Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 2, pp 693–713

Mapping and quantifying habitat fragmentation in small coastal areas: a case study of three protected wetlands in Apulia (Italy)

  • Valeria Tomaselli
  • Patrizia Tenerelli
  • Saverio Sciandrello
Article

Abstract

In the Mediterranean Region, habitat loss and fragmentation severely affect coastal wetlands, due to the rapid expansion of anthropogenic activities that has occurred in the last decades. Landscape metrics are commonly used to define landscape patterns and to evaluate fragmentation processes. This investigation focuses on the performance of a set of landscape pattern indices within landscapes characterized by coastal environments and extent below 1,000 ha. The aim is to assess the degree of habitat fragmentation for the monitoring of protected areas and to learn whether values of landscape metrics can characterize fine-resolution landscape patterns. The study areas are three coastal wetlands belonging to the Natura 2000 network and sited on the Adriatic side of Apulia (Southern Italy). The Habitat Maps were derived from the Vegetation Maps generated integrating phytosociological relevés and Earth Observation data. In the three sites, a total of 16 habitat types were detected. A selected set of landscape metrics was applied in order to investigate their performance in assessing fragmentation and spatial patterns of habitats. The final results showed that the most significant landscape patterns are related to highly specialized habitat types closely linked to coastal environments. In interpreting the landscape patterns of these highly specialized habitats, some specific ecological factors were taken into account. The shape indices were the most useful in assessing the degree of fragmentation of habitat types that usually have elongated morphology along the shoreline or the coastal lagoons. In all the cases, to be meaningful, data obtained from the application of the selected indices were jointly assessed, especially at the class level.

