, E., & Renner, J. (2008). Self-potential signals induced by periodic pumping tests. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, B01203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mondal, N. C., & Singh, V. P. (2011). Hydrochemical analysis of salinization for a tannery belt in Southern India. Journal of Hydrology, 405(2–3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mondal, N. C., Singh, V. P., Singh, V. S., & Saxena, V. K. (2010). Determining the interaction between groundwater and saline water through groundwater major ions chemistry. Journal of Hydrology, 388(1–2), 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mondal, N. C., Singh, V. P., Singh, S., & Singh, V. S. (2011). Hydrochemical characteristic of coastal aquifer from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175(1–4), 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moreira, C. A., & Braga, A. C. D. (2009). Applications of geophysical methods in monitoring contaminated area under natural attenuation. Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental, 14(2), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nguyen, F., Kemna, A., Antonsson, A., Engesgaard, P., Kuras, O., Ogilvy, R., et al. (2009). Characterization of seawater intrusion using 2D electrical imaging. Near Surface Geophysics, 7(5–6), 377–390.Google Scholar
  40. Ortega-Guerrero, A., Cherry, J. A., & Aravena, R. (1997). Origin of pore water and salinity in the lacustrine aquitard overlying the regional aquifer of Mexico City. Journal of Hydrology, 197(1–4), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park, S. C., Yun, S. T., Chae, G. T., Yoo, I., Shin, K. S., Heo, C. H., et al. (2005). Regional hydrochemical study on salinization of coastal aquifers, western coastal area of South Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 313(3–4), 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radhakrishna, I. (2001). Saline water interface structure in Mahanadi Delta region, Orissa, India. Environmental Geology, 40(3), 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Revil, A., Titov, K., Doussan, C., & Lapenna, V. (2006). Applications of the self-potential method to hydrological problems. Applied Hydrogeophysics, 71, 255–292. Springer Netherlands, NATO Ser. IV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanford, W. E., & Pope, J. P. (2010). Current challenges using models to forecast seawater intrusion: Lessons from the Eastern Shore of Virginia, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 18(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sankaran, S., Saheb Rao, S., Krishnakumar, K. (2009). Micro level groundwater quality/groundwater movement in Cuddalore SIPCOT, Tamilnadu (pp.67). Technical Report No. NGRI-2009-GW-689.Google Scholar
  46. Sarwade, D. V., Nandakumar, M. V., Kesari, M. P., Mondal, N. C., Singh, V. S., & Singh, B. (2007). Evaluation of seawater ingress into an Indian Attoll. Environmental Geology, 52(2), 1475–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sato, M., & Mooney, H. M. (1960). The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide self-potentials. Geophysics, 25, 226–249.Google Scholar
  48. Singh, V. S., Sarwade, D. V., Mondal, N. C., & Singh, B. (2009). Evaluation of groundwater resources in a tiny Andrott Island, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158(1–4), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart, M. T. (1982). Evaluation of electromagnetic methods for rapid mapping of salt–water interfaces in coastal aquifers. Groundwater, 20(5), 538–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Urish, D. W. (1983). The practical application of surface electrical resistivity to detection of groundwater pollution. Groundwater, 21(2), 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vengosh, A., Spivack, A. J., Artzi, Y., & Ayalon, A. (1999). Geochemical and boron, strontium, and oxygen isotopic constraints on the origin of the salinity in groundwater from the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Water Resources Research, 35(6), 1877–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vengosh, A., Kloppmann, W., Marei, A., Livshitz, Y., Gutierrez, A., Banna, M., et al. (2005). Sources of salinity and boron in the Gaza strip: Natural contaminant flow in the southern Mediterranean coastal aquifer. Water Resources Research, 41(W01013), 1–19.Google Scholar
  53. Wanfang, Z., Beck, B. F., & Spephenson, J. B. (1999). Investigation of groundwater flow in karst area using component separation of natural potential measurements. Environmental Geology, 37, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward, N. I. (1995). Trace elements. In F. W. Fifield, & P. J. Haines (Eds.), Environmental analytical chemistry. Chapman and Hall: Blackie.Google Scholar
  55. World Health Organization (WHO). (1984). Guideline of drinking quality (pp. 333–335). Washington: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  56. Zilberbrand, M., Rosenthal, E., & Shachnai, E. (2001). Impact of urbanization on hydrochemical evolution of groundwater and on unsaturated-zone gas composition in the coastal city of Tel Aviv, Israel. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 50(3–4), 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zohdy, A. R., Martin, P., Bisdorf, R. J. (1993). A study of seawater intrusion using direct-current soundings in the southeastern part of the Oxnard Plain, California (p.139). USGS Open-File Report 93–524.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Sankaran
    • 1
  • S. Sonkamble
    • 1
  • K. Krishnakumar
    • 1
  • N. C. Mondal
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Geophysics GroupNational Geophysical Research Institute (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations