Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 289–311 | Cite as

Bioaccumulation surveillance in Milford Haven Waterway

  • W. J. Langston
  • S. O’Hara
  • N. D. Pope
  • M. Davey
  • E. Shortridge
  • M. Imamura
  • H. Harino
  • A. Kim
  • C. H. Vane
Article

Abstract

Biomonitoring of contaminants (metals, organotins, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), PCBs) was undertaken in Milford Haven Waterway (MHW) and a reference site in the Tywi Estuary (St Ishmael/Ferryside) during 2007–2008. Bioindicator species encompassed various uptake routes—Fucus vesiculosus (dissolved contaminants); Littorina littorea (grazer); Mytilus edulis and Cerastoderma edule (suspension feeders); and Hediste (=Nereis) diversicolor (sediments). Differences in feeding and habitat preference have subtle implications for bioaccumulation trends though, with few exceptions, contaminant burdens in MHW were higher than the Tywi reference site, reflecting inputs. Elevated metal concentrations were observed at some MHW sites, whilst As and Se (molluscs and seaweed) were consistently at the higher end of the UK range. However, for most metals, distributions in MH biota were not exceptional. Several metal-species combinations indicated increases in bioavailability upstream, which may reflect the influence of geogenic/land-based sources—perhaps enhanced by lower salinity. TBT levels in MH mussels were below OSPAR toxicity thresholds and in the Tywi were close to zero. Phenyltins were not accumulated appreciably in M. edulis, whereas some H. diversicolor populations appear subjected to localized (historical) sources. PAHs in H. diversicolor were distributed evenly across most of MHW, although acenaphthene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene and chrysene were highest at one site near the mouth; naphthalenes in H. diversicolor were enriched in the mid-upper Haven (a pattern seen in M. edulis for most PAHs). Whilst PAH (and PCB) concentrations in MH mussels were mostly above reference and OSPAR backgrounds, they are unlikely to exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. Bivalve Condition indices (CI) were highest at the Tywi reference site and at the seaward end of MH, decreasing upstream—giving rise to several significant (negative) relationships between CI and body burdens. Despite the possible influence of salinity gradient as a complicating factor, multivariate analysis indicated that a combination of contaminants could influence the pattern in condition (and the biomarkers metallothionein and TOSC). Integrating bioaccumulation data with biological and biochemical endpoints is seen as a useful way to discriminate environmental quality of moderately contaminated areas such as MHW and to prioritise cause and effect investigations.

Keywords

Milford Haven Bioaccumulation Metals PAHs PCBs Organotins TOSC Metallothionein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10661_2011_1968_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
(PDF 1.15 MB)

References

  1. Amiard, J.-C., Amiard-Triquet, C., Barka, S., Pellerin, J., & Rainbow, P. S. (2006). Metallothioneins in aquatic invertebrates: their role in metal detoxification and their use as biomarkers. Aquatic Toxicology, 76, 160–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins (2005). Development of an inputs budget for Milford Haven Waterway: Phase 1 technical report (p. 50 + electronic appendices). Technical report to the Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group from W S Atkins.Google Scholar
  3. Bent, E. (2000). A review of environmental studies in Milford Haven Waterway 1992–2000 (p. 64 + appendices). Technical report to the Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group.Google Scholar
  4. Bryan, G. W., & Langston, W. J. (1992). Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: A review. Environmental Pollution, 76, 89–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, G. W., Langston, W. J., & Hummerstone, L. G. (1980). The use of biological indicators of heavy metal contamination in estuaries, with special reference to an assessment of the biological availability of metals in estuarine sediments from South-West Britain (p. 73). Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. Occasional Publication No. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Bryan, G. W., Langston, W. J., Hummerstone, L. G., & Burt, G. R. (1985). A guide to the assessment of heavy-metal contamination in estuaries using biological indicators (p. 92). Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., Occasional Publication No. 4.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, S. (2006). Pembrokeshire marine special area of conservation (p. 181). Management Scheme. http://www.pembrokeshiremarinesac.org.uk/english/downloads/PMSAC%20agreed%20ManScheme%202008.pdf.
  8. CEFAS (2000). Monitoring and surveillance of non-radioactive contaminants in the aquatic environment and activities regulating the disposal of wastes at sea. Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report, 52, 92.Google Scholar
  9. Chesman, B. S., O’ Hara, S., Burt, G. R., & Langston, W. J. (2007). Hepatic metallothionein and total oxyradical scavenging capacity in Atlantic cod Gadus morhua caged in open sea contamination gradients. Aquatic Toxicology, 84, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, K. R., & Gorley, R. N. (2006). Primer v6: User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: Primer-E Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, G., & Ellery, S. (1995). Results of the NRA Welsh Region marine bioaccumulation programme 1991–1995. NRA Report No. SE/EAU/95/9.Google Scholar
  12. Dyrynda, E. A., Law, R. J., Dyrynda, P. E. J., Kelly, C. A., Pipe, R. K., & Ratcliffe, N. A. (2000). Changes in immune parameters of natural mussel Mytilus edulis populations following a major oil spill (’Sea Empress’, Wales, UK). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 206, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harding, M. J. C., Davies, I. M., Minchin, A., & Grewar, G. (1998). Effects of TBT in western coastal waters. Fisheries Research Services Report No. 5/98, Fisheries Research Services, Aberdeen, 39pp + figs & appendices.Google Scholar
  14. Harino, H., Iwasaki, N., Arai, T., Ohji, M., & Miyazaki, N. (2005). Accumulation of Organotin compounds in the deep-sea environment of Nankai Trough, Japan. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 49, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey, J. S., Lyons, B. P., Page, T. S., Stewart, C., & Parry, J. M. (1999). An assessment of the genotoxic impact of the Sea Empress oil spill by the measurement of DNA adduct levels in selected invertebrate and vertebrate species. Mutation Research, 441(1), 103–114.Google Scholar
  16. Hebog Environmental (Hebog) (2006). Milford Haven maintenance dredging assessment: Biological and sediment characterisation report (p. 50).Google Scholar
  17. Hobbs, G., & Morgan, C. I. (1992). A review of the current state of environmental knowledge of the Milford Haven Waterway (p. 140). Report to the Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Monitoring Steering Group.Google Scholar
  18. Howells, S. E., Abbiss, T. P., & Rostron, D. (1987). Some factors affecting the fate of estuarine sediment hydrocarbons and trace metals in Milford Haven 1978–1982. In P. J. Coughtrey, M. H. Martin, & M. H. Unsworth (Eds.), Pollutant transport and fate in ecosystems (pp. 55–87). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Kitts, H. (1999). Quantification of inputs to Milford Haven (p. 29 + appendices). Report to the Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Monitoring Steering Group from Hyder Consulting.Google Scholar
  20. Langston, W. J., Bryan, G. W., & Burt, G. R. (1994a). Heavy metals in UK estuaries: PML data and mapping programme (p. 85). R&D Note 280, National Rivers Authority.Google Scholar
  21. Langston, W. J., Bryan, G. W., Burt, G. R., & Pope, N. D. (1994b). Effects of sediment metals on estuarine benthic organisms (p. 49). Project Record 105/2/A, National Rivers Authority.Google Scholar
  22. Langston, W. J., & Spence, S. K. (1995). Biological Factors involved in metal concentrations observed in aquatic organisms. In A. Tessier, & D. R. Turner (Eds.), Metal speciation and bioavailability (pp. 407–478). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Law, R. J., Kelly, C. A., & Nicholson, M. D. (1999). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in shellfish affected by the Sea Empress oil spill in Wales in 1996. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 17(1–4), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Law, R. J., Thain, J. E., Kirby, M. F., Allen, Y. T., Lyons, B. P., Kelly, C. A., et al. (1998). The impact of the Sea Empress oil spill on fish and shellfish. In R. Edwards, & H. Sime (Eds.), The Sea Empress oil spill (pp. 109–136). Lavenham: Lavenham.Google Scholar
  25. Levell, D., Hobbs, G., Smith, J., & Law, R. (1997). The effects of the Sea Empress oil spill on the subtidal macrobenthos of the Milford Haven Waterway: A comparison of survey data from October 1993 and October 1996. Report to the Environment Agency by OPRU/Cordah, Neyland, Pembrokeshire. Report No. OPRU/22/97.Google Scholar
  26. Little, D. I. (2009). Sediment transport and contaminants review (p. 414). Final Report to Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group.Google Scholar
  27. Little, D. I., Howells, S. E., Abbiss, T. P., & Rostron, D. (1987). Some factors affecting the fate of estuarine sediment hydrocarbons and trace metals in Milford Haven, 1978–1982. In P. J. Coughtrey, M. H. Martin, & M. H. Unsworth (Eds.), Pollutant transport and fate in ecosystems (pp. 55–87). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Little, D. I., & McLaren, P. (1989). Sediment and contaminant transport in Milford Haven. In B. Dicks (Ed.), Ecological impacts of the oil industry (pp. 203–234). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Lundebye, A. K., Langston, W. J., & Depledge, M. H. (1997). Stress proteins and condition index as biomarkers of TBT exposure. Ecotoxicology, 6, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLaren, P., & Little, D. I. (1987). The effects of sediment transport on contaminant dispersal: An example from Milford Haven. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 18(11), 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson-Smith, A. (1965). Marine biology of Milford Haven: The physical environment. Field Studies, 2(2), 155–188.Google Scholar
  32. Nikitik, C. C. S., & Robinson, A. W. (2003). Patterns in benthic populations in the Milford Haven Waterway following the Sea Empress oil spill with special reference to amphipods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46, 1125–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NMMP (2004). UK national marine monitoring programme. Second report (1999–2001) (p. 136). Marine Environment Monitoring Group, CEFAS, ISBN 0 907545 20 3.Google Scholar
  34. OSPAR (2000). Quality status report 2000 for the North-East Atlantic (p. 108+vii). London: OSPAR Commission.Google Scholar
  35. OSPAR (2004). OSPAR/ICES Workshop on the evaluation and update of background reference concentrations (BRCs) and ecotoxicological assessment criteria (EACs) and how these assessment tools should be used in assessing contaminants in water, sediment and biota. Hazardous Substances Series, 214, 167. ISBN 1-904426-52-2.Google Scholar
  36. OSPAR (2007). 2006/2007 CEMP assessment: Trends and concentrations of selected hazardous substances in the marine environment. Assessment and Monitoring Series, 330/2007, 63.Google Scholar
  37. Rostron, D. (1998). Sea Empress sediment shore impact assessment monitoring: Infauna of heavily oiled shores in Milford Haven and Carmarthen Bay (p. 51 + appendices). A report to the Countryside Council for Wales from SubSea Survey, Pembroke.Google Scholar
  38. SEEEC (1998). The environmental impact of the Sea Empress oil spill. Final report of the Sea Empress Environmental Evaluation Committee (p. 135). London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, J., & Hobbs, G. (1994). Metal concentrations in Milford Haven sea bed sediments—data storage, analysis and initial interpretation (p. 8 + appendices). Field Studies Research Council Research Centre FSC/RC/12/94.Google Scholar
  40. Swannell, R., Mitchell, D., Little, D., & Smith, J. (1997). The fate of oil on cleaned and uncleaned beaches following the Sea Empress incident. Report to SEEEC. AEA Technology,plc. Report No. 2001.Google Scholar
  41. Vane, C. H., Harrison, I., & Kim, A. (2007). Assessment of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in surface sediments of the Inner Clyde Estuary, UK. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54, 1301–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Widdows, J., Donkin, P., Staff, F. J., Matthiessen, P., Law, R. J., Allen, Y. T., et al. (2002). Measurement of stress effects (scope for growth) and contaminant levels in mussels (Mytilus edulis) collected from the Irish Sea. Marine Environmental Research, 53, 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodhead, R. J., Law, R. J., & Matthiessen, P. (1999). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments around England and Wales, and their possible biological significance. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38, 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. Langston
    • 1
  • S. O’Hara
    • 1
  • N. D. Pope
    • 1
  • M. Davey
    • 1
  • E. Shortridge
    • 1
  • M. Imamura
    • 2
  • H. Harino
    • 3
  • A. Kim
    • 4
  • C. H. Vane
    • 4
  1. 1.Marine Biological AssociationPlymouthUK
  2. 2.Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry Environmental Science LaboratoryAbiko City, ChibaJapan
  3. 3.School of Human SciencesKobe CollegeNishinomiya, HyogoJapan
  4. 4.British Geological SurveyKingsley Dunham CentreKeyworthUK

Personalised recommendations