Keywords

Habitat fragmentation Landscape metrics Habitat directive Natura 2000 network Habitat mapping Coastal wetlands Protected areas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aparicio, A. (2008). Descriptive analysis of the relictual Mediterranean landscape in the Guadalquivir River valley (southern Spain): A baseline for scientific research and the development of conservation action plans. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 2219–2232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bascompte, J., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2001). Habitat patchiness and plant species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D., Billeter, R., Aviron, S., Schweiger, O., & Herzog, F. (2007). The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton, T., Vickery, J. A., & Wilson, J. D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trend Ecology and Evolutionary, 18, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berberoglu, S., Yilmaz, K. T., & Ozkan, C. (2004). Mapping and monitoring of coastal wetlands of Cukurova Delta in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botequilha Leitão, A., & Ahren, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964). Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde (Vol. 3, p. 330). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Braun-Blanquet, J., Molinier, R., & Wagner, H. (1940). Prodrome dés groupements végétaux. Prodromus der Pflanzengesellchaften. Cisto-Lavanduletea (landes siliceuses a cistes et lavandes). Montpellier, 53 p.Google Scholar
  9. Braun-Blanquet, J., Roussine, N., & Nègre, R. (1952). Les groupements végétaux de la France Méditerranéenne. Montpellier: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  10. Braun-Blanquet, J., & Tuxen, R. (1952). Irische Pflanzengesellchaften. Veroff. Ber. Geobot. Inst. E.T.H. Stiffung Rubel, 25, 222–421.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Rylands, A. B., Konstant, W. R., Flick, P., et al. (2002). Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conseils and Biology, 16, 909–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Jongman, R. H. G., Brandt, J., de Blust, G., Elena-Rossello, R., et al. (2008). A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape Ecology, 23, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carranza, M. L., Acosta, A., Stanisci, A., Pirone, G., & Ciaschetti, G. (2008). Ecosystem classification for EU habitat distribution assessment in sandy coastal environments: An application in central Italy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chust, G., Pérez-Haase, A., Chave, J., & Pretus, J. L. (2006). Floristic patterns and plant traits of Mediterranean communities in fragmented habitats. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1235–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collinge, K. S. (1996). Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Concepción, E. D., Díaz, M., & Baquero, R. A. (2008). Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landscape Ecology, 23, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, E. A. (2002). Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corry, R. C. (2004). Characterizing fine-scale patterns of alternative agricultural landscapes with landscape pattern indices. Landscape Ecology, 20, 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Council of the European Union (2007). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, version 1.1.2007. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm.
  20. Cushman, A., McGarigal, K., & Neel, M. C. (2008). Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality and consistency. Ecology Indicator, 8, 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Bolòs, A., & de Bolòs, O. (1950). Vegetación de las comarcas Barcelonesas. Barcelona: Instituto Español de Estudios Mediterraneos.Google Scholar
  22. Dimopoulos, P., Bergmeier, E., & Fisher, P. (2005). Monitoring and conservation status assessment of habitat types in Greece: Fundamentals and exemplary cases. Annals of Botany, V, 7–20.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2007). Interpretation manual of European Union Habitats—EUR 27. Published by the European Commission DG Environment Nature and Biodiversity.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (2008). Technical reports for the Management of Natura 2000 Habitats (pp. 1–24). Commissioned by the European Commission DG Environment Nature and Biodiversity.Google Scholar
  25. Fahring, L. (2002). Effects of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: A synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12, 346–353.Google Scholar
  26. Fahring, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolutionary Systems, 34, 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2002). Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: Two case studies on birds in south eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 106, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Gardner, R. H., Dale, V. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (1989). Quantifying scale-dependent effects of animal movement with simple percolation models. Landscape Ecology, 3, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geri, F., Rocchini, D., & Chiarucci, A. (2010). Landscape metrics and topographical determinants of large-scale forest dynamics in a Mediterranean landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gibbs, J. (1993). Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetlands-associated animals. Wetlands, 13(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibbs, J. P. (2000). Wetlands loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 314–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, J. S. (1997). Marine biodiversity: Patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haines Young, R. H., Barr, C. J., Black, H. I. J., Briggs, D. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Clarke, R. T., et al. (2000). Accounting for nature: Assessing habitats in the U.K. countryside. London: DETR.Google Scholar
  35. Hargis, C. D., Bissonette, J. A., & David, J. L. (1998). The behaviour of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoffmeister, T. S., Vet, L. E. M., Biere, A., Holsinger, K., & Filser, J. (2005). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biological invasion and habitat fragmentation. Ecosystems, 8, 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klika, J., & Novak, V. (eds.) (1941). Praktikum rostlinné sociologie, pudoznaltství, klimatologie a ekologie. (Handbook of plant sociology, pedology, climatology and ecology). Praha: Melantrich.Google Scholar
  38. Kutiel, P. (2001). Conservation and management of the Mediterranean coastal sand dunes in Israel. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 7, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ladoux, L., Crooks, S., Jordan, A., & Turner, R. K. (2000). Implementing EU biodiversity policy: U.K. experiences. Land Use Policy, 17, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laguna, E. (2001). The micro-reserves as a tool for conservation of threatened plants in Europe (Nature and Environment series 121, 119 pp.) Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  41. Levantis, E., & Kaltsa, A. (2002). Rapports: Greece: The effectiveness of the new Habitat Directive in Greece. The heritage of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. European Public Law, 8, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levin, N., Elron, E., & Gasith, A. (2009). Decline of wetland ecosystems in the coastal plain of Israel during the 20th century: Implications for wetland conservation and management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ludwig, J. A. (1999). Disturbance and landscapes: The little things count. In J. A. Wiens & M. R. Moss (Eds.), Issues in landscape ecology. The International Association for Landscape Ecology (pp. 59–63). Ontario: Guelph.Google Scholar
  44. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats/html.
  45. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Corvallis: Forest Science Department, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  46. McGarigal, K., & McComb, W. C. (1999). Forest fragmentation effects on breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. In J. A. Rochelle, L. A. Lehman, & J. Wisniewski (Eds.), Forest fragmentation: Wildlife and management implications (pp. 223–246). Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google Scholar
  47. Mehtälä, J., & Vuorisalo, T. (2001). Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: Favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success. European Environment, 17, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mücher, C. A., Hennekens, S. M., Bunce, R. G. H., Schaminée, J. H. J., & Schaepman, M. E. (2009). Modelling the spatial distribution of Natura 2000 habitats across Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Munroe, D. K., Nagendra, H., & Southworth, J. (2007). Monitoring landscape fragmentation in an inaccessible mountain area: Celaque National Park, Western Honduras. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagendra, H. (2002). Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography, 22, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neel, M. C., McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2004). Behaviour of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecology, 19, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oberdorfer, E. (1954). Nordägäische Kraut- und Zwergstrauchfluren im Vergleich mit den entsprechenden Vegetationseinheiten des westlichen Mittelmeergebietes. Vegetatio, 5–6, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Neill, R. V., Turner, S. J., Cullinan, V. I., Coffin, D. P., Cook, T., Conley, W., et al. (1991). Multiple landscape scales: An intersite comparison. Landscape Ecology, 5, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peng, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Li, W., & Li, Y. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns. Ecology Indicator, 10, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petermann, J., & Ssymank, A. (2007). Natura 2000 and its implications for the protection of plant syntaxa in Germany—With a case study on grasslands. Annals of Botany, 7, 5–18.Google Scholar
  56. Pethicj, J. (1996). The sustainable use of coasts: Monitoring, modelling and management. In P. S. Jones, M. G. Healy, & A. T. Williams (Eds.), Studies in European coastal management (pp. 83–92). Cardigan, U.K.: Samara.Google Scholar
  57. Plieninger, T. (2006). Habitat loss, fragmentation, and alteration—Quantifying the impact of land-use changes on a Spanish dehesa landscape by use of aerial photography and GIS. Landscape Ecology, 21, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rivas Goday, S. (1958). Nuevos órdenes y alianzas de Helianthemetea annua Br.-BI. Anales Inst. Bot. Cavanilles, 15(1957), 539–651.Google Scholar
  59. Rivas-Martínez, S. (1972). Vegetatio Hispaniae. Notula III. Bol. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., Secc. Biol., 70, 153–162.Google Scholar
  60. Rivas-Martínez, S. (1975). Mapa de la vegetacion de la Provincia de Avila. Anales Inst. Bot. Canavilles, 32, 1493–1556.Google Scholar
  61. Rivas-Martínez, S., Costa, M., Castroviejo, S., & Valdés, E. (1980). La vegetación de Doñana(Huelva, España). Lazaroa, 2, 5–190.Google Scholar
  62. Rivas-Martínez, S., Fernández González, F., Loidi, J., Lousa, M., & Penas, A. (2001). Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level. Itinera Geobotanica, 14, 5–341.Google Scholar
  63. Rodwell, J. S., Schaminée, J. H. J., Mucina, L., Pignatti, S., Dring, J., & Moss, D. (2002). The diversity of European vegetation. An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats. Wageningen: EC-LNV.Google Scholar
  64. Rutledge, D. (2003). Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: Can pattern reflect process? (Doc Science Internal Series, 98). Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  65. Saura, S., & Carballal, P. (2004). Discrimination of native and exotic forest patterns through shape irregularity indices: An analysis in the landscape of Galicia, Spain. Landscape Ecology, 19, 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saura, S. & Pascual-Hortal, L. (2007). A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2–3), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scheffer, M., van Geest, G. J., Zimmer, K., Jeppesen, E., Sǿndergaard, M., Butler, M. G., et al. (2006). Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: Second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos, 112, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwartz, M. W., & van Mantgem, P. (1997). The value of small preserves. In M. W. Schwartz (Ed.), Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes (pp. 379–394). NY: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  69. Soverel, N. O., Coops, N. C., White, J. C., & Wulder, M. A. (2010). Characterizing the forest fragmentation of Canada’s national parks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 164, 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stephens, S. E., Koons, D. N., Rotella, J. J., & Willey, D. W. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation, 115(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., & Milne, B. T. (1989). Effecting of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Valdemoro, H. I., Sanchez-Arcilla, A., & Jiménez, J. A. (2007). Coastal dynamics and wetlands stability. The Ebro delta case. Hydrobiological, 577, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Westhoff, W., Dijk, J. W., & Passchier, H. (1946). Overzicht der plantengemeenschappen in Nederland. Amsterdam: G.W. Breughel.Google Scholar
  75. Westhoff, V., Van Leeuwen, C. G., & Adriani, M. J. (1962). Enkele aspecten van vegetatie en bodem der duinen van Goeree, in her bijzonder de contactgordels tussen zout en zoet milieu – some aspects of the vegetation and soil of the Goeree dunes, in particular of the contact zone between salty and fresh-water environments. Jaarb. Wetensch. Genootsch. Goeree-Overflakke 1961.Google Scholar
  76. Wu, J. G. (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeria Tomaselli
    • 1
  • Patrizia Tenerelli
    • 2
  • Saverio Sciandrello
    • 3
  1. 1.C.N.R.—Institute of Plant GeneticsBariItaly
  2. 2.European Commission, Joint Research CentreInstitute for the Protection and Security of the CitizenIspraItaly
  3. 3.Department of BotanyUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations