Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 183, Issue 1–4, pp 465–483 | Cite as

Deliberative assessment in complex socioecological systems: recommendations for environmental assessment in drylands

  • Stephen Whitfield
  • Helmut J. Geist
  • Antonio A. R. Ioris
Article

Abstract

Desertification is a complex process, characterised not only by a damaged ecology but also by conflict over access to scarce resources and trade-offs between the needs of multiple stakeholders at multiple scales. As such, orthodox approaches to environmental assessment in drylands, which rely solely on ecological expertise, are gradually losing legitimacy and greater attention is being given to integrated and participatory assessment approaches, which draw on multiple sources of knowledge in order to accurately describe complex socioecological processes. Moreover, there is growing recognition that successful management of desertification requires a strategy that can accommodate the multiple and often competing needs of contemporary and future stakeholders. In light of these conceptual advances, this paper highlights seven key criteria that dryland environmental assessments must meet: (1) accurately understand complex socioecological system processes, (2) focus on slow variables, (3) integrate multiple scales of analysis, (4) integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives and values, (5) ensure that future generations are fairly represented, (6) ensure that less powerful stakeholders are fairly represented and (7) integrate local and scientific knowledge. The virtues and challenges of deliberative environmental assessments, a novel subset of participatory environmental assessment approaches which places emphasis on social learning, argumentation and critical reflection, are considered in relation to each of these requirements. We argue that deliberative approaches have the potential to achieve accurate, progressive and integrated assessment of dryland environments.

Keywords

Deliberation Integrated assessment Participation Local ecological knowledge Desertification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbot, J., & Guijt, I. (1998). Changing views on change: A working paper on participatory monitoring of the environment. London: IIED.Google Scholar
  2. Adeel, Z., & Safriel, U. (2008). Achieving sustainability by introducing alternative livelihoods. Sustainability Science, 3(1), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselme, B., Bousquet, F., Lyet, A., Etienne, M., Fady, B., & Le Page, C. (2010). Modelling of spatial dynamics and biodiversity conservation on Lure Mountain (France). Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1385–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baber, W., & Bartlett, R. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbier, E. B. (2003). Upstream dams and downstream water allocation: The case of the Hadejia-Jama’are floodplain, northern Nigeria. Water Resources Research, 39(11), 1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bautista, S., Orr, B., & Vallejo, R. (2009). Integrated assessment of prevention and restoration actions to combat desertification. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstract #GC23A-074.Google Scholar
  8. Baviskar, A. (2007). The dream machine: The model development and the remaking of the state. In A. Baviskar (Ed.), Waterscapes: The cultural politics of a natural resource. Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  9. Becu, N., Neef, A., Schreinemachers, P., & Sangkapitux, C. (2008). Participatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: Potential and limits of stakeholder involvement. Land Use Policy, 25(4), 498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blowers, A. (1998). Power, participation and partnership—The limits of co-operative environmental management. In Glasbergen, P. (Ed.), Co-operative environmental governance: Public–private agreements as a policy strategy (pp. 229–249). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, J. R., & Havstad, K. M. (2004). Monitoring to detect change on rangelands: Physical, social and economic/policy drivers. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 21, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campo, P. C., Bousquet, F., & Villanueva, T. R. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders within a development project. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1302–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. C. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Chhotray, V. (2011). The “Anti-Politics Machine” in India: State, decentralisation and participatory watershed development, South Asian Studies Series. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, J., & Murdoch, J. (1997). Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: A reflection on three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis, 37(1), 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development, 11(4), 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooke, B. & Khothari, U. (2001). Participation: A new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  20. Dill, B. (2009). The paradoxes of community-based participation in Dar es Salaam. Development and Change, 40(4), 717–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C., Thomas, D. S. G., & Sporton, D. (2002). Soil degradation assessment in mixed farming systems of southern Africa: Use of nutrient balance studies for participatory degradation monitoring. Geographical Journal, 168(3), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dowlatabadi, H., & Morgan, M. G. (1993). Integrated assessment of climate change. Science, 259(1813), 1932.Google Scholar
  23. Dryzek, J. S., & List, C. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ekeli, K. (2005). Giving a voice to posterity—deliberative democracy and representation of future people. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Enfors, E. I., & Gordon, L. J. (2007). Analysing resilience in dryland agro-ecosystems: A case study of the Makanya catchment in Tanzania over the past 50 years. Land Degradation & Development, 18(6), 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Failing, L., Gregory, R., & Harstone, M. (2007). Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach. Ecological Economics, 64(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fish, R. D., Ioris, A. A. R., & Watson, N. M. (2010). Integrating water and agricultural management: Collaborative governance for a complex policy problem. Science of The Total Environment, 408(23), 5623–5630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptation: A Cross-Cutting Theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.Google Scholar
  30. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(5), 437–440.Google Scholar
  31. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., et al. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35(1), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Frame, B., & O’Connor, M. (2011). Integrating valuation and deliberation: The purposes of sustainability assessment. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2004). Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. BioScience, 54(9), 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. González, A., Gilmer, A., Foley, R., Sweeney, J., & Fry, J. (2008). Technology-aided participative methods in environmental assessment: An international perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(4), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haigh, N. (1998). The European forum on integrated environmental assessment. In J. Rotmans & P. Vellinga (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for integrated environmental assessment. Environmental modelling and assessment 3 (Vol. 3, Special issue, pp. 135–142).Google Scholar
  38. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  39. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2005). Relocating participation within a radical politics of development. Development and Change, 36(2), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hildyard, N., Hegde, P., Wolvekamp, P., & Reddy, S. (2001). Pluralism, participation and power: Joint forest management in India. In B. Cooke, & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation, the new tyranny? (pp. 56–71). London: Zed.Google Scholar
  41. Hobbs, R. J., & Cramer, V. A. (2008). Restoration ecology: Interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Howarth, R. B., & Farber, S. (2002). Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huber-Sannwald, E., Maestre, F. T., Herrick, J. E., & Reynolds, J. F. (2006). Ecohydrological feedbacks and linkages associated with land degradation: A case study from Mexico. Hydrological Processes, 20(15), 3395–3411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ingram, J. (2008). Are farmers in England equipped to meet the knowledge challenge of sustainable soil management? An analysis of farmer and advisor views. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kenyon, W., Hanley, N., & Nevin, C. (2001). Citizens’ juries: An aid to environmental valuation? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kinzig, A. P., Ryan, P., Etienne, M., Allison, H., Elmqvist, T. & Walker, B. H. (2006). Resilience and regime shifts: Assessing cascading effects. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 20.Google Scholar
  48. Kok, K., Biggs, R., & Zurek, M. (2007). Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: Insights from southern Africa and Europe. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/.Google Scholar
  49. Lagabrielle, E., Botta, A., Daré, W., David, D., Aubert, S., & Fabricius, C. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders to integrate biodiversity into land-use planning—Lessons learned in Réunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1413–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) (2005). Reflections on indicators for land degradation assessment. The Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands Project. http://www.fao.org/nr/lada/. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.
  51. Lankford, B., & Beale, T. (2007). Equilibrium and non-equilibrium theories of sustainable water resources management: Dynamic river basin and irrigation behaviour in Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leach, M. & Mearns, R. (1996). The lie of the land: Challenging received wisdom on the African environment. Oxford: Currey.Google Scholar
  53. Lebel, L., Thongbai, P., Kok, K., Bennett, E., Mala, W., Agard, J., et al. (2006). Sub-global scenarios. In D. Capistrano, C. K. Samper, M. J. Lee, & C. Rauseppe-Hearne (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being: Multiscale assessments. Findings of the sub-global assessments working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 229–259). Washington: Island.Google Scholar
  54. Liu, Y., Gupta, H., Springer, E., & Wagener, T. (2008). Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(7), 846–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu, S., Proctor, W., & Cook, D. (2010). Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2374–2382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lynam, T., Drewry, J., Higham, W., & Mitchell, C. (2010). Adaptive modelling for adaptive water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mackinson, S. (2001). Integrating local and scientific knowledge: An example in fisheries science. Environmental Management, 27(4), 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mamun, A. A. (2010). Understanding the value of local ecological knowledge and practices for habitat restoration in human-altered floodplain systems: A case from Bangladesh. Environmental Management, 45(5), 922–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mendoza, G. A., & Prabhu, R. (2006). Participatory modeling and analysis for sustainable forest management: Overview of soft system dynamics models and applications. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
  61. Morgan, M. G., & Dowlatabadi, H. (1996). Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Climatic Change, 34(3), 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mosse, D. (1994). Authority, gender and knowledge: Theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal. Development and Change, 25(3), 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nachtergaele, F. O. F., & Licona-Manzur, C. (2009). The Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) Project: Reflections on indicators for land degradation assessment. In C. Lee & T. Schaaf (Eds.), The future of drylands (pp. 327–348). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. National Environmental Research Institute (NERI) (1995). Recommendations on strategies for integrated assessment of broad environmental problems. Report to the European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  65. Norton, B. G. (1982). Environmental ethics and the rights of future generations. Environmental Ethics, 4, 319–337.Google Scholar
  66. O’Connor, M., Bureau, P., & Reichel, V. (2007). Deliberative sustainability assessment with the on line KerDST Deliberation Support Tool, Cahiers du C3ED No. 2007-03, C3ED. France: Université de Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines.Google Scholar
  67. Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2001). Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: A study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems, 4(2), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Osborne, C. P. (2004). Modelling the ecology of plants. In J. Wainwright & M. Mulligan (Eds.), Environmental modelling: Finding simplicity in complexity. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Owens, S. (2000). ‘Engaging the public’: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A, 32(7), 1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Owens, S. (2005). Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(3), 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Özesmi, U., & Özesmi, S. L. (2004). Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: A multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling, 176(1–2), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pahl-Wostl, C., & Hare, M. (2004). Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Parfit, D. A. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Patel, M., Kok, K., & Rothman, D. S. (2007). Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy, 24(3), 546–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand. Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Pellizzoni, L. (2001). The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason1. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M. S., Quinn, C. H., Jin, N., Holden, J., et al. (2007). If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: Traditional versus participatory model building. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32, 263–282.Google Scholar
  79. Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Puigdefábregas, J. (1998). Ecological impacts of global change on drylands and their implications for desertification. Land Degradation & Development, 9(5), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rawls, J. (2001). A theory of justice. In E. Kelly (Ed.), Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reed, M. S. (2007). Participatory technology development for agroforestry extension: An innovation-decision approach. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2, 334–341.Google Scholar
  84. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reed, M. S., & Dougill, A. J. (2002). Participatory selection process for indicators of rangeland condition in the Kalahari. Geographical Journal, 168(3), 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Baker, T. R. (2008). Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other? Ecological Applications, 18(5), 1253–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Reed, M. S., Buenemann, M., Atlhopheng, J., Akhtar-Schuster, M., Bachmann, F., Bastin, G., et al. (2011). Cross-scale monitoring and assessment of land degradation and sustainable land management: A methodological framework for knowledge management. Land Degradation & Development, online in advance of print. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.1087/abstract.
  89. Reynolds, J. F., & Stafford-Smith, D. M. (2002). Global desertification: Do humans cause deserts?. Berlin: Dahlem University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Reynolds, J. F., Smith, D. M. S., Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., II, Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S. P. J., et al. (2007). Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science, 316(5826), 847–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Richards, C., Sherlock, K. L., & Carter, C. (2004). Practical approaches to participation. SERP Policy Brief, No. 1., Series Editors: C. Carter and C. L. Spash. Aberdeen: Macaulay Institute.Google Scholar
  92. Risbey, J., Kandlikar, M., & Patwardhan, A. (1996). Assessing integrated assessments. Climatic Change, 34(3), 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Roba, H., & Oba, G. (2009). Efficacy of integrating herder knowledge and ecological methods for monitoring rangeland degradation in Northern Kenya. Human Ecology, 37(5), 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Robinson, J., Clouston, B., Suh, J., & Chaloupka, M. (2008). Are citizens’ juries a useful tool for assessing environmental value? Environmental Conservation, 35(4), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rodríguez, J. P., Beard, T. D. Jr, Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S., Agard, J., et al. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/.Google Scholar
  96. Rose, S. K., & Chapman, D. (2003). Timber harvest adjacency economies, hunting, species protection, and old growth value: Seeking the dynamic optimum. Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3(3), 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rouan, M., Kerbiriou, C., Levrel, H., & Etienne, M. (2010). A co-modelling process of social and natural dynamics on the isle of Ouessant: Sheep, turf and bikes. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1399–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Safriel, U., & Adeel, Z. (2005). Dryland systems. In R. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.). Ecosystems and human well-being, current state and trends (Vol. 1, pp. 625–658). Washington: Island.Google Scholar
  100. Sagoff, M. (1988). The economy of the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sagoff, M. (1998). Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: A look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics, 24(2–3), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sallu, S., Twyman, M. C. & Stringer, L. C. (2010). Resilient or vulnerable livelihoods? Assessing livelihood dynamics and trajectories in rural Botswana. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art3/.Google Scholar
  103. Schneider, S. H. (1997). Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions? Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2(4), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., & Liniger, H. (2009). Appraising and selecting conservation measures to mitigate desertification and land degradation based on stakeholder participation and global best practices. Land Degradation & Development, 20(3), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  106. Simon, C., & Etienne, M. (2010). A companion modelling approach applied to forest management planning. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1371–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Smajgl, A. (2010). Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1470–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sonneveld, M. P. W., Everson, T. M., & Veldkamp, A. (2005). Multi-scale analysis of soil erosion dynamics in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Land Degradation & Development, 16(3), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Souchère, V., Millair, L., Echeverria, J., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., & Etienne, M. (2010). Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1359–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of socialecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society 11(2), 39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/ Google Scholar
  111. Stringer, L. C., & Reed, M. S. (2007). Land degradation assessment in Southern Africa: Integrating local and scientific knowledge bases. Land Degradation & Development, 18(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Tol, R., & Vellinga, P. (1998). The European forum on integrated environmental assessment. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3(3), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Toth, F., & Hizsnyik, E. (1998). Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolution and applications. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3(3), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/.Google Scholar
  115. UNCCD (2009a). Basic facts about desertification: Fact sheet. http://www.unccd.int/publicinfo/factsheets/menu.php.
  116. UNCCD (2009b). Enhancing synergies among the Rio conventions on land use and sustainable land management recommendations from the UNCCD 1st Scientific Conference, 22–24 September 2009, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Science briefs series no.1. http://www.unccd.int/knowledge/docs/Science%20Briefs%20Series%20No.1.pdf.
  117. van de Kerkhof, M. (2006). Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues. Policy Sciences, 39(3), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. van Vliet, M., Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures, 42(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Verdoodt, A., & Van Ranst, E. (2006). Environmental assessment tools for multi-scale land resources information systems: A case study of Rwanda. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2–4), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Vieira Pak, M., & Castillo Brieva, D. (2010). Designing and implementing a role-playing game: A tool to explain factors, decision making and landscape transformation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1322–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M. et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Ecology and Society, 6(1), 14.Google Scholar
  123. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.Google Scholar
  124. Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzing, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Schultz, L. (2006a). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 13.Google Scholar
  125. Walker, B., Anderies, J., Kinzig, A., & Ryan, P. (2006b). Exploring resilience in social–ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: Introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/.Google Scholar
  126. Warren, A. (2002). Land degradation is contextual. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Westhoek, H. J., van den Berg, M., & Bakkes, J. A. (2006). Scenario development to explore the future of Europe’s rural areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wood, J. (2005). How green is my valley? Desktop geographic information systems as a community-based participatory mapping tool. Area, 37(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Worrapimphong, K., Gajaseni, N., Le Page, C., & Bousquet, F. (2010). A companion modeling approach applied to fishery management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1334–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment, and modernity towards a new ecology (pp. 44–83). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  131. Xu, D. Y., Kang, X. W., Zhuang, D. F., & Pan, J. J. (2010). Multi-scale quantitative assessment of the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification—A case study of the Ordos Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(4), 498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Yuan, W., James, P., Hodgson, K., Hutchinson, S. M., & Shi, C. (2003). Development of sustainability indicators by communities in China: A case study of Chongming County, Shanghai. Journal of Environmental Management, 68(3), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zeitoun, M., & Allan, J. A. (2008). Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis. Water Policy, 10(suppl. 2), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Whitfield
    • 1
  • Helmut J. Geist
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio A. R. Ioris
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  2. 2.Centre for Sustainable International DevelopmentAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Aberdeen Centre for Environmental SustainabilityUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations