Inventory methods for trees in nonforest areas in the great plains states
- 204 Downloads
The US Forest Service’s Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program collects information on trees in areas that meet its definition of forest. However, the inventory excludes trees in areas that do not meet this definition, such as those found in urban areas, in isolated patches, in areas with sparse or predominantly herbaceous vegetation, in narrow strips (e.g., shelterbelts), or in riparian areas. In the Great Plains States, little is known about the tree resource in these noninventoried, nonforest areas, and there is a great deal of concern about the potential impact of invasive pests, such as the emerald ash borer. To address this knowledge gap, FIA’s National Inventory and Monitoring Applications Center has partnered with state cooperators and others in a project called the Great Plains Initiative to design and implement an inventory of trees in nonforest areas. The goal of the inventory is to characterize the nonforest tree resource using methods compatible with those of FIA so a holistic understanding of the resource can be obtained by integrating the two surveys. The goal of this paper is to describe the process of designing and implementing the survey, including plot and sample design, and to present some example results from a reporting tool we developed.
KeywordsTrees outside forest Nonforest tree inventory Emerald ash borer Great Plains forest inventory Multiphase sample National Inventory and Monitoring Applications Center Great Plains Initiative
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ball, J., Mason, S., Kiesz, A., McCormick, D., & Brown, C. (2007). Assessing the hazard of emerald ash borer and other exotic stressors to community forests. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 33(5), 350–359.Google Scholar
- Chen, X., Liu, S., Zhu, Z., Vogelmann, J., Li, Z., & Ohlen, D. (2011). Estimating aboveground forest biomass carbon and fire consumption in the U.S. Utah High Plateaus using data from the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, Landsat, and LANDFIRE. Ecological Indicators 11, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gillespie, A. (1999). Rationale for a national annual forest inventory program. Journal of Forestry, 97(12), 16–20.Google Scholar
- Hansen, P. L., & Hoffman, G. R. (1988). The Vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland Districts of the Custer National Forest: A Habitat Type Classification. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-157. Fort Collins: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
- Holmgren, P., Masakha, E. J., & Sjöholm, H. (1994). Not all African land is being degraded: A recent survey of trees on farms in Kenya reveals rapidly increasing forest resources. Ambio, 23(7), 390–395.Google Scholar
- Homer, C., Dewitz, J., Fry, J., Coan, M., Hossain, M., Larson, C., et al. (2007). Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73, 337–341.Google Scholar
- Krist, F., Sapio, F., & Tkacz, B. (2007). Mapping Risk from Forest Insects and Diseases. FHTET 2007–06. Fort Collins: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team.Google Scholar
- Lister, A. J., & Scott, C. T. (2008). Use of space-filling curves to select sample locations in natural resource monitoring studies. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 149(1–4), 71–80.Google Scholar
- Miles, P. D. (2009). EVALIDator Reports: Reporting beyond the FIADB. In W. McWilliams, G. Moisen, & R. Czaplewski (Comps.), Proceedings of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium 2008, 21–23 October 2008, Park City, UT. Proc. RMRS-P-56CD. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
- Nebraska Forest Service (2007). Great Plains Tree and Forest Invasives Initiative—A Multi-state Cooperative Effort for Education, Mitigation and Utilization. Grant Proposal. Lincoln, Nebraska. http://www.nfs.unl.edu/documents/GPI%20Fact%20Sheet%20May%202009.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2010.
- Nowak, D. J., & Crane, D. E. (2000). The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In M. Hansen & T. Burk (Eds.), Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century (pp. 714–720). Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-212. St. Paul: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.Google Scholar
- Piva, R. J., Lister, A. J., & Haugan, D. (2009a). South Dakota’s Forest Resources, 2007. Res. Note. NRS-32. Newtown Square: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.Google Scholar
- Piva, R. J., Moser, W. K., Haugan, D. D., Josten, G. J., Brand, G. J., Butler, B. J., et al. (2009b). South Dakota’s Forests 2005. Resour. Bull. NRS-35. Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.Google Scholar
- Poland, T. M., & McCullough, D. G. (2006). Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. Journal of Forestry, 104, 118–124.Google Scholar
- Scott, C. T. (2009). Overview of the National Inventory and Monitoring Applications Center (NIMAC). In W. McWilliams, G. Moisen, & R. Czaplewski (Comps.), Proceedings of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium 2008, 21–23 October 2008, Park City, UT. Proc. RMRS-P-56CD. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
- Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Vissage, J. S., & Pugh, S. A. (2004). Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241. St. Paul: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2002). U.S. Census 2000 TIGER/Line® files Machine-Readable Data Files. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- U.S. Forest Service (2000). RPA Assessment of Forest and Range Lands. FS-687. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
- U.S. Forest Service (2007). Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, volume 1: field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 4.0. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/fia/data-collection/. Accessed 15 November 2008.
- U.S. Forest Service (2008). The forest inventory and analysis database: Database description and users manual version 4.0 for Phase 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/database-documentation/. Accessed 25 January 2009.
- U.S. Forest Service (2009a). North Dakota Forest Health Highlights—2007. http://fhm.fs.fed.us/fhh/fhh_07/nd_fhh_07.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2009.
- U.S. Forest Service (2009b). South Dakota Forest Health Highlights—2002. http://fhm.fs.fed.us/fhh/fhh-02/sd/sd_02.htm. Accessed 8 December 2009.
- U.S. Forest Service (2009c). 2003 Forest Health Highlights—Nebraska. http://fhm.fs.fed.us/fhh/fhh-03/ne/ne_03.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2009.
- U.S. Forest Service (2009d). Forest Health Highlights 2003—Kansas. http://fhm.fs.fed.us/fhh/fhh-03/ks/ks_03.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2009.